ÿWPC• §^Û.‡k>s Œö­šo§$?È OL|Qò÷t¸/ouH-hd2$óöÊðj¡¥o]7ƒñM2–/àý_Ù-(Ö}^2{WÑÁ)¶+ z‡ ;#¹$ñ¯Ç©˜‘¢9½ÕxÊ!`8pôß¾ïaŠèå…™èd¢ö˜õÍÏl¯ Øç5³ÍÉ?ø¦)8ýéž Ìw?¿ûQ¥ýÆü'‡)ÊiO7ôù«[JÙªÄC.rÁƒ.'Ó¢¾„„}ßÇÔfÝX7ÄjK jÔì½ËÿOÍ6Ðé¶ëdB±©xÿlð¯_ª†ËjðiZ.‰„&ÝÈ¡;¤1Ú°Ç(ß„Sgž²ÙÆm©Ìé‡#`>æ*÷W Œ½{ŠÖÀÀ³ð­Ž{KXÇÎHº_Õ›Ù‹òH'ü….-AÄXû]ª~ƒ£öÈ,°rJ^ãu¼fn1Ln""^Ñá¹e¨=yD驞;úzÂxŸ×£¾WšçÿMTjŠÁöÜm²rñU1oËE“‹-°\ Á`Ìâ}?² ,öxä=»é^n÷`±úþ*â[4É6”j\Ãh®Ï’Æýÿþ@örßYu n e »Xŵšp RœŽ†Ã¿UÀbU;N\ %ª 0ˆ°#Á8 Œù Ú… ^ _ zk Òå · ¿ mÁ wØ ÆÜ Æ¢ ÆhÆ.4ôN & E02 A bJ ^¬ 0D  N VV ^ f n v ~ †  Ž  ˜  ¢UN¬UNúU@HHHHbˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆ 0ë B{{ 0¤˜ D5< D-q 0Kžž ASéÆ< 0¤ 0D¦ A«ê(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\CUSTOM~1\OPINION3.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\Custom WP Templates\opinion3.wptpy<)â  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 ;)´¥¡\Opinion Summary3|x ÿÝ ƒRx`$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€X X»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôû´ òXX ÔRule€10€of€the€Rules€of€the€Court€of€Appeals€reads€as€follows:Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€Court,€with€the€concurrence€of€all€judges€participating€in€the€case,€may€affirm,€reverseÐ 8ˆ Ðor€modify€the€actions€of€the€trial€court€by€memorandum€opinion€when€a€formal€opinion€would€haveÐ üL Ðno€precedential€value.€€When€a€case€is€decided€by€memorandum€opinion€it€shall€be€designatedÐ À Ð"MEMORANDUM€OPINION,"€shall€not€be€published,€and€shall€not€be€cited€or€relied€upon€in€anyÐ „Ô Ðunrelated€case.Ô#†X X òôû´~#Ô?\Appellants Attorney Name & Appellant's Name.?\Appellees Attorney Name & Appellee's Name.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó12456789101112(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regularô\  `(Times NewRomanTT- ù-(|G2x`$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€IŒ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€X X»»Ô d(|3Çq$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€IŒ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Çq$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€IŒ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€IŒ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼IŒ»»»ÔÑ  ÑÑ8€ XXdì»»d8Ñà@¦ ¦ ìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@§§$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÐ  ÐÓ  ÓNovember€1999€SessionÐ Ô$ ÐÓnÓÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔÌò òÔ#†¼IŒ»XX ´#ÔÔ% ‡ ÔÓ  ÓSHELBY€JEAN€CHOATE€LASSITERÔ%†úÔòòóó€v.€Ô% ‡ ÔCHARLES€DAVID€LASSITERÔ%†IÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔó óÐ Ò" ÐÓÓÌà@œ œ ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Ô% ‡ ÔChancery€CourtÔ%†êÔ€for€RobertsonÔ% ‡ ÔÔ%† $Ô€CountyˆÐ Ò " Ðà@77ìàNo.€Ô% ‡! Ô13701Ô%†!uÔ€€€Carol€Catalano,€JudgeÔ% ‡" ÔÔ%†"°ÔˆÐ ¾  Ðó óÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` A߈Ð ‚Ò  ÐÌà@. . ìàò òNo.€M1999„00374„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€September€28,€Ô_Ô2000Ô% ‡# ÔÔ%†#ÌÔó óÔ_ԈР}Í  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<T` AßÐ U¥  ÐÌÔ% ‡ Ôò òó óÔ%†kÔà  àThis€case€involves€a€divorce€ending€a€seven„year€marriage.€€The€divorce€was€awarded€to€theÐ P   Ðwife€on€grounds€of€the€husband's€inappropriate€marital€conduct.€€The€trial€court€divided€the€propertyÐ <Œ Ðand€debts€according€to€the€parties'€stipulations.