ÿWPCê û¶b{6€#ÕÒ %BŸVà¢(,K¹`‚¼¿)ÕÐ ÿÿ‡9Ö­_ÿ¨ÁF(ºóÓŠX3zWEoúÌæ ³ï««¾èâþ@Vñ¿ÎTiBYY•^‹RT>Jr7ž@ñn?^XsraÁG³}93QŠ`ߨ¤R Iµ1} ʼn'L)¶„'0Jÿ<"Ýš.-M‹ØCnÜX·Z‡j5ýFÉ4˼¯ÂtG>íbñB.:m*I?÷ƒ“¯ðܘÖg">«aómÈÏ gL‘ß¡RXT½Åy%YPüö•LŠ[~"âz@HM~\¶G~S·vË“ –š• x][)/6éÙU¾õû`MŸ÷-ñÌe ÄVUªüâ øÆuµiàärùp–yõ¥é¶Æ‘ 0¤W 0Dû A«?˜\\IB01S01\CLERK1NASÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»Ÿž/Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularqdj/B011C8 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ ÔÝ ƒR¾Ø$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôíÉò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Among€her€milder€statements€in€the€letter€are:€€Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà ` àIn€addition,€the€uninformed,€dishonest,€and€thieving€witnesses€you€have€contacted,€such€asÐ 8ˆ ÐMary€Lou€Campbell€and€Donna€Schmidt,€who€were€both€dismissed€from€their€jobs€by€me€for€drug€useÐ üL Ðand€money€laundering,€respectively,€are€completely€not€credible€as€witnesses€because€they€are€bothÐ À Ðcorrupt€and€dishonest.ЄÔÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð  \ ÐÌà8  àYour€support€of€these€obvious€and€illegal€actions€and€the€violation€of€my€rights€because€of€theseÐ ” ä   Ðactions€shows€that€you€stand€with€this€Jewish„Democratic€Coalition€who€is€against€the€constitutionalÐ ° Ðrights€of€all€Americans,€including€myself.€€By€pursuing€this€case,€Mr.€Tepley,€knowingly€you€are€nowÐ tÄ Ðsupporting€a€very€progressive€and€destructive€anti„Christian€and€anti„government€coalition€which€canÐ 8ˆ Ðbring€very€serious€consequences.à8hÐ Ð àà À àLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  - ù-(|G2¾Ø$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_Á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôíÉò»»Ô d(|3$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_Á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_Á»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€_Á»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼_Á»»»ÔÑ8€mXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îVH_ÁÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼_Á»îîVH #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓOctober€7,€2003€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XmX»¼_ÁÔÌò òÔ#†¼_Á»XXmô#ÔÔ_ÔELEONORAÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔKOGANÔ_Ô,€D.D.S.òòóó€v.€TENNESSEE€BOARD€OF€DENTISTRYÔ‡XmX»¼_ÁÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€02„976„I€€€€€€Irvin€H.€Ô_ÔKilcreaseÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€ChancellorÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2003„00291„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€30,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ԀР¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓIn€this€case€we€are€asked€to€determine€the€type€of€notice€required€to€be€given€a€defendant€in€aÐ xÈ  Ðcontested€case€hearing€before€a€state€administrative€agency.€€We€determine€that€TennesseeÐ d´ ÐCompilation€of€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulations€13604„1„.06€applies€and€requires€personalÐ P  Ðservice,€return€receipt€mail,€or,€in€the€event€of€evading€service,€personal€service€with€a€person€at€theÐ <Œ Ðpartiesðð€dwelling€place.€€In€the€case€at€bar,€service€of€notice€of€the€new€trial€date€was€made€throughÐ (x Ðregular€mail€only.€€This€method€of€service€is€insufficient.€€The€decision€of€the€Board€of€Dentistry€isÐ d Ðvacated,€and€the€case€is€remanded.€Ð P ÐÓ(ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€Court€Ð Ø( ÐVacated€and€Remandedó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼_Á»àXm¶#ÔÔ‡XmX.¼_ÁÔWilliam€B.€Cain,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€WòòILLIAMóó€C.€KòòOCHóó,€JòòRóó.,€P.J.,€M.S.òòóóÐ œì Ðand€òòóóFòòRANKóó€G.€CòòLEMENTóó,€JòòRóó.,€J.,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌFrank€J.€Ô_ÔScanlonÔ_Ô,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Ô_ÔEleonoraÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔKoganÔ_Ô.Ð `° ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Sue€A.€Sheldon,€Senior€Counsel,€for€the€appellee,Ð 8!ˆ  ÐTennessee€Board€of€Dentistry.Ð $"t! ÐÓÕÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼_Á»XXm #ÔÔ‡XmX»¼_ÁÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼_Á»XXm² #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XmX»¼_ÁÔà  àBecause€we€find€service€of€the€notice€of€hearing€relative€to€the€January€24,€2002€hearingÐ Ô%$!% Ðbefore€the€Board€of€Dentistry€to€be€ineffectual€under€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€RulesÐ À&"& Ðand€Regulations€1360„4„1„.06,€the€decision€of€the€Board€of€Dentistry€resulting€from€the€January€24,Ð ¬'ü"' Ð2002€hearing€must€be€set€aside€and€the€case€remanded€to€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Dentistry€forÐ ˜(è#( Ðfurther€proceedings.Ð „)Ô$) ÐÌà  àA€detailed€chronology€of€events€is€necessary€before€we€can€properly€address€the€sufficiencyÐ \+¬&+ Ðof€service€of€the€notice€of€hearing€in€this€case.Ð H,˜', ÐÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_ Ôà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„5„320(c)€provides€that€no€revocation,€suspension,€orÐ ° Ðwithdrawal€of€any€license€is€lawful€unless,€prior€to€the€institution€of€agency€proceedings,€the€agencyÐ œì Ðgives€notice€by€mail€to€the€licensee€of€the€facts€or€conduct€which€warrant€the€intended€action€and€theÐ ˆØ Ðlicensee€is€given€an€opportunity€to€show€compliance€with€all€lawful€requirements€for€the€retentionÐ tÄ Ðof€the€license.€€Pursuant€to€this€statute,€the€Assistant€Attorney€General,€representing€the€DepartmentÐ `° Ðof€Health€of€Tennessee,€on€August€1,€2001,€sent€a€letter€to€Appellant€at€her€address€at€3836€TalilunaÐ L œ ÐAvenue,€Knoxville,€Tennessee€€37919,€advising€her€that€an€agency€investigation€had€revealed€thatÐ 8 ˆ Ðfrom€January€28,€1992€until€June€18,€1998€she€had€been€prescribed€drugs€and€narcotics€in€amountsÐ $ t Ðwhich€could€have€impaired€or€limited€her€ability€to€practice€dentistry.€€This€letter€further€asserted€thatÐ  ` Ðshe€had€failed€to€reveal€this€information€in€her€license€application€of€June€24,€1998€and€that€suchÐ ü L  Ðfacts€were€a€violation€of€the€Dental€Practice€Acts,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€63„5„101€toÐ è 8  Ð133.€€In€the€letter,€she€was€afforded€the€opportunity€to€show€compliance€with€all€appropriate€legalÐ Ô$  Ðand€regulatory€requirements€for€the€retention€of€her€dental€license€and€given€a€deadline€of€AugustÐ À  Ð13,€2001€within€which€to€reply.€€This€letter€was€sent€by€certified€mail€but€returned€on€September€10,Ð ¬ü  Ð2001€as€being€ð ðunclaimedðð.€€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àOn€August€14,€2001€the€division€of€health€related€boards€of€the€Department€of€Health€filedÐ pÀ Ðcharges€before€the€Board€of€Dentistry€against€Appellant€charging€her€with€unprofessional€conduct,Ð \¬ Ðmaking€false€and€misleading€statements,€and€habitual€intoxication€or€personal€misuse€of€drugs,€suchÐ H˜ Ðcharges€being€made€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€63„5„124(a).€€A€copy€of€theseÐ 4„ Ðcharges,€along€with€a€cover€letter,€was€sent€to€Appellant€by€registered€mail€to€the€3836€TalilunaÐ  p ÐAvenue€address,€and€the€return€receipt€was€executed€by€Appellant.€€This€Complaint€notifiedÐ  \ ÐAppellant€that€the€hearing€to€consider€the€charges€was€set€for€September€20,€2001.Ð øH ÐÌà  àOn€September€7,€2001,€counsel€for€the€Department€of€Health€forwarded€to€Appellant€its€listÐ Ð  Ðof€potential€witnesses€to€be€called€at€the€hearing.€€Included€among€the€witnesses€were€Mary€LouÐ ¼  ÐCampbell€and€Donna€Schmidt€both€of€Knoxville.€€The€return€receipt€was€executed€on€behalf€ofÐ ¨ø ÐAppellant€on€September€15,€2001.Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àAppellant€obviously€received€both€the€charges€and€the€witness€list,€as€she€promptlyÐ l¼ Ðresponded€by€letter€of€September€15,€2001€asserting€her€inability€to€attend€the€scheduled€hearing€toÐ X ¨ Ðbe€held€September€20,€2001€because€of€poor€health,€after€which€she€launched€into€a€broadside€attackÐ D!” Ðon€everyone€connected€with€the€case.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð 0"€  Їà  àOn€September€13,€2001,€counsel€for€the€Department€of€Health€filed€a€Motion€to€ContinueÐ ° Ðthe€September€20,€2001€hearing€and€requested€a€resetting€on€January€24,€2002.€€Cause€for€thisÐ œì Ðcontinuance€was€asserted€to€be€that€three€subpoenaed€witnesses€for€the€state€were€scheduled€to€beÐ ˆØ Ðout€of€town€or€unavailable€for€the€September€20,€2001€hearing.€€A€copy€of€this€Motion€together€withÐ tÄ Ða€cover€letter€and€proposed€order€granting€the€continuance€and€resetting€the€case€on€January€24,€2002Ð `° Ðwas€sent€by€certified€mail€to€Appellant€at€3836€Taliluna€Avenue€but€was€returned€ð ðunclaimedðð€onÐ L œ ÐOctober€16,€2001.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àOn€September€21,€2001,€Administrative€Law€Judge€Bettye€Springfield€executed€the€OrderÐ  ` Ðgranting€the€Motion€for€a€Continuance€filed€by€the€State€of€Tennessee€and€reset€the€case€for€JanuaryÐ ü L  Ð24,€2002.€€The€ð ðcertificate€of€serviceðð€appearing€over€the€signature€of€Janice€Kizer€of€theÐ è 8  ÐAdministrative€Procedures€Division€of€the€Office€of€the€Secretary€of€State€also€dated€September€21,Ð Ô$  Ð2001,€states€the€following:€€ð ðThe€undersigned€hereby€certifies€that€a€true€and€correct€copy€of€thisÐ À  Ðdocument€has€been€served€on€all€parties,€by€delivering€same€to€them,€or€to€their€counsel,€at€theirÐ ¬ü  Ðaddress€of€record,€or€by€placing€a€true€and€correct€copy€of€same€in€the€United€States€mail,€postageÐ ˜è  Ðprepaid.ððÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àOn€December€27,€2001,€Todd€R.€Kelley,€Administrative€Law€Judge,€entered€an€Order€settingÐ \¬ Ðthe€case€for€hearing€on€January€24,€2002€and€setting€forth€a€schedule€for€exhibits,€witness€list,Ð H˜ Ðprehearing€motions€and€briefs.€€The€ð ðcertificate€of€serviceðð€on€this€letter,€made€by€Sarah€Weaver,Ð 4„ ÐAdministrative€Procedures€Division€of€the€Office€of€the€Secretary€of€State,€also€under€date€ofÐ  p ÐDecember€27,€2001,€provides:€€ð ðThe€undersigned€hereby€certifies€that€a€true€and€correct€copy€of€thisÐ  \ Ðdocument€has€been€served€upon€all€parties,€by€delivering€same€to€them,€or€to€their€counsel,€at€theirÐ øH Ðaddress€of€record,€or€by€placing€a€true€and€correct€copy€of€same€in€the€United€States€mail,€postageÐ ä4 Ðprepaid.ððÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àTwo€other€documents€appear€as€exhibits€at€the€January€24,€2002€hearing€relative€to€the€noticeÐ ¨ø Ðquestion.€€First€is€a€computer€search€of€March€30,€2001€indicating€that€Appellantððs€correct€addressÐ ”ä Ðis€3836€Taliluna€Avenue,€Knoxville,€Tennessee€€37919.€€The€second€document€is€a€copy€of€a€pageÐ €Ð Ðof€the€Knoxville,€Tennessee€telephone€directory€disclosing:€€ð ðKogan,€Eleanora,€3836€TalilunaÐ l¼ ÐAvenue,€€37919€„€„€„€„€„€„€540„8863.ððÐ X ¨ ÐÌà  àIn€summary,€without€regard€to€the€pre„complaint€letter€of€August€1,€2001,€which€was€returnedÐ 0"€  Ðto€the€sender€as€ð ðunclaimed,ðð€the€record€clearly€shows€that€Appellant€actually€received€the€AugustÐ #l! Ð14,€2001€Complaint€and€the€September€7,€2001€Stateððs€Witness€and€Exhibit€List.€€The€ComplaintÐ $X" Ðplainly€disclosed€the€hearing€date€of€September€20,€2001€and€her€expansive€response€of€SeptemberÐ ô$D # Ð15,€2001€verifies€that€she€was€aware€of€the€September€20,€2001€hearing€and€that€she€wished€to€haveÐ à%0!$ Ðit€continued€on€grounds€of€ill€health.€€Ð Ì&"% Їà  àIt€is€from€this€point€forward€that€the€notice€problem€develops.€€The€Motion€by€theÐ ° ÐDepartment€to€continue€the€hearing€from€September€20€because€certain€Stateððs€witnesses€wereÐ œì Ðunavailable,€together€with€the€proposed€order€continuing€the€case€and€resetting€it€for€January€24,Ð ˆØ Ð2001€and€the€cover€letter€disclosing€the€proposed€new€hearing€date,€is€the€first€set€of€documents€inÐ tÄ Ðthe€record€disclosing€the€proposed€new€hearing€date€of€January€24,€2001.€€The€only€service€attemptedÐ `° Ðupon€Appellant€was€by€certified€mail€to€her€3836€Taliluna€Avenue€address,€which€attempt€wasÐ L œ Ðreturned€to€the€sender€as€ð ðunclaimed.ðð€€The€next€document€disclosing€the€January€24,€2002€hearingÐ 8 ˆ Ðdate€was€the€September€21,€Order€of€Administrative€Law€Judge€Bettye€Springfield€that€purportedÐ $ t Ðto€be€served€by€regular€mail.€€The€last€document€disclosing€the€January€24,€2002€hearing€date€wasÐ  ` Ðthe€Order€of€Judge€Todd€R.€Kelley€of€December€27,€2001€that€again€purported€to€be€served€byÐ ü L  Ðregular€mail.€€Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àDeterminative€of€the€notice€issue€is€the€applicability€or€the€nonapplicability€of€TennesseeÐ À  ÐCompilation€of€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulations€1360„4„1„.06(2)€to€the€service€on€AppellantÐ ¬ü  Ðof€notice€of€the€rescheduled€hearing€of€January€24,€2002.€€Appellee€asserts€that€this€regulation€setsÐ ˜è  Ðforth€requirements€governing€the€initial€notice€of€hearing/notice€of€charges€and€does€not€apply€toÐ „Ô  Ðsubsequent€filings€and€orders.€€Appellee€further€asserts€that€Tennessee€Compilation€ofÐ pÀ ÐAdministrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.03€and€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„5„308Ð \¬ Ðapply€to€everything€occurring€after€the€initial€notice€of€hearing/notice€of€charges€and€specificallyÐ H˜ Ðallow€for€service€of€such€documents€to€be€made€€by€regular€mail.€€If€the€position€of€Appellee€isÐ 4„ Ðcorrect,€the€notice€of€hearing€prior€to€the€January€24,€2002€hearing,€if€properly€mailed,€is€adequateÐ  p Ðsince€the€record€conclusively€shows€that€the€initial€Complaint€was€served€upon€Appellant.€Ð  \ ÐThereafter,€use€of€regular€mail€to€provide€notice€would€be€sufficient€if,€indeed,€the€proof€of€mailingÐ øH Ðof€the€September€13,€2001€Motion€to€Continue,€the€September€21,€2001€copy€of€the€Order€ofÐ ä4 ÐContinuance,€and€the€December€27,€2001€Order€of€Judge€Kelley€was€adequate.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€difficulty€with€the€position€of€Appellee€is€that€we€are€not€dealing€with€the€sufficiencyÐ ¨ø Ðof€the€notice€of€hearing,€but€rather€with€the€service€of€the€notice€of€hearing.