ÿWPCx ## úUN %S 0(Yw@4ÁÕ 0lä 0DP” 0Jœ 0Tæ 0^: 0h˜ 0r 0|r 0†î 0t 1u 0dyU>Ýï v~ vÓˆ B[˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nL$Ò(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ ëDìDíDîDïDðñEòóVôDB\J#3|xô((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman åÝ ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ÔÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€Illinois€court€awarded€this€residence€to€Wife€in€the€divorce€decree.ÌPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHØ(d'`Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  ion-F Geneva ÒÒ  ion-F Geneva Ò dÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ÔÝ  Ý›Ñ\R AØ'\ÑÓ  ÓÑ\R AØ'\ÑÞ ÞÌà@ àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌà@ àWESTERN€SECTION€AT€JACKSONÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌóóÌMONTEE€H.€CARRUTHERS€JOHNSON,)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€)Ìà àó óPlaintiff/Appellant,à àà àà àò ò€)à àó óShelby€Equity€No.€104772€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àò ò€)Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà àà à€)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€)à àó óAppeal€No.€02A01„9603„CH„00061ò òÌNATHAN€JOHNSON,€à àà àà à€)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà à€)Ìà àó óDefendant/Appellee.à àà àà àò ò€)ÌÌÌÌó óÌÌà0 àà àà@ àAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€SHELBY€COUNTYÌà@ àAT€MEMPHIS,€TENNESSEEÌÌÌÌÌà@ àTHE€HONORABLE€D.€J.€ALISSANDRATOS,€CHANCELLORÌÌÌÌòòÌÌFor€the€Plaintiff/Appellantóó:òòà àà àà àFor€the€Defendant/Appelleeóó:ÌÌJames€V.€Ball€€€€€€€€€€€€à àà àà àà àArthur€Mayhall€€€€ÌMemphis,€Tennessee€€à àà àà àHarry€Scruggs,€Jr.€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àMemphis,€Tennessee€ÌÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àò òREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDó óÌÌÌÌà àà àà àà àà àà àHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€J.ÌÌÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€J.€Ìò òÇØØÙ  ÙÓÓÑ7€Ü‘XXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ñà@ àOPINIONó óÌà àThis€is€a€divorce€case€involving€an€Illinois€decree.€€An€Illinois€court€granted€a€divorce€to€theÏhusband€and€awarded€the€marital€residence€in€Tennessee€to€the€husband.€€The€Tennessee€trial€courtÏenforced€the€Illinois€œcourtððs€award€of›€œproperty,›€and€the€wife€appeals.€€Because€the€Illinois€court€didÏnot€have€personal€jurisdiction€over€the€wife,€we€reverse€and€remand.Ìà àIn€May€of€1993,€Appellant€Montee€H.€Carruthers€Johnson€(ð ðWifeðð)€and€Appellee€NathanÏJohnson€(ð ðHusbandðð)€separated.€€Husband€moved€from€the€marital€residence€in€Memphis,ÏTennessee,€to€Rock€Island,€Illinois.€€On€December€7,€1993,€Husband€filed€for€divorce€in€Illinois.€ÏProcess€was€served€on€Wife€through€the€mail.€€She€received€process€on€December€17,€and€retainedÏan€attorney.€€Her€attorney€wrote€a€letter€to€Husbandððs€attorney€on€January€15,€1994.€€On€JanuaryÏ21,€Wifeððs€attorney€received€a€fax€from€Husbandððs€attorney.€€This€fax€stated€that€Wife€had€failed€toÏenter€an€appearance€in€the€Illinois€court€within€thirty€days€of€Husbandððs€filing€for€divorce€and€that,€Ïconsequently,€Husbandððs€attorney€would€set€the€matter€for€entry€of€judgment.€€Wife€also€receivedÏnotice,€dated€January€17,€1994,€of€a€hearing€set€for€January€24,€1994.€€Wife€never€appeared€in€theÏIllinois€court.€€The€Illinois€court€entered€a€Judgment€of€Dissolution€of€Marriage€on€January€24.€ÏAmong€other€things,€the€Illinois€divorce€decree€awarded€Husband€the€marital€residence€located€atÏ1748€Valley€Boulevard,€Memphis,€Tennessee.