WPC5 u\Ar`;RgRA6x@pJiw3󢱱;fNAP3$􉾦+oxAsͣ_s}hVÒ1=VeaBWgy{So=ɖDU7qLi=`Pfob&dS1޽=ϰ>0y)P< ayB-Y韛zg]eO&^)]f"zQ? u3;N%(fߺ^GLz{E͛ki%?Q6SKB}zRtX[] :w?cA;>f¬Cf'c٬%qc9Bx6d-;Ӂw{RoM /,z)XUSLn@Y"'pPuOI뇝YF W⩧dc:7̃-+4'sQފBBBG%o[qXτo.D8hʞ-b#\ %% + 0 ^ r U"N~ w z J 4 0 ? mA X  0<pN 0 0<|E 0C]Hpf 1uK 0Uf 0 0 0c 0"! 0! 0"b;# 0C# 0# 0$$ 0P% 0!& 0& 0'' 0(( 0( 0d) 0) 0* 0H+ 0, 0, 0p- 0. 0. 0J/ 0/ 72f0 0c000000000000 00000 B11 02 D32 D-2 0K33 ASR33 0k4 0D5 AS5\\IB01S01\CLERK1NAS,,,,0 R$      1  :  _Hicksv.State,945S.W.2d706,706(Tenn.1997).(`$.8dd8    4\/ ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpto=/B011C23|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5<:Footnote Ref<II :Body Text In  X XXX       X < :Footnote Tex R$      2  :  _ThedisciplinaryboardapparentlydecidedtosuspendMr.Hickssplacementinpunitivesegregation.($     S R$      4  :  _ThismotiondoesnotcomplywiththerequirementinTenn.R.Civ.P.7.02(1)thatmotions statewith  particularitythegroundstherefor.Whilethegroundsforthemotionmayhavebeensetoutinanaccompanying t memorandumoflaw,thememorandumoflawisnotpartoftherecordbyoperationofTenn.R.App.P.24.Willisv. 8 TennesseeDeptofCorr.,113S.W.3d706,709n.2(Tenn.2003).  R$      5  :  _Thenotationwas:  8  8`   8 ` x` xcc:  TerryHicks#109387t      `    TomAnderson,Esq. 8 Thenotation cciscommonlyunderstoodtoindicatethatacopyofthedocumenthasbeenprovidedtothepersons L subsequentlyidentified. DONALKilcreaseHardemanSandin S.CtWhitevilleSheri suasponteNat'lEntmanIcard TimmFurenGinsburgBowleniSalugaHanberry Cmty Cas3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)  R$      3  :  _Mr.HicksshouldhavefiledhispetitioninHardemanCounty.InHawkinsv.TennesseeDeptofCorr.,No.  M200100473COAR3CV,2002WL1677718,at*78(Tenn.Ct.App.July25,2002)(NoTenn.R.App.P.11 t applicationfiled),weconstruedTenn.CodeAnn.4121803(2003)torequirethatalawsuitaccruingwhileaprisoner 8 isincarceratedmustbebroughtinthecountywherethefacilityhousingtheprisonerislocated.However,wewillnot L remandthecasefortransfertothepropercourtbecauseMr.HicksfiledhispetitionbeforewehandeddowntheHawkins  decisionandbecauseLarryCravenandSheriSalugadidnotraisethisissueinthetrialcourt.Theycannotraisethisissue  forthefirsttimeonappeal.Simpsonv.FrontierCmty.CreditUnion,810S.W.2d147,153(Tenn.1991);Williamson H  CountyBroad.Co.v.IntermediaPartners,987S.W.2d550,553(Tenn.Ct.App.1998);Sweeneyv.StateDeptof  \ Transp.,744S.W.2d905,906(Tenn.Ct.App.1987).*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h - -*)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   %i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (|G2$ !.8 dXXd8         0  : d(|3c$ !.8 dXXd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3c$ !.8 dXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8 dd8     __   8XXdd8  @  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE# #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsJanuary16,2002 L XX  # XX#TERRYHICKSv.DONALCAMPBELL,etal.XX   J @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  J @@No.002593IIrvinH.Kilcrease,Jr.,Chancellor  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200100280COAR3CVFiledOctober28,2003 # XX#XX     AV) ` dE<|` A }     ThisappealinvolvesaprisonerdisciplinaryproceedingattheHardemanCountyCorrectional x  Facility.AprisonerfiledapetitionforcommonlawwritofcertiorariintheChanceryCourtfor d DavidsonCountyseekingjudicialreviewofaprisondisciplinaryboardsfindingthathewasguilty P of conspiracytoviolatestatelaw.Twoofthesevenrespondentsnamedinthepetitionfileda < Tenn.R.Civ.P.12.02(6)motiontodismiss.Thetrialcourtgrantedthemotion,andtheprisoner (x perfectedthisappeal.Wehavedeterminedthattheappealshouldbedismissedbecausetheorder d beingappealedfromisnotfinalanddoesnotcomplywithTenn.R.Civ.P.58. P # XXH#XX  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtDismissed  (   # X:#XX. WilliamC.Koch,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichWilliamB.Cainand  PatriciaJ.Cottrell,JJ.,joined.  TerryHicks,Whiteville,Tennessee,ProSe. t TomAnderson,Jackson,Tennessee,fortheappellees,LarryCravenandSheriSaluga. L   OPINION # XX #XX  #`"  I.  $8 $ # XX #XX     TerryHicksispresentlyservingatenyearsentenceforvoluntarymanslaughterasaresult &"& ofapleabargainintheCircuitCourtforMadisonCounty.   