ÿWPCÄ  €] ÙØÞå9¼ªa)­oµÇþïeö »ú÷aÉÞå „Ó0+>g›Âˆ$aƒ+i±Œ¸gñÑW),½¤[" åBøiÒ ª‹ö–ÌE‘{£ÝƒPgfÓp 'añ£háÔ¥A“î–_Æ)ß7¶'«I¾ÙÀÚæ—:ƒc˜ð‹Ÿi"íý:K˜¥#¥ØÂ¨Óy)À‡uÂÔnŒÆ#ýÁÇYaä·{È.›YeJûCUR“&P(NfÖ§I€DÔÜ w}ƒ±Îe`Ä9$­]½ŸïA3˜|êØàáEô[âéNNššyGÉD`Õ úåJá=ÄP´6(è\û+MðâB‚EGpªˆ5”÷¤å”1òfcOm0¼[÷ùÆûž4µ¼®fâqI\¦ñSë.èøæŒÕ@OÚû"ð à‘V“™ˆÿÓ35!æ²äG ÓgT ±s%¶hö6£•› Tõ].%Ÿ±$rmÌ%g5—2)óaÀIåiX³,Ο<ý”lß™1¼™\ÝsÁb1´‚¨=T (%áÄTÂ*Eð€nõ„CzKÂÜ(»¼a÷ j-ðZwi¾=ì®OrÃmJ`>bä#e#Ɇ %O ^ U 0ˆa wé UNí 4; zO ÒÉ › ª m¬ Jà Æ ÆÓ Æ™Æ_ 0D%Ni¸kÈ#EëWíííííííííííííííííííííííbDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 0ëLLLL B77 0¤T D3ø D-+ 0KXX AS£Æö 0¤¼ 0D` A«¤¤¤uO˜\\ib01s01\clerk1nasÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»Ž›r1 (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular„‚–0ê:i¢×+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ  P.J.HerbisonBemis t]heLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ®Ý ƒRKè$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô?ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€10€application,€the€answer,€the€record,€and€the€supplemental€briefs€fully€set€forth€theÐ ° Ðpartiesðð€positions€and€the€material€facts.€€Therefore,€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€2,€we€suspend€the€application€of€Tenn.Ð tÄ ÐR.€App.€P.€29,€and€find€oral€argument€to€be€unnecessary€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€35(c).€€òòSeeóó€òòHammock€v.€SumnerÐ 8ˆ ÐCo.óó,€No.€01A01-9710-CV-00600,€1997€WL€749461€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Dec.€5,€1997)€(No€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€11€applicationÐ üL Ðfiled). ¾Ý ƒRKè$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô?ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔHad€the€October€4,€2004€order€not€violated€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(5),€we€would€still€have€determined€that€theÐ ° Ðlater€hearing€and€order€did€not€render€the€business€ownerððs€complaints€about€the€September€21,€2004€order€moot.€€€TheÐ tÄ Ðcourts€may€determine€that€a€case€remains€justiciable€when€it€involves€an€issue€that€is€capable€of€repetition€yet€evadesÐ 8ˆ Ðreview.€€òòBemis€Pentecostal€Church€v.€Stateóó,€731€S.W.2d€897,€903€(Tenn.1987);€òòNational€Loans,€Inc.€v.€Tennessee€Dept.Ð üL Ðof€Financial€Institutionsóó,€No.€01A01„9506„CH„00241€at€n.3,€1997€WL€194992€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Apr.€23,€1997)€(NoÐ À ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€11€application€filed).€€It€is€unlikely€that€a€business€owner€adversely€affected€by€an€ex€parte€temporaryÐ „Ô Ðrestraining€order€issued€in€violation€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a)€could€obtain€appellate€review€of€the€order€beforeÐ H ˜ Ðthe€entry€of€a€later€temporary€injunction€issued€in€accordance€with€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.04.Ð  \ Ѐ MÝ ƒRKè$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô?ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔMr.€Ô_ÔNelsonððsÔ_Ô€and€1231€Ô_ÔCorporationððsÔ_Ô€motion€for€leave€to€file€their€supplemental€brief€one€day€late€is€herebyÐ ° Ðgranted.- ù-(|G2Kè$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô?ò»»Ô d(|3OŠ$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3OŠ$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKK kÝ ƒRKè$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô?ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(1)€provides:€ð ðA€restraining€order€may€be€granted€at€the€commencement€of€the€actionÐ ° Ðor€during€the€pendency€thereof€without€notice,€if€it€is€clearly€shown€by€verified€complaint€or€affidavit€that€the€applicantððsÐ tÄ Ðrights€are€being€or€will€be€violated€by€the€adverse€party€and€the€applicant€will€suffer€immediate€and€irreparable€injury,Ð 8ˆ Ðloss€or€damage€before€notice€can€be€served€and€a€hearing€had€thereon.ððÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑÀ°ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼–»»»ÔÑ8€Ê¥XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡î‹x–ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼–»îî‹x#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓÔ‡XÊ¥X»¼–ÔÌò òÔ#†¼–»XXÊ¥Ö#ÔSTATE€òòex€rel€KARL€F.€DEAN€óóv.€JOHN€AARON€NELSON,€òòet€alóó.Ô‡XÊ¥X»¼–Ôó óÐ è8 ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ è 8 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€3564€€€€€€Steve€R.€Dozier,€JudgeÐ Ô $ ÐÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<« ` AßÐ ¬ ü ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2004„02509„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R10„CV€„€Filed€November€18,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ § ÷  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<~` AßÐ Ï  Ðó óÓ  ÓÌThis€extraordinary€appeal€involves€the€efforts€of€the€Metropolitan€Government€of€Nashville€andÐ zÊ  ÐDavidson€County€to€close€an€adult€business€where€acts€of€prostitution€and€lewdness€were€allegedlyÐ f¶  Ðoccurring.€€At€the€Cityððs€request,€the€Criminal€Court€for€Davidson€County€issued€an€ex€parteÐ R¢  Ðtemporary€restraining€order€immediately€padlocking€the€business.€€Following€a€hearing€one€weekÐ >Ž Ðlater,€the€trial€court€entered€a€second€order€stating€that€the€temporary€restraining€order€would€ð ðremainÐ *z Ðbinding€and€in€effect€pending€a€trial.ðð€€The€owner€of€the€adult€business€filed€a€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€10Ð f Ðapplication€with€this€court.€€We€have€concluded€that€the€trial€court€departed€from€the€accepted€andÐ R Ðusual€course€of€judicial€proceedings€in€two€respects.€€First,€the€court€violated€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„Ð î> Ð3„106(a)€(2000)€by€issuing€the€temporary€restraining€order€without€five€days€written€notice.€€Second,Ð Ú* Ðthe€trial€court€violated€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(5)€by€allowing€the€temporary€restraining€order€toÐ Æ Ðremain€in€effect€pending€the€trial.€€Ô#†¼–»XXÊ¥^#ÔÔ‡XÊ¥X»¼–ÔAccordingly,€we€grant€the€ownerððs€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€10Ð ² Ðapplication€and€vacate€the€order€padlocking€the€premises.Ô#†¼–»XXÊ¥£ #ÔÔ‡XÊ¥X»¼–Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#†¼–»XXÊ¥k #ÔÔ‡XÊ¥X»¼–ÔÐ žî ÐÓœÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€10€Extraordinary€Appeal;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Vacatedó óÐ vÆ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼–»àXÊ¥ #ÔÔ‡XÊ¥X.¼–ÔWilliam€C.€Koch,€Jr.,óó€P.J.,€M.S.,€òòWilliam€B.€Cainóó,€and€òòFrank€G.€Clement,€Jr.,€JJ.,€óódelivered€theÐ Nž Ðopinion€of€the€court.Ð :Š ÐÌJohn€E.€Herbison,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€John€Aaron€Nelson€and€1231€Corporation.Ð !b  ÐÌKarl€F.€Dean€and€J.€Douglas€Sloan,€III,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ê":" ÐÓ´ ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼–»XXÊ¥ã #ÔÔ‡XÊ¥X»¼–ÔÐ Â$ $ ÐÌÔ#†¼–»XX洃 #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÊ¥X»¼–Ôà@¬¬)ìàò òI.ó óˆÐ š&ê!& ÐÌà  àJohn€Aaron€Nelson€and€1231€Corporation€operate€an€adult€business€called€Madam€X€at€701Ð r(Â#( ÐTwelfth€Avenue,€South€in€Nashville.€€On€September€21,€2004,€Karl€F.€Dean,€the€Director€of€Law€forÐ ^)®$)ý Ðthe€Metropolitan€Government€of€Nashville€and€Davidson€County,€filed€a€petition€in€the€CriminalÐ ° ÐCourt€for€Davidson€County€to€abate€Madam€X€as€a€public€nuisance€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€29„3„Ð œì Ð101,€„115€(2000€&€Supp.€2004).€€The€petition€and€supporting€affidavits€asserted€that€Mr.€Nelson€andÐ ˆØ Ð1231€Corporation€were€permitting€acts€of€prostitution€and€other€lewd€acts€to€occur€on€their€businessÐ tÄ Ðpremises.€€At€the€Cityððs€request,€the€trial€court€considered€the€petition€ex€parte€and€issued€aÐ `° Ðtemporary€restraining€order€directing€the€authorities€to€padlock€the€premises€immediately€pendingÐ L œ Ða€hearing€on€September€28,€2004.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àOn€September€27,€2004,€Mr.€Nelson€and€1231€Corporation€moved€to€dissolve€the€ex€parteÐ  ` Ðrestraining€order€or,€in€the€alternative,€to€modify€the€order€to€exempt€the€retail€sales€area€of€theÐ ü L  Ðpremises€where€books,€magazines,€and€other€items€were€sold.€€The€trial€court€considered€theirÐ è 8  Ðmotion€during€the€September€28,€2004€hearing,€and€on€October€4,€2004,€entered€an€order€directingÐ Ô$  Ðthat€its€September€21,€2004€temporary€restraining€order€ð ðremain€binding€and€in€effect€pending€a€trialÐ À  Ðin€this€matter.ðð€€Mr.€Nelson€and€1231€Corporation€subsequently€filed€this€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€10Ð ¬ü  Ðapplication€for€an€extraordinary€appeal.Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àOn€October€26,€2004,€we€ordered€the€City€to€file€an€answer€to€the€application€pursuant€toÐ pÀ ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€10(d)€and€directed€the€criminal€court€clerk€to€prepare€and€file€a€record.€€FollowingÐ \¬ Ðthe€receipt€of€the€record€and€answer,€we€directed€both€parties€to€file€supplemental€briefs€addressingÐ H˜ Ðthe€following€issues:€Ð 4„ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)à0¸ ` x` xàWhether€the€trial€court€erred€by€granting€the€MetropolitanÐ  \ ÐGovernment€an€ex€parte€temporary€restraining€order€onÐ øH ÐSeptember€21,€2004,€immediately€padlocking€the€premises€atÐ ä4 Ð701€Twelfth€Avenue,€South,€when€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„Ð Ð  Ð106(a)€(2000)€and€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.07€required€theÐ ¼  ÐMetropolitan€Government€to€give€Mr.€Nelson€and€1231Ð ¨ø ÐCorporation€five€days€written€notice€of€its€application.Ð”ä¸ x¸ x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)à0¸ ` x` xàWhether€Mr.€Nelson€and€the€1231€Corporation€have€currentlyÐ l¼ Ðsustained€a€legally€cognizable€injury€from€the€entry€of€theÐ X ¨ ÐSeptember€21,€2004€order€when€the€trial€court,€followingÐ D!” Ðnotice€and€a€hearing,€issued€a€second€order€on€October€4,Ð 0"€  Ð2004,€maintaining€the€earlier€order€in€effect.Ð#l!¸ x¸ x ÐÌThe€supplemental€briefs€were€filed€on€November€5€and€November€8,€2004.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ô$D # ÐÌà@……)ìàò òII.ó óˆà  àÐ Ì&"% ÐÌà  àProceedings€to€abate€a€nuisance€are€governed€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€29„3„101€to€„115.€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐWhen€a€petition€to€abate€a€nuisance€has€been€filed,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„105(a)€permits€the€courtÐ )à$( Ðto€ð ðaward€a€temporary€writ€of€injunction,€enjoining€and€restraining€the€further€continuance€of€suchÐ ° Ðnuisance,€and€the€closing€of€the€building€or€place€wherein€the€same€is€conducted€until€the€furtherÐ œì Ðorder€of€the€court,€judge,€or€chancellor.ðð€€However,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a)€requires€thatÐ ˆØ Ðð ðfive€(5)€daysðð€notice€in€writing€shall€be€given€the€defendant€of€the€hearing€of€the€application€[forÐ tÄ Ðthe€temporary€writ€of€injunction].ðð€€The€City€acknowledges€the€requirements€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð `° Ððð€29„3„106(a)€but€contends€that€the€statute€is€inapplicable€in€this€case€because€the€September€21,Ð L œ Ð2004€order€was€a€temporary€restraining€order,€not€a€temporary€injunction.€€The€City€insists€that€Tenn.Ð 8 ˆ ÐR.€Civ.€P.€65.03€expressly€permits€the€issuance€of€ex€parte€temporary€restraining€orders€withoutÐ $ t Ðnotice€to€the€defendants.׃d×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р ` ÐÌà  àWe€agree€that€the€courtððs€September€21,€2004€order€is€properly€characterized€as€a€temporaryÐ è 8  Ðrestraining€order€rather€than€as€a€temporary€injunction.€€We€do€not,€however,€agree€that€temporaryÐ Ô$  Ðrestraining€orders€issued€in€actions€to€abate€a€public€nuisance€are€not€subject€to€the€noticeÐ À  Ðrequirement€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a).€€Both€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„105(a)€and€Tenn.Ð ¬ü  ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a)€were€enacted€prior€to€the€promulgation€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€CivilÐ ˜è  ÐProcedure.