€€Wife€and€Husband€had€lived€in€the€maritalÏresidence€for€several€years€prior€to€the€divorce,€€and€Wife€was€living€œin€it›€at€the€time€of€the€divorce.Ìà àIn€August€of€1994,€Wife€was€still€living€in€the€marital€residence.€€Husband€filed€a€detainerÏaction€in€General€Sessions€Court€in€Memphis,€Tennessee,€in€order€to€remove€Wife€from€the€maritalÏresidence.€€The€General€Sessions€Court€ruled€in€Husbandððs€favor,€ordering€Wife€to€vacate€theÏpremises€by€September€30,€1994.€€Wife€subsequently€filed€suit€in€Chancery€Court,€seeking€anÏaccounting,€damages,€a€temporary€restraining€order,€and€a€temporary€and€permanent€injunctionÏagainst€Husband.Ìà àHusband€filed€a€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€In€response,€Wife€filed€an€answer€and€anÏaffidavit.€€In€the€affidavit,€Wife€testified€that,€after€she€married€Husband,€they€lived€in€a€houseÍwhich€was€hers€from€a€previous€marriage.× ƒ ××  ×€€The€house€that€later€became€the€marital€residence€hadÏbelonged€to€Husband€before€the€marriage,€but€was€encumbered€by€an€outstanding€mortgage€andÏwas€in€need€of€repair.€€Wife€testified€that€the€house€was€repaired€and€expanded.€€Wife€andÏHusband€moved€into€the€marital€residence€approximately€six€years€after€their€marriage.€€AccordingÏto€Wife,€both€worked€during€the€marriage,€and€both€incomes€paid€the€marital€bills.€€She€testifiedÏthat€the€repairs€and€additions€to€the€marital€residence€were€financed€through€two€loans€in€bothÏHusbandððs€and€Wifeððs€names€as€owners€of€the€residence.€€In€order€to€obtain€the€loans,€HusbandÏand€Wife€both€signed€an€affidavit€that€they€were€the€owners€of€the€marital€residence.€€Wife€statedÏthat€she€believed€that€Husband€had€deeded€part€of€the€residence€to€her,€and€only€after€the€divorceÏdid€she€learn€that€the€marital€residence€was€deeded€solely€in€Husbandððs€name.Ìà àThe€trial€court€granted€Husbandððs€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€The€trial€courtððs€orderÏprovided:ÌÓÓà8 à[T]he€Court€finds€that€the€Plaintiff€[Wife]€in€this€cause€and€Defendant€[Husband]€inÏthe€cause€in€Illinois€had€actual€acknowledge€[sic]€of€the€existence,€in€accordance€toÏher€own€complaint,€of€a€complaint€for€divorce,€œthat€that›€matter€was€pursued€to€finalÏadjudication,€that€she€has€slept€on€her€rights€and€failed€to€avail€herself€of€anyÏremedies€that€were€or€still€may€be€available€to€her€under€Illinois€law€proceedings,Ïeither€trial€Court€level€or€the€Appellate€Court€level€in€Illinois.ÌÌà8 àà àInstead€she€has€sought€the€relief€from€this€Court€from€a€valid€final€decree.€ÏShe€has€further€admitted€to€the€validity€of€that€decree€in€that€her€original€complaintÏdoes€not€set€to€ask€this€Court€to€not€enforce€that€final€decree€and€hold€it€as€void€andÏnot€to€grant€full€faith€and€credit.€€Instead€she€indicates€to€the€contrary€that€it€is€aÏvalid€final€decree€and€it€should€be€enforced€an€[sic]€is€entitled€to€all€full€faith€andÏcredit€for€the€purposes€of€dissolution€of€marriage,€but€she€wishes€to€only€seekÏlimited€relief€from€this€Court.ÌÌà8 àà àThis€Court€finds€that€her€dispute€was€proper€in€Illinois€and€that€her€remediesÏshould€be,€if€not€already€exhausted,€either€have€been€or€presently€are,€in€Illinois.€ÏTennessee€has€no€jurisdiction€over€this€matter€and€the€Motion€for€SummaryÏJudgment€should€be€granted.ÌÌÓÓWife€now€appeals€the€trial€courtððs€order€as€to€the€Tennessee€marital€residence.€€There€is€no€disputeÏas€to€the€validity€of€œthe€portion€of€the›€Illinois€œorder€granting€Husband€a€divorce.›Ìà àOn€appeal,€Wife€seeks€a€determination€of€whether€Illinois€has€jurisdiction€over€the€maritalÏresidence€in€Tennessee€and€whether€Tennessee€should€give€full€faith€and€credit€to€the€part€of€theÏIllinois€divorce€decree€awarding€that€marital€residence€to€Husband.Ìà àA€motion€for€summary€judgment€should€be€granted€when€the€movant€demonstrates€thatÏthere€are€no€genuine€issues€of€material€fact€and€that€the€moving€party€is€entitled€to€a€judgment€as€aÏmatter€of€law.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.03.€€The€party€moving€for€summary€judgment€bears€theÏburden€of€demonstrating€that€no€genuine€issue€of€material€fact€exists.€€ò òòòByrd€v.€Hallóóó ó,€847ÏS.W.2d€208,€211€(Tenn.€1993).€€On€a€motion€for€summary€judgment,€the€court€must€take€theÏstrongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€in€favor€of€the€nonmoving€party,€allow€all€reasonableÏinferences€in€favor€of€that€party,€and€discard€all€countervailing€evidence.€€òòò òId.ó óóó€at€210„11.€€SummaryÏjudgment€is€only€appropriate€when€the€facts€and€the€legal€conclusions€drawn€from€the€factsÏreasonably€permit€only€one€conclusion.€€ò òòòCarvell€v.€Bottomsó óóó,€900€S.W.2d€23,€26€(Tenn.Ï1995).€€Since€only€questions€of€law€are€involved,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€regardingÏa€trial€court's€grant€of€summary€judgment.€€ò òòòId.ó óóó€€Therefore,€our€review€of€the€trial€courtððs€grant€ofÏsummary€judgment€is€ò òòòde€novoó óóó€on€the€record€before€this€Court.€€ò òòòId.óóó óÌà àWife€argues€that€the€instant€case€is€controlled€by€ò òòòBurton€v.€Burtonó óóó,€52€Tenn.€App.€484,Ï376€S.W.2d€504€(1963).€€In€ò òòòBurtonó óóó,€this€Court€noted€that€ð ð[t]he€case€of€Toncray€v.€ToncrayÏfixed€the€public€policy€of€the€State€of€Tennessee€as€limiting€the€right€of€a€wife€to€recover€alimonyÏfrom€a€husband€who€had€obtained€a€divorce€on€constructive€service€in€another€State€to€cases€whereÏTennessee€is€or€was€the€matrimonial€domicile€of€the€parties,€and€we€do€not€feel€justified€inÏdeparting€from€the€public€policy€so€established.ðð€€ò òòòId.óóó ó€at€510,€376€S.W.2d€at€516;€ò òòòsee€alsoÏToncray€v.€Toncrayó óóó,€123€Tenn.€476,€œ131›€S.W.€977€(1910).€€Wife€argues€that€if€a€party€obtainsÏa€divorce€in€another€jurisdiction€through€constructive€service,€and€Tennessee€was€the€matrimonialÏdomicile,€then€the€party€remaining€in€Tennessee€may€adjudicate€in€Tennessee€matters€related€toÏmarital€property€rights,€even€if€€those€issues€were€addressed€by€the€foreign€decree.€€It€must€beÏnoted€however,€that€ò òòòBurtonóóó ó€involved€a€situation€in€which€the€foreign€decree€was€based€onÍconstructive€notice.€€In€this€case,€€Husband€served€Wife€personally€through€the€mail,€and€WifeÏadmittedly€had€actual€notice€of€the€Illinois€divorce€proceedings.€€However,€we€must€examine€theÏjurisdiction€of€the€Illinois€court€to€adjudicate€the€disposition€of€the€marital€residence€in€Tennessee.€€€Ìà àA€court€cannot€adjudicate€a€non„residentððs€property€rights€in€another€state€without€œhaving€›Ïœò òòòin›€personamóóó ó€jurisdiction.€€ò òòòSee€International€Shoe€Co.€v.€Washingtonó óóó,€326€U.S.€310,Ï316,€66€S.€Ct.€154,€158,€90€L.€Ed.€95€(1945);€ò òòòBaggett€v.€Baggettó óóó,€541€S.W.2d€407,€409„10Ï(Tenn.€1976);€ò òòòFernandez€v.€Fernandezóóó ó,€No.€85„194„II,€1986€WL€6842,€at€*2€(Tenn.€App.ÏJune€18,€1986).€€Therefore,€a€court€cannot,€in€a€divorce€decree,€distribute€the€marital€property€of€aÏnon„resident€party€if€that€property€is€outside€the€state€and€the€state€does€not€have€personalÏjurisdiction€over€that€party.€€ò òòòSeeó óóó€ò òòòClouse€v.€Clouseóóó ó,€185€Tenn.€666,€670„76,€207€S.W.2d€576,Ï578„80€(1948);€ò òòòCory€v.