ÿWPC1 R^∠‹äü8žõsØçÒíÛ¸,çÇáB±³ýhƒ»$ÛÕzÄÝC¹ [WÃ\Ó¿éÒ2Gf-Î@xUޝpÆeèÑEigÇcñÚ·›ÊÓŠ!¸è ÿ»*=Îö"•ƒÁåïÝu™Ôþ¿°.×q"¥X¬Þ“nP¿·LTZ”f&”¶;½æEÿ¤Òª0Ašx…@d£µ|.ûÔ…€L”ùݰ±@lúLšw~\ÓÿNˆ >!††JõÒn„Uj’ÿ»·h]Èqƒóýë¤Û¢òZrPª¿‚VbËà*¿ Ê"Êk`ñ[‡'2ö©^]Bùñ䈺àÆêðÖ÷-íô- vv˜Tt\»dmÒ°8SÕv@I vÊâxq*œË°ôµ£) Ìé—zʃGD³àëÀÌ\„„Žç_E }ìë¡F[ybªSU29òà€\Í|áFæR2ï—HÕÃ̸ªýzLv4ûµ©îks+·GV›Î¹ùûþ$ðvœë~ko™àµK¡Žûó‡WýJ0É)Ùˆæ¦4 à úoo6§ëõõ 7«ÿ¡±Ô 5_Ø€¨[>£-d²|ª‚ŸAQóÓ†¡ß)9ÒH§ïÍpÆQÊ-úŠDUb %\^ b 0ˆnU(NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ U N‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1É÷NÀ¸ÂUNzEÈ 0DÊU>ÚLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLb&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 0ë.... B 0¤6 D3Ú D-  0K:: AS…ÆØ 0¤ž 0DB A«†»•sK-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularš‚,- a£3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 ¿Ý ƒRr$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAt€the€time€Father€filed€his€petition,€he€lived€with€his€parents. Adelspergerpretermits COAMeadorsShrumHighers W.S.GallatinAllman(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóóô\  `‹&Times New Roman ÐÝ ƒRr$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôµòòôµÔFrom€a€review€of€the€testimony,€it€seems€that€when€these€parties€have€any€type€of€contact,€a€dispute€erupts.€Ð ° ÐFor€example,€Mother€testified€that€she€became€upset€with€Father€when€he€took€Alexis€to€a€medical€center€for€a€soreÐ tÄ Ðthroat,€because€he€did€not€first€consult€Mother.€€Father€testified€that,€on€another€occasion,€he€became€upset€with€MotherÐ 8ˆ Ðfor€allowing€Alexis€to€wander€away€and€become€lost€at€the€ball€park.€€From€the€testimony€presented€at€the€hearing,€theÐ üL Ðtrial€court€admonished€Mother€and€Father,€stating€that€they€were€ð ðstill€fussing€with€each€other€instead€of€getting€on€withÐ À Ð[their]€lives,€and€the€child€is€going€to€suffer€because€of€that.ðð€€€Ð „Ô ÐÔ#†ôµòòôµ~#Ô- ù-(|G2r$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€e»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôµò»»Ô d(|3ÁE$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€e»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÁE$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€e»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€e»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼e»»»ÔÑ8€Q‰XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îeÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼e»îî #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓJuly€11,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XQ‰X»¼eÔÌò òÔ#†¼e»XXQ‰ò#ÔJOSEPH€CHAD€MEADORS€òòóóv.€SONYA€DANIELLE€(MEADORS)€SHRUMòòóóÔ‡XQ‰X»¼eÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAn€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Sumner€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€18107„C€€€€€€C.€L.€Rogers,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02691„COA„R3„CV€„€Filed€October€11,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThis€case€involves€a€petition€to€modify€visitation.€€The€mother€and€father€were€divorced€in€JanuaryÐ xÈ  Ð1999.€€By€agreement,€the€mother€was€granted€custody€of€the€partiesðð€minor€child,€and€the€father€wasÐ d´ Ðgiven€visitation.€€The€divorce€decree€provided€that€the€fatherððs€visitation€schedule€would€changeÐ P  Ðfrom€week€to€week€depending€on€fatherððs€fluctuating€work€schedule€in€his€job€as€an€emergencyÐ <Œ Ðmedical€technician.€€This€schedule€necessitated€repeated€negotiating€between€the€mother€and€theÐ (x Ðfather€to€agree€on€the€fatherððs€visitation€schedule.€€In€April€2001,€the€father€petitioned€the€court€forÐ d Ðð ðstandardðð€every„other„weekend€visitation,€without€regard€to€his€work€schedule,€in€order€to€end€theÐ P Ðpartiesðð€pattern€of€negotiating€and€bickering.€€The€trial€court€determined€that€the€parties€were€unableÐ ì< Ðto€work€together€amicably,€and€ordered€ð ðstandardðð€every„other„weekend€visitation€in€order€toÐ Ø( Ðminimize€the€interaction€between€the€parties.€€The€mother€now€appeals.€€We€affirm,€finding€that€theÐ Ä Ðpartiesðð€inability€to€implement€amicablyÔ#†¼e»XXQ‰y#ÔÔ‡XQ‰X»¼eÔ€the€ordered€visitation€arrangement€constituted€a€sufficientÐ ° Ðchange€in€circumstances€to€warrant€the€slight€modification€in€visitation.€€Ð œì ÐÌÔ#†¼e»XXQ‰± #ÔÔ‡XQ‰X»¼eÔÓ—Óò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmedó óÐ tÄ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼e»àXQ‰¥ #ÔÔ‡XQ‰X.¼eÔHolly€Kirby€Lillard,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòW.€Frank€Crawford,€P.J.,Ð L œ ÐW.S.,óó€and€òòAlan€E.€Highers,€J.óó,€joined.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌAndy€L.€Allman,€Ô_ÔHendersonvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Sonya€Danielle€(Meadors)€Shrum.€Ð #`" ÐJohn€R.€Phillips,€Jr.,€Gallatin,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€Joseph€Chad€Meadors.Ð ü#L# ÐÓ0 ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼e»XXQ‰_ #ÔÔ‡XQ‰X»¼eÔÐ Ô%$!% ÐÌÔ#†¼e»XXQ‰w #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XQ‰X»¼eÔÓ Óà  àPlaintiff/Appellee€Joseph€Chad€Meadors€(ð ðFatherðð)€and€Defendant/Appellant€Sonya€DanielleÐ ¬'ü"' Ð(Meadors)€Shrum€(ð ðMotherðð),€Ô‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ôwere€divorced€in€January€1999.€€Their€child,€Alexis€Laken€Meadors,Ð ˜(è#( Ðwas€five€years€old€at€the€time€of€the€divorce.€€By€agreement€of€the€parties,€primary€custody€of€AlexisÐ „)Ô$) Ðwas€awarded€to€Mother.€€The€divorce€decree€provided€that€Fatherððs€visitation€would€vary,€dependingÐ p*À%* Ðâ âon€Fatherððs€fluctuating€work€schedule.€€Father€worked€as€an€emergency€medical€technician€and€was€Ð \+¬&+ýÇ Ðnormally€scheduled€to€work€one€24„hour€shift€every€three€days€from€8:00€a.m.€until€8:00€a.m.€theÐ ° Ðâ ânext€day.€€In€light€of€this,€the€original€order€provided€that€Fatherððs€visitation€would:Ð œì Ðà8  àinclude€the€one€full€weekend€of€each€month€that€he€is€not€working€from€8:30€a.m.€onÐ tÄ ÐSaturday€until€6:00€p.m.€on€Sunday.€€On€the€alternate€weeks€when€he€does€not€haveÐ `° Ða€full€weekend€off,€he€will€have€the€child€on€the€Saturday€or€Sunday€he€is€off€thatÐ L œ Ðweek.€[Father]€shall€have€additional€visitation€at€reasonable€times€in€which€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðparties€may€agree.Ð$ tÐ Ð  Ðà  àLess€than€a€year€later,€on€October€29,€1999,€Mother€filed€a€motion€to€modify€FatherððsÐ ü L  Ðvisitation,€asserting€that€Father€refused€to€maintain€any€regular€visitation€schedule.€€In€her€petition,Ð è 8  ÐMother€asked€the€trial€court€to€order€ð ðstandardðð€visitation€for€Father,€with€Alexis€staying€with€FatherÐ Ô$  Ðon€ð ðalternate€weekends€from€6:00€p.m.€on€Friday€until€6:00€p.m.€on€Sunday.ðð€€Mother€stated€in€herÐ À  Ðpetition€that,€if€ð ðFATHER€is€working€on€the€weekend€that€he€has€visitation,€MOTHER€agrees€thatÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€minor€child€may€stay€with€her€paternal€grandparents€while€FATHER€works.ðð€€In€December€1999,Ð ˜è  Ðin€response€to€Motherððs€petition,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order,€finding€a€material€change€inÐ „Ô  Ðcircumstances€which€warranted€a€modification€of€the€original€decree.€€The€trial€court€granted€FatherÐ pÀ Ðvisitation€every€other€weekend€according€to€the€following€schedule:Ð \¬ Ðà8  à(a)€from€6:00€p.m.€Friday€until€6:00€p.m.€Sunday€[on]€the€weekends€he€does€not€workÐ 4„ Ðon€Saturday€and€Sunday;Ð pÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(b)€from€9:00€a.m.€on€until€6:00€p.m.€on€Sunday€if€his€alternate€weekend€falls€on€theÐ øH Ðweekend€he€is€off€work€on€Sunday;Ðä4Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(c)€from€6:00€p.m.€Friday€until€6:00€p.m.€Saturday€on€the€alternate€weekend€thatÐ ¼  ÐFATHER€is€off€work€on€Saturday;€Ð¨øÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(d)€In€the€event€FATHER€is€working€on€the€Saturday€and€Sunday€he€has€alternativeÐ €Ð Ðweekend€visitation,€then€he€has€no€visitation€that€weekend.Ðl¼Ð Ð  ÐThus,€although€Father€was€given€a€regular€every„other„weekend€visitation€(except€on€weekends€whenÐ D!” Ðhe€worked€the€entire€weekend),€the€specific€timetable€of€the€visitation€still€varied,€depending€onÐ 0"€  ÐFatherððs€work€schedule.Ð #l! Ðà  àOn€April€24,€2001,€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰¯#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔFather€filed€a€petition€to€modify€his€visitation€schedule,€asking€the€trialÐ ô$D # Ðcourt€to€grant€him€standard€visitation€every€other€weekend€without€regard€to€his€work€schedule.€€InÐ à%0!$ Ðhis€petition,€Father€said€that€his€parents€would€keep€the€child€if€his€visitation€fell€on€an€ð ðon„dutyððÐ Ì&"% Ðweekend.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Father€asserted€that,€since€the€modified€order€was€issued€in€December€1999,€ð ðthe€partiesÐ ¸'#& Ðâ âhave€engaged€in€a€continual€pattern€of€negotiating€and€bickering,€primarily€as€a€result€of€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðfluctuating€nature€of€the€visitation€schedule.ðð€€Father€asked€that€the€trial€courtððs€order€also€provideÐ ° Ðfor€summer€visitation€and€for€more€specific€provisions€regarding€holidays.Ð œì Ðâ âà  àOn€September€24,€2001,€the€trial€court€held€a€hearing€on€the€matter.€€ò òó óÔ#†XQ‰XX XQ‰Ë#ÔÔ‡XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔBoth€Father€and€MotherÐ tÄ Ðtestified€at€the€hearing.€€Father€stated€that€his€work€schedule€varied€from€week€to€week,€and€that€heÐ `° Ðhad€to€contact€Mother€frequently€to€compare€schedules€and€set€up€visitation€arrangements.€€HeÐ L œ Ðindicated€that€Mother€was€not€willing€to€accommodate€his€schedule,€and€that€he€did€not€call€MotherÐ 8 ˆ Ðfor€extra€visitation€because€he€wanted€to€avoid€causing€a€controversy.€€He€testified€about€argumentsÐ $ t Ðhe€had€with€Mother€at€the€ball€field€and€at€the€Bible€school€regarding€the€proper€care€of€Alexis.€Ð  ` ÐMother€testified€that€she€wanted€Father€to€have€visitation€only€when€he€would€not€be€at€work,€so€thatÐ ü L  ÐAlexis€could€spend€quality€time€with€Father.€€She€testified€that€she€had€problems€getting€along€withÐ è 8  ÐJudy€Meadors,€Fatherððs€mother€(ð ðGrandmotherðð),€and€that€she€wanted€Father€to€be€at€home€whenÐ Ô$  Ðthe€child€was€visiting€and€staying€with€Grandmother.€€At€the€hearing,€one€of€Alexisððs€teachersÐ À  Ðtestified€about€Alexisððs€behavior,€stating€that€the€child€had€told€her€that€Father€ð ðcalled€her€mom€badÐ ¬ü  Ðnames.ðð€Another€witness,€Motherððs€sister„in„law,€also€testified€about€Alexis,€observing€that€she€isÐ ˜è  Ðð ðvery€agitated€whenever€both€families€.€.€.€are€present.ððÐ „Ô  ÐÔ#†XQ‰XXXQ‰ó#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ôà  àOn€September€27,€2001,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€granting€Fatherððs€petition€andÐ \¬ Ðordering€that€he€have€standard€every„other„weekend€visitation,€without€regard€to€his€work€schedule.€Ð H˜ ÐThe€trial€courtððs€order€also€modified€the€partiesðð€holiday€and€summer€schedules,€eliminating€anyÐ 4„ Ðlanguage€that€would€make€Fatherððs€visitation€dependent€upon€his€work€schedule.€€The€trial€courtÐ  p Ðfound€that€Mother€and€Father€ð ðcanððt€simply€pick€the€phone€up€and€discuss€this€without€someÐ  \ Ðargument,ðð€and€ordered€this€arrangement€in€order€to€minimize€the€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰é%#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ôinteraction€between€Mother€andÐ øH ÐFather.Ð ä4 Ðà  àMother€now€appeals€from€this€order.€€She€asserts€on€appeal€that€there€has€not€been€theÐ ¼  Ðrequisite€change€in€circumstances€to€justify€an€order€modifying€visitation.€€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰É(#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔÐ ¨ø Ðà  àWe€review€the€trial€courtððsÔ#†XQ‰XX XQ‰*#ÔÔ‡XQ‰XXXQ‰Ô€decision€de€novo€upon€the€record,€and€the€trial€courtððs€findingsÐ €Ð Ðof€fact€will€be€presumed€correct€unless€the€preponderance€of€the€evidence€is€otherwise.€€Tenn.€R.Ð l¼ ÐApp.€P.€13(d);€ò òòòsee€Ô_ÔHassÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔKnightonÔ_Ôóóó ó,€676€S.W.2d€554,€555€(Tenn.€1984).€€Ô#†XQ‰XXXQ‰Ÿ*#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔThe€trial€courtððsÐ X ¨ Ðconclusions€of€law€are€afforded€no€such€presumption.€€ò òòòGanzevoort€v.€Russellóóó ó,€949€S.W.2d€293,€296Ð D!” Ð(Tenn.€1997).€€The€trial€court€has€broad€discretion€when€deciding€visitation€issues.€€ò òòòEldridge€v.Ð 0"€  ÐEldridgeó óóó,€42€S.W.3d€82,€85€(Tenn.€2001);€òòò òsee€also€Edwards€v.€Edwardsó óóó,€501€S.W.2d€283,€291Ð #l! Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1973)€(stating€that€ð ðthe€details€of€custody€and€visitation€with€children€are€peculiarlyÐ $X" Ðwithin€the€broad€discretion€of€the€trial€judgeðð).€òòò òóóó ó€A€trial€courtððs€decision€regarding€visitation€will€beÐ ô$D # Ðreversed€only€upon€a€showing€that€the€trial€court€has€abused€its€discretion.€€ò òòòSee€Suttles€v.€Suttlesó óóó,Ð à%0!$ Ð748€S.W.2d€427,€429€(Tenn.€1988);ò òòò€Gaskill€v.€Gaskillóóó ó,€936€S.W.2d€626,€631€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996).€Ð Ì&"% Ðà  àUnder€Tennessee€law,€once€a€trial€court€has€entered€an€original€custody€decree,€that€decreeÐ ¤(ô#' Ðis€òòres€judicataóó€and€ð ðmay€not€be€modified€unless€a€material€change€of€circumstances€has€occurredÐ )à$( Ðsuch€that€the€childððs€welfare€requires€a€modification€of€the€custody€decree.ðð€ò òòòó óóó€ò òòòHoalcraft€v.€Smithsonóóó ó,Ð |*Ì%) Ð19€S.W.3d€822,€828€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1999).€€A€material€change€in€circumstances€is€any€changeÐ h+¸&* Ðaffecting€the€welfare€of€the€child,€including€new€facts€or€changed€conditions€which€could€not€beÐ ° Ðanticipated€at€the€time€of€the€original€order.€€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰D,#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ôò òòòId.€óóó ó€ð ðIf€the€trial€court€finds€that€there€has€been€a€materialÐ œì Ðchange€in€circumstances,€it€will€then€consider€the€petition€to€modify€using€the€best€interestsÐ ˆØ Ðstandard.ðð€€ò òòòId.€€ó óóóThe€determination€of€the€visitation€arrangement€that€best€serves€the€childððs€interestsÐ tÄ Ðis€fact€specific€and€requires€a€balancing€of€numerous€considerations,€including€those€enumerated€inÐ `° ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€36„6„106.€€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰è2#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ôò òòòSee€id.óóó ó€at€829.Ð L œ Ðà  àIn€this€appeal,€Mother€argues€that€there€had€been€no€material€change€in€circumstances€thatÐ $ t Ðaffected€Alexisððs€welfare.€€She€argues€that€the€partiesðð€inability€to€negotiate€amicably€is€notÐ  ` Ðsignificant€enough€to€warrant€a€change€in€the€childððs€custodial€environment.€€Mother€asserts€thatÐ ü L  ÐFather€sought€the€modification€so€that€Alexis€could€spend€more€time€with€Fatherððs€parents€and€otherÐ è 8  Ðfamily€members.€€Mother€asserts€that€the€modification€permits€Father€to€give€his€visitation€to€thirdÐ Ô$  Ðparties,€over€her€objection,€at€times€when€the€child€could€be€spending€time€with€her.€€She€argues€thatÐ À  Ðthis€interferes€with€her€fundamental€parenting€rights.€Ð ¬ü  Ѐ€à  àFrom€a€review€of€the€record,€it€is€clear€that€the€former€visitation€order€was€the€source€ofÐ „Ô  Ðheated€arguments€between€these€parties.€€Under€the€trial€courtððs€original€order,€Fatherððs€visitationÐ pÀ Ðchanged€from€week€to€week,€requiring€regular€contact€between€the€parties,€and€inevitably€leadingÐ \¬ Ðto€disagreements.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€ò òó óThis€constituted€a€sufficient€change€in€circumstances€to€justify€the€slightÐ H˜ Ðmodification€in€the€visitation€arrangement€ordered€by€the€trial€court.€€The€court€stated€that€theÐ 4„ Ðpurpose€of€the€modification€was€ð ðto€fix€it€best€I€can€where€these€parents€have€no€real€interaction,€noÐ  p Ðneed€for€any€real€interaction€unless€itððs€a€dire€emergency.ðð€€Such€a€limitation€in€confrontation€isÐ  \ Ðcertainly€in€the€minor€childððs€best€interest.€€Moreover,€the€trial€courtððs€modification€is€so€slight€thatÐ øH Ðit€might€better€be€described€as€a€ð ðtweakingðð€of€the€visitation€schedule.€€It€does€not€increase€theÐ ä4 Ðamount€of€Fatherððs€visitation,€and€therefore€has€no€effect€whatsoever€on€the€amount€of€time€MotherÐ Ð  Ðspends€with€Alexis.€€The€fact€that€Alexis€is€with€the€paternal€grandparents€while€Father€is€at€workÐ ¼  Ðdoes€not€affect€Motherððs€parental€rights.€€Mother€does€not€allege€an€adverse€effect€on€the€child€fromÐ ¨ø Ðspending€time€in€the€care€of€the€grandparents.€€Indeed,€Mother€requested€precisely€this€arrangementÐ ”ä Ðin€October€1999,€when€she€stated€in€her€petition€to€modify€that€the€ð ðchild€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰-5#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰Ômay€stay€with€her€paternalÐ €Ð Ðgrandparents€while€FATHER€works.ðð€€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰­?#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔUnder€all€of€these€circumstances,€it€is€puzzling€why€MotherÐ l¼ Ðopposed€Fatherððs€request€to€modify€visitation€and€why€she€felt€it€necessary€to€appeal€the€trial€courtððsÐ X ¨ Ðorder.€€We€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€modify€Fatherððs€visitation€arrangement.Ð D!” ÐÐ  #l! Ðà  àWe€affirm€the€decision€of€the€trial€court.€€Costs€are€to€be€taxed€to€appellant,€Sonya€DanielleÐ ° Ð(Meadors)€Shrum,€and€her€surety,€for€which€execution€may€issue,€if€necessary.€€Ô#†XQ‰XX XQ‰D@#ÔÔ‡ XQ‰XXXQ‰ÔÐ œì Ðà  àÔ#†XQ‰XX XQ‰­B#ÔÌÌÓ Óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð $ t Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€JUDGE