ÿWPCE  ¶N‰IùbIÐi#"ÅO‘ÆñØ~¼!ºË¬íš¬ ÿqÞ~=tGFCÒ¦-ù5mæý ¹õs9ÚUjÂ1­°£ºéXX0zè/£iÂ}ªiìòðAâ@mß2ànqð•‰õ£)ð…‚˜Æ}X¨6%Á;›¸ÎnE5·Ò|«*ŸBYê¾ð8˜Æ!‚9ÖvœÑ\{(¢ž«×8ŽQ]eh–7µEˆ_)€ë‹i–A ÿþSð.™Ÿ“9ƒîúÄ ÜzœkÃüøq^8ú𔉬``᪒¢‹‚Áüñ±ßI»&þÝH ¡›ýÿ\+j—ïGkArè·ÄH›EDeâ=Ĉx1C®¼XÁ©³ý"¸âäå~Ð_Gß²Ù{\Ö9³ùn1þ"Çþ’-ò…Ÿv'Ý/9` XJ‡&aË–¤ “ÙdH ´PšŽw¿“E›;ûáÑð5Z8Î@œ«/E ®Èno± ¶Òëkák⌚5УH‚€ö¾Öt®ÌnlýîÒùn“óÑ^ëãHp›*Ú1,3ÁëRrŒ O#%‚ÐmAlÐÍøðñ²N±y¹¦«GͰzov'QçÍý6Eªˆ  ³iPºa¦˜ú¡ƒðM5ÏýN&ݵ•ö ¿*# LUNW %¥ 0(«w@Ó4'UN6„ŒŒU:ŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒŒ AQÆÆ 0DÝ 0D! 0De e D/© BØ Bõ D3 ˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLdÒ(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡ ²³D´µD¶·U¸Ó€ÂÃÄU©yË&î:8Î<à”"3|xÄ'Ör Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular öÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€ X«XXXÔÔ€ ôbX X«ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ X«X ôbÔÐ  ÐÌJune€18,€1999ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxd düÿP Pd'''''ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý›ÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€ì…XXdðdÈ7ÑÓ  Óà@} } ìàò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@úú$ìàAT€NASHVILLEˆÌñÃñœßt€ )>.*jx‚ÿ` `€€@EJ¨` 8ttxP‚ð  tß›ñÃñ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ð à Мñ·ñÌñ·ññÃñ›ñÃññ·ññ·ññÄñÌñÄññ·ññ·ññÄñÌñÄññ·ñÌñ·ññ¸ñ›ñ¸ññÃññ¸ñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@EÈf ` 8ttxP` ð  rßñ¸ññÃññ¸ñ›ñ¸ñÌóóÌTRACY€RENEE€MIGLIN,à  àà h àà À à)Ð  p  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ìó ó€€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff/Appellee,à  àà h àà À àò ò)à  àó óMaury€Chancery€No.€95„725à x àà Ð àÐ P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àò òà  àà h àà À à)à  àà p àÐ ð@  Ðv.à  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ð à0  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àó óAppeal€No.€01A01„9802„CH„00080ò òÐ Ð  ÐDANIEL€WALTER€MIGLIN,€€à h àà À à)Ð À Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ìà  àó óDefendant/Appellant.à  àà h àà À àò ò)Ð  ð Ðó óÌÌà0  àà ° àà@ØØì(#(#àAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURT€OF€œMAURY›€COUNTYˆÌà@ÖÖìàAT€COLUMBIA,€TENNESSEEà@@ìì*ìàˆÌÌÌà@ ìàTHE€HONORABLE€JIM€T.€HAMILTON,€CHANCELLORˆÌòòÌÌÌFor€the€Plaintiff/Appelleeóó:òòà  àà h àà À àFor€the€Defendant/Appellantóó:òòÐ ð@ Ðóóà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌBarbara€J.€Walker€€€€€€€€€€€€à  àà h àà À àLouise€R.€Fontecchio€€€€€€€€€€Ð Ð  ÐColumbia,€œTennessee›€€€à  àà h àà À àNashville,€Tennessee€€€€€€€Ð À! ÐÌÌÌò òà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAFFIRMEDó ó€ò òIN€œPART,€Ð €%Ð # Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àREVERSED›€IN€œPART€Ìà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAND€REMANDEDó ó›Ð `'°"% ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àHOLLY€KIRBY€LILLARD,€J.ÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÔ‡X‹tXXXÔBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€P.J.,€M.S.Ð à.0*- ÐÌWILLIAM€BRYAN€CAIN,€J.€€€Ô#†Xì…XXX‹tï #ÔòòÐ  ¸0,/ ÐØØÑ7€ì…XXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑóóÑ  Ñà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌÌÓÓà  àThis€is€a€post„divorce€case€involving€a€petition€to€modify€child€support€and€modify€orÏterminate€alimony.€€The€trial€court€ordered€the€father€to€pay€child€support€according€to€the€childÏsupport€guidelines€based€on€his€year€œto€date›€earnings,€plus€a€percentage€œof€any›€bonuses€received.€ÏThe€trial€court€refused€to€modify€or€terminate€alimony.€€The€father€now€appeals.€€Because€theÏbonuses€were€counted€œtwice,›€we€reverse€the€trial€courtððs€order€for€an€additional€percentage€ofÏbonuses€received.€€The€remainder€of€the€trial€courtððs€order€is€affirmed.€Ìà  àThe€record€in€this€case€does€not€include€a€complete€account€of€the€prior€litigation€betweenÏthe€parties.€€The€original€divorce€decree€was€appealed€by€the€father,€as€set€forth€in€òòò òMiglin€v.€œMiglinóóó ó,Ð  ð ÐNo.€01„A„01„9707„CH00362,›€1998€WL€440724€(Tenn.€App.€Aug.€8,€1998).€€The€facts€are€gleanedÏfrom€our€prior€Opinion€in€ò òòòMiglinó óóó€as€well€as€the€record€in€this€proceeding.€€Ð `° Ðà  àOn€May€7,€1996,€Daniel€Walter€Miglin€(ð ðFatherðð)€and€Tracy€Renee€Miglin€(ð ðMotherðð)€wereÏdivorced.€€There€were€two€children€of€the€marriage,€Jason€Daniel€Miglin,€born€on€August€8,€1990,Ïand€Logan€Andrew€Miglin,€born€on€August€17,€œ1993.€€Prior›€to€the€divorce,€the€trial€court€issued€aÏtemporary€restraining€order€prohibiting€Father€from€bothering€or€harming€Mother€or€the€children,€œÏbut€permitted€Father€to€exercise›€scheduled€visitation€with€the€children.€€In€the€trial€courtððs€finalÏdecree€of€divorce,€the€trial€court€declared€the€parties€divorced€and€made€the€temporary€restrainingÏorder€a€permanent€injunction.€€The€trial€court€awarded€custody€of€the€children€to€Mother,€orderedÏFather€to€pay€child€support€in€the€amount€of€$1,097€per€month€based€on€his€1995€income€and€alsoÏordered€him€to€pay€$300€per€month€in€œalimony.€€Father›€was€ordered€to€pay€one„half€of€œMotherððs›Ïattorneyððs€fees.€€òòò òMiglin€v.€Miglinóóó ó,€1998€WL€440724,€at€œ*2.€€Father›€filed€a€Notice€of€Appeal,€whichÐ  +p&) Ðwas€dismissed€without€prejudice€for€lack€of€finality€because€the€amount€of€œMotherððs›€attorneyððs€feesÏhad€not€been€determined.€€ò òòòId.óóó óÐ à.0*- Ðà  àOn€June€18,€1996,€œMother›€filed€a€petition€for€contempt€alleging€œFather›€violated€theÏpermanent€restraining€œorder.€€ò òòòId.óóó 󛀀The€trial€court€did€not€find€œFather›€in€contempt€but€expanded€theÐ  2ð-1 Ðscope€of€the€permanent€injunction.€€ò òòòId.óóó 󀀜Father›€filed€a€timely€notice€of€appeal.€€ò òòòId.ó óóó€€Subsequently,Ð €4Ð/3 МMother›€filed€another€petition€for€œcontempt,€while›€œFather›€filed€a€petition€to€reduce€or€terminateÏalimony€and€also€sought€a€reduction€in€child€support.€€œThe€trial›€court€refused€to€terminate€alimonyÏand€increased€child€support€based€upon€œFatherððs›€1996€income.€€ò òòòId.€óóó ó€On€July€21,€1997,€œFather›€filedÐ  :p59 Ða€Notice€of€Appeal€seeking€review€of€all€of€the€trial€courtððs€orders.€€ò òòòId.ó óóóÐ