WPC 2# UN %% 04+ 0_w@4^r mj 0J  0TV 0^ 0h 0rp 0| 0^ 0 1ut 0d AQM  0Dd 0@ 0D D/, B[ Bx D3U>B)DC/ AMrU*Kv~4vHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh'"  Z 6Times New Roman Regular( U$  (o(2\$ U!   XXX   `   0   ,-D.P/P01e2U3U4Ӏ>_#x _33|x>Uholloway v. collier - concurring opinion   0 '  0 .   2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ("$    ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd<  9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d++++7Border 1dd!#,C << G<  9p`(Arial A !  #d#**   ""  ..   YYY FILED.XNovember14,1997CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva ! . **         X \RA'\\RA'\7dd7*  ћ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ MIDDLESECTIONATNASHVILLE ̜!R-/,A1-j|P`  `@Rߛ*RICKHOLLOWAY,   )      ) Plaintiff/Appellee,  )      ) MauryCircuit      ) No.7188VS.      )      ) AppealNo.      ) 01A019704CV00153JOHNR.COLLIER,JR.,  )      ) Defendant/Appellant.  )*@ CONCURRINGOPINION ̜*̛ IconcurwiththecourtsopiniononthegroundthatMr.HollowayscircumstantialevidenceconcerningMr.ColliersactionsdoesnotamounttomaterialevidencesufficienttosupportthejurysconclusionthatMr.Collieractedintentionallyandwithoutjustification.Proofofthissortofmotivationisanessentialelementofaclaimforinterferencewithanemploymentrelationship,seeForresterv._Stockstill_,869S.W.2d328,331(Tenn.1994),andwithoutitMr.Hollowayscaseshouldneverhavegonetothejury.̛̜       _____________________________       WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE