ÿWPCÏ ¿\ ö iÚ¹hZ ¸hZ»ŒÓÆÌ¡<ûÛÇ0—} ÿ€» ia™Þ.ü¢ó‰ Ö o¿†Z…} ºöñU=¹g×݈iŸ4ÒašŸž¸ÌƒpòãÙcÇÉ¢•´w>å09´H•ëü?ã¢ÔõÙ,côY».øofÂYX.”Í%G,ÂOu£e;—&Ý«¼† ¬¬'Á/¯§­Û¡1,8´Tå ·›ÙŸµeƒÇ@j¹wd$œ^‡a«ÕQ§yN6`t°åÂ?¾º×i(áz™¥W&ñô˜`ap’¾ð©d€Z"‹tZ-ù3-ŒÛŸ?8© zW}öÉÁÈã?å+„. Ø»îü’Š}R“üQe")÷xz dé.Ý"Ȳá 8’Et/¹£‰š”Z§ÈPIˆJ/WMÑ2Áø¼L×f(D8)vüJ|Æ#b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 UN¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ UN™ Æç Æ­ ÆsÆ9 0DÿNChE‹­E888Š:::::::::::::::::::::bÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ 0ëÌÌÌÌ B·· 0¤Ô D3x D-« 0KØØ AS#Æv 0¤< 0Dà A«$˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK4ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»W¡}1Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÖƒF1ê:i¢Ø+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó BrunetzMarks,JrLoganville collectibilityOverstreetreweighStricklanKoellaMcWilliamsMcCampbell CasMoncierremittiturShoneyJessupTague Ý ƒRXd$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€XSIX»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Jessup€relies€on€€òòSidney€v.€Clementóó,€257€F.€Supp.€63€(E.D.€Tenn.€1966),€for€the€positionÐ ° Ðthat€the€judgment€must€be€shown€to€be€collectible.€€òòSidney€óóis€federal€precedent,€which€is€not€bindingÐ œì Ðon€this€Court. €Ý ƒRXd$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€XSIX»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔMs.€Tague€testified€regarding€her€damages,€which€she€explained€as€the€$9,500.00€she€hadÐ ° Ðpaid€Jessup,€plus€the€loss€of€future€alimony,€loss€of€additional€arrearage€not€awarded€($27,000.00),Ð œì Ðloss€of€arrearage€accrued€during€time€case€was€pending€($17,000.00)€and€interest€of€$24,000.00.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àMs.€Tague€testified€that€Jessup€never€told€her€he€was€collecting€the€fee€award€from€her€ex,Ð `° Ðand€did€not€consult€with€her€about€doing€so.- ù-(|G2Xd$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€XSIX»»Ô d(|3Çp$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Çp$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€…»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼…»»»ÔÑ8€SIXXdì»»d8Ñà@¦ ¦ ìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@””$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEˆÐ  Ðà@ZZìàAugust€10,€2004€SessionˆÐ Ô$ ÐÔ‡XSIX»¼…ÔÌò òÔ#†¼…»XXSI¡#ÔÓ  ÓWILLIAM€EUGENE€JESSUP€v.€MARCIA€J.€TAGUEòòóóÔ‡XSIX»¼…Ôó óÐ Ò" ÐÓçÓÌà@MM ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Hamilton€County,€Part€IIˆÐ Ò " Ðà@h h ìàNo.€98„0484€€€€€€Hon.€Howell€N.€Peoples,€ChancellorˆÐ ¾  ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` A߈Ð ‚Ò  ÐÌà@U U ìàNo.€E2002„02058„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€FILED€NOVEMBER€29,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_Ô€ˆÐ }Í  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<T` AßÐ U¥  Ðó óÌIn€this€dispute€between€attorney€and€client,€a€jury€awarded€the€client€damages€against€the€attorneyÐ P   Ðwhich€award€was€approved€by€the€Trial€Court.€€On€appeal,€we€affirm.Ð <Œ ÐÌÔ#†¼…»XXSI!#ÔÔ‡XSIX»¼…ÔÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ P ÐÌÌòòHerschel€Pickens€Franks,€Ô_ÔP.Jóó.Ô_Ô,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€whichòò€Charles€D.€Susano,Ð Ä ÐJr.,€J.óó,€andòò€Sharon€G.€Lee,€Jóó.,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌÔ#†¼…»XXSIˆ#ÔÔ‡XSIX»¼…ÔÌArthur€P.€Brock€and€Neil€A.€Brunetz,€Chattanooga,€Tennessee,€for€Appellant.Ð tÄ ÐÌLisa€Z.€Espy,€Chattanooga,€Tennessee,€andÐ Lœ ÐH.€Edward€Marks,€Jr.,€Loganville,€Georgia,€for€Appellee.Ð 8ˆ ÐÌÌÌà@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼…»XXSI#ÔÔ‡XSIX»¼…ԈРè"8" ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼…»XXSIi#ÔÔ‡XSIX»¼…ÔÔ‡ X!7XXXSIÔà0  àÐ (#(# Ðà  àà ` àThis€case€began€with€the€filing€of€a€Complaint€by€attorney€William€Jessup,€seekingÐ ¬%ü % Ðpayment€of€attorneyððs€fees€from€a€former€client,€Marcia€Tague.€€€Jessup€alleged€that€Tague€employedÐ ˜&è!& Ðhim€in€March€of€1996,€to€collect€alimony€from€her€former€husband,€John€Tague,€Jr.,€that€he€filed€aÐ „'Ô"' ÐPetition€on€her€behalf€seeking€recovery€of€alimony€Ô_ÔarrearagesÔ_Ô€of€$57,600.00,€and€as€a€result,€theÐ p(À#( ÐCourt€found€€in€Ms.€Ô_ÔTagueÔ_Ôððs€favor,€granting€her€a€judgment€of€$57,400.00.€€He€further€alleged€thatÐ \)¬$) Ðhe€had€a€fee€agreement€with€Ms.€Tague,€which€he€exhibited€to€the€Complaint,€and€that€he€had€sentÐ H*˜%* Ðhis€client€billing€statements€detailing€his€work€on€the€case.€€He€averred€that€Ms.€Tague€owed€himÐ 4+„&+ Ð$33,608.00€in€attorneyððs€fees,€plus€prejudgment€interest€at€a€rate€of€10%.€Ð  ,p', ÐÐ  -\(-ý  ÐÔ_Ôà  àà ` à€Ms.€Tague€filed€an€Answer€and€Counterclaim,€alleging€the€Court€lacked€jurisdictionÐ ° Ðover€her,€and€over€the€subject€matter€of€the€claim,€and€that€the€fee€agreement€was€unenforceable€forÐ œì Ðvarious€reasons€and€that€Jessup€had€materially€breached€the€Agreement.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àà ` àTague€counterclaimed€against€Jessup,€alleging€that€she€hired€Jessup€for€the€purposeÐ `° Ðof€collecting€alimony€owed€by€her€ex„husband€under€a€Georgia€divorce€decree,€and€that€Jessup€wasÐ L œ Ðaware€of€her€limited€financial€resources,€and€promised€to€devote€his€best€efforts€to€her€case,€and€notÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€charge€her€an€unreasonable€or€excessive€fee.€€She€alleged€that€Jessup€failed€to€use€his€skill€andÐ $ t Ðdiligence€as€expected€by€abandoning€and€neglecting€the€case,€by€charging€her€for€time€he€did€notÐ  ` Ðactually€spend€on€the€case,€and€by€charging€her€an€unreasonable€and€excessive€fee,€and€that€she€hadÐ ü L  Ðsuffered€damages€as€a€result€of€Jessupððs€conduct.€€She€alleged€that€Jessup€advised€her€the€CourtÐ è 8  Ðwould€order€her€ex„husband€to€pay€her€attorneyððs€fees,€but€the€Court€only€awarded€her€fees€in€theÐ Ô$  Ðamount€of€$12,500.00,€and€Jessup€never€challenged€the€amount€of€the€award.€€Further€that€JessupÐ À  Ðhad€hired€an€attorney€to€collect€the€award€of€$12,500.00€against€her€ex„husband,€without€her€consent,Ð ¬ü  Ðand€failed€to€notify€her€that€he€had€received€the€funds.€€Ð ˜è  Ѐ€Ð „Ô  Ðà  àà ` àThe€case€was€tried€before€a€jury€and€before€the€case€was€submitted€to€the€jury,€theÐ pÀ ÐTrial€Court€directed€a€verdict€for€Jessup€on€the€issue€of€punitive€damages€because€there€was€no€clearÐ \¬ Ðand€convincing€evidence€of€willful€or€wrongful€intent.€€The€jury€then€returned€a€verdict€for€Ms.Ð H˜ ÐTague,€finding€that€the€Contract€between€Jessup€and€Tague€was€unenforceable,€and€that€JessupÐ 4„ Ðperformed€services€for€Ms.€Tague€but€that€the€total€fee€was€unreasonable€and€clearly€excessive€andÐ  p Ðthat€Jessup€should€be€awarded€no€fee.