1      ׀HeisincarceratedatHardemanCounty '"' CorrectionalFacilityinWhiteville,Tennessee,aprivatefacilityoperatedbyCorrectionsCorporation (#( ofAmerica( CCA)undercontractwiththeTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Followingan )$)  investigationintodrugtraffickingatthefacility,Mr.Hicksandnineteenotherprisonerswere p*%* _chargedwithoneormoredisciplinaryoffensesinvolvingpossessionofillegaldrugsand conspiracy  toviolatestatelaw.     PrisondisciplinaryboardsconvenedontwooccasionstoconsiderthechargesagainstMr. t Hicks,buttheDepartmentrejectedtheirdecisionsbecauseofproceduralirregularities.Following ` athirdhearing,adisciplinaryboardfoundMr.Hicksguiltyofconspiracytoviolatestatelawand, L  aspunishment,placedhiminadministrativesegregationforfifteendays,   2      ׀finedhimfivedollars,and 8  suspendedhisprivilegetohavevisitorsforsixmonths.Thispunishmentwasapprovedbythe $ t Departmentsliaison,thewarden,andultimatelytheDepartmentsAssistantCommissionerof  ` Operations.  L    OnAugust17,2000,Mr.Hicksfiledapetitionforcommonlawwritofcertiorariinthe $  ChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty.&T   3      ׀HenamedasrespondentstheDepartmentofCorrection,the   CommissionerofCorrection,andfiveotherpersons,includingLarryCraven,Jr.,thewardenofthe   HardenCountyCorrectionalFacility,andSheriSaluga,aninternalaffairsofficeratthefacility.Both   WardenCravenandOfficerSalugaareCCAemployees.OnOctober13,2000,WardenCravenand   OfficerSalugafiledaTenn.R.Civ.P.12.02(6)motionseekingdismissaloftheclaimsagainstthem, p presumablyonthegroundthattheywerenotamenabletosuitbecausetheywereCCAemployees."    4      ׀ \ OnJanuary10,2001,thetrialcourtgrantedthemotionanddismissedMr.Hickssclaimsagainst H WardenCravenandOfficerSaluga.Mr.Hicksthenappealedtothiscourt. 4 @) II.   \   Mr.HicksisentitledtoanappealasofrightfromthetrialcourtsJanuary10,2001order 4 onlyifitisfinalandappealable.Anordermustsatisfytwoconditionstobeconsideredfinaland   appealable.First,itmusteitherresolvealltheclaimsbetweenallthepartiesleavingnothingelse   forthetrialcourttodo,Tenn.R.App.P.3(a);AetnaCas.&Sur.Co.v.Miller,491S.W.2d85,86  (Tenn.1973),orthetrialcourtmustcertifyitasappealableinaccordancewithTenn.R.Civ.P.  54.02.Second,theorderfromwhichanappealissoughtmustbe effectivepursuanttoTenn.R.  Civ.P.58.ThetrialcourtsJanuary10,2001orderisneither.    TheJanuary10,2001ordermerelydismissesMr.Hickssclaimsagainsttwoofseven t defendants.Byleavingtheclaimsagainsttheremainingfivedefendantsintact,theorderleaves ` muchforthetrialcourttodobeforealltheclaimsbetweenallthepartiesarefinallyresolved.Thus, L  becausethetrialcourtdidnotcertifytheJanuary10,2001orderasappealableunderTenn.R.Civ. 8  P.54.02,itisnotappealableasofrightunderTenn.R.App.P.3(a). $ t   Inaddition,theJanuary10,2001orderisnotan effectiveorder.Tobeeffective,anorder  L  mustsatisfytherequirementsofTenn.R.Civ.P.58.Onewaytosatisfytheserequirementsisfor  8  theordertocontain thesignatureofthejudgeandacertificateoftheclerkthatacopyhasbeen $  servedonallotherpartiesofrecordorcounsel.Tenn.R.Civ.P.58(3).ThetrialcourtsJanuary   10,2001ordercontainsa RULE58CERTIFICATIONstatingthat [a]copyofthisorderhasbeen   servedbyU.S.Mailuponallpartiesortheircounselasnamedabove.Italsocontainsanotation   indicatingthatacopyoftheorderwasprovidedtoMr.HicksandthelawyerrepresentingWarden   CravenandOfficerSaluga.#   5      ׀Theorder,however,containsnoindicationthatcopieswereprovided p totheremainingfivedefendantsortotheAttorneyGeneralandReporterwhoseofficehadentered \ anappearanceonbehalfofthesedefendantsapproximatelythreemonthsearlieronOctober17, H 2000.Therefore,theJanuary10,2001orderdoesnotcomplywithTenn.R.Civ.P.58. 4 @^^( III.   \ # XX< #XX   WedismissMr.Hickssappealbecauseheisseekingappellatereviewofanorderthanisnot 4 appealableasofrightandremandthecasetothetrialcourtforfurtherconsiderationofMr.Hickss   petitionconsistentwithWillisv.TennesseeDeptofCorr.,113S.W.3d706(Tenn.2003).Wetax   thecostsofthisappealtoTerryHicksforwhichexecution,ifnecessary,mayissue.Wealsofind  thatMr.HickssappealisfrivolousinaccordancewithTenn.CodeAnn.4121807(c),816(a)(1)  (2003).  # XXp"#XX    `     h     ________________________ 0"     `     h     WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,J.# XXF%#