€€The€court€then€awarded€the€wife€alimony€òòin€futuroóóÐ (x Ðand€ordered€the€husband€to€pay€$750€of€the€wife's€attorney€fees.€€The€husband€appeals€the€awardsÐ d Ðof€alimony€and€attorney€feesÔ#†¼IŒ»XX }#ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔ.€€We€affirm.Ð P ÐÌò òÔ% ‡$ ÔÓ  ÓTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€RightÔ%†$üÔ;€Judgment€of€the€Ô% ‡% ÔChancery€Court€Affirmed€andÐ Ø( ÐRemandedÔ%†%]Ôó óÐ Ä ÐÓ ÓÌòòCottrellÔ#†¼IŒ»àX ·#ÔÔ‡X X.¼IŒÔ,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€Còòantrell,€P.J.,€M.S.Ô% ‡& ÔÔ%†&v Ô,óó€andòòÔ% ‡' Ô€€Cain,€J.Ô%†'Ÿ Ôóó,Ð œì Ðjoined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌÔ% ‡ ÔJohn€B.€Holt,€Springfield,€Tennessee€for€the€appellant,€Charles€David€Lassiter.Ô%†ý ÔÐ `° ÐÌÔ% ‡ ÔÔ%†€ ÔCharlotte€U.€Fleming,€Springfield,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€Shelby€Jean€Choate€Lassiter.Ð 8ˆ ÐÌà@ìì!ìàò òMEMORANDUMó ó€ò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼IŒ»XX  #ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔ׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׈Ð !`  ÐÌà  àShelby€Jean€Choate€Lassiter€("Wife")€and€Charles€David€Lassiter€("Husband")€married€inÐ ì"<" Ð1991.€€The€marriage€was€Husband's€second€and€Wife's€thirdÔ#†¼IŒ»XX c #ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔ.€€Husband€had€one€minor€child,€forÐ Ø#(# Ðwhom€Wife€provided€€care€for€two€years.€€The€parties€adopted€Wife's€grandchild,€who€reached€theÐ Ä$ $ Ðage€of€majority€shortly€after€the€trial.Ð °%!% ÐÐ œ&ì!&ý? Ðò òó óà  àWife€had€been€diagnosed€with€post„polio€syndrome€in€1985,€and€was€"getting€around€well"Ð ° Ðbut€exhibiting€some€symptoms€of€the€condition€when€the€parties€married.€€Husband€was€aware€ofÐ œì Ðher€condition.Ô#†¼IŒ»XX ¿ #ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔ€€Wife's€health€deteriorated€throughout€the€marriage.€€By€the€time€of€the€trial,€WifeÐ ˆØ Ð"had€to€rest€for€hours€in€order€to€do€normal€household€chores."€€She€testified€that€she€had€continuedÐ tÄ Ðto€prepare€meals,€pay€bills,€and€run€the€household.€€Wife€had€received€Social€Security€disabilityÐ `° Ðpayments€for€some€time.€€She€cared€for€Husband's€daughter,€and€at€least€once€used€her€SocialÐ L œ ÐSecurity€payments€to€pay€Husband's€child€support€arrearage€when€his€business€was€slow.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌÔ#†¼IŒ»XX #ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔò òà  àó óWhen€the€parties€married,€Husband€had€a€roofing€business€and€he€worked€in€sheet€metal.€Ð  ` ÐHe€€owed€$5,000€on€the€house€and€$13,000€in€back€taxes.€€Apparently€Husband€also€had€"liens€onÐ ü L  Ðhis€€property"€in€addition€to€the€other€debts,€but€the€amounts€owed,€and€the€reasons€for€the€liens€areÐ è 8  Ðnot€part€of€the€record.€€Wife€arranged€for€a€$70,000€consolidation€loan€secured€by€the€house.€Ð Ô$  ÐHusband€admitted€that€Wife€"straightened€out€his€finances."€€The€parties€thought€they€could€handleÐ À  Ðthe€payments€on€the€new€loan.€€Husband€began€to€experience€physical€problems,€however,€whichÐ ¬ü  Ðprevented€his€work€as€a€roofer€or€a€sheet€metal€worker,€and€the€parties€lost€their€home€throughÐ ˜è  Ðforeclosure.€€They€lived€with€Wife's€parents€for€about€two€years.Ð „Ô  ÐÌÔ#†¼IŒ»XX z#ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔà  àThe€parties€began€experiencing€marital€difficulties.