€The€jury€further€found€that€Jessup€failed€to€use€his€skill,Ð  \ Ðprudence,€and€diligence€reasonably€expected€of€an€attorney€or€that€he€breached€his€fiduciary€dutiesÐ øH Ðowed€to€Ms.€Tague.€€The€jury€awarded€Ms.€Tague€$74,200.00€in€damages.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Рä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àSubsequent€to€the€entry€of€the€Judgment€on€the€jury€verdict,€Jessup€filed€a€Motion€forÐ ¼  ÐJudgment€notwithstanding€the€verdict€and€for€a€new€trial€and€remittitur.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€Court€held€a€hearing€on€the€motion,€and€found€€the€fee€was€clearly€excessive€andÐ €Ð Ðthat€Jessup€breached€his€duty€to€Ms.€Tague,€and€that€there€was€sufficient€evidence€in€the€record€ofÐ l¼ Ðhis€failures.€€The€Court€stated€the€damages€awarded€by€the€jury€were€within€the€range€ofÐ X ¨ Ðreasonableness€based€on€the€proof,€and€concurred€in€the€verdict.€€The€Motion€was€denied.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àà ` à€Jessup€has€appealed,€raising€these€issues:Ð #l! Ðò òÌÓ  Óó óà0  àà0` (#(#à1.à0¸ ` (#` (#àWhether€the€Trial€Court€erred€in€admitting€certain€evidence€of€damagesÐ ô$D # Ðwhen€the€defendant€failed€to€show€that€those€damages€were€proximatelyÐ ° Ðcaused€by€Jessup?Ðœì¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌà0  àà0` (#(#à2.à0¸ ` (#` (#àWhether€the€Trial€Court€erred€in€failing€to€instruct€the€jury€regardingÐ tÄ Ðcollectibility€andò ò€ó ósolvency€of€Ms.€Tagueððs€ex„husband?Ð`°¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌÓ  ÓAppellee€raised€the€issue€of€whether€the€Trial€Court€erred€by€directing€a€verdict€against€Ms.€TagueÐ < Œ Ðon€the€issue€of€Jessupððs€liability€for€punitive€damages?ò òÐ ( x ÐÓ  ÓÌó óÓ  Óà  àà ` àPursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(d),€findings€of€fact€by€a€jury€in€civil€actions€will€beÐ  P  Ðset€aside€only€if€there€is€no€material€evidence€to€support€the€verdict.€€òòOverstreet€v.€Shoneyððs,€Inc.óó,Ð ì <  Ð4€S.W.3d€694€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1999).Ð Ø(  ÐÌà  àà ` àò òó óWhen€a€trial€court€approves€a€jury€verdict,€we€will€only€review€the€record€toÐ °  Ðdetermine€whether€it€contains€material€evidence€to€support€the€jury's€verdict.€€We€do€not€reweigh€theÐ œì  Ðevidence€and€consider€where€the€preponderance€lies,€but€if€there€is€material€evidence€to€support€theÐ ˆØ  Ðverdict,€the€judgment€must€be€affirmed.€€òòId.óóÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àà ` àJessup€asserts€the€Court€should€not€have€allowed€evidence€of€damages€which€JessupÐ Lœ Ðclaims€an€appeal€would€have€cured,€relying€on€Florida€case€law.€€Jessup€admits€that€a€finding€ofÐ 8ˆ Ðmalpractice€requires€four€elements€be€proven:Ð $t Ðà  àÌà0  àà0` (#(#à1)à0¸ ` (#` (#àthe€attorney€owed€a€duty€to€the€client,ÐüL¸ (#¸ (# Ðà  àÌà0  àà0` (#(#à2)à0¸ ` (#` (#àthe€attorney€breached€that€duty,€ÐÔ$¸ (#¸ (# Ðà  àÌà0  àà0` (#(#à3)à0¸ ` (#` (#àthe€client€suffered€damage,€andЬü¸ (#¸ (# Ðà  àÌà0  àà0` (#(#à4)à0¸ ` (#` (#àthat€the€breach€proximately€caused€the€damage.€Ð„Ô¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌòòSeeóó€òòHorton€v.€Hughesóó,€971€S.W.2d€957€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998).€€Ð \ ¬ ÐÌà  àà ` àJessup€insists€that€the€failure€to€appeal€the€Trial€Courtððs€decision€was€the€proximateÐ 4"„  Ðcause€of€Ms.€Tagueððs€damages,€and€not€his€actions€or€failures€as€her€attorney.€€Ð  #p! Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àProximate€cause€has€been€explained€as€ð ðthe€nexus€between€the€negligence€and€theÐ ø$H # Ðinjuryðð.€€òòStricklan€v.€Koellaóó,€546€S.W.2d€810,€813€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1976).€€The€causation€issue€is€oneÐ ä%4!$ Ðfor€the€jury€to€determine,€and€ð ðthis€Court€has€noted€that€a€jury€may€infer€a€causal€connection€throughÐ Ð& "% Ðthe€use€of€circumstantial€evidence,€expert€testimony€or€both.ðð€€òòHamblen€v.€Davidsonóó,€50€S.W.3d€433,Ð ¼' #& Ð440€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2000).Ð ¨(ø#' Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àIn€this€case,€the€jury€found€that€Jessup€breached€his€duty€to€Ms.€Tague,€and€that€theÐ €*Ð%) Ðbreach€was€the€proximate€cause€of€her€injury.€€The€record€shows€there€was€material€evidence€toÐ l+¼&* Ðsupport€the€juryððs€verdict.€€Ms.€Tague€and€another€witness€testified€in€great€detail€regarding€the€errorsÐ ° Ðthat€Jessup€made€in€the€handling€of€the€case,€and€Jessup€admitted€to€certain€errors€regarding€hisÐ œì Ðbilling€practices,€his€use€of€pleadings,€and€his€misunderstanding€of€the€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure.€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€issue€of€Ms.€Tagueððs€decision€to€forego€an€appeal€was€brought€before€the€juryÐ `° Ðby€Jessupððs€counsel.€€Both€Jessup€and€Tague€testified€that€he€refused€to€handle€her€appeal€unless€sheÐ L œ Ðpaid€him€$33,000.00€immediately.€€Tague€testified€she€was€unable€to€comply€with€Jessupððs€monetaryÐ 8 ˆ Ðdemands,€and€was€further€unable€to€hire€another€attorney€to€represent€her,€and€thus€she€had€to€foregoÐ $ t Ðher€appeal.€€McWilliams€testifying€as€an€expert,€said€that€Jessupððs€presentation€of€Ms.€Tagueððs€caseÐ  ` Ðat€trial€was€so€lacking€that€there€would€be€no€way€for€anyone€to€get€relief€for€her€on€appeal,€becauseÐ ü L  Ðthe€record€was€simply€insufficient.€€Given€this€proof,€there€is€material€evidence€to€support€the€juryððsÐ è 8  Ðfinding€regarding€proximate€causation.€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àà ` àNext,€Jessup€argues€that€the€Trial€Court€erred€in€its€instruction€to€the€jury,€becauseÐ ¬ü  Ðit€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€that€Ms.€Tague€had€to€show€that€the€underlying€judgment€against€Mr.Ð ˜è  ÐTague€was€collectible€and€that€he€was€solvent€in€order€to€prove€malpractice€by€Jessup.€€Jessup€reliesÐ „Ô  Ðon€the€case€of€òòCommercial€Truck€and€Trailer€Sales,€Inc.€v.€McCampbellóó,€580€S.W.2d€765€(Tenn.Ð pÀ Ð1979),€but€our€review€of€that€case€and€its€predecessor€shows€this€reliance€is€misplaced.€€InÐ \¬ ÐòòCommercialóó,€the€Supreme€Court€simply€said€that€the€malpractice€ð ðplaintiff€is€required€to€prove€thatÐ H˜ Ðrecovery€could€have€been€made€in€the€original€action€which€the€attorney€was€employed€toÐ 4„ Ðprosecute.ðð€€òòIdóó.€€Thus,€the€plaintiff€must€show€that€the€claim€was€viable€and€could€have€succeeded,Ð  p Ðnot€that€the€resulting€judgment€would€ultimately€be€collectible€in€full.Ð  \ Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àThe€Court€in€òòCommercialóó€relied€upon€the€prior€case€of€òòGay€&€Taylor,€Inc.€v.Ð ä4 ÐAmerican€Cas.€Co.€of€Reading,€Pa.óó,€381€S.W.2d€304,€306€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1963),€wherein€it€wasÐ Ð  Ðsaid:Ð ¼  Ðà8  àÐ Ð Ð  Ðà0  àà0` (#(#àThe€burden€of€proving€that€damages€resulted€from€the€negligence€of€an€attorney,€orÐ ”ä Ðfrom€his€failure€to€follow€instructions,€in€connection€with€the€prosecution€or€defenseÐ €Ð Ðof€a€suit€rests€upon€the€client€and€usually€requires€the€client€to€demonstrate€that,€butÐ l¼ Ðfor€the€negligence€complained€of,€the€client€would€have€been€successful€in€theÐ X ¨ Ðprosecution€or€defense€of€the€action€in€question.€€7€Am.Jur.,€Attorneys€at€Law,€Sec.Ð D!” Ð188,€p.€156;€Anno.€45€A.L.R.2d€21.Ð0"€ ` (#` (# ÐÌThese€cases€do€not€require€a€showing€that€the€judgment€be€collectible,€rather,€what€is€required€is€justÐ $X" Ðthat€it€be€shown€that€the€judgment€was€obtainable.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ô$D # Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àMoreover,€Jessup€failed€to€raise€this€issue€at€the€trial€court€level,€and€failed€to€requestÐ Ì&"% Ðan€instruction€regarding€same.€€It€is€well„settled€that€an€issue€not€raised€at€trial€cannot€be€raised€forÐ ¸'#& Ðthe€first€time€on€appeal.€€òòHill€v.€Moncieróó,€122€S.W.3d€787€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2003).€€òòAlso€see,€BowersÐ ° Ðv.€Thompsonóó,€688€S.W.2d€827€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984).€€This€issue€is€without€merit.Ð œì ÐÌà  àà ` àFinally,€Ms.€Tague€argues€the€Trial€Court€erred€by€removing€the€issue€of€punitiveÐ tÄ Ðdamages€from€the€jury.€€Punitive€damages€may€be€awarded€in€legal€malpractice€cases,€ð ðprovided€theÐ `° Ðculpable€conduct€.€.€.€i.e.€intentional,€fraudulent,€malicious,€or€reckless,€is€proven€by€clear€andÐ L œ Ðconvincing€evidence.ðð€€òòMetcalfe€v.€Watersóó,€970€S.W.2d€448€(Tenn.€1998).€€€Ð 8 ˆ Ðà  àà ` àÌà  àà ` àThe€Trial€Court€found€there€was€no€clear€and€convincing€evidence€of€culpableÐ  ` Ðconduct€requiring€the€issue€to€be€submitted€to€the€jury.€In€òòMetcalfeóó,€the€Supreme€Court€found€theÐ ü L  Ðattorney€accused€of€malpractice€had€made€ð ðrepeated€transgressionsðð€which€showed€ð ðcallousÐ è 8  Ðdisregard€for€the€rights€of€his€clientsðð,€and€that€there€was€ð ðoverwhelming€evidence€from€which€theÐ Ô$  Ðjury€could€find,€at€a€minimum,€reckless€conduct,€that€is,€conduct€constituting€a€gross€deviation€fromÐ À  Ðthe€applicable€standard€of€care.ðð€€òòId.óó€€While€there€is€material€evidence€to€support€the€juryððs€findingÐ ¬ü  Ðthat€ð ðJessup€failed€to€use€the€skill,€prudence€and€diligence€reasonably€expected€of€an€attorney,€or€thatÐ ˜è  Ðhe€breached€his€fiduciary€duties€which€he€owed€to€Ms.€Tagueðð,€his€conduct€was€not€as€flagrant€asÐ „Ô  Ðthe€attorney€sued€in€òòMetcalfeóó,€and€we€concur€with€the€Trial€Courtððs€finding€that€the€proof€was€notÐ pÀ Ðclear€and€convincing€that€his€transgressions€showed€a€ð ðcallous€disregard€for€the€rights€of€€his€clientðð.Ð \¬ ÐWe€find€the€issue€to€be€without€merit.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àà ` àWe€affirm€the€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€on€all€issues€and€remand,€with€the€cost€ofÐ  p Ðthe€appeal€assessed€to€William€Eugene€Jessup.Ð  \ ÐÌÌÌÌÔ#†XSIXX X!7ç#ÔÔ#†¼…»XXSIÈ#ÔÔ‡XSIX»¼…ÔÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à______________________________Ð ”ä Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àòòHerschel€Pickens€Franks,€P.J.Ð €Ð Ðóó