€Olmsteadóóó ó,€154€Tenn.€513,€516„17,€290€S.W.€31,€32€(1926);Ïòòò òGilliland€v.€Stanleyóóó ó,€No.€3258,€1997€WL€180587,€at€*2€(Tenn.€App.€Apr.€16,€1997).€€InÏorder€for€a€state€to€have€personal€jurisdiction€over€a€non„resident€party,€the€state€must€achieveÏservice€of€process€and€must€also€have€minimum€contacts€with€the€individual.€€ò òòòSee€InternationalÏShoeóóó ó,€326€U.S.€at€316,€66€S.€Ct.€at€158;€ò òòòMasada€Investment€Corp.€v.€Allenóóó ó,€697€S.W.2dÏ332,€334€(Tenn.€1985).€€Generally,€these€contacts€must€be€such€that€the€party€ð ðshould€reasonablyÏanticipate€being€haled€into€courtðð€in€that€state.€€ò òòòWorld„Wide€Volkswagen€Corp.€v.ÏWoodsonó óóó,€444€U.S.€286,€297,€100€S.€Ct.€559,€567,€62€L.€Ed.€2d€490€(1980);€ò òòòMasadaóóó ó,€697ÏS.W.2d€at€334.€€Therefore,€in€this€case,€if€Illinois€had€not€established€personal€jurisdiction€overÏWife,€this€Court€is€not€required€to€give€full€faith€and€credit€to€that€part€of€the€Illinois€decree€whichÏis€void€for€lack€of€personal€jurisdiction.€€ò òòòSeeó óóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€26„6„101€ò òòòet€œseq.€ó óóó(1980);›Ïò òòòFour€Seasons€Gardening€&€Landscaping,€œInc.€v.€Crouchó óóó,›€688€S.W.2d€439,€443„46Ï(Tenn.€App.€1984).Ìà àIn€order€to€determine€whether€Illinois€had€personal€jurisdiction€over€Wife,€it€is€necessary€toÏlook€to€the€jurisdictional€statutes€of€that€state.€€ò òòòSee€Fordjour€v.€Fordjouró óóó,€Shelby€Equity€No.Ïœ54,€1986›€WL€5037,€at€*4€(Tenn.€App.€Apr.€29,€1986);€ò òòòFour€Seasons€Gardeningó óóó,€688ÍS.W.2d€at€444.€€The€applicable€Illinois€statute€is€735€Illinois€Compiled€Statutes€ðð€œ5/2„209€(1997),›Ïwhich€provides,€in€pertinent€part:ÌÓÓà8 à(a)€€Any€person,€whether€or€not€a€citizen€or€resident€of€this€State,€who€in€person€orÏthrough€an€agent€does€any€of€the€acts€hereinafter€enumerated,€thereby€submits€suchÏperson,€and,€if€an€individual,€his€or€her€personal€representative,€to€the€jurisdictionÏof€the€courts€of€this€State€as€to€any€cause€of€action€arising€from€the€doing€of€any€ofÏsuch€acts:ÌÌà8 àà à(1)€€The€transaction€of€any€business€within€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(2)€€The€commission€of€a€tortious€act€within€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(3)€€The€ownership,€use,€or€possession€of€any€real€estate€situated€in€thisÏState;Ìà8 àà à(4)€€Contracting€to€insure€any€person,€property€or€risk€located€within€thisÏState€at€the€time€of€contracting;Ìà8 àà àò òòò(5)€€With€respect€to€actions€of€dissolution€of€marriage,Ïdeclaration€of€invalidity€of€marriage€and€legal€separation,€theÏmaintenance€in€this€State€of€a€matrimonial€domicile€at€the€time€thisÏcause€of€action€arose€or€the€commission€in€this€State€of€any€actÏgiving€rise€to€the€cause€of€action;óóó óÌà8 àà à(6)€€With€respect€to€actions€brought€under€the€Illinois€Parentage€Act€ofÏ1984,€as€now€or€hereafter€amended,€the€performance€of€an€act€of€sexual€intercourseÏwithin€this€State€during€the€possible€period€of€conception;Ìà8 àà à(7)€€The€making€or€performance€of€any€contract€or€promise€substantiallyÏconnected€with€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(8)€€The€performance€of€sexual€intercourse€within€this€State€which€isÏclaimed€to€have€resulted€in€the€conception€of€a€child€who€resides€in€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(9)€€The€failure€to€support€a€child,€spouse€or€former€spouse€who€hasÏcontinued€to€reside€in€this€State€since€the€person€either€formerly€resided€with€themÏin€this€State€or€directed€them€to€reside€in€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(10)€€The€acquisition€of€ownership,€possession€or€control€of€any€asset€orÏthing€of€value€present€within€this€State€when€ownership,€possession€or€control€wasÏacquired;Ìà8 àà à(11)€€The€breach€of€any€fiduciary€duty€within€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(12)€€The€performance€of€duties€as€a€director€or€officer€of€a€corporationÏorganized€under€the€laws€of€this€State€or€having€its€principal€place€of€businessÏwithin€this€State;Ìà8 àà à(13)€€The€ownership€of€an€interest€in€any€trust€administered€within€thisÏState;€orÌà8 àà à(14)€€The€exercise€of€powers€granted€under€the€authority€of€this€State€as€aÏfiduciary.ÌÌà8 àà à(b)€€A€court€may€exercise€jurisdiction€in€any€action€arising€within€or€withoutÏthis€State€against€any€person€who:ÌÌà8 àà à(1)€€Is€a€natural€person€present€within€this€State€when€served;Ìà8 àà à(2)€€Is€a€natural€person€domiciled€or€resident€within€this€State€when€theÏcause€of€action€arose,€the€action€was€commenced,€or€process€was€served;Ìà8 àà à(3)€€Is€a€corporation€organized€under€the€laws€of€this€State;€orÌà8 àà à(4)€€Is€a€natural€person€or€corporation€doing€business€within€this€State.ÌÌà8 àà à(c)€€A€court€may€also€exercise€jurisdiction€on€any€other€basis€now€orÏhereafter€permitted€by€the€Illinois€Constitution€and€the€Constitution€of€the€UnitedÏStates.ÌÌÓÓœ(emphasis›€added).€€Under€this€statute,€it€is€apparent€that€the€Illinois€court€did€not€have€personalÏjurisdiction€over€Wife.€€Other€than€having€her€attorney€write€a€letter€to€Husbandððs€attorney,€WifeÏhad€no€contact€with€Illinois.€€She€put€in€no€appearance€in€the€divorce€suit,€not€even€to€answer€theÏcomplaint.€€The€marital€domicile€was€not€located€in€Illinois,€and€Wife€never€committed€in€IllinoisÏany€of€the€acts€which€led€to€the€divorce.Ìà àWe€must€therefore€conclude€that€the€Illinois€court€did€not€have€personal€jurisdiction€overÏWife€in€order€to€distribute€marital€property€œin€Tennessee€in›€which€Wife€had€an€interest.€ÏConsequently,€€Tennessee€courts€are€not€required€to€give€full€faith€and€credit€to€the€Illinois€courtððsÏaward€of€the€marital€residence€to€Husband.€€Wifeððs€affidavit€raises€genuine€issues€of€material€factÏregarding€her€property€interest€in€the€marital€residence€and€the€propriety€of€the€Illinois€courtððsÏaward€of€that€property€to€Husband.€€Therefore,€we€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€grant€of€summaryÏjudgment€and€remand€for€further€proceedings.Ìà à€We€note€that€Tennessee€has€long€recognized€that€a€foreign€divorce€decree€can€be€given€fullÏfaith€and€credit€to€the€extent€that€it€dissolves€a€marital€relationship€without€giving€full€comity€to€thatÏpart€of€the€decree€which€violates€the€constitutional€rights€of€one€of€the€parties.€€ò òòòSeeó óóó€ò òòòBaggettó óóó,€541ÏS.W.2d€at€œ409„10;›€ò òòòBurtonóóó ó,€52€Tenn.€App.€at€504„11,€376€S.W.2d€at€œ514„17;›€òòò òToncrayóóó ó,€123ÏTenn.€at€481„92,€131€S.W.€at€œ978„80.›€€Thus,€on€remand,€the€validity€of€the€underlying€divorceÏneed€not€be€addressed,€only€the€issues€raised€by€Wife€regarding€the€marital€œproperty€in€Tennessee.›ÌœÇ›à àThe€decision€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed,€and€this€matter€is€remanded€for€furtherÏproceedings€consistent€with€this€Opinion.€€Costs€are€adjudged€against€Appellee,€for€whichÏexecution€may€issue€if€necessary.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àà àò òóóHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌóóALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€J.ÌÌÌòòÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÌDAVID€R.€FARMER,€J.ó óÌ€€€€€€€€€