WPC &+9͂ƂIW0(Os #(P$CCS6&>oG.?^[.4U6퉭L=+gdzGң2[rnւG~\td^90 HJ U 雁WN G!i)%REXzfh„Wr~)E>1 ƼPL^?jXd>u rA?2 `/s4 =>> *S!=8ߑ+n4[IS"|RDCcD-K c^mS޼sQ )|f!s-Az> 6}id'?Y x4 ] $g#>,ݕ@ j ^oC;^/e{}*]WQ׊\'y@?(m.קد.Fb#\ %% ^ + 07 UN w 4 z%  q  m  _ %NEb 0 B 0 D3i D- 0K ASg 0- 0D A\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK4,,,,0ly/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular=.:i+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8%dd8         0   d(|3k$ !.8%dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3k$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8%dd8     _  %8SXXdd8  @  |%INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#% | #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsOctober17,2003 L XSX% #%XXS#RONALDKEITH_LOINES_,JR.v.KIMBERLY_LOINES_XSX%  J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHamiltonCounty  J @@No.02D1566SamuelH.Payne,Judge  6 FILEDNOVEMBER25,2003    @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200300526_COA_ԄR3CV   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Inthisdivorcecase,thetrialcourtawardedRonaldKeith_Loines_,Jr.( Husband)adivorcefrom x  Kimberly_Loines_Ԁ( Wife)byjudgmententeredJanuary14,2003.Wifefiledhernoticeofappeal d onFebruary25,2003.Becausethenoticeofappealwasnotfiledwithin30daysoftheentryofthe P judgmentofdivorce,wearewithoutjurisdictiontoconsidertheissuesraisedbyWife.Accordingly, < Wifesappealisdismissed. (x  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;AppealDismissed;CaseRemanded  P   #%XS#XSX.%CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand ( D.Michael_Swiney_,JJ.,joined.  Kimberly_Loines_,appellant,ProSe.  BrianM.House,_Ringgold_,Georgia,fortheappellee,RonaldKeith_Loines_,Jr. t  OPINION #%XXS#XSX% L  #%XXS0 #  XSX%  Therecordbeforeusconsistsof,amongotherdocuments,(1)Husbandsoriginalcomplaint; $"t! (2)Wifesanswer;(3)Husbandsmotiontosetthecaseforhearing;(4)thetrialcourtsordersetting #`" thecaseforhearingonJanuary14,2003;(5)a finaldecreeofdivorceenteredJanuary14,2003, #L# reflectingahearingonthatdate,andnotingthat [_t]he_Ԁdefendant_ha[d_]failedtoappear;and(6)a $8 $ noticeofappealfiledFebruary25,2003.ThepleadingsfiledbyHusbandfollowingthefilingof %$!% Wifesanswer,theordersettingthecaseforhearing,andthefinaldecreeofdivorceallreflect &"& serviceonWifeat SunBox43954,TucsonArizona85733.Thisisthesameaddressreflectedby '"' Wifeonherbrieffiledprose. (#(   Anoticeofappeal shallbefiledwithandreceivedbytheclerkofthetrialcourtwithin30 p*%* daysafterthedateofentryofthejudgmentappealedfrom;....Tenn.R.App.P.4(a).While \+&+ Tenn.R.App.P.2providesthatanappellatecourtmaysuspendtherequirementsoftheRulesof H,', AppellateProcedure,thatruledoes notpermittheextensionoftimeforfilinganoticeofappeal. 4-(- _Tenn.R.App.P.2.Bythesametoken,theextensionoftimeprovisionsofTenn.R.App.P.21(b)  clearlyprovidethat thecourtmaynotenlargethetimeforfilinganoticeofappeal.  Tenn.R.App.  P.21(b).    The30day timelimitismandatoryandjurisdictionalincivilcases. Jeffersonv.Pneumo ` Servs.Corp .,699S.W.2d181,184(Tenn.Ct.App.1985);seealso AmericanSteinwinterInvestor L  Groupv.AmericanSteinwinter,Inc. ,964S.W.2d569,571(Tenn.Ct.App.1997). 8    WehavenoappellatejurisdictiontoconsidertheissuesraisedbyWife.Accordingly,this  ` appealisdismissed.CostsonappealaretaxedtoKimberlyLoines.Thiscaseisremandedtothe  L  trialcourtforenforcementofthatcourtsjudgmentandforcollectionofcostsassessedbelow,all  8  pursuanttoapplicablelaw. $     `     h     _______________________________      `     h     CHARLESD.SUSANO,JR.,JUDGE p    `     h      p