ÿWPCr  ¬1àé\mô…ÓªoÁŽŠ=‡Ì¢À¿Öh=´_Ýs4›<Žíb‡öüÖdŠÚšm=¬¿Ë}öÉËZò¸‰è+ÏKxj¡§r{ý\¾#55þ†=WB[^q’½HEöVÇWa|{»{ÞA…]Éí;z‚¸ÊW‹KÆcÏÚ¨úè7Ôx2D ¿"ù±‚ æé/›QÀ°Š*\t’ :–š¼¢šO¹¨wlID!”ØXÎØÖ÷»«SÐ4¯%ÀØþËã®eRR•ÂìUï4<3ˆõm•åñùs×oûµ³ÏÙÞvœÂdŽÖÒn1À‹¬Ÿ£R@åñbG%¥¿x"wIJË^˜ºoUMmʼî)—„VÁëéJýÕœÑbþµthЕc‡ qº–BpÙc7_éXLßKí+´ù‰L–PJ¾¸TgBRæ#\"*ºìE’ñº,Šá¹KrÑ–¿£FúÓÎx{±¬©+y‡G¹ÞS[§XwQÓÅ‹ +¦ÈÞY2š H“SU™g”9 ½ñ©9ÆoÝN?ü¤ö|'‚™­*4.¨>S9‹rHžÏi´ro6¼“-íÌ‚Róm…dPÏ9D–7ÉÛá}Cm8«‰EF†8à ©ø æÍ[ÈC©b %\U@b 0ˆ¢U#N*^ xw„4ˆ zœÒ è ÷ mù 1u Æ… ÆK Æ Æ× 72 NÏ 1‡Ñ 0DXEœ 0cž 0Š#Á‹U @L-Œ¹Ï________________bgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg 0ëoooo BZZ 0¤w D3 D-N 0K{{ ASÆÆ 0¤ß 0Dƒ A«Ç»(ÈhH  Z(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularl|o) -vn)bk2¨áÏ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 i)05hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à(b·¤$¶¶à0  àà0` (#(#àÔ2#ÔÚ  ÚÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0¸ ` (#` (#à˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman  #Ñ#€mXÿÿd#Ñ Ñ û Ñ †Ý ƒR:×$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡uò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà ` àÔ‡ô¡uòòô¡uÔAt€trial,€the€Wife€testified€to€having€inherited€a€total€of€$26,838.00€from€her€fatherððs€estate€€in€1996.€Ð ° ÐExhibit€No.€4€is€a€copy€of€checks€dated€May€21,€1996€and€May€14,€1996€totaling€that€amount. - ù-(|G2:×$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¡uò»»Ô d(|3h$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3h$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ]»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ]»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼ ]»»»ÔÑ8€Z1XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡î| ]ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ ]»îî| #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓJune€2000€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XZ1X»¼ ]ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ ]»XXZ1î#ÔLOIS€LYNN€MILLERòòóó€v.€JAMES€EARL€MILLERòòóóÔ‡XZ1X»¼ ]Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òA€Direct€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€98D„1144€€€€€€The€Honorable€Muriel€Robinson,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1999„00724„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€August€Ô_Ô31,Ô_Ô€2000Ð ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1Ôà  àIn€this€divorce,€both€Husband€and€Wife€have€appealed€contesting€the€trial€courtððs€divisionÐ xÈ  Ðof€marital€property€and€alimony€awards.€€The€division€of€marital€property€is€affirmed,€alimonyÐ d´ Ðawards€are€modified,€and€the€case€is€remanded€for€a€determination€of€the€value€of€HusbandððsÐ P  Ðretirement€plan€and€a€proper€division€thereof.Ô#†XZ1XXXZ1È#ÔÔ#†¼ ]»XXZ1e#ÔÔ‡XZ1X»¼ ]ÔÐ <Œ ÐÓ¼ÓÌò òÔ_ÔTenn.R.App.P.Ô_Ô€3;€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Modified€in€Part;Ð d ÐReversed€in€Part;€Affirmed€in€Part€and€Remanded.ó óÐ P ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ ]»àXZ1¿#ÔÔ‡XZ1X.¼ ]ÔW.€Frank€Crawford,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,€Ô_ÔW.S.Ô_Ôóó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€R.€Farmer,Ð Ø( ÐJ.óó€and€òòHolly€Kirby€Ô_ÔLillardÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€joined.Ð Ä ÐÌJack€Green,€Nashville,€For€Appellant,€James€Earl€MillerÐ œì ÐÌRobert€L.€Jackson,€Nashville;€Larry€Hayes,€Jr.,€Nashville,€For€Appellee,€Lois€Lynn€MillerÐ tÄ ÐÌÓÜÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ ]»XXZ1 #ÔÔ‡XZ1X»¼ ]ÔÐ 8!ˆ  ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ ]»XXZ1D #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XZ1X»¼ ]ÔÌò òÔ‡&W² %XXZ1Ôó óÔ‡&W² % %&W²ÔÑ€{·ÑÑ€¯bÑà0  àÔ#†XZ1X %&W²Ñ #Ô€€This€is€an€appeal€from€a€final€decree€of€divorce€by€the€Circuit€Court€of€DavidsonÐü#L#(#(# ÐCounty.€€Lois€Lynn€Miller€(hereinafter€ð ðWifeðð)€filed€a€complaint€for€divorce€against€James€EarlÐ è$8 $ ÐMiller€(hereinafter€ð ðHusbandðð)€on€April€8,€1998.€€After€a€non„jury€trial,€the€trial€court€awarded€theÐ Ô%$!% Ðdivorce€to€Wife€on€the€grounds€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct.€€The€final€decree€awarded€alimonyÐ À&"& Ðòòin€futuroóó,€alimony€òòin€Ô_ÔsolidoÔ_Ôóó,€and€attorney€fees€to€Wife€and€classified€and€divided€the€partiesðð€maritalÐ ¬'ü"' Ðproperty.€€Husband€has€appealed,€and€Wife€also€presents€issues€for€review.Ð ˜(è#( ÐÌ€€€€€€€€The€parties€were€marriedÔ‡&W² %XXZ1Ô€Ô#†XZ1X %&W²q#Ôin€January€of€1988.€€At€the€time€of€the€marriage,€Husband€was€48Ð p*À%* Ðyears€old,€and€Wife€was€58€years€old.€€€The€marriage€lasted€11€years.€€There€were€no€children€of€theÐ \+¬&+ Ðmarriage.€€After€about€three€years,€the€marriage€began€to€deteriorate,€but€the€parties€continued€to€liveÐ H,˜', Ðtogether.€€The€parties€did€not€acquire€title€or€interest€to€real€property€but€lived€in€an€apartment€thatÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÑ{·Ñâ âÑ8€Z1XXdìXXdì8Ñâ âÑ  ÑÔ_Ôhad€been€occupied€by€Husband€before€the€marriage.€€Husbandððs€total€income€during€the€marriageÐ ° Ðwas€$363,086.00.€€Wifeððs€total€income€during€the€marriage€was€$214,867.00.€ò ò€€ó óThroughout€theÐ œì Ðmarriage,€Husbandò ò€ó ópaid€the€rent€and€utilities.€€€Wife€purchased€all€of€their€groceries€and€cleaningÐ ŒÜ Ðsupplies,€as€well€her€own€clothes,€car,€and€gasoline.€Ð |Ì ÐÌà  àWife€filed€for€divorce€alleging€inappropriate€marital€conduct€on€the€part€of€Husband€andÐ T ¤ Ðirreconcilable€differences.€€€€A€trial€was€held€on€September€20,€1999.€€At€the€time€of€trial,€Husband€Ð @  Ðwas€60€years€old,€and€Wife€was€70€years€old.€€Wife€testified€that€she€worked€throughout€the€marriageÐ , | Ðuntil€1998,€when€she€applied€for€and€was€granted€social€security€benefits€in€the€amount€of€$963.00Ð  h Ðper€month€and€medicare€coverage.€€Wife€testified€to€monthly€expenses€of€$1,432.00.€€Ð  T  ÐÌà  àHusband€testified€that€during€the€marriage,€he€worked€for€Avco,€which€was€subsequentlyÐ Ü,  Ðknown€as€Textron,€and€then€Aerostructures.€€Prior€to€the€marriage,€Husband€had€retirement€fundsÐ È  Ðand€stocks€in€mutual€funds.€€Husband€testified€that€Wife€signed€a€waiver€making€Husbandððs€childrenÐ ´  Ðthe€beneficiaries€of€a€Lincoln€Life€account.€€Husband€further€stated€that€all€accounts€were€establishedÐ  ð  Ðprior€to€the€marriage€and€that€neither€party€contributed€to€accounts€during€the€marriage.€€TheÐ ŒÜ  Ðaccounts€included€a€Heritage€Federal€Credit€Union€Account,€a€CD€with€J.C.€Bradford,€a€CD€withÐ xÈ ÐHeritage€Federal,€two€Lincoln€Life€IRAs,€and€a€Textron€pension€fund.Ð d´ ÐÌò òà  àó óAt€the€close€of€proof,€the€court€stated€from€the€bench€that€the€demise€of€the€marriage€afterÐ <Œ Ð2€ðð€years€was€the€fault€of€both€parties,€but€that€they€chose€to€continue€to€live€together€and€ð ðbeÐ (x Ðbasically€miserable€for€8€years.ðð€€The€court€found€that€during€the€marriage€the€parties€chose€to€keepÐ d Ðtheir€finances€separate,€maintaining€separate€checking€accounts,€paying€separate€bills,€and€keepingÐ P Ðseparate€retirements€and€401(K)€accounts.€€The€court€noted,€however,€that€Wife€paid€for€their€sharedÐ ì< Ðgroceries€in€addition€to€her€own€expenses,€allowing€the€Husband€to€ð ðcompile€a€sizeable€estate.ðð€€TheÐ Ø( Ðcourt€found€that€although€Wife€made€no€monetary€contributions,€she€maintained€the€marital€homeÐ Ä Ðfor€11€years.€€The€trial€court€noted€that€Wife€is€10€years€older€than€the€Husband,€is€retired,€is€on€aÐ ° Ðfixed€income,€and€has€health€problems.Ð œì ÐÌà  àA€final€decree€granting€Wife€a€divorce€was€entered€on€September€29,€1999.€€The€final€decreeÐ tÄ Ðdivided€the€property€as€follows:Ð ` ° ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIT€IS€FURTHER,€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€and€DECREEDÐ 8"ˆ  Ðby€the€Court€that€the€following€non„marital€accounts€shall€be€awardedÐ $#t! Ðto€Mr.€Miller:€Heritage€Federal€Credit€Union€account€402500173Ð $`" Ð(Money€Management€Account);€Heritage€Federal€Credit€UnionÐ ü$L # Ðaccount€402500173€(Prime€Share€Account);€Heritage€Federal€CreditÐ è%8!$ ÐUnion€account€402500173€(Checking€Account);€IDEX€II€MutualÐ Ô&$"% ÐFund€account€1000131757;€the€J.€C.€Bradford€Certificate€of€Deposit;Ð À'#& Ðthe€Heritage€Federal€Certificate€of€Deposit;€Lincoln€Life€IRA€accountÐ ¬(ü#' Ð96„9148992;€and€Lincoln€Life€IRA€account€96„900817.И)è$(` x` x Ðâ âÐ „*Ô%) Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIT€IS€FURTHER,€ORDERED,€ADJUDGEDÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1ó #ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1Ô€and€DECREEDÐ ° Ðâ âby€the€€Court€that€the€following€marital€assets€shall€be€awarded€toÐ œì ÐMrs.€Miller:€$7,000.00€of€Dean€Witter€Fund€account€303„043020;Ð ˆØ ÐDean€Witter€Fund€account€308„052604„054€(inheritance).ÐtÄ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIT€IS€FURTHER,€ORDERED,€ADJUDGEDÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1‹ #ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1Ô€and€DECREEDÐ L œ Ðby€the€Court€that€the€following€accounts€are€deemed€marital€propertyÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€be€equally€divided€between€the€parties:€Aerostructures€CorporationÐ $ t Ð401€(K)€account€402500173„62532,€approximately€$24,000.00;€theÐ  ` ÐDelaware€Group€Roth€IRA€account€600005455,€approximatelyÐ ü L  Ð$1,856.46;€Essential€Service€Inc.€Profit€Sharing€Sun€Trust€accountÐ è 8  Ð465„40„2982,€approximately€$20,920.55;€Essential€Service€Inc.Ð Ô$  Ð401(K)€account€465402982,€approximately€$17,668.00.€€The€balancesÐ À  Ðin€these€accounts€shall€be€divided€equally€between€the€parties€with€theÐ ¬ü  Ðvalue€determined€as€of€September€20,€1999.€€Ð˜è ` x` x ÐÌWife€was€awarded€alimony€òòin€futuro€óóof€$850.00€per€month€until€death€or€remarriage€and€alimonyòòÐ pÀ Ðin€solidoóó€of€$65,000.00.€€She€was€also€awarded€$4,500.00€in€attorney€fees.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àHusband€appeals,€bringing€three€issues€for€review:Ð 4„ Ðò òó ó€€Ð  p Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1.€€Whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€awardingà8@æ` x` xàà8  à€Wife€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€in€the€amount€of€$65,000.00?Ð \Ð Ð  ÐÌò òó óÓ€ (5h83 ÓØ! !Øà8  àà8` Ð Ð à2.€€Whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€à8@` x` xàà8  à€awarding€Wife€alimony€òòin€futuroóó€of€$850.00€per€month?Ðä4Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à3.€€Ø! !ØWhether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€awarding€Wife€herÐ ¼  Ðattorneys€fees€in€the€amount€of€$4,500.00?Шø` x` x Ðà  àÌà  àWife€raises€additional€issues€on€appeal:Ð €Ð ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1.€€Whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€classifying€the€followingà8@ôÐ Ð àà8@ô”äà€assets€asÐ X ¨ ÐHusbandððs€separate€property,€thereby€failing€to€make€an€equitableÐ D!” Ðdistribution€thereof?Ð0"€ ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà8¸ ` x` xàa.€€The€Heritage€Federal€Credit€Union€Account,€withÐ $X" Ða€value€of€$2,050.00;€the€CD€with€J.C.€Bradford,€withÐ ô$D # Ða€value€of€$79,000.00;€and€the€appreciation€in€value€inÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€amount€of€$31,899.00€of€Husbandððs€CD€withÐ Ì&"% ÐHeritage€Federal€with€value€of€$98,015.00и'#&¸ ¸  Ðò òÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà8¸ ` x` xàó ób.€€The€appreciation€in€value€in€the€amount€ofÐ )à$( Ð$120,735.00€of€the€Idex€II€Mutual€Fund,€with€value€ofÐ |*Ì%) Ð$136,831.00Ðh+¸&*¸ ¸  Ðò òÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà8¸ ` x` xàó óc.€€Lincoln€Life€IRA,€with€value€of€$71,860.00Ðœì¸ ¸  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà8¸ ` x` xàd.€€Lincoln€Life€IRA€with€value€of€$162,824,00Ðtĸ ¸  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà8¸ ` x` xàe.€€Husbandððs€vested€retirement€plan€with€his€currentÐ L œ Ðemployer.Ð8 ˆ¸ ¸  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à2.€€Whether€Wife€should€be€awarded€her€attorneyððs€fees€on€appeal?ò òÐ `` x` x ÐÌà  àó óSince€this€case€was€tried€by€the€trial€court€sitting€without€a€jury,€we€review€the€case€òòde€novoóóÐ è 8  Ðupon€the€record€with€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€findings€of€fact€by€the€trial€court.€€UnlessÐ Ô$  Ðthe€evidence€preponderates€against€the€findings,€we€must€affirm,€absent€error€of€law.€€Tenn€.R.€App.Ð À  ÐP.€13(d).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àHusband€contends€that€the€trial€court€awarded€excessive€alimony.€€He€argues€that€the€trialÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€did€not€properly€consider€the€three€most€important€elements€in€determining€alimony€awards:Ð pÀ Ðduration€of€the€marriage,€need€of€the€wife,€and€non„marital€assets€of€the€husband.€€Husband€contendsÐ \¬ Ðthat€this€was€a€marriage€of€short€duration,€with€the€parties€living€as€husband€and€wife€for€a€minimumÐ H˜ Ðof€two,€and€a€maximum€of€four€years.€€Husband€further€asserts€that€Wife€has€social€securityÐ 4„ Ðpayments€of€$963.00€per€month,€Medicare€insurance,€an€inherited€amount׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×,€with€an€estate€acquiredÐ  p Ðduring€the€marriage€of€$92,134.27.€€€€Husband€contends€that€Wife€has€sufficient€monies€of€her€ownÐ  \ Ðand€does€not€need,€nor€has€she€demonstrated€the€need€for,€€the€amount€of€alimony€awarded€by€theÐ øH Ðtrial€court.€€With€regard€to€the€trial€courtððs€award€of€$65,000.00€in€alimony€òòin€solidoóó,€HusbandÐ ä4 Ðasserts€that€the€only€possible€basis€for€the€trial€courtððs€award€was€the€value€of€the€stock€that€heÐ Ð  Ðacquired€prior€to€the€marriage.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌòòò òóóó ó€€€€€€€€Regardingò òó ó€Husbandððs€Aerostructures€Federal€Credit€Union€Account€(later€called€HeritageÐ ”ä ÐFederal€Credit€Union)ò ò,€ó óWife€claims€that€during€the€marriage€he€deposited€some€of€€his€paychecks,Ð €Ð Ðmonies€from€matured€CDs,€and€disability€payments€€into€that€account.€Wife€contends€that€the€J.C.Ð pÀ ÐBradford€CD€was€acquired€during€the€marriage.€€Wife€asserts€that€funds€in€the€Credit€Union€accountÐ \ ¬ Ðand€funds€to€purchase€the€CD€were€co„mingled€with€marital€funds.€€Wife€claims€to€be€entitled€to€anÐ H!˜ Ðequitable€division€of€the€increase€in€value€of€Husbandððs€investments€during€the€marriage€(particularlyÐ 4"„  Ðhis€Idex€fund)ò ò,€ó óbecause€she€made€a€significant€and€substantial€contribution€to€this€marriage.€€WifeÐ  #p! Ðalso€asserts€she€is€entitled€to€an€equitable€division€of€the€increase€in€value€of€Husbandððs€IRAs.€€Ð $`" ÐÌà  àÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1E"#ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1Ôò òó óIn€her€brief,€Wife€submits€that€the€trial€courtððs€award€of€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€was€€most€likelyÐ è%8!$ Ðin€lieu€of€an€equitable€division€of€the€increase€in€value€of€Husbandððs€assets€during€the€marriage.€€€SheÐ Ô&$"% Ðfurther€concedes€that€it€would€be€improper€to€award€her€both€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€and€an€equitableÐ À'#& Ðdivision€of€Husbandððs€assets.Ô#†XZ1XXXZ15;#ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1ÔÐ ¬(ü#' Їà  àÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1=#ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1ÔWe€address€the€trial€courtððs€division€of€property€first.€€Ô#†XZ1XXXZ1v=#ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1ÔIn€ò òòòBatson€v.€Batson,€ó óóó769€S.W.2d€849Ð ° Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988),€ò òòòóóó óthe€Middle€section€of€the€Tennessee€Court€of€Appeals€addressed€the€issueÐ œì Ðof€division€of€property€in€a€divorce.€€The€first€order€of€business€for€a€trial€court€in€the€division€ofÐ ˆØ Ðproperty€is€to€classify€the€property,€giving€each€party€their€separate€property,€and€then€dividing€theÐ tÄ Ðmarital€property€equitably.€€€€ò òòòBatson,óóó ó€769€S.W.€2d€at€856.òòò òóóó ó€òòò òóóó ó(citations€omitted).Ð `° ÐÌà  àT.C.A.€ðð€36„4„121€(1996)€defines€marital€property€as€follows:Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(1)€(A)€ððMarital€propertyðð€means€all€real€and€personalÐ  ` Ðproperty,€both€tangible€and€intangible,€acquired€by€either€or€bothÐ ü L  Ðspouses€during€the€course€of€the€marriage€up€to€the€date€of€the€finalÐ è 8  Ðdivorce€hearing€and€owned€by€either€or€both€spouses€as€of€the€date€ofÐ Ô$  Ðfiling€of€a€complaint€for€divorce,€except€in€the€case€of€fraudulentÐ À  Ðconveyance€in€anticipation€of€filing,€and€including€any€property€toÐ ¬ü  Ðwhich€a€right€was€acquired€up€to€the€date€of€the€finial€divorce€hearing,Ð ˜è  Ðand€valued€as€of€a€date€as€near€as€reasonably€possible€to€the€finalÐ „Ô  Ðdivorce€hearing€date.à0h` x` xàÐpÀhxhx Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(B)€ððMarital€propertyðð€includes€income€from,€and€any€increaseÐ \¬ Ðin€value€during€the€marriage€of,€property€determined€to€be€separateÐ H˜ Ðproperty€in€accordance€with€subdivision€(b)(2)€if€each€partyÐ 4„ Ðsubstantially€contributed€to€its€preservation€and€appreciation€and€theÐ  p Ðvalue€of€vested€pension,€retirement€or€other€fringe€benefit€rightsÐ  \ Ðaccrued€during€the€period€of€the€marriage.ÐøH` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(€C€)€As€used€in€this€subsection,€ð ðsubstantial€contributionððÐ ä4 Ðmay€include,€but€not€be€limited€to,€the€direct€or€indirect€contributionÐ Ð  Ðof€a€spouse€as€homemaker,€wage€earner,€parent€or€family€financialÐ ¼  Ðmanager,€together€with€such€other€factors€as€the€court€havingÐ ¨ø Ðjurisdiction€thereof€may€determine.Дä` x` x ÐÌà  àò òòòóóó óÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1õ=#ÔÔ‡XZ1XXXZ1ÔSpecifically,€Wife€first€takes€issue€with€the€classification€of€the€Heritage€Federal€CreditÐ l¼ ÐUnion€Accounts,€€the€Bradford€CDs,€and€the€Heritage€CD€as€Husbandððs€separate€property.€€TheÐ X ¨ Ðrecord€shows€that€at€the€time€of€the€marriage,€Husband€had€a€credit€union€account€known€asÐ D!” ÐAerostructures€Federal€Credit€Union.€€In€1991,€that€credit€union€account€became€the€Heritage€FederalÐ 0"€  ÐCredit€Union.€€Husband€testified€to€buying€CDððs€with€money€from€the€Heritage€Federal€AccountÐ #l! Ðduring€the€marriage,€including€the€J.C.€Bradford€CD€and€the€Heritage€CD.€€Wife€contends€thatÐ $X" ÐHusbandððs€activity€with€regard€to€the€Heritage€Federal€Credit€Union€Account€constitutes€aÐ ô$D # Ðcommingling€of€separate€funds€in€the€Heritage€Federal€Credit€Union€Account€with€marital€funds,Ð à%0!$ Ðthereby€rendering€the€$2,050.00€balance€in€the€account€marital€property€and€subject€to€an€equitableÐ Ì&"% Ðdivision€by€the€trial€court.Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àIn€response€to€a€direct€question€from€the€court,€Husband€testified€that€neither€he€nor€WifeÐ )à$( Ðmade€any€contribution€to€these€accounts€during€the€marriage.€€The€trial€court€evidently€accreditedÐ |*Ì%) Ðthis€testimony.€€The€weight,€faith,€and€credit€given€to€the€testimony€by€the€trial€court€in€the€firstÐ h+¸&* Ðinstance€is€to€be€given€great€weight€on€appeal.€€ò òòòSee€Haverlah€v.€Memphis€Aviationó óóó,€674€S.W.2dÐ ° Ð297,€302€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984).€€The€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€the€trial€courtððsÐ œì Ðfindings€that€these€accounts€are€Husbandððs€separate€property.€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àNext,€Wife€asserts€that€the€Idex€fund,€valued€at€approximately€$19,000.00€at€the€time€of€theÐ `° Ðmarriage€and€approximately€$136,814.00€at€the€time€of€trial,€should€have€been€classified€as€maritalÐ L œ Ðproperty€by€the€trial€court€and€equitably€divided.€€Wife€contends€that€she€made€a€significant€andÐ 8 ˆ Ðsubstantial€contribution€to€the€marriage€and€that€her€efforts€made€it€possible€for€Husband€to€allowÐ $ t Ðhis€investments€to€grow€over€the€11€years€of€the€marriage.€Wife€asserts€that€the€trial€court€shouldÐ  ` Ðhave€awarded€her€an€equitable€division€of€the€approximately€$117,814.00€increase€in€value€ofÐ ü L  ÐHusbandððs€Idex€Account.€€Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àRegarding€T.C.A.€ðð€36„4„121€(b)(1),€our€Supreme€Court€stated€in€ò òòòEllis€v.Ellisóó,€ó ó748€S.W.€2dÐ À  Ð424,€427€(Tenn.€1988),€that€the€only€condition€imposed€for€treating€any€increase€in€the€value€ofÐ °  Ðproperty€during€the€marriage€as€marital€property€is€that€ð ðif€each€party€substantially€contributed€to€itsÐ œì  Ðpreservation€and€appreciation.ðð€€Whether€the€non„owner€spouse€made€a€substantial€contribution€toÐ ˆØ  Ðan€increase€in€equity€is€a€question€of€fact.€€ò òòòCohen€v.€Cohenóóó ó,€937€S.W.€2d€823,€833€€(Tenn.€1996)Ð tÄ Ð(citing€ò òòòBrown€v.€Brownóóó ó,€913€S.W.€2d€163,€167€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994)).€€In€ò òòòWade€v.€Wade,€óóó ó897Ð `° ÐS.W.2d€702€9Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994),€€the€Court€held€that€the€appreciation€of€stocks€owned€by€theÐ Lœ Ðhusband€prior€to€the€marriage€was€marital€property€due€to€wifeððs€substantial€contribution€to€theÐ 8ˆ Ðpreservation€and€appreciation€of€the€stocks.€€In€so€ruling,€the€ò òòòWadeóóó ó€Court€found€that€the€husbandððsÐ $t Ðstock€appreciated€while€the€wife€supported€the€husband€with€her€earnings,€and€made€indirectÐ ` Ðcontributions€as€a€homemaker,€wage€earner,€parent,€and€family€financial€manager,€and€also€that€sheÐ üL Ðmade€direct€contribution€to€the€managing€of€the€stocks.€€ò òòòId.€óóó óat€714€„€15.€€In€ò òòòSmith€v.€Smithóóó ó,€709Ð è8 ÐS.W.2d€588€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1985),€the€Court€held€that€the€wifeððs€efforts€as€a€wife,€homemaker,€andÐ Ô$ Ðmother€alone€contributed€to€the€value€of€the€husbandððs€law€practice,€thereby€recognizing€indirectÐ À Ðcontributions€of€a€non„owner€spouse€as€a€substantial€contribution.€€ò òòòIdóóó ó.€at€€591.€€ò òòòSee€alsoóóó ó€ò òòòBatson€v.Ð ¬ü ÐBatson,óóó ó€769€S.W.€2d€at€858.€€Ð ˜è ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case,€the€parties€lived€virtually€separate€lives€for€all€but€the€first€two€years€ofÐ pÀ Ðthe€marriage.€€Wife€testified€that€she€furnished€groceries€and€cooked€most€of€the€meals.€€HusbandÐ \ ¬ Ðtestified€that€he€paid€for€the€rent€and€utilities.€€Other€than€these€contributions€by€both€parties,€theyÐ H!˜ Ðpursued€their€individual€ways.€€Wife€supported€herself,€made€her€own€investments,€and€generallyÐ 4"„  Ðmade€her€own€way.€€Ð  #p! ÐÌà  àBy€the€same€token,€Husband€did€likewise.€€There€is€no€proof€that€Husband€made€anyÐ ø$H # Ðcontribution€to€this€fund€from€his€marital€income.€€Under€the€peculiar€facts€of€this€case,€we€do€notÐ ä%4!$ Ðfind€that€the€evidence€preponderates€against€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€the€increase€in€value€of€theÐ Ð& "% ÐIdex€fund€is€not€marital€property.Ð ¼' #& ÐÌà  àWife€also€takes€issue€with€the€trial€courtððs€treatment€of€the€two€Lincoln€Life€IRA€accountsÐ ”)ä$( Ðas€separate€property€of€Husband.€€Husband€testified€that€one€Lincoln€Life€IRA,€valued€atÐ €*Ð%) Ðapproximately€$72,910.00€at€the€time€of€trial,€was€valued€at€approximately€$34,259.00€when€heÐ l+¼&* Ðrolled€it€over€in€January€of€1995€from€the€Idex€fund.€€As€previously€noted,€the€Idex€fund€and€itsÐ ° Ðincrease€in€value€is€Husbandððs€separate€property,€and€thus€the€roll„over€to€the€Lincoln€Life€IRAÐ œì Ðconstitutes€Husbandððs€separate€property.€€As€to€the€other€Lincoln€Life€IRA,€Husband€testified€thatÐ ˆØ Ð$38,300.00€was€transferred€from€a€401(K)€plan€in€1996.€€The€funds€in€the€401(K)€plan€includedÐ tÄ Ðcontributions€made€by€Husband€from€his€salary€during€the€period€from€1988€to€1996.€€Under€theseÐ `° Ðcircumstances,€the€contributions€of€the€401(K)€plan€constitute€marital€property.€€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àFinally,€Wife€contends€Husband€has€two€traditional€retirement€accounts:€the€Avco€Plan,Ð $ t Ðwhich€accumulated€when€the€company€that€employs€him€was€know€as€Avco,€and€the€Textron€Plan,Ð  ` Ðwhich€began€accumulating€after€his€employer€changed€its€name€to€Textron,€around€the€time€of€theÐ ü L  Ðmarriage.€€Wife€asserts€that€Husband€admitted€that€all€of€the€monthly€payments€after€retirement€toÐ è 8  Ðwhich€he€is€entitled€under€the€Textron€Plan€were€accumulated€during€the€marriage.€€Wife€argues€thatÐ Ô$  Ð$200.00,€the€portion€of€Husbandððs€retirement€benefit€attributable€to€the€Textron€plan,€is€maritalÐ À  Ðproperty€and€that€she€should€therefore€receive€an€equitable€portion€of€that€amount,€$100.00.€€The€trialÐ ¬ü  Ðcourt€did€not€address€either€of€these€retirement€accounts€specifically€in€its€final€decree.à Ð àÐ ˜è  ÐÌà  àMarital€property€includes€the€value€of€ð ðpension€retirement€or€other€fringe€benefit€rightsÐ pÀ Ðaccrued€during€the€period€of€the€marriage,ðð€T.€C.€A.€ðð€36„4„121(b)(1)(B),€with€no€regard€to€the€otherÐ \¬ Ðspouseððs€contribution€during€the€marriage.€€ò òòòCohen€v.€Cohen,€ó óóó937€S.W.€2d€at€830;€òòò òKendrick€v.Ð H˜ ÐKendrickó óóó,€902€S.W.2d€918,€926€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994).€€òòò òó óóóConsequently,€marital€property€includes€anyÐ 4„ Ðincrease€during€the€marriage€in€the€value€of€retirement€or€pension€rights,€regardless€if€growth€beÐ  p Ðthrough€passive€growth,€or€through€either€partyððs€direct€or€indirect€contribution.€€ò òòòUmstot€v.€Umstotóóó ó,Ð  \ Ð968€S.W.2d€819,€822€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997).ò òòòóóó óÐ øH ÐÌà  àOnly€the€portion€of€retirement€benefits€accrued€during€the€marriage€are€marital€propertyÐ Ð  Ðsubject€to€equitable€division.€€The€value€of€retirement€benefits€must€be€determined€at€a€date€as€nearÐ ¼  Ðas€possible€to€the€date€of€the€divorce.€€ò òòòCohen€v.€Cohenó óóó,€ò òòòsupraó óóó.Ð ¨ø ÐÌÒe°Òà  àHusband€testified€the€Textron€retirement€plan€was€begun€sometime€close€to€the€time€of€theÐ €Ð Ðmarriage.€€Husband€also€testified€that€under€both€plans€he€would€receive€approximately€$725.00€perÐ l¼ Ðmonth€in€benefits.€€Approximately€$525.00€per€month€would€come€from€the€old€Avco€Plan,€and€theÐ X ¨ Ðremaining€$200.00€would€be€derived€from€the€Textron€plan.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àIt€appears€from€the€record€that€Husbandððs€retirement€plan€with€Textron€accrued€during€theÐ #l! Ðmarriage,€but€we€cannot€ascertain€from€the€record€the€value€of€that€accrual.€€Upon€remand,€the€courtÐ $X" Ðshould€determine€the€value€of€this€marital€asset€and€make€a€proper€division€thereof.Ð ô$D # Ðà  àò òó óHusbandððs€first€issue€is€whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€awarding€Wife€alimonyòòÐ à%0!$ Ðin€solidoóó€in€the€amount€of€$65,000.00.€€There€is€no€clear€statement€in€the€trial€courtððs€final€decree,€orÐ Ì&"% Ðin€the€record,€as€to€the€basis€of€the€$65,000.00€figure.€€In€her€brief,€Wife€submits€that€the€trial€courtððsÐ ¸'#& Ðaward€of€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€was€most€likely€in€lieu€of€and€in€the€nature€of€an€equitable€division€of€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðincrease€in€value€of€Husbandððs€assets€during€the€course€of€this€marriage.€€If€that€is€the€case,€we€wouldÐ )à$( Ðagree€with€Wife€that€it€would€be€improper€to€award€her€both€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€and€an€equitableÐ |*Ì%) Ðdivision€of€Husbandððs€assets.Ð h+¸&* Їà  àT.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1)€mandates€that€all€relevant€factors€be€considered€by€the€trial€court€inÐ ° Ðdetermining€€the€nature,€amount,€length€of€term,€and€manner€of€payment€of€alimony,€and€enumerates€Ð œì Ðfactors€to€be€included€in€that€consideration.€€Need€and€the€ability€to€pay€are€the€critical€factors€inÐ ˆØ Ðsetting€the€amount€of€an€alimony€award.€€ò òòòUmstot€v.€Umstot,óóó ó€968€S.W.2d€at€823;€(citing€ò òòòSmith€v.Ð tÄ ÐSmith,€óóó ó912€S.W.2d€155,€159€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995)).€€ð ðThe€propriety€of€awarding€alimony€as€wellÐ `° Ðas€the€adequacy€of€the€amount€awarded€depend€upon€the€unique€facts€of€each€case.ðð€€òòò òId.€óóó ó(citing€ò òòòButlerÐ L œ Ðv.€Butler,€óóó ó680€S.W.2d€467,€470€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984)).€€The€amount€of€alimony€to€be€awarded€is€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðmatter€for€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€and€should€not€be€altered€on€appeal€except€where€the€recordÐ $ t Ðreflects€that€discretion€has€been€abused.€€ò òòòId.€óóó ó€In€view€of€the€nature€of€the€partiesðð€relationship€and€withÐ  ` Ðan€award€of€alimony€òòin€futuroóó,€we€see€no€real€entitlement€to€alimony€òòin€solidoóó.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àHusbandððs€second€issue,€whether€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€awarding€the€WifeÐ Ô$  Ð$850.00€per€month€alimony€òòin€futuro,€óówe€again€refer€to€the€relevant€statue,€T.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101(d)€(1).€Ð À  ÐAs€the€court€noted€in€the€final€decree€of€divorce:Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà8  àà8` !!àMr.€Miller€is€gainfully€employed€and€is€ten€years€younger€than€Ms.€Ð „Ô  ÐMiller.€€Sheððs€retired.€€Sheððs€on€fixed€income.€€Sheððs€still€his€wife.€Ð pÀ ÐSheððs€ten€years€older.€€Sheððs€got€health€problems€that€sheððs€describedÐ \¬ Ðto€the€Court€....So€they€have€just€kind€of€existed€in€this€state€for€the€lastÐ H˜ Ð8€years.€€But€theyððre€still€married€until€the€gavel€falls.€€Ð4„` Ã` à Ðà8  àà8` !!àÐ ` Ã` à Ðà  àAccording€to€Wifeððs€income€and€expense€statement,€she€has€ongoing€expenses€of€$1,432.00Ð  \ Ðper€month.€€Wife€receives€monthly€social€security€benefits€of€$963.00.€€Wife€testified€€that€althoughÐ øH Ðthis€marriage€deteriorated€after€the€first€two€years,€the€parties€remained€married.€€Therefore€theÐ ä4 Ðduration€of€the€marriage€is€of€11€years,€which€she€contends€is€not€a€short€marriage.€€Wife€testified€thatÐ Ð  Ðshe€was€supportive€of€Husbandððs€attempts€as€a€recovering€alcoholic,€to€remain€sober€by€attendingÐ ¼  Ðmeetings€and€was€otherwise€supporting€his€sobriety€through€the€marriage.€€Wife€asserts€that€despiteÐ ¨ø Ðher€support,€Husband€stopped€communicating€with€her€in€1990/1991€and€began€verbally€abusing€her,Ð ”ä Ðoften€using€profane€language€in€her€presence.€€Wife€asserts€that€Husband€rebuffed€Wifeððs€attemptsÐ €Ð Ðto€rekindle€the€marriage€or€to€seek€counseling€for€the€marriage.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àConsidering€the€fact€that€the€court€awarded€this€divorce€to€Wife,€her€fixed€income,€her€need,Ð D!” Ðher€age,€and€Husbandððs€ability€to€pay,€an€award€of€alimony€òòin€futuroóó€is€proper.€€However,€we€believeÐ 0"€  Ða€more€appropriate€award,€after€consideration€of€all€factors,€is€$500.00€per€month.€€Ð #l! Ðà  àHusbandððs€third€issue€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€granting€the€Wife€an€award€ofÐ $X" Ð$4,500.00€in€attorneyððs€fees.€€In€determining€whether€to€award€attorney€fees,€the€trial€court€shouldÐ ô$D # Ðconsider€the€relevant€factors€enumerated€in€T.C.A.€ðð€36„5„101(d)(1).€€ò òòòSee€Umstot€v.€Umstot,óóó ó€968Ð à%0!$ ÐS.W.2d€at€€824;€(citing€ò òòòKincaid€v.€Kincaidó óóó,€912€S.W.€2d€140,€144€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995)).€€WhereÐ Ì&"% Ðone€party€shows€that€it€is€financially€unable€to€afford€counsel,€and€the€other€party€has€the€ability€toÐ ¸'#& Ðpay,€that€trial€court€may€properly€order€the€other€party€to€pay€attorneyððs€fees.€€ò òòòId.€€óóó óSuch€an€award€isÐ ¤(ô#' Ðwithin€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trial€court€and€should€not€be€disturbed€on€appeal,€unless€theÐ )à$( Ðâ âevidence€preponderates€against€the€award.€€ò òòòId.€€ó óóóA€party€with€adequate€income€and€property€is€notÐ |*Ì%) Ðentitled€to€an€additional€award€of€alimony€to€compensate€for€attorney€fees€and€expenses.€€òòò òId.€€ó óóó(citingÐ ° Ðòòò òDuncan€v.€Duncan,€ó óóó686€S.W.2d€568€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1984)).Ð œì Ðâ âÌà8  àà8` !!àòòò òóóó óThese€awards€are€appropriate,€however,€only€when€the€spouse€seekingÐ tÄ Ðthem€lacks€sufficient€funds€to€pay€his€or€her€own€legal€expenses,Ð `° Ðòòò òHoughland€v.€Houghland,ó óóó€844€S.W.2d€619,€623€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð L œ ÐApp.1992);€€€ò òòòIngram€v.€Ingram,óóó ó€721€S.W.2d€at€264,€or€would€beÐ 8 ˆ Ðrequired€to€deplete€his€or€her€resources€in€order€to€pay€these€expenses.€Ð $ t Ѐò òòòHarwell€v.€Harwell,óóó ó€612€S.W.2d€182,€185€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1980).Ð `` Ã` à ÐÌòòò òÓÓBrown€v.€Brown,ó óóó€913€S.W.2d€163,€170.(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994).€€Ð è 8  ÐÓÓà  àWhere€one€party€has€been€awarded€additional€funds€for€maintenance€and€support€and€suchÐ À  Ðfunds€are€intended€to€provide€the€party€with€a€source€of€future€income,€the€party€need€not€be€requiredÐ ¬ü  Ðto€pay€legal€expenses€by€using€assets€that€will€provide€for€future€income.€€ò òòòBatson€v.€Batsonóóó ó,€769€S.W.Ð ˜è  Ð2d€at€862€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988).€€Thus,€where€the€wife€has€demonstrated€that€she€is€financially€unableÐ „Ô  Ðto€procure€counsel,€and€where€the€husband€has€the€ability€to€pay,€the€court€may€properly€order€theÐ pÀ Ðhusband€to€pay€the€wife's€attorneys€fees.€€€ò òòòHarwell€v.€Harwell,€óóó ó612€S.W.2d€182,€185€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð \¬ ÐApp.1980);€€€ò òòòPalmer€v.€Palmer,€óóó ó562€S.W.2d€833,€839€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1977);€€òòò òLigon€v.€Ligon,ó óóó€556Ð H˜ ÐS.W.2d€763,€768€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1977).€€òòò òó óóóÐ 4„ ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case,€the€€trial€court€awarded€Wife€a€portion€of€her€attorney€fees,€stating€inÐ  \ Ðpertinent€part:Ð øH ÐÌà8  àà8` !!àà ¸ àIT€IS€FURTHER,€ORDERED,€ADJUDGED€and€DECREEDÐ Ð  Ðby€the€Court€that€Mr.€Miller€has€not€been€forthright€on€getting€togetherÐ ¼  Ðinformation,€therefore,€counsel€for€Mrs.€Miller€had€to€do€a€lot€of€work,Ð ¨ø Ðtherefore,€the€court€does€award€attorney€fees€to€Robert€L.€Jackson€andÐ ”ä ÐLarry€G.€Hayes€in€the€some€of€$4,500.00,€which€fee€shall€be€Taxed€toÐ €Ð Ðthe€Defendant,€James€Earl€Miller,€for€the€representation€of€the€wife,Ð l¼ Ðalong€with€the€cost€of€this€cause,€for€all€of€which€execution€may€issue,Ð X ¨ Ðif€necessary.ÐD!”` Ã` à ÐÌIn€addition,€the€record€indicates€that€Wife€is€not€able€to€afford€counsel€without€drawing€on€fundsÐ #l! Ðintended€for€her€future€living€expenses.€€€She€is€retired€and€on€a€fixed€income,€therefore€there€is€noÐ $X" Ðexpectation€of€increased€earnings€in€the€future.€€We€believe€that€the€evidence€does€not€preponderateÐ ô$D # Ðagainst€the€trial€court€finding€and€award€to€Wife€of€$4,500.00€òòóófor€her€attorneyððs€fees.Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àIn€summary,€the€trial€courtððs€final€decree€is€modified€to€award€alimony€òòin€futuroóó€of€$500.00Ð ¸'#& Ðper€month.€The€trial€courtððs€award€of€$65,000.00€as€alimony€òòin€solidoóó€is€reversed,€and€the€case€isÐ ¤(ô#' Ðremanded€to€the€trial€court€for€a€determination€of€the€value€of€Husbandððs€retirement€plan€with€TextronÐ )à$( Ðand€the€value€of€the€Lincoln€Life€IRA€rolled€over€from€a€401€(K)€plan.€€The€court€should€then€makeÐ |*Ì%) Ðan€equitable€division€thereof.€€The€decree€of€the€trial€court€in€all€other€respects€is€affirmed.€€Each€partyÐ h+¸&* Ðwill€pay€their€own€attorney€fees€on€appeal,€and€costs€of€the€appeal€are€assessed€equally€to€the€parties,Ð ° ÐLois€Lynn€Miller€and€James€Earl€Miller.Ð œì ÐÔ#†XZ1XXXZ1H#ÔÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à__________________________________________Ð `° Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.