€€Tennessee€CompilationÐ ”ä Ðof€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.05€deals€with€the€commencement€of€contestedÐ €Ð Ðcase€proceedings€and€paragraph€(2)€thereof€provides:€€ð ðNotice€of€hearing.€€In€every€contested€case,Ð l¼ Ða€notice€of€hearing€shall€be€issued€by€the€agency,€which€notice€shall€comply€with€T.C.A.€ðð€4„5„Ð X ¨ Ð307(b).ðð€€The€notice€of€hearing€in€this€case€does€comply€with€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„Ð D!” Ð5„307(b)€in€that€it€contains€a€statement€of€the€time,€place,€and€nature€of€the€hearing,€and€the€right€toÐ 0"€  Ðbe€represented€by€counsel,€along€with€a€statement€of€the€legal€authority€and€jurisdiction€under€whichÐ #l! Ðthe€hearing€is€to€be€held€with€reference€to€the€particular€section€of€the€statutes€and€rules€involved.€Ð $X" ÐIt€also€contains€a€short€and€plain€statement€of€the€matters€asserted.€€However,€neither€this€rule€norÐ ô$D # ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„5„307€have€anything€to€do€with€òòserviceóó€of€the€notice€of€hearing.Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àIt€is€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.06,€entitledÐ ¸'#& ÐService€of€€Notice€of€Hearing,€that€provides€in€detail€the€methods€by€which€òòserviceóó€of€the€notice€ofÐ ¤(ô#' Ðhearing€must€be€accomplished.€€Unless€that€notice€of€hearing€is€included€within€the€originalÐ )à$( Ðcomplaint€(as€it€was€in€this€case€as€far€as€the€proposed€September€20,€2001€hearing€is€concerned),Ð |*Ì%) Ðrule€1360„4„1„.06€does€not€involve€the€òòinitialóó€complaint.€€Nothing€in€the€rules€prevents€the€initialÐ h+¸&* Ðcomplaint€from,€likewise,€serving€as€a€vehicle€to€deliver€notice€of€hearing,€provided€that€the€initialÐ ° Ðcomplaint€containing€such€notice€of€hearing€is€served€on€the€respondent€party€more€than€thirty€daysÐ œì Ðprior€to€the€hearing€date€as€required€by€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€Rules€andÐ ˆØ ÐRegulation€1360„4„1„.06(2).€€While€the€response€of€Appellant€to€the€original€complaint€containedÐ tÄ Ðin€her€letter€of€September€15,€2001€indicated€that€she€could€not€be€present€for€the€September€20,Ð `° Ð2001€hearing€and€suggested€that€the€hearing€be€postponed,€no€action€was€taken€by€the€AdministrativeÐ L œ ÐTribunal€on€her€request€for€a€continuance,€and,€had€such€hearing€been€held€in€her€absence€onÐ 8 ˆ ÐSeptember€20,€2001,€she€would€be€in€no€position€to€complain€about€default€having€been€enteredÐ $ t Ðagainst€her€or€the€hearing€actually€held€in€her€absence.€€The€continuance€of€the€September€20,€2001Ð  ` Ðhearing,€however,€was€granted€because€of€the€request€of€Appellee€of€September€13,€2001€on€groundsÐ ü L  Ðof€the€unavailability€of€state€witnesses.€€No€provision€of€this€rule€or€of€the€statutes€under€which€theÐ è 8  Ðrule€is€promulgated,€€sections€4„5„219,€4„5„301(b)€and€4„5„307€of€the€Code,€relieves€the€agency€ofÐ Ô$  Ðits€burden€relative€to€the€òòserviceóó€of€a€notice€of€the€rescheduled€hearing,€as€that€burden€is€delineatedÐ À  Ðby€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.06(2),€which€provides:Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà8  àIn€any€case€in€which€an€agency€is€initiating€proceedings€against€a€party€by€bringingÐ „Ô  Ðcharges,€by€attempting€to€take€action€against€a€license,€or€by€other€similar€action,€aÐ pÀ Ðcopy€of€the€notice€of€hearing€shall€be€served€upon€the€party€to€be€affected€no€laterÐ \¬ Ðthan€30€days€prior€to€the€hearing€date.€€Except€as€provided€in€paragraph€(3)€below,Ð H˜ Ðservice€in€such€a€case€shall€be€by€personal€service,€return€receipt€mail€or€equivalentÐ 4„ Ðcarrier€with€a€return€receipt;€a€person€making€personal€service€on€a€party€shall€returnÐ  p Ða€statement€indicating€the€time€and€place€of€service,€and€a€return€receipt€must€beÐ  \ Ðsigned€by€the€party€to€be€affected.€€However,€if€the€party€to€be€affected€evades€orÐ øH Ðattempts€to€evade€service,€service€may€be€made€by€leaving€the€notice€or€a€copyÐ ä4 Ðthereof€at€the€partyððs€dwelling€house€or€usual€place€of€abode€with€some€person€ofÐ Ð  Ðsuitable€age€and€discretion€residing€therein,€whose€name€shall€appear€on€the€proof€ofÐ ¼  Ðservice€or€return€receipt€card.€€Service€may€also€be€made€by€delivering€the€notice€orÐ ¨ø Ðcopy€to€an€agent€authorized€by€appointment€or€by€law€to€receive€service€on€behalf€ofÐ ”ä Ðthe€individual€served,€or€by€any€other€method€allowed€by€law€in€judicial€proceedings.ЀÐÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àIn€the€case€at€bar:Ð X ¨ Ð1.à0  àThere€has€never€been€personal€service€of€anything.ÐD!”(#(# Ð2.à  àService€by€return€receipt€mail€was€only€effected€as€to€the€original€Complaint€and€the€StateððsÐ 0"€  ÐWitness€and€Exhibit€List€prior€to€the€scheduled€September€20,€2001€hearing.€Ð #l! Ð3.à  àReturn€receipt€mail€service€was€attempted€as€to€the€pre„complaint€letter€of€August€1,€2001Ð $X" Ðand€Appelleeððs€September€13,€2001€Motion€for€a€Continuance,€but€such€attempted€service€wasÐ ô$D # Ðincomplete€because€the€return€receipt€was€not€ð ðsigned€by€the€party€to€be€affected.ððÐ à%0!$ Ð4.à  àIf€one€assumes€that€Appellant€was€attempting€to€evade€service,€there€is€no€evidence€in€theÐ Ì&"% Ðrecord€that€service€was€made€ð ðby€leaving€the€notice€or€a€copy€thereof€at€the€partyððs€dwelling€houseÐ ¸'#& Ðor€usual€place€of€abode€with€some€person€of€suitable€age€and€discretion€residing€therein,€whose€nameÐ ¤(ô#' Ðâ âshall€appear€on€the€proof€of€service€or€return€receipt€card.ððÐ )à$( Ð5.à  àThere€is€no€evidence€that€any€agent€of€the€respondent€was€ever€served€with€either€theÐ ° ÐSeptember€13,€2001€Motion€by€the€state€for€a€continuance,€the€September€21,€2001€Order€grantingÐ œì Ðthe€continuance,€or€the€December€27,€2001€Order€of€Judge€Todd€R.€Kelley.Ð ˆØ Ðâ â6.à  àThere€is€no€evidence€of€service€ð ðby€any€other€method€allowed€by€law€in€judicialÐ tÄ Ðproceedings.ððÐ `° ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„5„219€provides,€in€pertinent€part:€€Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà8  àà ` à(a)€The€secretary€of€state,€from€time€to€time,€shall€adopt,€in€accordance€withÐ  ` Ðthe€rulemaking€requirements€of€this€chapter,€model€rules€of€procedure€appropriate€forÐ ü L  Ðuse€by€as€many€agencies€as€possible.Ðè 8 Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(b)€The€model€rules€shall€deal€with€all€general€functions€and€duties€performedÐ Ô$  Ðin€common€by€several€agencies.ÐÀ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` à(c)€Each€agency€shall€adopt€as€much€of€the€model€rules€as€is€practicable.€€ToÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€extent€an€agency€adopts€the€model€rules,€it€shall€do€so€in€accordance€with€theÐ ˜è  Ðrulemaking€requirements€of€this€chapter.Ð„Ô Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„219(a)„(c)(1998).€€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€Rules€andÐ \¬ ÐRegulation€1360„4„1„.06€was€adopted€under€the€authority€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€4„5„Ð H˜ Ð219.€€Generally,€rules€and€regulations€promulgated€pursuant€to€statutory€directive€and€notÐ 4„ Ðinconsistent€with€such€statutes€have€the€force€of€law.€€òòHouck€v.€Mintonóó,€212€S.W.2d€891Ð  p Ð(Tenn.1948);€òòParkridge€Hosp.,€Inc.€v.€Califanoóó,€625€F.2d€719€(6th€Cir.1980).€€It€is€of€noÐ  \ Ðconsequence€that€the€notice€provisions€applicable€to€the€hearing€in€this€case€are€prescribed€byÐ øH Ðadministrative€rule€rather€than€by€the€statute€itself.€€Such€rules€have€the€force€and€effect€of€law.€€òòSeeÐ ä4 ÐU.€S.€v.€Grimaudóó,€220€U.S.€506,€31€S.Ct.€480,€55€L.Ed.€563€(1911);€òòUnion€Light€Heat€and€PowerÐ Ð  ÐCo.€v.€Pub.€Serv.€Commððnóó,€271€S.W.2d€361€(Ky.Ct.App.1954);€òòHomeownersðð€Loan€Corp.€v.Ð ¼  ÐRawsonóó,€83€P.2d€765€(Wash.1938).Ð ¨ø ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€question€of€this€delegation€of€authority€has€been€much€before€the€courts,Ð €Ð Ðand€especially€is€that€true€in€recent€years€by€the€enlarged€powers€conferred€uponÐ l¼ Ðadministrative€boards€and€tribunals.€€The€generally€accepted€rule€governing€suchÐ X ¨ Ðmatters€now€appears€to€be€that€a€legislative€body€may,€after€declaring€a€policy€andÐ D!” Ðfixing€a€primary€standard,€confer€upon€executive€or€administrative€officers€the€powerÐ 0"€  Ðto€fill€up€the€details,€by€prescribing€rules€and€regulations€to€promote€the€purpose€andÐ #l! Ðspirit€of€the€legislation€and€to€carry€it€into€effect.€€In€such€cases€the€action€of€theÐ $X" ÐLegislature€in€giving€such€rules€and€regulations€the€force€of€laws€does€not€violate€theÐ ô$D # Ðconstitutional€inhibition€against€delegating€the€legislative€function.€€The€rule€findsÐ à%0!$ Ðsupport€in€òòField€(Marshall)€v.€Clarkóó,€143€U.S.€649,€12€S.Ct.€495,€505,€36€L.Ed.€294,Ð Ì&"% Ðwherein€the€Supreme€Court€said:€€ð ðThe€legislature€cannot€delegate€its€power€to€makeÐ ¸'#& Ða€law,€but€it€can€make€a€law€to€delegate€a€power€to€determine€some€fact€or€state€ofÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthings€upon€which€the€law€makes,€or€intends€to€make,€its€own€action€depend.€€ToÐ )à$( Ðdeny€this€would€be€to€stop€the€wheels€of€government.€€There€are€many€things€uponÐ |*Ì%) Ðwhich€wise€and€useful€legislation€must€depend€which€cannot€be€known€to€theÐ h+¸&* Ðlawmaking€power,€and€must€therefore€be€a€subject€of€inquiry€and€determinationÐ ° Ðoutside€of€the€halls€of€legislation.ðð€ÐœìÐ Ð  ÐÌòòWilliams€v.€Stateóó,€176€S.W.2d€177,€183€(Tex.Crim.App.1943);€òòsee€also€Rinehart€v.€Woodford€FlyingÐ tÄ ÐServ.óó,€9€S.E.2d€521€(W.Va.1940).Ð `° ÐÌà  àAddressing€this€rule,€it€has€been€said:Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà8  àà ` àWe€must€first€turn€our€attention€to€the€state€of€the€law€in€Kentucky.€Ð  ` ÐAdministrative€regulations€of€any€kind€which€have€been€duly€adopted€and€properlyÐ ü L  Ðfiled€have€the€full€effect€of€law.€€However,€the€authority€of€the€agency€is€limited€toÐ è 8  Ða€direct€implementation€of€the€functions€assigned€to€the€agency€by€the€statute.€Ð Ô$  ÐRegulations€are€valid€only€as€subordinate€rules€when€found€to€be€within€theÐ À  Ðframework€of€the€policy€defined€by€the€legislation.€€Ð¬ü Ð Ð  ÐÌòòFlying€J€Travel€Plaza€v.€Commonwealthóó,€928€S.W.2d€344,€347€(Ky.1996).€€In€a€similar€context€theÐ „Ô  Ðrule€is€stated:€€Ð pÀ ÐÌà8  àà ` àIt€is€well€settled€that€reasonable€regulations€promulgated€pursuant€to€statutoryÐ H˜ Ðauthority€have€the€force€and€effect€of€law.€Ð4„Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð  \ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àWhen€a€Government€official€or€agency€lawfully€prescribesÐ ä4 Ðrules€and€procedures,€these€are€binding€on€the€government€as€well€asÐ Ð  Ðon€its€citizens.м ` x` x ÐÌòòPearce€v.€Director,€Office€of€Workerððs€Comp.óó,€647€F.2d€716,€726€(7th€Cir.1981)(quoting€òòWhelan€v.Ð ”ä ÐUnited€Statesóó,€529€F.2d€1000,€1003€(1976)).Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àThe€Supreme€Court€of€Tennessee€has€held:Ð X ¨ ÐÌà8  àà ` àOf€course,€an€administrative€body€of€this€kind€which€is€given€legislativeÐ 0"€  Ðpower€to€make€rules€and€regulations€does€not€have€the€power€to€make€a€rule€orÐ #l! Ðregulation€which€is€inconsistent€with€the€constitutional€provision€or€other€law€on€theÐ $X" Ðsubject,€and€it€does€not€include€the€authority€to€enact€laws,€or€to€make€rules€affectingÐ ô$D # Ðor€creating€substantive€rights.€€Said€body€though€does€have€the€power€when€it€isÐ à%0!$ Ðgiven€it€by€the€Legislature€to€make€rules€and€regulations€and€in€exercising€the€powerÐ Ì&"% Ðthus€given€it€to€adopt€which€rules€and€regulations€as€are€necessary€and€reasonable€inÐ ¸'#& Ðqualifying€general€contractors€for€a€license.€€The€only€thing€that€it€may€not€do€in€thisÐ ¤(ô#' Ðparticular€is€to€act€arbitrarily€and€capriciously.€€This€making€of€reasonable€rules€andÐ )à$( Ðregulations€is€a€delegated€legislative€power€which€the€body€may€use€so€long€as€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðrules€and€regulations€are€designed€to€carry€out€the€duties€imposed€upon€this€body,€theÐ h+¸&* ÐBoard€for€Licensing€General€Contractors,€wherein€these€rules€are€made€to€effectuateÐ ° Ðthe€purpose€of€the€Act€creating€the€body€which€Act€the€body€is€administering.€€16Ð œì ÐC.J.S.€Constitutional€Law€ðð€133,€page€552;€11€Am.Jur.,€955,€ðð€240.€ÐˆØÐ Ð  ÐÌòòTasco€Developing€and€Bldg.€Corp.€v.€Longóó,€368€S.W.2d€65,€67„68€(Tenn.1963).€€TennesseeÐ `° ÐCompilation€of€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.06€in€no€way€contradicts€TennesseeÐ L œ ÐCode€Annotated€section€4„5„219€but,€rather,€is€a€subordinate€implementation€thereof.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àIt€is€also€settled€that€when€a€statute€requires€a€particular€method€for€the€service€of€notice,€thatÐ  ` Ðmethod€is€exclusive.€€òòSee€Payne€v.€Stateóó,€12€S.W.2d€528€(Tenn.1928);€òòMcDonnell€v.€Amoóó,€34Ð ü L  ÐS.W.2d€212€(Tenn.1931);€òòDunn€v.€Alabama€Oil€&€Gas€Co.óó,€299€S.W.2d€25€(Tenn.Ct.App.1956);Ð è 8  ÐòòU.S.€Life€Title€Ins.€Co.€v.€Depððt€of€Commerceóó,€770€S.W.2d€537€(Tenn.Ct.App.1988).€€Even€if€oneÐ Ô$  Ðconcedes€a€presumption€that€a€letter€properly€addressed,€stamped€and€mailed€was€received€in€theÐ À  Ðcourse€of€such€mail,€such€presumption€has€no€application€when€confronted€with€a€statutory€mandateÐ ¬ü  Ðof€a€particular€mode€of€service€that€does€not€include€ordinary€mail.Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8  àà ` àWhen€a€statute,€such€as€here,€or€a€contract€requires€notice€by€certified€mail,Ð pÀ Ðno€presumption€of€receipt€arises€from€mailing€by€ordinary€mail.€€The€very€reason€forÐ \¬ Ðproviding€for€certified€mail€or€actual€receipt€is€to€avoid€such€a€presumption.€€à @ àòòNatððlÐ H˜ ÐState€Bank€v.€Terminal€Constr.€Corp.óó,€217€F.Supp.€341,€355„56€(D.N.J.1963),€affððdÐ 4„ Ð328€F.2d€315€(3€Cir.€1964),€citing€and€distinguishing€òòSzczesny,€supraóó.Ð pÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àIt€is€evident€from€the€tenor€of€the€Tort€Claims€Act€that€the€LegislatureÐ øH Ðconsidered€the€receipt€of€notice€of€fundamental€importance€(N.J.S.A.€59:8„3€to€11).