ÿWPC_  Ó]–ýF‡³>È#<îÞ!…Ô[=‚°Û»ºŽ‘#{&]ö¿›Æ)83Á?Ù䈅ȼÃrmèºõk­£H…dÆj¬ÉNªðw/K mkèž¡­Å|%„0“’ÚÌU ô=½ÎÏPcôgÜ“{–yìDÙ Íü$ÿ8‘ø ®“K–+r‚æÇöÎ''šèI }Í覕C¾év-úuOâ,% Q‚c²G¸É&¹Î;=hcEÄ/½~8"B%¨p-+tÞâ\ô§ñ°77Éš[.¤AÝÎøœ"^´Tö“Fbí€Á >Åœ/cÒÇ5B´GJÑlÃë–0æCíËÝ×0S±øO•ÒD>@QÈ xG¿•ÖaŸ­»ÈÁç'›lJæÎ¨Õ@ ±”T“êŠR×ågÁå?€òèËìËNízSÎî•üQkOs{ÈçÛÿìÃêXæ¾quJ9VQëé÷‚€.Ë®ººb» ý3—-e™€®ó½Â­& QD1q¡1K0ÓÖ¶&û)°û;zí~\˜»àЙJXû{~®_Û‹"B:a§ìaSP]µY¬ |‡û¨(Üîkƒ:‹ge8™ƒóàD±jÞ¹¯­’ÈÜC°_H¼Þ­›È_ ¾¥I}«´ zÏé€)# >UNI %— 0(UNÅw@4Sgv(~U:¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ AQàÆ1 0D÷ 0D; 0D  D/à Bò B D3, ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡'Ör Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular “D”•D–g—v˜d™EšV›Ó€§n~<$Ô3|x§ Ý ƒ!¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ XlXXXÔÔ€ Ã2X XlÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ XlX Ã2ÔÐ  ÐÌò òDecember€3,€1998Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ ô î ôX XlÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular !"#%Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó'''÷ÿ dxd düÿP Pd&&&&'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ‡XfHXXXÔÓ  ÓÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑñ–ñÑ7€ìåXXdðdÈ7Ññ–ñò òñ–ñÑ7€ÈXXdðXXdð7Ññ–ññ§ññ›ñßr€ (<,(j 8` `€€@Eȱ` ttx$°ð Õrßñ›ññ§ññ§ññ§ñà@ ìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEó óˆÐ ° Ðò òñ§ñßt€ (>.*jx^¤` `€€@E&@` ttx$^œN x tßñ§ñà@kk%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ œì Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ˆØ ЛÌóóÌPATSY€LOREAN€JOHNSON,€€€€à h à€€€à À à)à  àÐ L œ Ðó óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àò ò)ó óÐ 8 ˆ Ðà  àPlaintiff/Appellee,€€€€€€€€ò òà h àà À à)à  àó óShelby€Chancery€No.€D„13441„3€€Ð $ t Ðò òà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)ó óà  àà p àÐ  d Ðò òv.à  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à€Ð  P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àÐ ì <  МJAMES›€LARRY€JOHNSON,à h à€à À à)à  àó óAppeal€No.€02A01„9703„CH„00069ò òÐ Ø(  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ìà  àó óDefendant/Appellant.ò òà  àà h àà À à)Ð ´  ЀÌÌà@ƒƒìàó óAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€SHELBY€COUNTY€€€ˆÐ |Ì Ðà@óóìàAT€MEMPHIS,€TENNESSEE€€ˆÌÌÌà@¿ ¿ ìàTHE€HONORABLE€D.€J.€ALISSANDRATOS,€CHANCELLORˆÌòòÌÌÌFor€the€Plaintiff/Appelleeóó:òòà  àà h àà À àFor€the€Defendant/Appellantóó:òòÐ Ü, ÐóóÌœCharlie›€R.€Ashford€€à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àLawrence€W.€White€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð ´ ÐMemphis,€Tennessee€€€à  àà h à€€€€€€€€€€€€Memphis,€Tennessee€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð  ð Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ÌÌÌò òÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAFFIRMEDÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àó óHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.Ð %P # ÐÌÌÌCONCURS:ÌòòÌóóDAVID€R.€FARMER,€J.Ð ˆ*Ø%) ÐÌœHEWITT›€P.€TOMLIN,€JR.,€SR.J.ÌÔ‡Pu;PXXfHÔÔ#†P3ìPPPu;#ÔÔ‡Pu;PPP3ìÔÐ  L-œ(, Ðñ—ñØØñ—ñÓÓñ—ñœñ—ññ—ñÑ7€ÈXXdðXXdð7Ññ—ññ˜ññ—ñœñ—ññ˜ññ˜ñÑ  Ññ˜ñà@>>'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ° Ðà  àThis€is€a€divorce€case.€€In€the€original€divorce,€years€ago,€the€wife€was€awarded€shares€of€stockÏfrom€the€husbandððs€pension€fund.€€Subsequently,€the€pension€fund€was€distributed€to€the€husband,€withÏno€monies€going€to€the€wife.€€In€this€action,€the€trial€court€awarded€the€wife€a€judgment€for€the€valueÏof€the€stock€at€the€time€of€the€trial€courtððs€order.€€The€husband€appeals.€€We€affirm.Ìà  àPatsy€Lorean€Johnson€(ð ðWifeðð)€filed€for€divorce€from€James€Larry€Johnson€(ð ðHusbandðð)€inÏShelby€County,€Tennessee,€on€October€8,€œ1985.ò ò€€ó óDuring›€the€litigation,€Husband€threatened€œthat›€heÐ tÄ  Ðwould€quit€his€job€and€collect€his€pension€before€he€would€pay€Wife€alimony€or€agree€to€a€division€ofÏthe€marital€assets.€€The€trial€court€then€entered€an€injunction€prohibiting€Husbandððs€employer€fromÏdistributing€to€Husband€ð ðany€savings,€œpensionñ–ñ›ñ–ñ€or›€profit€sharing€funds,€or€other€retirement€funds,Ïpending€further€orders€of€this€Court.ðð€This€injunction€was€never€modified€or€lifted.€Ìà  àThe€final€decree€of€divorce€was€entered€on€December€19,€1986.€€The€decree€awarded€œWife:ÌÓÓà8  àthe›€exclusive€ownership€of€a€one€half€(ðð)€interest€in€any€and€all€pension€funds,€profitÏsharing€accounts,€savings€or€stock€accounts€held€in€the€name€of€or€for€the€use€andÏbenefit€of€the€defendant,€James€Larry€Johnson,€by€his€employer,€Buckeye€CelluloseÏCompany,€any€of€its€agents,€fiduciaries€or€depositories€and€said€interest€shall€be€vestedÏand€determined€as€of€December€15,€œ1986.Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓNothing›€was€done€at€that€time€to€transfer€Wifeððs€interest€to€her.€€Husband€continued€to€work€forÏBuckeye€Cellulose€after€the€divorce.€€Ìà  àIn€May€1996,€Wife€filed€a€petition€to€require€Husband€to€disclose€his€pension€and€profit€sharingÏfunds.€€After€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€that,€in€1993,€the€pension€funds€had€been€distributed€toÏHusband€with€no€funds€going€to€Wife.€€The€trial€œcourtððs€findings€may€be€summarized›€as€follows:€ÌÓÓà8  à1.à ` àIn€the€partiesðð€divorce€decree€dated€December€19,€1986,€Wife€was€awardedÐ ¤(ô#( Ðone„half€of€Husbandððs€pension,€savings€and€profit€sharing€accounts€with€his€employer,ÏBuckeye€€Cellulose€œCompany.›Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ2.›€à ` àœHusbandððs€employer,€however,€never›€transferred€œthe€funds€into›€Wifeððs€name.ÐV+¦&+Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ3.›à ` àThe€entire€pension€fund€was€distributed€to€Husband€on€or€about€March€16,Ð <,Œ', Ð1993.Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ4.›à ` àHusband€did€not€deliver€to€Wife€her€share€of€the€funds.Ð.X).Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ5.›à ` àAt€the€time€of€the€divorce,€Wife€was€entitled€to€533.802€shares€of€Proctor€andÐ î.>*/ ÐGamble€common€stock€and€cash€amounting€to€$2,557.87.Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ6.›à ` àThe€shares€have€split€two€for€one€on€October€20,€1989€and€again€on€May€15,Ð º0 ,1 Ð1992.Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ7.›à ` àAt€the€time€of€distribution€in€1993,€Wife€was€entitled€to€2,135.208€shares€ofÐ †2Ö-3 ÐProctor€&€Gamble€stock,€and€share€value€as€of€September€17,€1996€was€$93.00€perÏshare.Ð Ð Ð  Ðà8  àœ8.›à ` àPlaintiff€is€entitled€to€receive€the€sum€of€$198,574.34€for€her€shares,€plus€theÐ 85ˆ06 Ðcash€award€of€$2,557.87,€for€a€total€award€of€$201,132.21.Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓThe€trial€court€also€found€Husband€in€contempt,€and€ordered€him€incarcerated€until€he€purged€himselfÏof€the€contempt€by€payment€of€the€judgment.€€Husband€was€later€released€from€custody€and€filed€thisÏappeal.€€Ð ‚;Ò6=  Ðà  àWe€review€the€trial€courtððs€findings€òòde€novoóó,€with€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€trialÐ ° Ðcourtððs€findings€of€œfact.€€òòò òSeeó óóó€Tenn.›€R.€App.€P.€13(d).€€ð ðTrial€courts€are€entitled€to€broad€discretion€inÐ |Ì Ðadjudicating€the€rights€of€parties€in€a€divorce€œcase.€€òòñ˜ñò òó óñ˜ñóóDecisions›€based€upon€this€discretion€are€entitledÐ Lœ Ðto€great€weight.ðð€œòòò òCutsinger€v.€Cutsingeró óóó,€917€S.W.2d€238,€243€(Tenn.€App.€1995)€(citations€omitted).€Ð  h ÐÔ#†P£¿PPP%?¿ #ÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿ÔÔ#†XöXPP%?} #ÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔòòò òñ˜ñ›ñ˜ñó óóóNoÔ#†P£¿PPP%? #ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿K#ÔÔ‡XöXXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔ›€transcript€or€statement€of€the€evidence€was€filed€in€this€case,€so€our€review€is€confined€to€theÐ è 8 Ðtechnical€record.€€€€Ô#†P£¿PPP%?É#ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿è#ÔÔ‡P£¿PXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿Ôòòò òà ¸ àó óóóÐ ´   Ðà  àœHusband›€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€him€incarcerated€for€civil€contempt€untilÏhe€paid€Wife€the€sum€of€$201,132.21,€an€amount€representing€the€present€value€of€the€pension€account.€ÏHusband€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€have€instead€awarded€Wife€$49,000,€which€represents€theÏvalue€of€Wifeððs€œfifty„percent›€interest€in€the€pension€fund€in€1986,€when€the€divorce€decree€was€entered.€ÏOn€appeal,€Husband€does€not€challenge€his€incarceration,€only€the€amount€of€the€money€judgmentÏrendered€against€him.€Ìà  àAt€the€time€of€the€divorce,€under€the€trial€courtððs€orders,€Wife€was€entitled€to€533.802€sharesÏof€Proctor€and€Gamble€common€stock.€€The€shares€split€two€for€one€on€October€20,€1989€and€againÏon€May€15,€1992€to€result€in€a€total€of€2,135.208€shares.€€Share€value€as€of€September€17,€1996€wasÏ$93.00€per€share,€for€a€total€cash€value€ofÔ#†P£¿PPP%?ø#ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿Ù#ÔÔ‡XöXXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔ€$198,574.34Ô#†XöXPP%?&##ÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔÔ#†P£¿PPP%?##ÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿Ô.€Ð ¬ü Ðà  àHusband€claims€that€the€trial€court€should€not€have€included€in€œits›€valuation€stock€splits€thatÏoccurred€twice€during€the€ten€years€since€œthe€divorce›€decree,€alleging€that€this€valuation€is€"arbitraryÏand€without€a€factual€basis."€€The€divorce€decree€states€that€Wife's€interest€"shall€be€vested€andÏdetermined€as€of€December€19,€œ1986."€€Therefore,›€Husband€claims€that€the€trial€court€should€not€haveÏused€present€day€dollars€to€determine€the€value€of€Wife's€percentage.€€Husband€alleges€that€the€divorceÏdecree€could€not€have€granted€the€trial€court€jurisdiction€to€divide€property€acquired€in€the€future.Ìà  àIn€dividing€marital€assets,€one€of€two€methods€may€be€employed€to€value€and€distribute€pensionÏbenefits.€€In€the€first€method,€the€trial€court€determines€the€present€cash€value€of€the€pension€at€the€timeÏof€the€dissolution€of€the€marriage.