ÿWPCi Ò]{™•÷óL+ºàL.º*ÄX&œn÷¿´›ÈBm/©Èa’[zà ±¿ðŠÉ¾½eòÝ“Wë¶÷»ßÿ²ÃqŽuxà1áX•…Öñgþ9ðoš¤PcÙ°ÌfÍì¹Å+‚šÚ î™è‹ªÅ9ÄQXwÅ „>HyÕå<Ùcø8v#¦Ö°'ÀmZß…“±i¾4Öòlè$ÐÁ€œêLflö@é,’­±O;2&†âßó„×.kkz‹~ þŸ²ês¸’¼Ò6÷‰­éÙÏ~·ŠP9H¼ jê%ÞVÐ1:¯b]pÜ+ô[ªaf”ìÚGGyð u ϰ‚ìåa®Nwʨâüúæì1)k@b %\UNb 0ˆ°UN8 0D†U<Ê^  z ÒŒ w^ Nb ×d 4; ÆO ÆÆÛÆ¡gNvx mzE‘#É“““““““““““““““““““““““b\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 0ëdddd BOO 0¤l D5 D-E 0Krr AS½Æ 0¤Ö 0Dz A«¾»(@øÐ Z‹6Times New Roman Regular(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó-šBu Z‹$Arrus BT RomanÜx‘1Ï  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ÍÝ ƒR4w$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôã ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€ò òConsideration€of€Issues€Not€Presented€for€Review.ó ó€€Review€generally€will€extend€only€to€those€issuesÐ ° Ðpresented€for€review.€€The€appellate€court€shall€also€consider€whether€the€trial€and€appellate€court€have€jurisdiction€overÐ uÅ Ðthe€subject€matter,€whether€or€not€presented€for€review,€and€may€in€its€discretion€consider€other€issues€in€order,€amongÐ 6† Ðother€reasons:€(1)€to€prevent€needless€litigation,€(2)€to€prevent€injury€to€the€interests€of€the€public,€and€(3)€to€preventÐ ÷G Ðprejudice€to€the€judicial€process.6hö0ê:i¢Ø+00Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0- ù-(|G24w$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€݉»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôã ò»»Ô d(|3·»$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€݉»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3·»$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€݉»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€݉»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼݉»»»ÔÑ8€„7XXdé»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ò ò ìàÔ‡î1݉ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼݉»îî1 #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  ÓOctober€13,€2004€SessionÐ öF ÐÔ‡X„7X»¼݉ÔÌò òÔ#†¼݉»XX„7ó#ÔWALTER€MILLER,€òòet€al.óó€v.€STATE€FARM€€INSURANCE€COMPANYòòóóÔ‡X„7X»¼݉Ôó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òA€Direct€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Shelby€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€03„2053€€€€€€The€Honorable€D.€J.€Alissandratos,€ChancellorÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2004„00480„COA„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€17,€2004Ð ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡X#4XXX„7Ôà  àPlaintiffs€appeal€an€adverse€judgment€from€the€general€sessions€court€to€the€circuit€court€forÐ V¦  Ða€trial€òòde€novoóó€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€ðð€27„5„108€(Supp.€2004).€€On€motion€of€defendant,€the€circuitÐ ? Ðcourt€transferred€the€case€to€the€chancery€court€because€a€previous€suit€filed€in€the€chancery€courtÐ (x Ðon€the€same€cause€of€action€was€voluntarily€dismissed€by€plaintiff.€€The€chancery€court€grantedÐ a Ðdefendantððs€motion€to€adopt€the€findings€of€the€special€master€filed€in€the€previous€chancery€courtÐ úJ Ðsuit€and€then€granted€defendantððs€motion€for€summary€judgment.€€Plaintiffs€have€appealed.€€WeÐ ã3 Ðvacate€and€remand€to€the€circuit€court.Ð Ì ÐÔ#†X„7XXX#4§#ÔÔ#†¼݉»XX„7{#ÔÔ‡X„7X»¼݉ÔÌÓ›ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€Court€Vacated€andÐ ‡× ÐRemandedó óÐ qÁ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼݉»àX„7"#ÔÔ‡X„7X.¼݉ÔW.€Frank€Crawford,€P.J.,€W.S.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòAlan€E.€Highers,Ð D” ÐJ.óó€and€òòHolly€M.€Kirby,€J.óó,€joined.Ð -} ÐÌJames€E.€Thomas€of€Memphis€for€Appellants,€Walter€Miller€and€Tarna€MillerÐ ÿO ÐÌRobert€L.€Moore€and€Dawn€Davis€Carson€of€Memphis€for€Defendant,€State€Farm€InsuranceÐ Ñ!!! ÐCompanyÐ º" " ÐÓáÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼݉»XX„7 #ÔÔ‡X„7X»¼݉ÔÐ Œ$Ü$ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼݉»XX„7 #ÔÔ‡X„7X»¼݉ÔÓ  Óà  àOn€February€21,€2003,€Tarna€Miller€and€Walter€Miller,€individually€and€as€guardians€forÐ _&¯!& ÐMatthew€Miller€(ð ðPlaintiffsðð),€filed€suit€in€general€sessions€court€against€State€Farm€Insurance€Corp.Ð H'˜"' Ð(ð ðState€Farmðð€or€ð ðDefendantðð),€seeking€damages€for€ð ðbreach€of€contract€in€failure€to€pay€claim€forÐ 1(#( Ðproperty€damage,€bad€faith€for€failure€to€pay€valid€claim,€compensatory€and€punitive€damages€forÐ )j$) Ðinjury€to€Matthew€Miller,€and€for€wrongful€reporting€resulting€in€denial€of€insurance.ððÐ *S%* ÐÌà  àFrom€an€adverse€judgment€from€the€general€sessions€court,€Plaintiffs,€pursuant€to€T.C.A.€ððÐ Õ+%', Ð27„5„108,€appealed€to€the€circuit€court€for€a€trial€òòde€novoóó.Ð ¾,(- ÐÐ §-÷(.ý Ðà  àOn€July€24,€2003,€Defendant€filed€a€motion€in€circuit€court€to€transfer€the€case€to€theÐ ° Ðchancery€court,€Part€III.€€The€premise€of€this€motion€was€that,€on€May€22,€1996,€Plaintiffs€filed€aÐ ™é Ðcomplaint€in€chancery€court€for€the€same€cause€of€action€based€in€the€general€sessions€complaint€andÐ ‚Ò Ðdemanded€a€jury€in€the€chancery€court€case.€€The€chancery€court€case€was€dismissed€by€order€ofÐ k» Ðdismissal€without€prejudice€entered€February€22,€2002.€€The€circuit€court€granted€the€motion€toÐ T¤ Ðtransfer€the€case€to€the€chancery€court,€pursuant€to€its€local€rules.€Ð =  ÐÌà  àPrior€to€the€dismissal€of€the€original€chancery€court€case,€the€trial€court€appointed€a€specialÐ  _ Ðmaster€ð ðto€make€an€investigation€including€a€review€of€the€pleadings€filed€in€this€matter€and€anÐ ø H Ðinspection€of€the€pool€house€structure€and€following€such€inspection€the€special€master€is€to€makeÐ á 1  Ðrecommendations€to€the€court€concerning€whether€the€pool€house€structure€was€properlyÐ Ê   Ðconstructed.ðð€€On€May€24,€2001,€the€special€master€filed€a€report€which€provides€in€pertinent€part:Ð ³  ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€Special€Master€reviewed€all€documents€includingÐ …Õ  Ðsubmission€statements€from€each€attorney;€exhibits;€affidavits€ofÐ n¾  Ðwitnesses;€and€the€deposition€of€Bryan€H.€Stephens,€Jr.,€P.E.,€aÐ W§  Ðwitness€of€the€Defendant.€€An€attempt€by€all€parties€to€settle€this€caseÐ @ Ðfailed.Ð)y` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àOn€Thursday,€March€29,€2001,€an€inspection€and€hearingÐ ûK Ðwere€held€at€the€house€of€the€Plaintiffs.€€After€the€inspection€of€theÐ ä4 ÐPool€House,€arguments€were€heard€by€the€partiesðð€attorneys€andÐ Í Ðwitnesses€were€sworn€in€and€testified.€€The€attorneys€elected€not€toÐ ¶ Ðhave€a€court€reporter€at€the€hearing.Пï` x` x ÐÌà0  àà ° àà@  ì(#(#àFINDINGS€AND€RECOMMENDATIONSˆÐ qÁ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à1.€€It€is€the€findings€of€the€Special€Master€that€the€Plaintiffs€failed€toÐ C“ Ðprove€their€allegations€and€that€no€contractual€liabilities€could€beÐ ,| Ðcharged€to€the€Defendant.Ðe` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à2.€€No€attorney€fees€are€to€be€awarded€and€all€court€cost,€includingÐ ç 7 Ðthe€Special€Masterððs€fee,€is€to€be€divided€equally€between€theÐ Ð!   ÐPlaintiffs€and€the€Defendant.й" !` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à3.€€In€conclusion,€the€Special€Master€agrees€with€the€DefendantððsÐ ‹$Û# Ðwitness,€Bryan€Stephens,€P.E.,€that€the€Pool€House€extension€wasÐ t%Ä $ Ðð ðpoorly€constructed,€with€poor€structural€integrity.ððÐ]&­!%` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à4.€€The€design,€workmanship€and€construction€of€the€rafters,€ceilingÐ /(#' Ðjoists€and€stud€walls,€and€their€connections,€are€below€acceptableÐ )h$( Ðstandards.Ð*Q%)` x` x Ðâ âÐ ê*:&* Ðà  à€Subsequently,€Defendant,€in€the€chancery€court,€moved€for€adoption€of€the€Masterððs€reportÐ ° Ðâ âand€for€a€summary€judgment.€€On€January€14,€2004,€the€chancery€court€filed€its€order€adopting€theÐ ™é ÐSpecial€Masterððs€ruling€in€the€previously€dismissed€case€and€granted€summary€judgment€toÐ ‚Ò ÐDefendant.€€Plaintiffs€have€appealed€and€present€one€issue€for€review:€€ð ðIs€there€a€material€issue€ofÐ k» Ðdisputed€fact€presented€by€the€record€which€precludes€the€grant€of€summary€judgment€to€defendant.ððÐ T¤ ÐÌà  àThis€case€presents€a€good€example€of€why€it€is€best€to€first€determine€whether€a€case€shouldÐ & v Ðbe€disposed€of€on€its€merits€rather€than€try€a€shortcut€method,€which€might€ultimately€result€inÐ  _ Ðprolonging€the€action.€€Rule€13€(b),€Tenn.R.App.P.€provides€that€the€appellate€court€may,€inÐ ø H Ðexercising€its€discretion,€consider€issues€other€than€that€presented€by€the€appellant.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð á 1  ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€look€at€the€case€appealed€from€the€general€sessions€court€to€the€circuit€court.€Ð ³  ÐT.C.A.€ðð€27„5„108€(Supp.€2004)€allows€an€appeal€by€any€party€from€an€adverse€decision€of€theÐ œì  Ðgeneral€sessions€court€to€the€circuit€court€of€the€county€and€specifically€provides:€€ð ðAny€appeal€shallÐ …Õ  Ðbe€heard€de€novo€in€the€circuit€court.ðð€€T.C.A.€ðð€27„5„108€(c)€(Supp.€2004).€€The€appeal€in€this€caseÐ n¾  Ðwas€duly€made€to€the€circuit€court.€€However,€on€motion€of€Defendant,€the€case€was€transferred€toÐ W§  Ðthe€chancery€court€apparently€under€the€provisions€of€Rule€4(e),€Rules€of€the€Circuit€Court€ofÐ @ ÐTennessee€for€the€Thirtieth€Judicial€District€at€Memphis,€Shelby€County.€€The€rule€provides:Ð )y ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(e)€Whenever€any€case€has€been€assigned€to€or€tried€before€any€JudgeÐ ûK Ðof€the€court,€and€comes€on€for€a€trial€or€retrial€as€the€result€of€a€non„Ð ä4 Ðsuit,€mistrial,€reversal,€setting€aside€of€a€verdict,€or€dismissal€on€someÐ Í Ðground€not€going€to€the€merits,€then€such€case€shall€be€assigned€forÐ ¶ Ðany€subsequent€trial€or€trial€to€the€division€of€the€court€presided€overÐ Ÿï Ðby€the€Judge€before€whom€the€case€was€previously€pending,€unlessÐ ˆØ Ðgood€cause€be€shown€to€the€contrary.ÐqÁ` x` x ÐÌIt€is€noted€that€the€rule€provides€for€transfer€to€another€division€of€circuit€court,€not€to€a€jurisdictionÐ C“ Ðoutside€of€circuit€court.€€Ð ,| ÐÌà  àWe€also€note€that€the€statute€allowing€for€appeals€from€general€sessions€court€specificallyÐ þN Ðprovides€that€the€appeal€is€to€the€circuit€court€for€a€trial€òòde€novoóó.€€Under€T.C.A.€ðð€27„5„108,€theÐ ç 7 Ðchancery€court€has€no€subject€matter€jurisdiction€to€hear€an€appeal€from€general€sessions€court.€€ò òòòSeeÐ Ð!   ÐGraves€v.€Kraft€General€Foodsó óóó,€45€S.W.3d€584€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€2000).€€Ð º" ! ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case,€Defendant€is€seeking€to€have€the€general€sessions€appeal€decided€by€theÐ $Ý# Ðâ âchancery€court.€€It€is€a€well€settled€principle€of€law€that€one€cannot€do€indirectly€what€cannot€beÐ v%Æ $ Ðdone€directly.€€ò òòòSee,€i.e.,€Scott€v.€McReynoldsó óóó,€255€S.W.2d€401,€406€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1952)€andÐ ° Ðò òòòRoberts€v.€Robertsó óóó,€767€S.W.2d€646,€649€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988).Ð šê Ðâ âÌà  àMoreover,€considering€the€use€of€the€Masterððs€report€filed€in€the€previous€chancery€courtÐ m½ Ðcase€presents€several€problems.€€First,€it€is€undisputed€that€there€had€been€no€judgment€of€theÐ V¦ Ðchancery€court€prior€to€its€dismissal€of€the€case€by€final€judgment.€€Secondly,€the€reference€to€theÐ ?  Ðmaster€in€the€first€chancery€court€case€was€a€reference€in€a€jury€case.€€ò òòòó óóóIn€4€MacLean,€Bonnyman€andÐ ( x ÐBrandt,€òòTennessee€Practice€Civil€Procedure€Forms€óóððòòóó€53:8€(3òòrdóó€ed.€2000),€it€is€stated:Ð  a ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àò ò53:8€Effect€of€Report€in€Jury€Actionó óÐã 3 ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àThe€findings€of€a€master€in€a€jury€action€are€not€conclusive.€Ð ¶  ÐTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€53.04(3)€states€that€the€findings€of€a€master€areÐ Ÿï  Ðadmissible€as€evidence€of€the€matters€found,€but€the€parties€mayÐ ˆØ  Ðpresent€to€the€jury€any€evidence€in€addition€to€the€masterððs€report,Ð qÁ  Ðcross„examine€the€master€upon€the€record,€and€object€to€the€report€onÐ Zª  Ðpoints€of€law.ÐC“` x` x ÐÌà  àThird,€the€reference€to€the€master€by€the€trial€court€constituted€the€main€issue€to€beÐ e Ðadjudicated.€€Concerning€references€to€the€master,€ò òòòFrazier€v.€Bridgestone/Firestone,€Inc.ó óóó,€67Ð þN ÐS.W.3d€782,€784€(Tenn.Sp.€Workers€Comp.€2001)€states:Ð è8 ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àBy€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€53,€a€court€may€submit€any€matter€to€aÐ º  Ðspecial€master.€€Case€law,€however,€both€before€and€after€the€1971Ð £ó Ðadoption€of€Rule€53,€supports€the€employerððs€contention€that€suchÐ ŒÜ Ðreferrals€are€limited€to€collateral,€subordinate,€and€incidental€issuesÐ uÅ Ðand€the€ascertainment€of€ancillary€facts,€while€the€main€issues€inÐ ^® Ðcontrolversy€and€the€principles€on€which€these€issues€are€to€beÐ G— Ðadjudicated€òòò òmust€ó óóóbe€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€ò òòòIngram€v.€Steinó óóó,Ð 0€ Ð23€Tenn.€App.€105,€126€S.W.2d€891,€892€(1938);€see€also€ò òòòArcher€v.Ð j ÐArcheró óóó,€907€S.W.2d€412,€415€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995),€(citingÐ  T Ðò òòòIngramó óóó).Ðî >` x` x ÐÌ(Emphasis€added).€€Ð Á"! ÐÌà  àò òòòó óóóThe€report€of€the€master€in€the€instant€case€is€a€ð ðstatement€of€legal€conclusions,€and€itÐ “$ã# Ðcontains€very€few€findings€of€fact.ðð€€ò òòòArcheró óóó,€907€S.W.2d€at€416.€€That€leads€us€to€the€principal€issueÐ |%Ì $ Ðstated€in€the€appellantððs€brief.€€Ð f&¶!% ÐÔ‡X„7XXX„7ÔÌà  àÔ#†X„7XXX„76#ÔÔ‡X„7XXX„7ÔA€motion€for€summary€judgment€should€be€granted€when€the€movant€demonstrates€that€thereÐ 8(ˆ#' Ðare€no€genuine€issues€of€material€fact€and€that€the€moving€party€is€entitled€to€a€judgment€as€a€matterÐ !)q$( Ðof€law.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.04.€€The€party€moving€for€summary€judgment€bears€the€burden€ofÐ  *Z%) Ðdemonstrating€that€no€genuine€issue€of€material€fact€exists.€€ò òòòBain€v.€Wellsó óóó,€936€S.W.2d€618,€622Ð ó*C&* Ð(Tenn.€1997).€€On€a€motion€for€summary€judgment,€the€court€must€take€the€strongest€legitimate€viewÐ Ý+-'+ Ðof€the€evidence€in€favor€of€the€nonmoving€party,€allow€all€reasonable€inferences€in€favor€of€thatÐ ° Ðparty,€and€discard€all€countervailing€evidence.€€òòò òId.ó óóó€€In€ò òòòByrd€v.€Halló óóó,€847€S.W.2d€208€(Tenn.€1993),Ð ™é Ðour€Supreme€Court€stated:Ð ƒÓ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àOnce€it€is€shown€by€the€moving€party€that€there€is€no€genuine€issueÐ U¥ Ðof€material€fact,€the€nonmoving€party€must€then€demonstrate,€byÐ > Ž Ðaffidavits€or€discovery€materials,€that€there€is€a€genuine,€material€factÐ ' w Ðdispute€to€warrant€a€trial.€€In€this€regard,€Rule€56.05€[now€RuleÐ  ` Ð56.06]€provides€that€the€nonmoving€party€cannot€simply€rely€upon€hisÐ ù I Ðpleadings€but€must€set€forth€òòspecific€factsóó€showing€that€there€is€aÐ â 2  Ðgenuine€issue€of€material€fact€for€trial.Ô#†X„7XXX„7T6#ÔÔ‡X„7XXX„7ÔÐË  ` x` x Ðò òòòÌÓÓId.ó óóó€at€211€(citations€omitted)€(emphasis€in€original).Ð œì  ÐÓÓà  àSummary€judgment€is€only€appropriate€when€the€facts€and€the€legal€conclusions€drawn€fromÐ pÀ  Ðthe€facts€reasonably€permit€only€one€conclusion.€€ò òòòCarvell€v.€Bottomsó óóó,€900€S.W.2d€23,€26€(Tenn.Ð Y©  Ð1995).€€Since€only€questions€of€law€are€involved,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€regardingÐ C“ Ða€trial€court's€grant€of€summary€judgment.€€ò òòòBainó óóó,€936€S.W.2d€at€622.€€Therefore,€our€review€of€theÐ ,| Ðtrial€courtððs€grant€of€summary€judgment€is€ò òòòde€novoó óóó€on€the€record€before€this€Court.€€ò òòòWarren€v.Ð f ÐEstate€of€Kirkó óóó,€954€S.W.2d€722,€723€(Tenn.€1997).Ô#†X„7XXX„7z<#ÔÔ‡X#4XXX„7ÔÐ P ÐÌà  àThe€record€before€us€reflects€that€Plaintiffs,€in€opposition€to€the€motion€for€summaryÐ Ó# Ðjudgment,€relied€upon€the€deposition€of€James€Toles,€who€testified€as€an€expert€consulting€engineerÐ ¼  Ðcontrary€to€the€deposition€testimony€of€Defendantððs€expert.€€Under€these€circumstances,€there€is€aÐ ¥õ Ðgenuine€dispute€as€to€material€facts,€and€summary€judgment€is€not€appropriate.Ð ŽÞ ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€for€the€above€reasons,€the€order€of€the€chancery€court€granting€summaryÐ `° Ðjudgment€is€vacated,€and€the€order€of€the€circuit€court€transferring€the€case€to€chancery€court€isÐ I™ Ðvacated,€and€the€case€is€remanded€to€the€circuit€court€for€further€proceedings€in€a€trial€ò òòòde€novoó óóó€asÐ 2‚ Ðprovided€by€statute.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€assessed€to€the€Appellee,€State€Farm€InsuranceÐ l ÐCompany.Ô#†X„7XXX#4@#ÔÔ#†¼݉»XX„7j #ÔÔ€X„7X»¼݉ÔÐ  U ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à__________________________________________Ð ©#ù" Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àW.€FRANK€CRAWFORD,€PRESIDING€JUDGE,€W.S.