€Ð ä4 ÐFor€this€reason,€it€required€delivery,€certified€mail,€or€òòactualóó€receipt.€€The€dictionaryÐ Ð  Ðdefines€actual€as€ð ðexisting€in€fact€or€reality.ðð€€The€care€and€detail€with€which€theÐ ¼  ÐLegislature€provided€for€notice€shows€clearly€that€it€did€not€mean€to€leave€proof€ofÐ ¨ø Ðactual€receipt€to€a€presumption.€€It€provided€only€two€alternatives€to€certifiedÐ ”ä Ðmailð!ðdelivery€and,€as€its€equivalent,€òòactualóó€receipt.€€When€the€Legislature€used€theÐ €Ð Ðword€ð ðactualðð€it€obviously€did€so€to€emphasize€that€there€be€positive€and€notÐ l¼ Ðpresumptive€proof€of€receipt.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àThat€statutory€requirements€for€giving€notice€in€a€particular€fashion€must€beÐ 0"€  Ðstrictly€followed€is€clear€from€the€cases.€€òòHepner€v.€Lawrence€Tp.óó,€115€N.J.Super.Ð #l! Ð155,€161,€278€A.2d€513€(App.Div.),€certif.€den.€59€N.J.€270,€281€A.2d€532€(1971);Ð $X" ÐòòHarvell€v.€N.Y.C.€Transit€Auth.óó,€49€A.D.2d€765,€373€N.Y.S.2d€14,€15Ð ô$D # Ð(App.Div.1975);€òòJefferson€v.€Government€Employees€Ins.€Co.óó,€48€A.D.2d€855,€368Ð à%0!$ ÐN.Y.S.2d€573,€574€(App.Div.1975);€òòMontez€v.€Metropolitan€Transp.€Auth.óó,€43Ð Ì&"% ÐA.D.2d€224,€350€N.Y.S.2d€665,€666„67€(App.Div.1974),€app.€dism.€by€the€New€YorkÐ ¸'#& ÐCourt€of€Appeals,€June€30,€1975.Ф(ô#'Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àCertified€mail€assures€definite€record€proof€of€mailing.€€The€official€òòMailersÐ |*Ì%) ÐGuideóó,€published€by€the€Unitedòò€óóStates€Postal€Service,€saysòò€óó(at€28),€ð ðCertified€MailÐ h+¸&* Ðservice€provides€for€a€record€of€delivery€to€be€maintained€by€the€post€office€fromÐ ° Ðwhich€delivered.€€The€carrier€delivering€the€item€obtains€a€signature€from€theÐ œì Ðaddressee€on€a€receipt€form€which€is€kept€for€two€years.ðð€€The€statute€provides€forÐ ˆØ Ðdelivery,€certified€mail€or€actual€receipt.€€Delivery€and€certified€mail€connoteÐ tÄ Ðpositive,€not€presumptive,€proof;€actual€receipt€can€mean€no€less.Ð`°Ð Ð  ÐòòÌHammond€v.€City€of€Patersonóó,€368€A.2d€373,€374„75€(N.J.1976).Ð 8 ˆ Ðà  àÌà  àThe€facts€of€this€case€indicateòò€óóthat€Appellant€may€well€have€been€trying€to€evade€the€serviceÐ  ` Ðof€critical€documents.€€Tennessee€Administrative€Rules€and€Regulation€1360„4„1„.06(2),€however,Ð ü L  Ðprovides€a€specific€means€of€serving€the€notice€of€hearing€on€persons€who€are€attempting€to€evadeÐ è 8  Ðservice.€€The€rule€provides,€ð ðif€the€party€to€be€affected€evades€or€attempts€to€evade€service,€serviceÐ Ô$  Ðmay€be€made€by€leaving€the€notice€or€a€copy€thereof€at€the€partyððs€dwelling€house€or€usual€place€ofÐ À  Ðabode€with€some€person€of€suitable€age€and€discretion€residing€therein,€whose€name€shall€appear€onÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€proof€of€service€or€return€receipt€card.ðð€€There€is€no€evidence€in€the€record€that€this€method€ofÐ ˜è  Ðserving€the€notice€of€hearing€was€even€attempted.Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àSince€the€notice€of€hearing€prior€to€the€January€24,€2002€hearing€before€the€Board€ofÐ \¬ ÐDentistry€did€not€comply€with€the€requirements€of€Tennessee€Compilation€of€Administrative€RulesÐ H˜ Ðand€Regulation€1360„4„1„.06(2),€it€is€not€necessary€to€discuss€shortcomings€in€Appelleeððs€proof€asÐ 4„ Ðto€the€actual€mailings€relative€to€service€by€ordinary€mail.€€òòU.S.€Life€Title€v.€Dept.€of€Commerceóó,€770Ð  p ÐS.W.2d€at€541„42.€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àThe€decision€of€the€trial€court€must€be€reversed,€the€decision€of€the€Board€of€DentistryÐ ä4 Ðresulting€from€the€January€24,€2002€hearing€vacated,€and€the€case€remanded€to€the€Board€of€DentistryÐ Ð  Ðfor€further€proceedings.Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àWhile€it€is€not€necessary€to€consider€the€quality€of€the€proof€offered€by€the€state€at€theÐ ”ä ÐJanuary€24,€2002€hearing,€it€is€well€to€observe€that€such€proof€may€not€be€suffice€as€ð ðsubstantial€andÐ €Ð Ðmaterial€evidenceðð€under€the€applicable€standard€of€review.€€The€investigatorððs€testimony€as€to€theÐ l¼ ÐVivian€Harris€prescription€consisted€of€the€hearsay€statements€of€a€pharmacist.€€The€testimony€ofÐ X ¨ Ðformer€co„workers€as€to€the€behavior€of€Dr.€Kogan€was€not€tied€to€the€use€of€prescriptive€drugs.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àWith€no€person€at€the€hearing€to€object€the€following€occurred:Ð #l! ÐÌà8  àà ` àQ.à ¸ àWere€there€any€other€parties€you€talked€to€or€individuals€you€talkedÐ ô$D # Ðto,€who€you€knew,€who€were€also€afraid€of€Dr.€Kogan?Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àA.à ¸ àI€spoke€with€Vivian€Harris€quite€a€bit,€and€she€also€told€me€that€„€„€sheÐ Ì&"% Ðalways€obtained€her€medications€from€Walgreenððs€on€Chapman€Highway€inÐ ¸'#& ÐKnoxville€„€„€and€she€told€me€that€Dr.