WPC^ +ZaʪsVPU~R>R,vdԶ `q?8P  hOZ/@ɍS_Yv4jvwrx߁נ[iF(VSoǽgE0t7eNi!s)b#ayuÒEg<.%$2!zzW5 'p&ywgn !5͑-VΎH{gt&馓~f[6K}@"Zi1.aRa9tbj,i >auuc"Kk9ub#\ % U N# 0q U N  G 0DS z w=^ Nw4E)+: m<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<bSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 0[[[[ BFF 0c D3 D-: 0Kgg AS 0 0Do AHP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0(I Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular  R $      1  XX  _XҸXXXRule10oftheRulesoftheCourtofAppealsreadsasfollows:  8   ` TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,may  affirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhen t aformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedby ` memorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shall L  notbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninanyunrelated 8  case.(#$  0   C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ri(L ~(3|xU- -(|G2 $ !.8dd8         0  XX d(|3!$ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3!$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _8XXdd8  @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE  XҸX #XXҸ#  JIMMY_HOBBS_v.ANNMARIE_HOBBS_XҸX   @  DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Sequatchie_ԀCounty   @B B No.6827ThomasW.Graham,Judge   @*AV) ` dE<o ` A߈ p   @ No.M199900715COAR3CVDecidedJuly13,2000 k  AV) ` dE<B` A C   Twoyearsafteradivorce,andeightmonthsafterthedivorcedecreewasaffirmedonappeal,the >  formerhusbandfiledaprosemotionaskingthetrialcourttoreviewnewevidenceandtofindthat *z  hehadbeendefraudedanddeniedhisconstitutionalrightsinthedivorceproceeding.Thetrialcourt f treatedthepleadingasamotionunderRule60,Tenn.R.Civ.P.,andheldthatthemotionwas(1) R untimelyand(2)notsupportedbytheproofsubmittedbythe_movant_.Weaffirmthetrialcourt. >    Tenn.R.App.P.AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt  AffirmedandRemanded   Cantrell,P.J.,M.S.#XҸJ#XҸX.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichKochandCain,JJ.joined.  Jimmy_Hobbs_,_Dunlap_,Tennessee,ProSe. b M.KeithDavis,_Dunlap_,Tennessee,fortheappellee,AnnMarie_Hobbs_. : @! MEMORANDUMOPINION #XXҸ#XҸX #  1      ׈ b   Mr.andMrs._Hobbs_ԀweredivorcedbyadecreeoftheCircuitCourtof_Sequatchie_ԀCounty !&! onJune17,1997.Mr._Hobbs_Ԁappealed,andthisCourtaffirmedthelowercourtonOctober23, ""  1998.TheSupremeCourtdeniedpermissiontoappealonFebruary8,1999andtheopinioncanbe ## foundat987S.W.2d844(Tenn.Ct.App.1998).TheSupremeCourtoftheUnitedStatesdenied  Mr._Hobbs_petitionforcertiorari.     OnJune18,1999,Mr._Hobbs_Ԁfiledamotioninthecircuitcourtaskingthecourttoconsider t newevidence,andtoholdthatMrs._Hobbs_Ԁperjuredherselfinthedivorcecase,andfailedtopaythe ` debtsthecourtorderedhertopay.Thecourtconductedahearing,heardMr._Hobbs_testimony,and L  reviewedthedocumentshepresented.Thecourtconcludedthatthemotionshouldbetreatedasa 8  motionunderRule60,Tenn.R.Civ.P.,seekingrelieffromthepriorjudgment.Butastherule $ t requiresamotionseekingreliefonthegroundoffraudtobefiledwithinoneyearofthejudgment,  ` themotionwastoolate.SeeRule60.02,Tenn.R.Civ.P.Thecourtalsoconsideredtheother  L  generalallegationsofmisconductonthepartofvariouslawyersandpublicemployees,andfound  8  thattheprooffailedtosupportthoseallegations. $    Weconcurinthefindingsandconclusionsofthetrialcourt.Althoughitisdifficultto   establishthespecificreliefMr._Hobbs_Ԁseeks,theonesthatcanbearticulatedarebeyondthereach   ofRule60,which,inanyevent,cometoolatetobeconsidered.       Thejudgmentoftrialcourtisaffirmed,andthecauseisremandedtotheCircuitCourtof \ _Sequatchie_ԀCountyforanyfurtherproceedingsnecessary.Taxthecostsonappealtotheappellant, H Jimmy_Hobbs_. 4