€€The€trial€court€then€determines€the€value€of€the€percentage€owedÏto€the€non„employee€spouse€and€ð ðawards€the€other€spouse€marital€property€of€equal€value.ðð€ò òòòKendrickÐ ¤1ô,2 Ðv.€Kendrickó óóó,€902€S.W.2d€918,€œ927€(Tenn.›€App.€1994).€€The€second€method,€called€the€ð ðretainedÐ t3Ä.4 Ðjurisdictionðð€method,€ð ðrequires€the€court€to€retain€jurisdiction€over€the€case€and€to€defer€dividing€theÏpension€interest€until€the€pension€vests€or€œmatures.ð𛀜òòò òId.ó óóó;òòò ò›€see€Cohen€v.€Cohenó óóó,€937€S.W.2d€823€(Tenn.€œñšñÐ  7`28 Ðñšñ1996).›€€œUnder€this›€œmethod,›€the€trial€œcourt€retains›€jurisdiction€to€oversee€the€payment€of€œbenefits.€€òòò òSee›Ð ° ÐCohenó óóó,€937€S.W.2d€at€831.€Ð €Ð ÐÔ#†P£¿PPP%?¶##ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿t##Ôà  àIn€this€case,€the€trial€courtððs€1986€permanent€injunction€stated€that€ð ðno€funds€shall€beÐ P  Ðdistributed€to€[Husband]€from€any€savings,€pension€or€profit€sharing€funds,€or€other€retirement€funds,Ïpending€further€orders€of€this€Court.ðð€€In€the€1986€final€decree€of€divorce,€the€trial€court€awardedÏWife:ÌÓÓà8  àœthe›€exclusive€ownership€of€a€one€half€(ðð)€interest€in€any€and€all€pension€funds,€profitÏsharing€accounts,€savings€or€stock€accounts€held€in€the€name€of€or€for€the€use€€andÏbenefit€of€the€defendant,€James€Larry€Johnson,€by€his€employer,€Buckeye€CelluloseÏCompany,€any€of€its€agents,€fiduciaries€or€depositories€and€said€interest€shall€beÏvested€and€determined€as€of€December€15,€1986.€€And€said€interest€shall€be€paid€toÏher€at€the€earliest€date€allowable;€that€any€of€œdefendants€[sic]›€interest€in€and€to€saidÏone„half€(ðð)€of€said€fund€is€devested€out€of€defendant€and€vested€in€plaintiff€and€anyÏinterest€of€the€plaintiff€in€the€balance€is€divested€out€of€her€and€vested€in€theÏdefendant.Ð Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓThe€final€decree€of€divorce€did€not€mention€the€earlier€permanent€injunction€and€made€œno€further›Ïprovision€to€distribute€Wifeððs€interest€in€the€pension€funds€to€her.€€Ìà  àTherefore,€the€trial€courtððs€final€decree€of€divorce€does€not€state€expressly€whether€theÏpension€funds€were€valued€by€the€present€cash€value€method€or€the€retained€jurisdiction€method.€ÏHusband€argues€that,€in€the€judgment€that€is€the€subject€of€this€appeal,€Ô‡P£¿PXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿Ôthe€trial€court€erred€in€theÐ °  Ðvaluation€of€the€pension€because€Wifeððs€interest€should€have€been€limited€to€a€portion€of€the€benefitsÏthat€Husband€earned€during€the€marriage,€œand€any›€accrual€beyond€that€amount€belonged€to€him.€ÏÔ#†P£¿PPP%?é0#ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿Ê0#ÔHowever,€in€the€1986€decree,€the€trial€court€simply€awarded€Wife€a€fixed€percentage€of€the€sharesÐ <&Œ!$ Ðof€stock€in€the€pension€fund,€and€left€in€place€the€permanent€injunction€prohibiting€the€distributionÏof€the€pension€fund€to€Husband.€€Therefore,€it€is€clear€that€the€trial€court€in€its€1986€decree€did€notÏvalue€the€pension€fund€under€the€ð ðpresent€valueðð€method,€because€no€shares€of€stock€or€equivalentÏmonies€were€distributed€to€Wife.€€Implicitly,€by€fixing€Wifeððs€share€of€the€pension€fund€and€leavingÏin€place€the€injunction€against€its€distribution,€the€trial€court€retained€jurisdiction€over€the€pensionÏfund€to€be€distributed€at€a€later€date.Ìà  àHusband€argues€that,€by€awarding€Wife€a€judgment€that€gives€her€the€benefit€of€stock€splitsÏand€increases€in€value€after€the€final€decree€of€divorce,€the€trial€court€erroneously€awarded€Wife€aÏdivision€of€property€out€of€Husbandððs€future€earnings€or€property€acquired€in€the€future.Ô‡XöXXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔ€€In€supportÐ 7l26 Ðof€his€contention,€Husband€cites€òòò òEttinger€v.€Ettingeró óóó,€637€P.2d€63€(Okla.€1981).€€In€òòò òEttingeró óóó,€œthe€wife›Ð 9`48 Ðclaimed€a€one„half€interest€in€stockòòò ò€ó óoptionsò ò€ó óóóthat€her€former€husband€would€receive€from€his€employerÐ ° Ðsome€time€in€the€future.€€The€ò òòòEttingeró óóó€court€found€that€it€was€ð ðwithout€œauthority›€to€make€a€divisionÐ €Ð Ðof€property€out€of€.€.€.€ððfuture€acquired€property.ðððð€òòò òId.ó óóó€at€65.€€It€stated€that€ð ð[s]tock€options€not€inÐ P  Ðexistence€at€the€time€of€the€entering€of€the€divorce€decree,€and€over€which€[Husband]€had€no€interestÏwhatsoever,€is€simply€not€property€acquired€by€[Wife]€and€[Husband]€during€coverture€and€thereforeÏis€not€subject€to€being€divided€by€the€court.ðð€òòò òId.ó óóó€Ð ¸   Ðà  àœTherefore,›€in€òòò òEttingeró óóó,€the€wife€sought€division€of€stock€options€not€yet€earned€by€the€husbandÐ ˆØ  Ðat€the€time€of€the€divorce€decree.€€In€contrast,€in€this€case,€Wife€received€in€the€1986€divorce€decreeÏshares€of€stock€that€were€in€existence€at€the€time€of€the€divorce.€€These€shares€increased€in€number€andÏin€value€as€the€result€of€economic€factors€outside€the€partiesðð€control.€€The€increase€in€value€of€WifeððsÏshare€in€the€pension€was€not€contingent€upon€any€action€by€Husband,€such€as€his€continuedÏemployment€with€that€company.€€Ìà  àThe€facts€in€this€case€are€analogous€to€those€in€ò òòòBigbie€v.€Bigbieó óóó,€œ898€P.2d€1271€(Okla.€1995).›€Ð T¤ ÐIn€òòò òBigbieó óóó,€the€husband,€an€insurance€agent,€claimed€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€considering€Ô#†XöXPP%?66#ÔÔ‡P%?PXXöÔÔ#†P£¿PPP%?6#ÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿ÔfutureÐ $t Ðcommissions€on€renewals€of€insurance€policies€as€marital€assets€and€not€as€ð ðfuture€acquired€property.ððÐ ôD Мòòò òBigbieó óóó,›€œ898€P.2d€at›€1272.€€The€appellate€court€found€that€the€anticipated€renewal€commissions€wereÐ À Ðproperly€designated€as€marital€property€because€œð ðthe›€husband€was€entitled€to€receive€the€income€underÏa€contractual€agreement€with€the€insurance€company€which€also€provided€for€the€husbandððs€heirs€toÏreceive€the€renewal€commissions€in€the€event€of€his€death€and€allowed€the€husband€to€assign€theÏcommissions€under€certain€œcircumstances.ððòòò ò›€Id.ó óóó€at€1273€œ(citing›€ò òòòNiroo€v.€Nirooóóó ó,€545€A.2d€35€(Md.Ð ô&D"& Ð1988)).€€As€inòòò ò€Bigbieó óóó,€in€this€case,€Husband€was€entitled€to€receive€the€pension€under€a€contractualÐ Ä($( Ðarrangement€with€his€employer€established€at€the€time€of€the€divorce€decree.€€òòò òSee€also€Pascale€v.Ð ”*ä%* ÐPascaleó óóó,€660€A.2d€485,€498€(N.J.€1995)€(ð ð[S]tock€options€awarded€after€the€marriage€has€terminatedÐ d,´', Ðbut€obtained€as€a€result€of€efforts€expended€during€the€marriage€should€be€subject€to€equitableÏdistribution.ðð).€€Ìà  àIt€must€be€noted€that€post„marriage€appreciation€of€a€marital€asset€is€not€marital€property.€€òòò òSeeó óóóÐ Ì1-2 Ðò òòòFox€v.€Foxóóó ó,€441€S.E.2d€613,€616€(N.C.€App.€1994).€€However,€after€the€1986€decree€of€divorce,Ð œ3ì.4 ÐWifeððs€share€of€the€pension€fund€was€no€longer€marital€property;€rather,€it€was€Wifeððs€separateÏproperty.€€Husband€seeks€to€retain€the€benefit€of€the€stock€splits€and€their€increase€in€value,€but€afterÏthe€1986€decree,€those€shares€of€stock€no€longer€belonged€to€him.Ô#†XöXPP%?:=#ÔÔ#†XÜüXXXö|=#ÔÔ‡P£¿PXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿ÔÐ 9T4: Ðà  àHusband€also€asserts€that€Wife€should€be€barred€from€pursuing€her€claim€by€the€doctrine€ofÏlaches.€€Husband€contends€that€by€failing€to€bring€this€action€for€over€seven€years,€Wife€lost€her€rightsÏto€the€funds.€€Husband€points€to€no€place€in€the€record€before€this€Court€in€which€this€issue€was€raisedÏbefore€the€trial€court.€€It€is€well„settled€that€ð ð[i]ssues€not€raised€or€complained€of€in€the€trial€court€willÏnot€be€considered€on€appeal.ðð€ò òòòTops€Bar„B„Que,€Inc.€v.€Stringeróóó ó,€582€S.W.2d€756,€758€(Tenn.€App.Ð à 0 Ð1977);€òòò òsee€Carl€Clear€Coal€Corp.€v.€Huddlestonó óóó,€850€S.W.2d€140,€143„44€(Tenn.€App.€1992).€Ð °  ÐTherefore,€the€argument€will€not€be€considered€on€appeal.€€€Ô#†P£¿PPP%?ùD#ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿ÚD#ÔÔ‡P£¿PXXÜüÔÔ‡P%?PPP£¿ÔÐ €Ð  Ðà  àFinally,€Husband€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€determining€that€he€was€in€willfulÏcontempt€of€a€permanent€injunction€when€the€final€decree€of€divorce€did€not€mention€the€continuationÏof€the€injunction.€€As€noted€above,€we€have€no€transcript€or€statement€of€evidence€on€the€proceedingsÏbelow.€€The€trial€court's€findings€do€not€address€Husband's€alleged€violation€of€a€permanent€injunction.€ÏThe€technical€record€does€not€reflect€the€basis€for€the€finding€of€contempt.€€The€trial€courtððs€orderÏentered€on€September€20,€1996,€states€only€that€œHusband:ÌÓÓñ‘ñà8  àñ‘ñknew›€of€[Wifeððs]€interest€in€the€pension,€profit€sharing€and€savings€funds€distributedÏto€him€on€March€16,€1993;€that€he€has€failed€to€produce€records€of€transactions€or€toÏaccount€to€[Wife]€or€the€Court€for€the€funds€received€and€the€Court€finds€[Husband]Ïin€willful€Civil€Contempt€of€the€prior€Orders€of€the€Court€and€that€he€should€beÏincarcerated€until€he€has€purged€himself€of€said€Civil€œContempt.ñ™ñðð€›€›ñ™ñÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌÓÓ€Without›€an€appellate€record€setting€forth€the€factual€basis€for€the€trial€courtððs€ruling,€ð ðwe€must€assumeÏthat€the€record,€had€it€been€œpreseñ’ñrvñ’ññ“ñntñ“ñed,›€would€have€contained€sufficient€evidence€to€support€the€trialÏcourtððs€factual€findings.ðð€€€œòòò òSherrod›€v.€Wixó óóó,€849€S.W.2d€780,€783€(Tenn.€App.€1992).€€Therefore,€weÐ %` $ Ðmust€find€this€issue€to€be€without€merit.€ÌÔ#†P£¿PPP%?xH#ÔÔ#†XÜüXPP£¿YH#Ô€à  àThe€decision€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€Costs€are€assessed€against€the€Appellant,€forÐ ¬(ü#( Ðwhich€execution€may€issue,€if€necessary.€€ÌÌÔ‡XöXXXÜüÔñ”ñÓÓñ”ñà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð L.œ). Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òóóHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.Ð 8/ˆ*/ Ðó óà  àò òÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð À405 ÐóóDAVID€R.€FARMER,€J.Ð ¬5ü06 ÐÌòò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ „7Ô28 ÐHEWITT€P.€TOMLIN,€JR.,€œSR.J.ó óñ•ñÐ p8À39 Ðñ•ñÔ#†XÜüXXXö{O#Ôñ•ñ›Ð p8À39 ÐÐ p8À39 Ðñ•ñ›