ÿWPC6  ÜV1z¤‰Ã¿òÏGL˯ªÒJ™ô>J0% P·4RM”qäÍr_‹j’~xñ`¹&£n'•¸ÈbY–×óÛã¨Ù©íamZ^µãš&øñ:GV&¢ÅéõäÈÀ‘¿Èi1ël;N¬MM¼™Q3çY*­#å /ÅTƒ+²LºƒbÖ÷„y ½°ã§AñŽ,îó†nÍU"wñH`œHœ:x”¼C¥ªCþ?÷¥nX0žÆ£6rgÙæsõú‚ÇïZ†ŠÛF'qùÀ?§¿&ûáš“z)º80D*QûnŽ3¡vŒï0(’ÏtáôC„:`ÿ‹^ÜnÖ·jOg¥UµQ¬:™š3|E!ðÛ±ñaZ ·¿áàóû1Ç„bVmy kó"^åSŠºnÒñY_-- ã†,õ¨Q=æg¸:bvŒ¹e}#QW«ç¶5ôù…ZTÀxpvéÑ/ÝB½Îÿqìq=ç…Ü?;¢?a´/w'Wpûh×ÿ¼… ³Æ…ôqnU&Úá´ÆÎHÌú3Ù6 }/B«a±mÔ\QñMo§‹Àáä- ºŸ¦ú^Ò~¸5‘“©°¹Ãà÷vnßÝÉ/4µ™ÍS—ÚŠý:ü Ü«3!Ò‹nëw*# LU:W %‘ 0(—b ¿w@Ë4 L.zzU:}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} AQ·Æ 0DÎ 0D 0DV V D/š BÉ Bæ D3 ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ, øð AZ‹"Arial RegularX($¡¡- ù - D !D"D#/$/%/&'Ó€1ìu[%xêêêú3|x1C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT ùÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ XÑXXXÔÔ€ ´IX XÑÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ XÑX ´IÔÐ  ÐÌNovember€5,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxd düÿP Pd'''''ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝѰÑÒ€°ÒÒ„°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€ÑXXdæXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  Ñò òÔ€¼Ö¼XXÔÓ  Óñ1ññ'ñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@Eô ` 8ttxP,ð  rßñ'ññ1ññ1ñßt€ )>.*jxéÿ ` `€€@EÝ` 8ttxPLð È tßñ1ñà@  êàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌà@¦¦(êàAT€NASHVILLEó óÔ€XÑX¼¼ÖԈР ÐÌÌÌÌÌYONG€MUN€CHONG€MEADOWS,à  à)Ð ® ¦ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)Ð zr  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Ð `X  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9801„CH„00054Ð F>  ÐVS.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ,$  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àMontgomery€ChanceryÐ   Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€95„11„0118Ð øð  ÐTOMMY€C.€MEADOWS,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ ÞÖ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àDefendant/Appellant.à 8 àà  à)Ð ª¢ ÐÌÌà@}}êàAPPEALED€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€MONTGOMERY€COUNTYˆÌà@"êàAT€CLARKSVILLE,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌà@R R êàTHE€HONORABLE€JAMES€E.€WALTON,€JUDGEˆÌÌÌÌÌÌYONG€MUN€CHONG€MEADOWSÌ2177€Powell€RoadÌClarksville,€Tennessee€37043Ìà Ø àPro€Se/Plaintiff/AppelleeÌÌGREGORY€D.€SMITHÌOne€Public€Square,€Suite€321ÌClarksville,€Tennessee€37040Ìà Ø àAttorney€for€Defendant/AppellantÌÌÌÌÌÌà@DD$êàAFFIRMED€AS€MODIFIEDˆÌà@¿¿(êàAND€REMANDEDˆÌÌÌÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àPRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌCONCUR:ÌKOCH,€J.ÌCAIN,€J.ÌÐ  ´9¬28/ ÐÓÓò òÔ€„\„XXÑÔòòà@tt(êàO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óÔ€XÑX„„\ԈР ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€trial€court€granted€the€parties€a€divorce,€divided€the€marital€property,Ïand€awarded€the€wife€permanent€alimony.€€On€appeal,€the€husband€contends€that€theÏcourt€should€have€adjusted€the€property€settlement€to€take€the€wifeððs€post„separationÏdissipation€of€marital€assets€into€account,€and€that€it€should€have€placed€someÏlimitations€on€the€alimony€award.€€We€agree,€and€we€modify€the€decree€to€incorporateÏthe€necessary€changes.ÌÌà@€€"êàò òI.€€Marriage€and€Divorceó óˆÐ 0( ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àTommy€Cleveland€Meadows,€a€teacher€of€Economics€,€and€Yong€MunÏChong,€a€native€of€Korea,€began€living€together€in€1977.€€In€1985,€a€son,€DanielÏThomas€Meadows,€was€born€to€them.€€In€1987€they€married.€€By€that€time,€TommyÏMeadows€was€a€tenured€Professor€of€Economics€at€Austin€Peay€State€University€inÏClarksville.€€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€partiesðð€marriage€produced€a€daughter,€Lucy€Rebecca€Meadows,Ïwho€was€born€in€1992.€€The€parties€separated€in€August€of€1995.€€In€August€of€1996,ÏYong€Meadows€went€to€the€Rivergate€Shopping€Center€in€Nashville€on€a€shopping€tripÏwith€her€daughter.€€Lucy€disappeared€during€that€trip.€€She€is€presumed€kidnapped,Ïand€her€whereabouts€are€currently€unknown.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àOn€August€12,€1996,€Ms.€Meadows€filed€a€complaint€for€absolute€divorceÏin€the€Chancery€Court€of€Montgomery€County€citing€irreconcilable€differences€andÏinappropriate€marital€conduct€on€the€part€of€Mr.€Meadows.€€He€answered€on€AugustÏ14,€1996,€denying€that€he€had€been€guilty€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct,€andÏpraying€for€dismissal€of€the€complaint.€€After€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€granted€theÐ ”8Œ16 Ðdismissal.€€However,€on€March€25,€1997,€Mr.€Meadows€filed€a€counter„complaint,Ïasking€the€court€to€grant€him€a€divorce€on€the€grounds€of€inappropriate€maritalÏbehavior€or€adultery.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àDuring€the€hearing€of€this€case€on€April€1€and€April€16,€1997,€the€partiesÏstipulated€that€they€both€had€grounds€for€divorce.€€At€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,Ïthe€court€declared€the€parties€divorced€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„129.€ÏYong€Meadows€was€granted€custody€of€the€children,€and€the€court€expressed€its€hopeÏthat€Lucy€would€be€found€safe€and€healthy.€€Tommy€Meadows€was€ordered€to€payÏchild€support€for€one€child,€pursuant€to€the€guidelines€($750.75,€which€is€21%€of€hisñ ñÏnetñ ñ€monthly€income€of€$3,575),€with€the€support€to€be€increased€if€Lucy€returns.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€courtððs€division€of€marital€property€involved€real€property,€financialÏassets,€personalty€and€debt.€€The€most€valuable€marital€asset€by€far€was€a€house€andÏfarm€in€Montgomery€County.€€Although€Ms.€Meadows€lived€in€the€house,€and€wantedÏto€remain€there,€the€court€found€itself€unable€to€divide€the€equity€in€the€propertyÏwithout€selling€it.€€The€court€therefore€ordered€the€property€sold,€with€the€equity€to€beÏdivided€equally€between€the€parties.€€Considering€the€testimony€as€to€the€propertyððsÏvalue,€and€the€mortgage€encumbering€it,€this€would€probably€result€in€net€proceedsÏfor€division€of€about€$160,000.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€court€also€granted€Ms.€Meadows€a€25%€interest€in€the€$58,844€inÏvested€retirement€funds€that€Mr.€Meadows€had€accumulated€at€the€time€of€divorce,€toÏbe€paid€after€Mr.€Meadows€retires€and€becomes€eligible€to€collect€the€funds.€€In€viewÏof€Mr.€Meadowsðð€superior€earning€capacity,€he€was€ordered€to€pay€all€the€partiesððÏdebts,€and€hold€Ms.€Meadows€harmless€for€the€same,€except€for€the€car€payments€onÏthe€Ford€Contour€that€she€was€awarded.€€The€court€also€ordered€Mr.€Meadows€to€payÐ ¨9 26 Ð$1,000€per€month€as€permanent€spousal€support€and€$3,000€in€attorney€fees.€€ThisÏappeal€followed.ÌÌà@<<êàò òII.€€Marital€Property€and€Marital€Debtó óˆÐ ¨   ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àMr.€Meadows€contends€in€his€brief€on€appeal€that€he€should€not€haveÏbeen€held€responsible€for€$36,000€that€Yong€Meadows€squandered€after€the€partiesððÏseparation.€€He€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€to€declare€that€hisÏalimony€obligation€would€terminate€upon€the€remarriage€of€the€supported€party.€€Ms.ÏMeadows€did€not€file€a€brief€in€response€to€Mr.€Meadowsðð€brief,€so€this€case€must€beÏdecided€on€the€basis€of€the€record€and€the€appellantððs€brief€alone.€€Tenn.R.App.P.Ï29(c).ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€record€reveals€that€Mr.€Meadows€gave€his€wife€generous€financialÏsupport€during€the€entire€period€of€separation,€even€to€the€extent€of€giving€her€controlÏof€his€entire€paycheck€of€$2,800€a€month.€€Despite€the€fact€that€she€was€givenÏsufficient€cash€to€cover€the€reasonable€expenses€of€her€household,€there€wasÏuncontroverted€testimony€that€Ms.€Meadows€ran€up€debt€of€about€$16,000€on€herÏLoweððs,€Discover,€and€Visa€credit€cards€between€August€1995€and€April€1997.€€SheÏdid€not€attempt€to€account€to€the€court€for€this€debt.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€record€also€shows€that€in€1995€ñ#ñDr.ñ#ññ#ñMr.ñ#ñ€Meadows€received€a€$23,000Ïcheck€to€retire€a€note€on€a€house€which€he€had€sold€and€financed€for€the€purchaser,Ïand€which€he€had€owned€prior€to€his€marriage.€€ñ$ñDr.ñ$ññ$ñMr.ñ$ñ€Meadows€endorsed€the€check€toÏhis€wife.€€She€was€unable€to€account€for€her€disposition€of€the€money,€except€for€aÏ$3,000€down€payment€on€a€car.Ìâ âÐ È7À04 Ðà Ø àà 0 àWe€must€note€that€we€found€it€difficult€to€understand€the€testimony€ofÏâ âMs.€Meadows,€even€in€its€trancribed€form.€€It€must€have€been€even€more€difficult€forÏthe€attorneys€involved,€who€had€to€formulate€follow„up€questions€to€poorly€understoodÏanswers.€€Part€of€the€problem€was€obviously€due€to€the€appelleeððs€limited€commandÏof€the€English€language,€though€we€note€that€she€has€lived€in€this€country€for€overÏtwenty€years,€and€ñ%ñDr.ñ%ññ%ñMr.ñ%ñ€Meadows€testified€that€her€English€was€actually€a€lot€better€thanÏshe€chose€to€demonstrate.ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àBut€a€good€part€of€the€problem€was€also€due€to€her€unwillingness€to€giveÏhonest€answers€to€direct€questions€about€her€use€of€the€money€given€to€her.€€At€oneÏpoint,€while€on€the€stand€responding€to€questions€regarding€the€$23,000€check€thatÏMr.€Meadows€gave€her,€she€stated€that€she€had€spent€$7,500€of€the€$23,000€checkÏon€a€car,€and€had€paid€North€Carolina€taxes€to€Mr.€Meadowsðð€first€wife€with€a€portionÏof€the€rest€(something€never€even€mentioned€during€her€two€depositions).€€TheÏappellantððs€attorney€impeached€her€testimony€with€excerpts€from€her€deposition,Ïincluding€the€following:ÌÒ0 €ÒÒ°„ÒÓÓÌÒ°ÒQ.à ˆ àWhere€do€you€have€the€money?Ð ø%ð! ÐÌA.à ˆ àI€donððt€have€money€anymore.Ð Ø'Ð # ÐÌQ.à ˆ àWhat€happened€to€it?Ð ¸)°"% ÐÌA.à ˆ àSpending.Ð ˜+$' ÐÌQ.à ˆ àOkay.€€Letððs€back€up.€€You€bought€a€car.€€What€car€didÐ x-p&) Ðyou€buy?€Is€that€the€car€youððre€now€driving?ÌÌA.à0 ˆ àYes.ÐH0@),ˆÐ ˆÐ  ÐÌQ.à ˆ àYou€bought€the€car€that€you€are€now€driving€which€isÐ (2 +. Ða€Ford€Contour.€€Youððve€told€us€that.€€Do€you€know€how€muchÏyou€paid€for€it?ÌÌA.à ˆ àI€think€so.€€Two,€$3,000.Ð è5à.2 ÐÌ...€€ÌÌQ.à ˆ àWhat€did€you€do€with€the€other€$20,000?Ð ¨9 26 ÐA.à ˆ àBuy€clothes,€buy€groceries,€take€children€to€games.€Ð  ÐRaining,€movie.ÌÌQ.à ˆ àHow€many€dollars€worth€of€clothes€did€you€buy?Ð Ø Ð ÐÌA.à ˆ àOh,€some€of€them€expensive.€€Some€of€thems€veryÐ ¸ ° Ðcheaper€because€I€looking€for€the€good€sale.ÌÌQ.à0 ˆ àHow€much€did€you€spend?€Ðˆ€ˆÐ ˆÐ  ÐÌA.à ˆ àI€donððt€know.Ð h`  ÐÌQ.à ˆ àDid€you€spend€$1,000?Ð H@  ÐÌA.à ˆ àMany€thousand.Ð (  ÐÌQ.à ˆ àMany€thousand?Ð  ÐÌA.à ˆ àYes€sir,€because€he€never€hardly€buy€me€clothes.Ð èà ÐÌQ.à ˆ àAre€we€talking€about€five€thousand,€ten€thousand?€Ð ÈÀ ÐHow€much€do€you€spend€on€clothes?ÌÌA.à ˆ àI€donððt€remember,€I€donððt€keep€the€receipt.€Ð ˜ ÐÌÒ€0 ÒÒ„ÒÓÓÌà Ø àà 0 àIn€view€of€her€obviously€wasteful€dissipation€of€valuable€assets,€Ms.ÏMeadows€should€be€required€to€reimburse€her€former€husband€for€the€$20,000€thatÏshe€could€not€account€for.€€We€also€believe€that€the€portion€of€the€trial€courtððs€orderÏdealing€with€marital€debt€should€be€modified€to€require€her€to€pay€up€to€$16,000€onÏthe€Loweððs,€Discover€and€Visa€debt.€To€the€extent€that€Mr.€Meadows€has€already€paidÏthese€debts,€she€should€be€required€to€reimburse€him€or€account€for€these€totals€if€theÏhouse€and€farm€have€not€been€sold€and€the€proceeds€divided.Ì€€€€Ìà@››'êàò òIII.€€€Alimonyó óˆÐ X/P(+ ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€alimony€portion€of€the€trial€courtððs€opinion€reads€as€follows:ÌÒ0 €ÒÒ„ÒÓÓà ˆ àIn€this€case,€there€is€a€great€disparity€in€the€needs€andÏabilities€of€the€parties.€€Mr.€Meadows€is€well„educated,Ïexperienced€in€business,€tenured€in€his€teaching€position€andÏfully€capable€of€earning€income€for€various€sources.€€Mrs.ÏMeadows,€on€the€other€hand,€has€no€job€skills,€speaks€veryÏbroken€English,€and€has€no€ability€in€the€foreseeable€futureÐ ¨9 26 Ðof€earning€any€significant€income.€€Mrs.€Meadows€has€a€needÏfor€support.€€Mr.€Meadows€has€the€ability€to€provide€thatÏsupport.€€After€payment€of€child€support,€Mr.€Meadows€willÏhave€disposable€income€of€approximately€$2700€per€month.€ÏMrs.€Meadowsðð€only€income€will€be€approximately€$740€perÏmonth€child€support€and€what€she€may€earn,€if€any,€fromÏinvestment€of€the€proceeds€from€the€sale€of€the€farm.€€It€is€notÏlikely€that€she€will€have€any€funds€to€invest€if€she€purchasesÏa€home€for€herself€and€her€children.€€Given€these€facts,€Mr.ÏMeadows€will€pay€to€Mrs.€Meadows€the€sum€of€$1000€perÏmonth€as€permanent€spousal€support.€€When€Mr.€MeadowsÏretires,€this€support€payment€will€be€reduced€by€the€amountÏof€retirement€paid€to€Mrs.€Meadows.€ÌÌÌÒ€0 ÒÒ„ÒÓÓÌà Ø àà 0 àThough€the€opinion,€and€the€final€decree,€speak€of€permanent€alimony,Ïthe€terms€of€the€award€seem€to€indicate€what€is€called€alimony€in€futuro€or€periodicÏalimony.€€Alimony€in€futuro€is€permanent€in€the€sense€that€the€obligation€is€notÏextinguished€upon€the€payment€of€a€specific€total€sum,€as€is€the€case€of€alimony€inÏsolido€and€rehabilitative€alimony.€òò€McKee€v.€McKeeóó,€655€S.W.2d€164,€165€(Tenn.€App.Ð xp Ð1985).€€But€it€is€not€necessarily€permanent,€because€the€obligation€may€be€modifiedÏor€eliminated€upon€a€showing€of€a€change€of€circumstances.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„¼101(a)(1).à 0 àÐ $ ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€appellant€argues€that€alimony€in€futuro€is€not€appropriate€in€thisÏcase,€because€the€legislature€has€stated€its€preference€for€the€payment€ofÏrehabilitative€temporary€support€and€maintenance,€where€the€economicallyÏdisadvantaged€spouse€is€capable€of€being€rehabilitated.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€€36„5„¼101(d)(1).€€He€argues€that€the€appelleeððs€employment€history€indicates€that€she€isÏcapable€of€earning€her€own€living,€and€that€the€order€of€the€court€gives€her€noÏincentive€ð ðto€stand€on€her€own€two€feet.ððÌÌà Ø àà 0 àWe€disagree.€€Ms.€Meadows€may€very€well€be€capable€of€working€andÏearning€money,€but€in€view€of€her€age€(44€at€the€time€of€trial),€lack€of€skills,€and€poorÐ ¸8°15 Ðproficiency€in€the€English€language,€we€find€it€unlikely€that€she€will€ever€be€able€toÏsupport€herself€fully€by€her€own€efforts.€€We€also€do€not€believe€that€the€alimony€awardÏwill€destroy€her€incentive€to€work.€€Especially€after€Daniel€is€grown,€and€(assumingÏLucy€does€not€return)€when€she€is€no€longer€receiving€child€support,€we€suspect€thatÏshe€will€want€to€work€and€will€need€to€supplement€her€alimony€check.€€But€that€checkÏwill€give€her€the€security€of€a€ð ðfloorðð€under€her€income,€to€protect€her€from€extremeÏeconomic€hardship.€€€€€ÌÌà Ø àà 0 àIt€has€been€customary,€however,€in€cases€of€alimony€in€futuro,€to€stateÏin€the€decree€that€the€alimony€will€terminate€if€the€recipient€remarries€or€dies.€€SuchÏa€statement€is€consistent€with€the€legislative€intent€indicated€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„¼5„101(a)(2)(B).€€We€believe€that€it€would€be€helpful€to€modify€the€trial€courtððs€decreeÏto€declare€that€the€alimony€it€awarded€is€indeed€alimony€in€futuro,€and€that€it€willÏterminate€upon€the€death€or€remarriage€of€the€recipient.€ÌÌà@oo-êàò òIV.ó óˆÐ (#  ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àThe€decree€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed€in€all€respects,€except€that€it€isÏmodified€in€regard€to€the€division€of€marital€property€and€in€the€provisions€for€theÏpayment€of€marital€debt,€as€discussed€above.€€It€is€also€modified€in€regard€to€theÏpermanence€of€the€alimony€award.€€Remand€this€cause€to€the€Chancery€Court€ofÏMontgomery€County€for€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.€€Tax€the€costs€onÏappeal€equally€between€the€appellant€and€the€appellee.ÌÌÌÓÓà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à_____________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌÐ ¨9 26 ÐCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌ_____________________________ÌWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÌÌÐ  (  ÐÑ  ÑÔ€¼—·¼XX¹hÔò òà@êê.êàñ&ñIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@™™(êàAT€NASHVILLEñ&ñó óñ&ñÔ€X¹hX¼¼—·ÔˆÐ  ÐÌÌÌÌÌYONG€MUN€CHONG€MEADOWS,à  à)Ð ä Ü Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff/Appellee,à à àà 8 àà  à)Рļ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àAppeal€No.Ð ´¬  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à01„A„01„9801„CH„00054Ð ¤œ  ÐVS.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ”Œ  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àMontgomery€ChanceryÐ „|  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€95„11„0118Ð tl  ÐTOMMY€C.€MEADOWS,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àà H! àà  # àÐ d\ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àDefendant/Appellant.à 8 àà  à)Ð D< ÐÌñ&ñññÌñññ&ñÔ€¼—·¼XX¹hÔò òòòà@uu'êàJ€U€D€G€M€E€N€Tóóó óˆÐ $ ÐÌñ&ñññÌñññ&ñÓÓÔ€X¹hX¼¼—·Ôà Ø àà 0 àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€on€appeal€from€theÐ PH ÐChancery€Court€of€Montgomery€County,€and€appellantððs€brief;€upon€considerationÏwhereof,€this€Court€is€of€the€opinion€that€ñ&ññ!ñin€ñ!ññ&ñthe€decree€of€the€Chancellor€ñ&ññ"ñthere€is€no€reversible€error.€€However,€the€decree€ñ"ññ&ñshould€beÏmodified€in€accordance€with€the€opinion€of€the€Court€filed€herein.€€€It€is,€therefore,Ïordered€and€decreed€by€this€Court€that€the€decree€is€affirmed€as€modified.€€Ìà Ø àà 0 àThe€cause€is€remanded€to€the€Chancery€Court€of€Montgomery€CountyÏfor€any€further€proceedings€necessary€and€for€the€collection€of€the€costs€accruedÏbelow.Ìà Ø àà 0 àCosts€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€equally€against€Tommy€C.€Meadows€andÏYong€Mun€Chong€Meadows,€for€which€execution€may€issue€if€necessary.ÌÓÓÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à_____________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€M.S.ÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à_____________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 à_____________________________________Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGEÌñ&ñ