WPC M,%5X7ýmÏΓS)lRؓ;҉OPeϭP^P> $e0'kkywn>OĉNnhZ.f( {?qUߥW)&{}va}!j~7>ח"εj ` S'Q#jn}Ѻ U_A[x&NMB܅kWPE?Iu,ęq|ְX"0bgeĵnUmMk6q蘌 ?Q;As4XWz VFI&?|cNąY߲oByETh 2E5EŊ8n-GnPҍ*T[С To( -#< Ǜ|y%R;tq^i L6錁3^MˇXe%UktS`gtwb#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz c   F 0D NPCRUNEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASD 0] 0D AEHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0m4+ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularK+l C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Y RR$      2     _Theword filialisdefinedas [_o]f_,relatingto,orbefittingasonordaughter.WebstersIINewRiverside  UniversityDictionary477(1994).Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   9 RR$      1     _TheorderappealedfromwasenteredasafinaladjudicationpursuanttotheprovisionsofTenn.R.Civ.P.  54.02.Thetrialcourtdirectedthat otheraspectsofthecaseshouldproceedwithoutneedforastay.These other t aspectspertaintosuchthingsasmedicalexpenses,funeralexpenses,andthementalandphysicalsufferingofthe 8 plaintiffsinfantchild.(I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2R$ !.8Od d 8         0  2 d(|3N $ !.8Od d 8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3N $ !.8Od d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Q$d d8     _  83XXdd 8  @ (INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#( #Ԉ &   May7,2001Session L XDuX #XXDu#JOHNR.MALONEY,etal.v.MORRISTOWNCLINICCORP.,d/b/a J EASTTENNESSEEOB/GYN,P.C.,etal.XDuX   ^ @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHamblenCounty  ^ @@No.99CV068KindallT.Lawson,Judge  J FILEDSEPTEMBER19,2001 "  @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200002729COAR3CV   AV) ` dE<` A      Thisisawrongfuldeathactionbaseduponallegedmedicalmalpractice.Theplaintiffsarethe  parentsofEmilyLeAnnMaloney,whodiedsixdaysafterherbirth.Thetrialcourtdismissed #  1      ׀the x plaintiffsclaims forconsortiumandcompanionshipdamagesagainstthedefendants!an d obstetrician,hisgroup,andahospital!allofwhomwereinvolvedinthebirthandsubsequentcare P oftheplaintiffsinfantchild.Wereverseandremandforfurtherproceedings. <  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt d Reversed;CaseRemanded  P   #XDu#XDuX.CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHoustonM.Goddard, ( P.J.,andD.MichaelSwiney,J.,joined.  DavidC.LeeandJ.D.Lee,Knoxville,Tennessee,fortheappellants,JohnR.MaloneyandCheryl  C.Caruso,individuallyandassurvivingparentsofEmilyLeAnnMaloney,deceased.  EdwardG.White,II,andAmyV.Hollars,Knoxville,Tennessee,fortheappellees,Morristown `!  ClinicCorp.,d/b/aEastTennesseeOB/GYN,P.C.,andWilliamB.Harris,Jr.,M.D. L"! C.J.Gideon,Jr.,andEdwardA.Hadley,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellee,Hospitalof $$t# Morristown,Inc.,d/b/aLakewayRegionalHospital. %` $  OPINION #XXDuD#XDuX &8"&   '$#'  #XXDu #XDuX    OnAugust31,2001,theSupremeCourtreleaseditsopinioninthecaseof Hancockv.   ChattanoogaHamiltonCountyHospitalAuthority, SCNo.E199900169SCR11CV,2001WL  997372(Tenn.,filedAugust31,2001).In Hancock ,theSupremeCourtheldthatT.C.A.2926  116 allowsrecoveryoffilialconsortiumdamagesasapartofthepecuniaryvalueofthedecedents t life.2001WL997372,at*3.Intheinstantcase,thetrialcourtdismissedtheplaintiffsclaims, ` whichclaimsarepredicatedontheplaintiffsallegationsthatthey havepermanentlylostthe L  companionship,affection,consortiumandloveoftheirdaughter.Insoacting,thetrialcourt 8  resolvedagainsttheplaintiffsanissue!whetherT.C.A.2926116countenancesarecoveryof $ t filialconsortiumdamages!onwhichtherewasthennodirectlegalauthority.TheSupremeCourts  ` decisionin Hancock hasnowaddressedthatissuebyaffirmativelyrecognizingsuchaclaim.The  L  plaintiffsintheinstantcasehavestatedalegallycognizableclaimforfilial  #  2      ׀consortiumdamages  8  asapartofthepecuniaryvalueoftheirinfantdaughterslife. $    Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisreversed.Costsonappealaretaxedagainsttheappellees.   Thiscaseisremandedforfurtherproceedings,pursuanttoapplicablelaw.      `     h     _______________________________ H    `     h     CHARLESD.SUSANO,JR.,JUDGE