WPC  &9ܨchq`/9z5+<\Bv.!&ڡԧq °n1c 5Np%wQ0"t#\(Ȳ<9QKc?_y^Wv! ɁtthAfJ.p*z(NQ}˨guo胙csvBEO_oӢ8|R%}I 2 l_rQ*pSjF'[sPIO*BB gȮmݭCSm4+ٝ6쿏=x!EwXF&5E=kK<؍N%Eݴ17bhL2T:@0{ȂO4MU0ٲ-vlh2oN>':-I(Y.?X43[V \;ݱXs%#1<)* P- s_XƬ땚o8@=L.*jx*` `@E ` 8ttxPV- tߛ  0      8     ) @ AppealNo.  X vs.  0      8     ) @ 01A019707CV00343  n   0      8     )KENNETHWAYNEROBSON,    ) @ SumnerCircuit J    0      8     ) @ No.16331C `    Defendant/Appellant. 8     ) v    COURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEMIDDLESECTIONATNASHVILLEAPPEALFROMTHECIRCUITCOURTFORSUMNERCOUNTY,ATGALLATIN,TENNESSEETHEHONORABLETHOMASGOODALL,JUDGE  MICHAELW.EDWARDS177EastMainStreetHendersonville,Tennessee37075 ATTORNEYFORPLAINTIFF/APPELLEETHOMASL.WHITESIDEFowlkes&Whiteside172SecondAvenueNorth,Suite204Nashville,Tennessee372011908 ATTORNEYFORDEFENDANT/APPELLANT  REVERSEDANDREMANDED   :L62w WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE  ,gOPINION  ,      g,Thiscaserepresentsanattemptonthepartoftheattorneyofasuccessful   divorcelitiganttoenforceanawardofattorneysfees,usingthecontemptpowersofthetrialcourthavingjurisdiction,inthenamenotoftheattorneybutofthelitigant.TherelevantfactsrevealthatthecourtbelowenteredafinaldecreeofdivorceinAppelleesfavor,whichstates:8 (12)Thecourtherebyawardsthe WIFE herreasonableattorneys !  feesdue MichaelW.Edwards intheamountof$5497.00as 7 alimonyinsolido,thesametobeconsideredajudgmentinfavorof M  MICHAELW.EDWARDS against HUSBAND,KENNETH c WAYNEROBSON ,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.)y ! !   Subsequently,thatorderwasamendedbyreducingtheawardto$2,997.00asalimonyinsolido.OnDecember4,1997,Appelleefiledapetitionforcontempt,citingasgrounds:+   8 @ I  8  0 ThesepartiesweredivorcedbyFinalDecreeofDivorceon d the1stdayofMay,1997,whereinjudgmentwasgrantedtothePetitionerinfavorofherattorney, MICHAELW.EDWARDS, in ! theamountofFiveThousandFourHundredNinetysevenand "  00/100Dollars($5,497.00)asalimonyinsolidoagainstthe # !  Respondent. $" " ! !   8 @ II  8  0 Subsequentlythereto,anAgreedOrderwasenteredonAugust8,1997,reducingtheamountofalimonyinsolido[attorneysfees]byTwoThousandFiveHundredand00/100 @*%' Dollars($2,500)tothesumofTwoThousandNineHundred V+&( Ninetysevenand00/100Dollars($2997.00),whichasofthisdate l,') remainsdue,owingandunpaidexceptforonepaymentofOne -(* Hundredand00/100Dollars($100.00)..)+ ! !  Ӝ̛ Theorderwhichisthesubjectofthisappeal,enteredonDecember18,1997,reads,inpertinentpart,asfollows:8 (1)KennethWayneRobsonisinwillfulanddeliberatecivilcontemptoftheCourtsorderfornonpaymentofalimonyinsolidointheamountof$2,897.00plusaccruedinterestof$260.73foratotalof$3,157.73.  ! !  t946 8 (2)ThecourtincarceratesKennethWayneRobsonintheSumnerCountyJailforsixmonthsoruntilhepurgeshimselfofcontemptbypaymenttotheClerkintheamountof$3,157.73.r947 ! ! М񀀀 Themainissuetobedecided,is,inAppellantswords:  М8 Whetherthetrialcourterredinconcludingthatanattorneycaninvokethecontemptpowersofthecourttoenforcecollectionofanattorneyfeeawardwhichwasdenominatedasalimonyinsolido.  ! ! М Afterdueconsiderationtocounselsableargumentonbothsidesandundertheauthoritiescitedbelow,thiscourtanswerstheaboveissueinthenegative. I. Contempt `    "InTennessee,thecourt'sauthoritytopunishcertainactsascontempt E  derivesfromstatuteandislimitedtotheformsofconductsetforthinTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection299102." Statev.Turner ,914S.W.2d951,955(Tenn. %u Ct.App.1995). Thisstatuteprovides:8  29-9-102.Scopeofpower. 󀄄Thepoweroftheseveralcourtsto  issueattachments,andinflictpunishmentsforcontemptofcourt,shallnotbeconstruedtoextendtoanyexceptthefollowingcases:  ! ! 8 (1)Thewillfulmisbehaviorofanypersoninthepresenceofthecourt,orsoneartheretoastoobstructtheadministrationofjustice.  ! ! 8 (2)Thewillfulmisbehaviorofanyoftheofficersofsuchcourts,intheirofficialtransactions.  ! ! 8 (3)Thewillfuldisobedienceorresistanceofanyofficerofthesuchcourts,party,juror,witness,oranyotherperson,toanylawfulwrit,process,order,rule,decree,orcommandofsuchcourts.  ! ! 8 (4)Abuseof,orunlawfulinterferencewith,theprocessorproceedingsofthecourt.  ! ! 8 (5)Willfullyconversingwithjurorsinrelationtothemeritsofthecauseinthetrialofwhichtheyareengaged,orotherwisetamperingwiththem.  ! ! 8 (6)Anyotheractoromissiondeclaredacontemptbylaw.[Code1858,4106(deriv.Acts1831,ch.19,1);Shan.,5918;Code1932,10119;T.C.A.(orig.ed.),23-902.]  ! ! ̜  Appelleehasmadenoallegationswhichwouldamounttowillfuldisobedienceofacourtorder.Appellantcitesinhisbrief,andthiscourtfindscontrolling,thecaseof Weinsteinv.Heimberg ,490S.W.2d692(Tenn.Ct.App. 3L/3 1972).Here,asin Weinstein ,theonlyevidenceofferedshowsthatthehusband 505 hasnotpaidhiswifesattorneysbillinfull.TherecordbeforeusrevealsnowilfulrefusalonthepartofMr.Robson.Thedebtthatwasallegedinthepetition 849 wasnomorethantwomonthsinarrears.The Weinstein courtfound,asthiscourt  doeshere,thatunderfactssuchasthese,acontemptpetitionisinappropriate. II. ProperPartiestoAlimonyAwards  {   EveniftheinstantcontemptpetitionhadbeenfiledinkeepingwiththerequirementsofTennessee'scontemptstatute,theoriginalgrantofattorneysfeesasalimonyinsolidoandasajudgmentinfavorofAppellee'scounselwouldnot @  supportsuchanaction.Alimonyisarightinthenatureofrehabilitationfortheneedyspouse. SeeGilliamv.Gilliam ,776S.W.2d81,86(Tenn.Ct.App.1998). p  Thiscourthasheldpreviouslythatattorney'sfeesawardsshouldnotbegranteddirectlytoaspouse'sattorneyinsofarastheattorneyisnotapartytothedivorceaction. Wilsonv.Wilson ,No.01A019707CV00325,1998WL557609at*12 ; (Tenn.Ct.App.Sept.2,1998).Suchanawarddoesviolencetotheconceptandpurposeofalimonyandshallbeconsideredvoid.Onremand,thiscourtsuggeststhatthepartiesmaydesiretofileamotionpursuanttoTenn.R.Civ.P.60.02(1998)tocorrecttheFinalDivorceDecreetoreflectaproperattorney'sfeeawardinfavoroftheAppelleeherselfasopposedtohercounsel.̜ Inlightofthesecircumstances,theOrderofContemptisherebyvacated f!$ andthefindingofthecourtbelowreversed.Thecauseisremandedtothetrialcourtforsuchfurtherproceedingsasarenecessary.CostsonappealaretaxedagainsttheAppellee.̜8   ! !    0      8   XX   @      H!  #   0      8   _______________________________________  0      8   WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE̜CONCUR:________________________________________BENH.CANTRELL,PRESIDINGJUDGE,M.S.________________________________________WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE