ÿWPCA 0W²Æ×~ÉÝ)î{Å1ŒJ¿;s)–˜Ïƒà‘JáùO•,y¸Ð"®¤x8„ü¢$NéV˜A ën“…M1­µ˜ô*%<{¶Ô5æê}‡S­ÅáîºpE5ó6æãB|èOÜòƒóô¸áëÄŠKù›ƒØA#Ĥ¬•1>•ƒÙl•.#±ŸÝ\ܵWí'|G¯á19zZGóÚÕû{±84e>Éhç`|`gõž8ÔÀFç%|:d"[yý3ó"'r@bÚTÜ÷÷r0K’v #2‘£|»«9òny¬rzôBÇÂGkAGZHyV $ï¢J´¡Øn|FCBa>ñ®:q–ļÿÏ"~È–·Õä0ÌBÝŽx+9%/ÓÔ`Ü ™·DÇøkä×ü;¼‰€­¥a¯çJ‡}ãƒdцYq#ÁW}R_#ÄUÆÀ£“R¹ÑyeA¯›fZø1ùn®%QI}±¾Ï²Žú M_x,/ŸÞ n¬èÝ#þJ¸›ê,.-¨Ãk¦´x¶ÍÏàåö4×´›{qö¬ W**³¾Øø'òyÉ;õ±, Õ ýŸW# ÂU NÍ % 04! 0ÏUb$ ^ , w@8 4x Œ › m †´ : 0DJ Ž U:‘÷ËËËËËËËËËËËËËË AQÂÆ 0DÙ 0D 0Daa D/¥¥ BÔ D3ñññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññññ B$˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular»( ¤U$¡¡Ó  Ó((2L9$¤¤Ý ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€X?XX»»ÔÑ  ÑÑÑà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-[šV%ä \E]^E_`aDbEcdÓ€nÖ…#%ingĈ3|xnÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ €LEDFORDLedfordBolingArtripCrilleyFuerst WinnBrownleeKesterson B.R.BankrArcata€LAWRENCEBURGSockwellLawrenceburgHickmanDeptCoakleyc]ounsel Ý ƒKa$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÏuX»»ÔÑ @ ÑÑ@Ñà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔMs.€Ledfordððs€brief€states€that€ð ð[c]ounsel€for€Mr.€Ledford€made€an€oral€motion€to€amend€forÐ ° Ðmoney€damages€to€which€the€Court€replied€that€no€damages€were€prayed€for,€and€that€someoneÏwould€ððeither€go€to€jail€or€pay€a€fine,ðð€but€inasmuch€as€no€judgment€was€plead,€there€would€be€noÏsuch€money€damages.ðð(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ùÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€»/ó »»»ÔÔ€Ø  »»/óÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€Xê X ØÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€23,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,@ÓÐAZ‹"Arial Regular íÝ ƒL9$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€X?XX»»ÔÑ @ ÑÑ@Ñà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔMs.€Ledford€remarried€and€is€now€Phyllis€Dianne€Rawdon.!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdVVVV'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ„°ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ  ÑÑ€ÑÑ7€—N»»ddÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÔ€„l7„»»Ôò òñnññdñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` 8ttxPX°ð  rßñdññnññnññnñÌñnñßt€ )>.*jxÛÿ` `€€@Eû` 8ttxP3ð  tßñnñà@¡ ¡ DàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌà@ÜÜ)DàAT€NASHVILLEó óÔ€¼M¼„„l7ԈР€Ð ÐÌÌÌMICHAEL€SHANE€LEDFORD,à0  à)Ð* z€%€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiff/Appellee,à0 À àà0À€%À€%à)à0p€%€%àLawrence€ChanceryÐV¦ p€%p€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àNo.€7378„95Ðl¼ p€%p€% ÐVS.à0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%à)Ð‚Ò €%€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àAppeal€No.Иè p€%p€% ÐPHYLLIS€DIANNE€LEDFORD,à0  à)à0p€%€%à01A01„9701„CH„00029Юþ p€%p€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendant/Appellant.à0 À àà0À€%À€%à)ÐÚ*€%€% ÐÌÌÌÌà@ß ß DàAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURTˆÌà@»»&DàFOR€LAWRENCE€COUNTYˆÌà@úú"DàAT€LAWRENCEBURG,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@ç ç DàTHE€HONORABLE€JIM€T.€HAMILTON,€JUDGEˆÌÌÌÌÌòòFor€Plaintiff/Appelleeóó:à0 h àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%àà0p€%€%àòòFor€Defendant/Appellantóó:Ð$^p€%p€% ÐÌPaul€A.€Batesà0  àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%àà0p€%€%àR.€Eddie€DavidsonÐ:&Š!p€%p€% ÐChristopher€V.€Sockwellà0 h àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%àà0p€%€%àNashville,€TennesseeÐP' "p€%p€% ÐBoston,€Bates,€Holt€&€SockwellÌLawrenceburg,€TennesseeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌà@%DàÔ‡„l7„¼¼MÔò òAFFIRMED€AND€REMANDEDó óÔ#†¼M¼„„l7p #ԈР,2|-) ÐÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àÌÌÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÐ  .;~61 ÐÑX„Ñò òÔ€„l7„¼¼MÔÓ€ÓÑ  Ñà@ÎÎ)DàòòO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÔ€¼M¼„„l7ԈР° ÐÌà ` àThis€appeal€involves€a€dispute€over€the€destruction€of€property€awarded€to€oneÏof€the€spouses€in€a€divorce€case.€€Believing€that€his€former€wife€was€responsible€forÏthe€damage€to€real€and€personal€property€he€had€received€following€the€divorce,€theÏformer€husband€filed€a€petition€in€the€Chancery€Court€for€Lawrence€County€seekingÏto€have€his€former€wife€held€in€contempt.€€During€the€contempt€hearing,€the€trial€courtÏgranted€the€former€husbandððs€motion€to€amend€his€petition€to€seek€monetary€damagesÏand€later€awarded€the€former€husband€$6,000€in€damages.€The€former€wife€asserts€onÏthis€appeal€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€permitting€her€former€husband€to€amend€hisÏpetition€to€seek€damages€and€that€the€evidence€does€not€support€the€damage€award.€ÏWe€affirm€the€trial€court.ÌÌà@ùù.Dàò òI.ó óˆÐ X¨ ÐÌà ` àIn€March€1996,€Michael€Shane€Ledford€and€Phyllis€Dianne€Ledford׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€wereÐ šê Ðdivorced€in€the€Chancery€Court€for€Lawrence€County.€€Mr.€Ledford€received€theÏpartiesðð€house€as€part€of€the€division€of€the€marital€property,€but€the€divorce€decreeÏpermitted€Ms.€Ledford€to€continue€to€occupy€the€house€until€the€third€week€of€MayÏ1996.€€The€parties€agreed€that€Ms.€Ledford€would€vacate€the€house€on€or€around€MayÏ20,€1996.ÌÌà ` àMr.€Ledford€discovered€extensive€damage€to€the€house€when€he€tookÏpossession€from€Ms.€Ledford€on€May€21,€1996.€€Light€fixtures€and€curtains€had€beenÏremoved;€window€screens€had€been€removed,€and€windows€broken;€carpet€had€beenÏtorn;€pieces€of€indoor€and€outdoor€furniture€had€been€damaged;€pantry€doors€hadÏbeen€taken€down;€and€a€telephone€jack€had€been€yanked€from€the€wall.€€Several€of€theÏrooms€had€been€blatantly€trashed.€€Mr.€Ledford€also€discovered€that€certain€items€ofÏpersonal€property€awarded€to€him€in€the€divorce€were€missing,€including€a€televisionÏand€VCR,€a€heating€stove,€fishing€poles€and€fishing€tackle,€a€complement€of€tools€thatÏMr.€Ledford€had€been€given€by€his€father,€some€kitchen€items,€a€step€ladder,€someÏbedding,€and€some€building€materials.ÌÐ K9›4@ Ðà ` àOn€June€12,€1996,€Mr.€Ledford€filed€a€petition€in€the€Chancery€Court€forÏLawrence€County€seeking€to€hold€Ms.€Ledford€in€contempt€for€ð ðwillful€disobedienceÏof€the€courtððs€prior€order.ðð€€His€petition€requested€that€Ms.€Ledford€be€made€to€appearÏand€show€cause€why€she€should€not€be€jailed€or€fined€for€contempt,€and€sought€allÏproper€general€relief.€€Ms.€Ledford€opposed€the€petition.ÌÌà ` àThe€trial€court€held€a€hearing€in€the€matter€on€August€13,€1996.€€Mr.€LedfordÏpresented€evidence€concerning€the€scope€of€the€property€damage€and€the€value€ofÏmissing€or€damaged€property.€€When€Ms.€Ledford€objected€to€the€valuation€evidence,ÏMr.€Ledford€moved€to€amend€his€petition€to€include€a€claim€for€money€damages€forÏthe€missing€or€damaged€property.€€Following€arguments€from€both€parties,€the€trialÏcourt€took€the€question€under€advisement€and€proceeded€with€the€hearing.€ÏThereafter,€Ms.€Ledford€testified€herself€and€offered€other€evidence€concerning€herÏestimation€of€the€damaged€and€missing€items.ÌÌà ` àOn€August€19,€1996,€the€court€entered€an€order€granting€Mr.€Ledfordððs€motionÏto€amend€his€petition€and€finding€that€Ms.€Ledford€had€harassed€Mr.€Ledford€inÏviolation€of€the€courtððs€previous€decree.€€After€concluding€that€Ms.€Ledford€hadÏintentionally€damaged€the€former€marital€residence,€the€trial€court€awarded€Mr.ÏLedford€$6,000€in€damages€for€the€loss€or€destruction€of€his€property.€€Ms.€LedfordÏhas€appealed.ÌÌà@ËË.Dàò òII.ó óˆÐ È($, ÐÌà ` àBefore€we€turn€to€the€two€issues€Ms.€Ledford€seeks€to€raise€on€this€appeal,€weÏmust€consider€the€content€of€the€record€on€appeal.€Our€review€of€the€issues€presentedÏon€appeal€is€limited€to€the€contents€of€the€appellate€record.€€With€the€exception€ofÏpost„judgment€facts,€which€are€not€applicable€here,€we€must€obtain€our€understandingÏof€what€transpired€during€the€proceedings€below€from€the€record€on€appeal.ÌÌà ` àThe€appellant€is€required€to€supply€this€court€with€a€record€that€conveys€a€fair,Ïaccurate,€and€complete€account€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€theÏissues€that€form€the€bases€for€the€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(a);€òòState€v.€Banesóó,Ð 09€4@ Ð874€S.W.2d€73,€82€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòState€v.€Bolingóó,€840€S.W.2d€944,€951Ð Ô:$6B Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992).€€Ordinarily,€the€appellate€record€contains€a€verbatimÏtranscript€of€proceedings€in€the€trial€court.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b);€however,Ð T¤ Ðwhen€a€transcript€is€not€available,€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(c)€permits€the€use€of€aÏstatement€of€the€evidence€of€the€proceedings.€€The€statement€of€the€evidence€must€beÏapproved€by€the€trial€court,€òòseeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(f),€and€once€it€is€approved,€itÐ @  Ðbecomes€the€official€record€of€the€proceedings€in€the€trial€court€for€the€purposes€ofÏthe€appeal.ÌÌà ` àThe€appellate€record€in€this€case€consists€of€the€papers€filed€with€the€trial€court,Ïthe€exhibits€introduced€by€Mr.€Ledford€at€the€August€13,€1996€hearing,€and€Mr.ÏLedfordððs€statement€of€the€evidence€that€was€approved€by€the€trial€court.€€These€areÏthe€documents€that€comprise€the€factual€universe€on€this€appeal,€and€we€must€limitÏour€consideration€to€these€documents,€notwithstanding€the€other€factualÏrepresentations€appearing€in€the€partiesðð€briefs€that€have€no€support€in€the€record.ÌÌà@-Dàò òIII.ó óˆÐ Lœ ÐÌà ` àMs.€Ledfordððs€first€assertion,€as€best€we€understand€it,€is€that€the€trial€courtÏerred€by€awarding€Mr.€Ledford€money€damages€for€the€damage€or€destruction€of€hisÏproperty€after€it€refused€to€grant€his€oral€motion€to€amend€his€complaint€to€seekÏmoney€damages.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€factual€premise€on€which€this€assertion€is€based€cannot€beÐ €%Ð ( Ðsubstantiated€by€the€appellate€record.€€If€anything,€the€appellate€record€establishesÏthat€precisely€the€opposite€occurred.€€Both€the€statement€of€the€evidence€and€the€finalÏjudgment€state€unambiguously€that€the€trial€court€granted€Mr.€Ledfordððs€motion€toÏamend.€€Thus,€the€only€conclusion€that€we€can€draw€from€the€record€is€that€the€trialÏcourt€granted€Mr.€Ledfordððs€motion€to€amend€to€seek€money€damages.ÌÌà ` àTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€15€reflects€a€broad€policy€favoring€permitting€parties€to€amendÏtheir€pleadings.€€òòSee€Branch€v.€Warrenóó,€527€S.W.2d€89,€91„92€(Tenn.€1975);€òòWinn€v.Ð  2ð-8 ÐTucker€Corp.óó,€848€S.W.2d€64,€68€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1992).€€The€policy€is€qualified€onlyÐ D4”/: Ðby€considerations€of€fairness,€and€the€courts,€as€a€general€rule,€will€grant€motions€toÐ è581< Ðamend€if€the€amendment€does€not€unduly€prejudice€the€opposing€partyððs€ability€to€goÏforward€with€an€action€or€defense.€€òòSee€Gardiner€v.€Wordóó,€731€S.W.2d€889,€891„92Ð T¤ Ð(Tenn.€1987);€òòCampbell€County€Bd.€of€Educ.€v.€Brownlee„Kesterson,€Inc.óó,€677Ð øH ÐS.W.2d€457,€463€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984).€€When€the€prejudice€caused€by€anÏamendment€consists€of€inconvenience,€surprise,€or€tactical€disadvantage,€the€courtsÏshould,€and€generally€will,€grant€the€opposing€partyððs€request€for€a€continuance.€òò€SeeóóÐ ä 4  ÐTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€15.02;€òòGardiner€v.€Wordóó,€731€S.W.2d€at€892„93;€òòWalden€v.€Wylieóó,Ð ˆØ  Ð645€S.W.2d€247,€250€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1982).€€Accordingly,€parties€who€neglect€toÏrequest€a€continuance€to€prepare€to€meet€the€evidence€to€be€introduced€under€anÏamendment€waive€the€right€to€complain€about€the€amendment€on€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòArcataÐ tÄ ÐGraphics€Co.€v.€Heidelberg€Harris,€Inc.óó,€874€S.W.2d€15,€22€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1993).Ð h ÐÌà ` àThe€record€contains€no€indication€that€Ms.€Ledford€requested€a€continuance€inÏorder€to€marshal€a€response€to€Mr.€Ledfordððs€request€for€money€damages.€€To€theÏcontrary,€Ms.€Ledford€affirmatively€countered€Mr.€Ledfordððs€evidence€on€damagesÏthrough€her€own€testimony€and€by€calling€her€own€witnesses€to€testify€about€theÏdamages€and€missing€items.€€Based€on€the€appellate€record,€no€conclusion€can€beÏdrawn€other€than€that€Ms.€Ledford€tried€the€damages€issue€by€consent€at€the€AugustÏ13,€1996€hearing.€€Accordingly,€€we€find€that€the€trial€court€did€not€commit€reversibleÏerror€by€permitting€Mr.€Ledford€to€proceed€with€his€claim€for€damages.€€ÌÌà@¥¥.Dàò òIñ`ñVñ`ññañIIñañ.ó óˆÐ $'t"* ÐÌà ` àAs€a€back„up€argument,€Ms.€Ledford€asserts€that€the€evidence€does€not€supportÏthe€trial€courtððs€damage€award.€€Compensatory€damage€awards€made€by€a€trial€courtÏsitting€without€a€jury€are€findings€of€fact.€€òòSeeóó€òòArmstrong€v.€Hickman€County€Hwy.Ð ´-)2 ÐDepððtóó,€743€S.W.2d€189,€195€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1987).€€Accordingly,€we€review€themÐ X/¨*4 Ðde€novo€upon€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€they€are€correct€unless€the€evidenceÏpreponderates€otherwise.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(d).Ð  2ð-8 ÐÌà ` àThe€record€contains€exhibits€and€other€evidence€supporting€Mr.€LedfordððsÏclaim€for€damages.€€The€evidence€in€the€appellate€record€contains€nothingÏcontradicting€in€detail€the€amount€of€damages€claimed€by€Mr.€Ledford.€€TheÏstatement€of€the€evidence€merely€recites€that€the€court€found€ð ðcertain€witnessesÐ Ô:$6B Ðproduced€by€Mrs.€Ledford€to€be€of€benefit€to€the€Court€in€establishing€damages€ofÏ$6,000.00€as€contrasted€to€the€higher€value€approximating€$10,000.00€sought€by€Mr.ÏLedford.ðð€€As€we€observed€earlier€in€this€opinion,€our€analysis€of€Ms.€LedfordððsÏissues€has€been€restricted€by€the€record€before€us.€€Ms.€Ledford€has€the€burden€ofÏdemonstrating€that€the€evidence€in€the€record€preponderates€against€the€trial€courtððsÏfactual€finding€on€damages.€€She€has€not€carried€that€burden€on€this€record.ÌÌà ` àMs.€Ledfordððs€argument€that€the€trial€court€could€not€use€its€contempt€powerÏto€assess€damages€against€her€misses€the€point.€€The€court€properly€allowed€Mr.ÏLedford€to€amend€his€original€contempt€petition€to€recover€monetary€damages€for€theÏitems€broken€or€missing€from€the€marital€residence.€€The€resulting€money€judgmentÏis€reasonably€attributable€to€Mr.€Ledfordððs€added€prayer€for€relief.ÌÌà@ÓÓ.Dàò òñbñIñbñV.ó óˆÐ T ÐÌà ` àWe€affirm€the€judgment€and€remand€the€case€to€the€trial€court€for€whateverÏfurther€proceedings€may€be€required.€€We€tax€the€costs€of€this€appeal€to€PhyllisÏDianne€Ledford€and€her€surety€for€which€execution,€if€necessary,€may€issue.€€ÌÌÓ€Óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌHENRY€F.€TODD,ÌPRESIDING€JUDGE€,€M.S.ÌÌÌ_________________________________ÌñZñWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEñZññ[ññZñbhcñZññ[ññ[ñBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€ñ[ññ\ññ[ñPRESIDING€ñ[ññ\ññ^ññ]ñjudgeñ]ññ^ññ_ñJUDGEñ_ññ\ññ[ñJUDGE,€ñ[ññ[ñM.S.ñ[ññZñ€ñZññ\ñ€ñcñÐ  2d-3 ÐÔ€ GÕ!»¼{1Ôò òÑ8€{1»»d»»d8Ñà@  DàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@ZZ)DàAT€NASHVILLEó óˆÐ òB ÐÌÔ‡¼{1»»¼{1ÔMICHAEL€SHANE€LEDFORD,à0  à)ÐvÆ€%€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiff/Appellee,à0 À àà0À€%À€%à)à0p€%€%àLawrence€ChanceryЦ öp€%p€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àNo.€7378„95о p€%p€% ÐVS.à0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%à)ÐÖ &€%€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àAppeal€No.Ðî > p€%p€% ÐPHYLLIS€DIANNE€LEDFORD,à0  à)à0p€%€%à01A01„9701„CH„00029ÐV p€%p€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendant/Appellant.à0 À àà0À€%À€%à)Ð6† €%€% ÐÌÔ#† GÕ!»¼{1Î8#ÔÌò òà@cc(DàòòJ€U€D€G€M€E€N€Tóóó óˆÐ ¨ø ÐÌÔ€ŠPÁ ‹! GÕÔÓ€Óà ` àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€on€appeal€from€the€Lawrence€CountyÐ ,| ÐChancery€Court,€the€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€arguments€of€counsel.€€Upon€consideration€ofÏthe€entire€record,€this€court€finds€and€concludes€that€the€trial€judgeððs€judgment€should€beÏaffirmed.ÌÌà ` àIn€accordance€with€the€opinion€filed€contemporaneously€with€this€judgment,€it€is,Ïtherefore,€ordered,€adjudged,€and€decreed€that€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€be€and€is€herebyÏaffirmed,€and€that€the€cause€be€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€consistentÏwith€this€courtððs€opinion.ÌÌà ` àIt€is€further€ordered€that€the€costs€of€this€appeal€be€taxed€to€Phyllis€Dianne€Ledford,Ïprincipal,€and€R.€Eddie€Davidson,€surety,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.ÌÌÓ€Óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à_______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àHENRY€F.€TODD,Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à_______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à_______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGE€€ñcñ