WPC. +]>Vڮ|a=wM*,I# ظ \3栩Q'ExuwlrD9@WVjymVmH d3ncY_- e+4ZiS 7 ͻG1Z)82aC?"1!ʓw51$҉ |(_[{yx#oh4s;+}O/6 ݔHfNOhԦe$hP^E~!R9EJqCޖ5y%H9Q ^X).[s&>W=(.k[qpO,980"CZY)M5hLzߗHJiݞˀrM15u]* \"28)l\EG.s*;hnFh``E1 i"&WPs۲@<E__/{4F Z 0(i  w@   UN U:0  j U:s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s UB % B D3   0DE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E AO  0D D/ Bf|$3|x($ {DDUDӀ XaXXX@XXa   Ad FILEDXaX@   July9,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr.XXaAppellateCourtClerk (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular,cAZ"Arial Regular  XaXXX @X Xa   Ad FILED XaX @   July8,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. X XaAppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX d%%%%'dxd(3$ !  -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd !    TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T79XXdd7XPyXXXXXPyr*<,(j 8` `@E ` ttx$ rr *<,(j 8` `@E ` ttx$ r񀀀@j j  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @>>%ATKNOXVILLE KEITHJOHNSON,etux,etal.,    )C/ANO.03A019710CV00464    4    <     ) 4 PlaintiffsAppellants,    )BLOUNTCIRCUIT   4    <     )v. 4    <     )HON.W.DALEYOUNG,    4    <     )JUDGEFORTUNESUNTOLD,INC.,d/b/a  )   EASYMONEYPAWNSHOP,etal.,  )AFFIRMED    4    <     )AND 4 DefendantsAppellees.    )REMANDED  ̛̜KEVINW.SHEPHERD,SHEPHERD&WHITE,P.A.,Maryville,forPlaintiffsAppellantsLanceDenaultandDinaDenault.ROCKFORDED.KINGandWESLEYL.HATMAKER,EGERTON,McAFEE,ARMISTEAD&DAVIS,P.C.,Knoxville,forDefendantAppelleeFortunesUntold,Inc.,d/b/aEasyMoneyPawnShop.WILLIAMA.YOUNG,ONEIL,PARKER&WILLIAMSON,Knoxville,forDefendantAppelleeFinchumConstructionCompany,Inc.LINDAJ.HAMILTONMOWLES,LEWIS,KING,KRIEG,WALDROP&CATRON,P.C.,Knoxville,forDefendantAppelleeHackneyPetroleum,Inc.@% OPINION  *##  4    <      D   Franks,J. 4  TheTrialdismissedplaintiffscausesofactionforpersonalinjuryonthebasisthatthestatuteoflimitationshadrunbeforetheactionwasproperlybrought,pursuanttoRule3,T.R.C.P. 4  ThegenesisofthiscasewasanaccidentwhichoccurredonMay2,1996.PlaintiffDinaDenaultwasleavingthepremisesofDefendantEasyMoneyPawnShopinBlountCounty,andwhilebacking,hercarfellintoanexposedtrench. :23 DefendantFinchumConstructionCompanyhadopenedtheexcavationwhileinstallingutilitiesforDefendantHackneyPetroleum,Inc.AlsopresentinthecarwereDenaultsminorsonJacob,AngelaJohnsonandJohnsonsthreeminorchildren. 4  OnMay2,1997,thesepartiesfiledacomplaintagainstthethreedefendantsforpersonalinjuryandfordamagetothecar.AlthoughthecomplaintwasfiledonMay2,1997,thesummonswasnotfileduntilMay5,1997.ThedefendantsmovedforeitheraSummaryJudgmentoraJudgmentonthePleadings,claimingthatthestatuteoflimitationsforpersonalinjurieshadexpired.TheTrialCourtgrantedDefendantsmotionsanddismissedtheplaintiffspersonalinjuryclaims.Thechildrensclaimswerenotdismissedbecausetheirminoritytolledthestatueoflimitations. 4  ThepartiesagreethatthepersonalinjuryclaimsaregovernedbyT.C.A.283104,whichprovidesthatallactionsforpersonalinjurymustbebroughtwithinoneyearoftheaccrualofthecauseofaction.Inthiscase,theaccidentoccurredonMay2,1996,andthecomplaintwasfiledonMay2,1997,butnosummonswasfileduntilMay5. 4  AtthetimeT.R.C.P.3providedinpertinentpart:8 4 0 4 4 AllcivilactionsarecommencedbyfilingaComplaintandSummonswiththeClerkoftheCourt.AnactioniscommencedwithinthemeaningofanystatuteoflimitationsuponsuchfilingofaComplaintandSummons,whetherprocessbeissuedornotissued,andwhetherprocessbereturnedservedorunserved...    4  ItisundisputedthatplaintiffsdidnotfileasummonswiththeClerkwithinoneyearoftheaccident.Thus,thepersonalinjuryactionwasnotproperly commencedwithinthemeaningofthestatute.WehaveconsideredthisissuepreviouslyinCareyv.Bourne,1997WL585750(Tenn.App.).InCarey,theplaintiff 5.. filedsuitformalpractice.TheoneyearstatuteoflimitationsbegantorunonMay26,Ϝ1994andtheplaintifffiledacomplaintonMay3,1995butdidnotfileasummons 922 untilMay30.Thecourtheldthatthemerefilingofthecomplaintwas insufficienttocommenceacauseofactionunderRule3...Id.at*4.Thecourtininterpretingthe   sameversionofRule3atissueinthiscase,said:8 4 0 4 4 [T]heactionwascommencedonMay30,1995,thedatetheamendedcomplaintandsummonswerefiled...Therefore,theactionisbarredbytheoneyearstatuteoflimitationsapplicabletomedicalmalpracticeclaims.   Id.at*5.TheresultinCareyandtheholdingoftheTrialJudgeinthiscaseisare 4,  consistentwiththeplainlanguageofRule3whichwasineffectatthetimethisactionwasfiled. 4  PlaintiffsarguethatRule3wasrepealedbyimplicationwhenRule4.07wasenacted.Thisissuewasnotraisedattrial,andgenerally,issuesnotraisedattrialcannotberaisedforthefirsttimeonappeal.StateDept.OfHumanServicesv. \T Defriece,937S.W.2d954,960(Tenn.App.1996);B&BDist.Co.v.Metropolitan d\ Nashville,667S.W.2d751(Tenn.App.1983).Moreover,thereisapresumption l d againstrepealbyimplication,Jenkinsv.LoudonCounty,736S.W.2d603(Tenn. t"l 1987). 4  Fortheforegoingreasons,weaffirmthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtandremandatappellantscost.Ӝ 4 @+ D  +$$  4    <     __________________________ ,%%  4    <     HerschelP.Franks,J.CONCUR:___________________________DonT.McMurray,J.̜___________________________WilliamH.Inman,Sr.J.