€€One€day,€Husband€went€to€work€andÐ \¬ Ðsimply€did€not€return;€he€moved€in€with€his€parents.€€Sometime€after€the€separation,€Wife€movedÐ H˜ Ðfrom€her€parents'€home€into€her€own€apartment.€€Wife€filed€a€complaint€for€divorce,€allegingÐ 4„ Ðinappropriate€marital€conduct€and€abandonment.€€The€trial€€court,€after€hearing€the€evidence,€awardedÐ  p ÐWife€a€divorce€on€grounds€of€Husband's€inappropriate€marital€conduct€because€Husband€had€"notÐ  \ Ðreturned€home€nor€made€any€arrangement€for€them€to€resume€their€relationship€as€husband€andÐ øH Ðwife."€€Husband€does€not€appeal€the€grant€of€the€divorce€to€Wife.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€court€divided€the€property€and€the€debts€according€to€the€parties'€stipulations,€and€notedÐ ¼  Ðthat€each€party€had€debts€for€deficiency€judgments,€which€the€court€described€as€"debts€for€whichÐ ¨ø Ð[they]€have€nothing€to€show."€€The€court€noted€that€those€debts€were€the€kind€which€"one€wouldÐ ”ä Ðtypically€expect€to€see€discharged€in€bankruptcy."€ò òó óÔ#†¼IŒ»XX N#ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔ€ò òó óThe€court€ordered€Husband€to€pay€$400€per€monthÐ €Ð Ðas€alimony€òòin€futuroóó,€and€$750€of€Wife's€attorney€fees.€€Husband€appeals€the€awards€of€alimony€andÐ l¼ Ðattorney€fees.Ð X ¨ ÐÌòòÔ#†¼IŒ»XX A#ÔóóÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔà  àOrdinarily,€our€review€would€be€òòde€novoóó€upon€the€record€with€a€presumption€of€correctnessÐ 0"€  Ðfor€the€findings€of€fact€by€the€trial€court€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€was€otherwise.€Ð #l! ÐòòSee€óóTenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(d).€€Husband€did€not€submit€a€transcript€of€the€proceedings,€nor€did€heÐ $X" Ðsubmit€a€statement€of€the€evidence€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(c).€€"In€the€absence€of€aÐ ô$D # Ðtranscript€or€a€statement€of€the€evidence,€we€must€conclusively€presume€that€every€fact€admissibleÐ à%0!$ Ðunder€the€pleadings€was€found€or€should€have€been€found€favorably€to€the€appellee."€€òòKing€v.€Kingóó,Ð Ì&"% Ð986€S.W.2d€216,€220€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998)€(quoting€òòLeek€v.€Powellóó,€884€S.W.2d€118,€121€(Tenn.Ð ¸'#& ÐCt.€App.€1994)).€€This€court€must€presume€the€trial€court's€findings€of€fact€are€correct.€€òòSee€Ô_Ôidóó.Ô_ÔÐ ¤(ô#' ÐHusband€argues€that,€in€the€case€before€us,€a€transcript€or€a€statement€of€the€evidence€was€notÐ )à$( Ðâ ânecessary.€€He€claims€the€findings€of€fact€made€by€the€trial€court€in€its€final€decree€were€neverÐ |*Ì%) Ðcontested.€€He€does€not€now€dispute€the€factual€findings€€of€the€court,€but€maintains€that,€under€theÐ ° Ðfacts€presented,€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€awards€of€alimony€and€attorney€fees.Ô#†¼IŒ»XX u#ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔÐ œì Ðâ âÌòòÔ‡)X XXX Ôà  àóóÔ#†X XX)X ¦!#ÔÔ‡)X XXX ÔAlimony€òòin€futuroóó€is€a€continuing,€but€modifiable,€support€obligation€to€an€economicallyÐ tÄ Ðdisadvantaged€spouse.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)€(Supp.€1999)Ô#†X XX)X ÷!#ÔÔ‡*X XXX Ô.Ô#†X XX*X ú"#ÔÔ‡)X XXX ÔÔ#†)¼IŒ»X)X d!#ÔÔ‡)X X»)¼IŒÔ€€Alimony€òòin€solidoóó€is€anÐ `° Ðunmodifiable€lump€sum€award.€òòÔ#†X XX)X =##ÔÔ‡*X XXX ÔSee€id.óó€€Ô#†X XX*X $#ÔÔ‡(X XXX ÔIn€the€context€of€a€divorce€proceeding,€attorney€fee€awardsÐ L œ Ðare€considered€as€alimony€òòin€solidoóó.€òòSee€Herrera€v.€Herreraóó,€944€S.W.2d€379,€390€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð 8 ˆ Ð1996).Ô#†X XX(X c$#ÔÔ#†¼IŒ»XX ##ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔÐ $ t ÐÌÔ‡)X XXX Ôà  àÔ#†X XX)X Ô%#ÔÔ‡)X XXX ÔIn€making€an€alimony€award,€a€court€must€consider€a€number€of€factors,€including€the€relativeÐ ü L  Ðearning€capacity,€obligations,€needs€and€financial€resources€of€the€parties.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ è 8  Ð36„5„101(d)(1)(A)„(L)€(Supp.€1999)€(listing€the€factors€a€court€must€consider).€€"The€need€of€theÐ Ô$  Ðspouse€receiving€the€support€is€the€single€most€important€factor."€€òòWatters€v.€Wattersóó,€22€S.W.2dÐ À  Ð817,€821€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1999).€The€obligor€spouse's€ability€to€pay€is€also€an€importantÐ ¬ü  Ðconsideration.€€òòSee€Hazard€v.€Hazardóó,€833€S.W.2d€911,€917€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1991).€€Because€supportÐ ˜è  Ðdecisions€are€factually€driven€and€involve€considering€and€balancing€numerous€factors,€appellateÐ „Ô  Ðcourts€give€wide€latitude€to€the€trial€courtððs€discretionòò.€€See€Cranford€v.€Cranfordóó,€772€S.W.2d€48,Ð pÀ Ð50€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1989).òòÐ \¬ ÐÔ#†X XX)X "&#ÔÔ#†¼IŒ»XX Ÿ%#ÔóóÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔÌòòÔ#†¼IŒ»XX €*#ÔÔ‡X X»¼IŒÔÔ‡)X XXX Ôà  àóóÔ#†X XX)X å*#ÔÔ‡(X XXX ÔHusband€appeals€the€awards€of€attorney€fees€and€alimony€òòin€futuroóó,€claiming€that,Ð 4„ Ðconsidering€the€short€duration€of€the€marriage€and€his€own€inability€to€pay,€the€award€is€excessive.€Ð  p ÐHe€claims€that€his€own€obligations,€and€his€lack€of€any€savings€for€retirement,€make€him€unable€toÐ  \ Ðpay€the€amounts€ordered.€€He€contends€that,€if€he€filed€bankruptcy,€as€he€asserts€the€trial€courtÐ øH Ðsuggested,€he€would€never€be€able€to€establish€financial€independence€or€establish€credit€for€himself.€Ð ä4 ÐHe€further€claims€that€Wife's€standard€of€living€has€improved€since€the€separation,€in€that€she€movedÐ Ð  Ðfrom€her€parents'€home€into€her€own€apartment.òòÔ#†X XX(X 6+#ÔÔ‡)X XXX ÔÔ#†)¼IŒ»X)X Æ*#ÔÔ‡)X X»)¼IŒÔ€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àóóÔ#†X XX)X r.#ÔThe€trial€court€found€that€Wife€needed€alimony€"for€mere€survival€until€her€death."€€BasedÐ ”ä Ðupon€the€record€before€us,€Ô‡)X XXX ÔÔ#†)¼IŒ»X)X ´.#ÔÔ‡)X X»)¼IŒÔ€Wife€is€clearly€an€economically€disadvantaged€spouse.€€òòÔ#†X XX)X §/#ÔÔ#†¼IŒ»XX é/#ÔÔ‡)¼IŒ»»¼IŒÔÔ‡)X X»)¼IŒÔóóHer€SocialÐ €Ð ÐSecurity€disability€payment€of€$594€per€month€was€€her€only€income.€€The€trial€court€found€that€WifeÐ l¼ Ðwas€"physically€and€totally€disabled€from€working€.€.€.€absolutely€unemployable€.€.€.€physically€andÐ X ¨ Ðpsychologically€altered€as€a€human€being€due€to€her€post„polio€syndrome€condition."òò€€óóIn€comparison,Ð D!” ÐHusband€earned€$1,400€to€$1,600€per€month.€€The€court€found€that€Husband€was€"healthy€and€theÐ 0"€  Ðfacts€show€that€he€[had]€survived€his€illnesses,€[was]€regularly€and€gainfully€employed€and€couldÐ #l! Ðpotentially€be€employed€to€a€greater€degree."òò€Ô#†X XX)X ‰0#ÔÔ‡)X XXX ÔÔ#†)¼IŒ»X)X ¨0#ÔÔ‡)X X»)¼IŒÔÐ $X" ÐóóÔ#†X XX)X •3#ÔÔ#†¼IŒ»XX ×3#ԀРô$D # Ðà  àÔ€X X»¼IŒÔThe€trial€court's€findings€that€Wife€is€economically€disadvantaged€and€is€not€capable€ofÐ &V!$ Ðrehabilitation€establish€the€prerequisites€for€an€award€of€alimony,€including€alimony€òòin€futuroóó.€€òòSeeóóÐ ò&B"% ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1).€Her€limited€income€and€her€modest€expenses€established€herÐ Þ'.#& Ðneed€for€spousal€support.€€Having€found€that€Wife€was€in€need€of€alimony,€the€trial€court€consideredÐ Ê($' Ð"the€only€remaining€question€.€.€.€whether€he€can€pay€somehow€for€her€maintenance€until€.€.€.€the€dayÐ ¶)%( Ðof€her€demise€or€remarriage."€€Ð ¢*ò%) ÐÐ Ž+Þ&* Ðà  àThe€trial€court€conscientiously€and€painstakingly€evaluated€the€parties'€relative€situations€inÐ ° Ðdetermining€Husband's€ability€to€pay,€Wife's€need,€and€the€amount€of€support€to€be€awarded.€€ForÐ œì Ðexample,€the€trial€court€reduced€Wife's€claimed€expenses€by€$200€per€month,€lowered€Husband'sÐ ˆØ Ðchild€support€payments€by€almost€$150€per€month€in€recognition€of€the€payments€their€child€receivedÐ tÄ Ðdue€to€Wife's€disability,€and€recognized€that€the€child€support€obligation€would€cease€altogether€inÐ `° ÐDecember€of€1998.€€The€court€approved€the€distribution€of€debts€and€of€marital€property€accordingÐ L œ Ðto€the€partiesðð€stipulations.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àThe€court€sympathized€with€Husband's€financial€situation,€stating€that€"all€he€thought€he€wasÐ  ` Ðacquiring€in€his€lifetime€through€his€business€is€gone,"€and€that€he€would€have€to€drive€a€bus€untilÐ ü L  ÐSocial€Security€provided€him€with€money€to€live.€€However,€the€court€noted€that€Husband€had€in€theÐ è 8  Ðpast€driven€for€other€bus€lines€in€addition€to€his€primary€employer,€but€was€not€doing€so€at€the€time.Ð Ô$  ÐThis€opportunity€provided€Husband€with€the€ability€to€work€full€time€even€when€his€employer€didÐ À  Ðnot€have€sufficient€trips€for€him.€€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àWe€cannot€say€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€consider€all€factors€relevant€to€the€determinationÐ „Ô  Ðto€award€spousal€support.€€To€the€contrary,€the€court€thoroughly€considered€and€weighed€theÐ pÀ Ðnecessary€factors.€€Further,€there€is€nothing€in€the€record€before€us€to€indicate€that€the€trial€court'sÐ \¬ Ðaward€of€alimony€òòin€futuro€óówas€contrary€to€the€weight€of€the€evidence.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àAs€noted€above,€an€award€of€attorney€fees€in€the€context€of€a€divorce€proceeding€isÐ  p Ðconsidered€alimony€òòin€solidoóó.€€òòSee€Ô_ÔHerreraÔ_Ôóó,€944€S.W.2d€at€390.€€The€factors€to€be€considered€inÐ  \ Ðmaking€an€award€of€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€are€the€same€as€those€considered€in€making€an€award€ofÐ øH Ðalimony€òòin€futuroóó,€with€the€exception€of€the€possibility€of€rehabilitation.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„Ð ä4 Ð6„101(d)(1)(A)„(L).€€For€the€reasons€we€discussed€above€in€affirming€the€award€of€alimony€òòin€futuroóó,Ð Ð  Ðwe€also€affirm€the€award€of€attorney€fees.Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€we€Ô‡(X XXX Ôaffirm€the€order€of€the€trial€court€awarding€attorney€fees€and€alimony€òòinÐ ”ä Ðfuturoóó€to€Wife€and€remand€for€such€further€proceedings€as€may€be€necessary.€€Costs€are€taxed€to€theÐ €Ð Ðappellant,€Charles€David€Lassiter,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.Ô#†X XX(X ’A#ÔÐ l¼ ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð #l! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àPATRICIA€J.€COTTRELL,€JUDGE