€Robinson€called€her,€not€too€long€before€he€gotÐ ¤(ô#' Ðsick€at€the€end€of€ðð98,€and€that€„€„€Dr.€Robinson€called€Vivian€and€told€her€that€he€wasÐ )à$( Ðcalling€in€a€prescription€for€Eleonora€Kogan€at€Walgreenððs€on€Chapman€Highway€inÐ |*Ì%) Ðher€name,€in€Vivianððs€name€„€„€and€I€believe€that€was€for€Soma€„€„€and€Vivian€toldÐ h+¸&* Ðhim,€No,€I€donððt€like€you€doing€that,€Reuben,€donððt€do€it.€€So€Vivian€didnððt€want€toÐ ° Ðconfront€her.МìÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à.€.€.€.Ð tÄ ÐÌà8  àà ` àBut€this€one€particular€day,€getting€back€to€the€Vivian€Harris,€I€was€at€Dr.Ð L œ ÐRobinsonððs€office€and€the€phone€rang,€and€it€was€the€CVS€Pharmacy€calling€fromÐ 8 ˆ ÐWestern€Plaza€in€about€October€of€ðð98.€€And€it€was€the€pharmacist€there€wanting€toÐ $ t Ðknow,€did€we€see€Vivian€Harris€the€day€before,€which€we€did€not.€€And€they€hadÐ  ` Ðsomeone€there€trying€to€pick€up€a€prescription€for€Vivian€Harris.€€Ðü L Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àAnd€I€turned€to€(sic)€phone€over€to€Dr.€Robinson,€and€it€was€Eleonora.€€AndÐ è 8  ÐI€did€hear€him€tell€her,€Donððt€be€doing€this;€I€told€you€not€to€do€it;€I€told€you€not€toÐ Ô$  Ðgo€down€there.€€And€then€he€started€talking€in€Hebrew.ÐÀ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àAnd€Vivian€Harris€told€me€the€reason€she€knew€it€was€Eleonora€Kogan€wasÐ ¬ü  Ðbecause€the€pharmacist€and€Vivian€Harris€were€personal€friends.€€She€knew€her.€€SheÐ ˜è  Ðknew€that€that€was€not€Vivian€Harris.Ð„Ô Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àAlso€troublesome€at€the€hearing€were€the€observations€of€member€of€the€board€J.€Glenn€GreerÐ \¬ Ðin€his€interrogation€of€one€of€the€stateððs€witnesses.Ð H˜ ÐÌà8  àà ` àDR.€GREER:à  àOn€one€of€the€examples€you€gave€where€they€went€to€theÐ  p Ðpharmacy€to€get€several€different€drugs€but€did€not€fill€the€Hydrocodone€and€he€calledÐ  \ Ðand€said€you€left€this€out€„€„€why€do€you€think€that€was€not€filled?ÐøHÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àTHE€WITNESS:€€I€donððt€know€if€it€was€an€oversight,€or€maybe€they€justÐ ä4 Ðhadnððt€had€time€to€fill€it.€€I€donððt€know.ÐÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àDR.€GREER:à  àI€guess,€really,€what€I€was€looking€at,€it€just€seems€like€a€longÐ ¼  Ðtrail€of€trafficking€here€between€obvious€individuals€of€which€several€parties€wereÐ ¨ø Ðvery€accommodating€for€a€very€long€time.ДäÐ Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àAnd€I€certainly€donððt€think€Dr.€Kogan€is€more€innocent€or€more€guilty€thanÐ €Ð Ðthe€others,€but€I€just€find€it€strange€that€she€winds€up€being€the€fall€guy€for€the€wholeÐ l¼ Ðthing.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àOne€other€question€is€that€you€noticed€her€being€an€angry€person.€€Were€thereÐ D!” Ðtimes€in€which€you€noticed€an€influence€of€drugs€versus€times€that€there€was€not€anÐ 0"€  Ðinfluence,€dealing€with€patients,€for€instance?Ð#l!Ð Ð  Ðà8  àà ` àTHE€WITNESS:€€There€were€several€times€that€she€would€be€halfway€cordial.€Ð $X" ÐSo€I€donððt€know.€€I€donððt€take€those€medications€„€„€I€canððt€„€„€so€I€donððt€know€howÐ ô$D # Ðthey€would€make€you€react.€€But€she€would€seem€to€me€that€she€was€a€little€calmer,Ð à%0!$ Ðmaybe€at€times€when€she€was€taking€them.€€I€donððt€know.€€A€lot€of€times€when€I€wasÐ Ì&"% Ðaround€her,€she€was€hostile.€€And,€you€know,€it€was€„€„€I€didnððt€think€that€was€a€veryÐ ¸'#& Ðgood€environment€for€patients€to€witness.Ф(ô#'Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àWhile€the€prescription€drug€profile€relative€to€Dr.€Kogan€is,€at€least€on€the€surface,€suggestiveÐ |*Ì%) Ðof€excessive€use€of€drugs,€little€substantive€proof€is€offered€to€suggest€any€excessive€drug€use€thatÐ h+¸&* Ðaffected€the€behavior€of€Dr.€Kogan€that€would€render€her€unfit€for€the€practice€of€dentistry.€€MuchÐ ° Ðof€the€shortcomings€in€the€proof€is€doubtless€attributable€to€the€fact€that€no€counsel€for€Dr.€KoganÐ œì Ðwas€present€to€offer€objections.€€However,€deficiencies€in€the€proof€are€not€material€to€ourÐ ˆØ Ðdisposition€of€the€case€in€view€of€the€ð ðnotice€of€hearingðð€question€and€the€fact€that€the€case€is€goingÐ tÄ Ðto€have€to€be€tried€again€on€remand.Ð `° ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€chancellor€is€reversed,€and€the€decision€of€the€Board€of€DentistryÐ 8 ˆ Ðvacated.€€The€case€is€remanded€to€the€Board€of€Dentistry€for€such€further€proceedings€as€may€beÐ $ t Ðnecessary.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àCosts€of€the€cause€are€assessed€to€Appellee.€Ð è 8  ÐÌòò€óóÐ À  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ¬ü  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGE