WPC +J[ Fq^Kp |`%^P'hhq`)/xWpRQb6E]Q($v0xEUiQKx&06")^Ps-[@tխF:,%L4hr!~ xv: *ڞ{d-Y+שhA Uc[#?֏`g`+bMɶD<b,<6qHOiKk¹6-Zji:G{+\ pH0 Іb#\ % UN# 0q U N G 0D` z U@^ 8wDH4`NtvE mb 0 B 0 D3T D- 0K ASR 0 0D AHP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0(I Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular  RC$      1  XX  _ X(XXX ` Rule10oftheRulesoftheCourtofAppealsreadsasfollows:  8   ` TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,may  affirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhen t aformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedby ` memorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shall L  notbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninanyunrelated 8  case.(#$  0   C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt (9 Z(Times New Roman Oj(L Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5~(bk10ߩ3|xU- -(|G2C$ !.8tdd8         0  XX d(|3A$ !.8tdd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3A$ !.8tdd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8tdd8     _t4t8XXdd8  @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE  X(X4 #4XX(#  CHERYLS.MURPHYv.CARLD.MARTIN,etal.X(X4   @   DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforDavidsonCounty   @) ) No.98C70HamiltonV._Gayden_,Jr.,Judge   @*AV) ` dE<o ` A߈ p   @ No.M199902273COAR3CVDecidedJuly13,2000 k  AV) ` dE<B` A C   Thetrialcourtdismissedthisnegligenceactionforthefailuretoprosecute.Onappealtheplaintiff >  assertsthatshedidnothaveadequatenoticethatherlawsuitwasinjeopardy.Weaffirmthetrial *z  court. f    Tenn.R.App.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt > AffirmedandRemanded  * kCantrell,P.J.,M.S.#4X(#X(X.4,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichKochandCain,JJ.joined.  CherylS.Murphy,Antioch,Tennessee,ProSe  @! MEMORANDUMOPINION #4XX(E#X(X4 #  1      ׈ N   OnJanuary9,1998,theappellant,actingprose,filedacomplaintagainsttwodefendants &v seekingtorecoverajudgmentforpersonalinjuriesshesustainedinanautomobileaccident.Neither b defendantfiledananswer,andnofurtheractionwastakenbytheplaintiff.OnFebruary3,1999, N thecircuitcourtfiledandservednoticeontheappellantthatthecasewouldbedismissedunlessthe  :  plaintiffsetthecasefortrialwithinthirtydaysorobtainedthecourtspermissiontoproceed.On !&! February26,1999,theplaintiffdidfileamotiontobeallowedtoproceed.Themotionitselfdidnot "" offeranyreasonforthelongdelayandthemotionwasnotsupportedbytheplaintiffsaffidavit ## statinganyreasons.Therecorddoesnotcontainanyevidencethattheplaintiffattemptedtogetthe $$' courttoactonthemotion.OnAugust18,1999,thecourtdismissedthecomplaintforwantof  prosecution.    OnSeptember2,1999,theplaintifffiledamotionforrelieffromthejudgmentunderRule t 60.02,Tenn.R.Civ.Proc.Thatmotionisapparentlystillpending. `   Appellantsassertiononappealthatshedidnothaveadequatenoticethatheractionwas 8  abouttobedismissediscompletelyrefutedbytherecord.Shedoesnotassertthatshedidnotget $ t theFebruary3notice,and,infact,wecouldinferthatherreceiptofthatorderpromptedhertofile  ` themotionofFebruary26.Eventhen,thecourtdidnotdismissthecasefornearlysixmonths.  L    Theappellantstatesonappealthatshewasinvolvedinseveralothercaraccidentsaftershe $  filedthecomplaintinthiscase.Thelastaccident,inDecemberof1998,allegedlyleftherdisabled   andunabletoprosecutethisaction.Butthiscourtisnottheplacetointroducethatproof.Sofaras   therecordshows,thatevidencehasneverbeenintroducedinthetrialcourt,andwasneverevenpled   untilafterthecasehadbeendismissed.     Wetakenopositioninthisappealontherule60.02motionfiledinthetrialcourt,noronthe \ appellantsabilityto_refile_ԀtheactionpursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.281105. H   ThejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedandthecauseisremandedtotheCircuitCourtfor  p DavidsonCountyforanyfurtherproceedingsnecessary.Taxthecostsonappealtotheappellant  \ CherylS.Murphy.