€€Thus,€their€references€to€a€ð ðtemporary€writ€of€injunctionðð€were€not€intended€to€draw€theÐ „Ô  Ðtechnical€distinction€between€temporary€restraining€orders€and€temporary€injunctions€drawn€inÐ pÀ Ðtodayððs€rules.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àThe€clear€intent€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a)€is€to€require€notice€to€a€defendant€beforeÐ 4„ Ðan€order€may€be€entered€ð ðenjoining€and€restrainingðð€a€nuisance€or€effecting€ð ðthe€closing€of€theÐ  p Ðbuilding€or€place€wherein€the€same€is€conducted.ðð€€The€subsequent€adoption€of€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65Ð  \ Ðdid€not€alter€this€notice€requirement.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.07€specifically€provides€that€ð ð[t]heÐ øH Ðprovisions€of€this€Rule€shall€be€subject€to€any€contrary€statutory€provisions€governing€restrainingÐ ä4 Ðorders€or€injunctions.ðð€€The€Cityððs€interpretation€would€make€the€five„day€notice€requirementÐ Ð  Ðfunctionally€meaningless,€while€the€clear€intent€of€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.07€was€to€preserve€suchÐ ¼  Ðstatutory€provisions.€€Accordingly,€we€hold€that€the€right€to€obtain€a€temporary€restraining€orderÐ ¨ø Ðabating€a€nuisance€pursuant€to€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65€is€subject€to€the€five„day€notice€requirement€ofÐ ”ä ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„3„106(a).€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àWe€are€likewise€unpersuaded€by€the€Cityððs€argument€that€the€five„day€notice€requirementÐ X ¨ Ðleaves€it€powerless€to€stop€illegal€activities€for€at€least€five€days.€€If€illegal€activities€are€occurringÐ D!” Ðon€the€premises,€the€City€may€immediately€arrest€the€individuals€involved.€€The€City€remains€freeÐ 0"€  Ðto€enforce€the€criminal€laws.€€It€simply€may€not€padlock€the€business€as€a€nuisance€without€givingÐ #l! Ðprior€written€notice.€€We€also€note€that,€despite€the€urgency€expressed€in€the€Cityððs€petition€and€itsÐ $X" Ðfilings€before€this€court,€it€appears€from€the€affidavits€in€support€of€the€petition€that€the€City€knewÐ ô$D # Ðof€the€alleged€illegal€acts€for€several€weeks€or€even€months€before€it€filed€its€petition.€€€€Ð à%0!$ Ðâ âÐ Ì&"% Ðà  àMr.€Nelson€and€the€1231€Corporation€sustained€a€legally€cognizable€injury€as€a€result€of€theÐ ° Ðâ âentry€of€the€September€21,€2004€order,€notwithstanding€the€trial€courtððs€entry€of€the€second€order€onÐ œì ÐOctober€4,€2004,€following€notice€and€a€hearing.€€The€ex€parte€order€deprived€them€of€five€days€useÐ ˆØ Ðof€their€premises.€€It€deprived€them€of€the€opportunity€to€assemble€proof€to€refute€the€allegations€inÐ tÄ Ðthe€Cityððs€petition.€€Moreover,€had€proper€notice€been€given,€the€trial€court€would€have€had€anÐ `° Ðopportunity€to€write€a€more€precise€order€defining€what€rights,€if€any,€the€business€owners€may€haveÐ L œ Ðhad€to€remove€presumptively€protected€material€from€the€premises.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà@^^(ìàò òIII.ó óˆÐ  ` ÐÌà  àThe€City€also€insists€that€any€possible€injury€caused€by€the€entry€of€the€September€21,€2004Ð è 8  Ðtemporary€restraining€order€ended€when€the€trial€court€conducted€a€hearing€and€then€entered€an€orderÐ Ô$  Ðon€October€4,€2004,€directing€that€its€temporary€restraining€order€ð ðremain€binding€and€in€effectÐ À  Ðpending€a€trial€in€this€matter.ðð€€This€argument€overlooks€the€fact€that€the€trial€courtððs€October€4,€2004Ð ¬ü  Ðorder€does€not€comply€with€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(5).Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àThe€transcript€of€the€September€28,€2004€hearing€reflects€that€its€chief€purpose€was€to€permitÐ pÀ Ðthe€business€owner€to€present€his€motion€either€to€dissolve€or€to€modify€the€September€21,€2004Ð \¬ Ðtemporary€restraining€order.€€At€no€time€during€the€hearing€did€the€City€request€the€trial€court€toÐ H˜ Ðgrant€it€a€temporary€injunction€closing€the€business€pending€the€trial.€€Accordingly,€rather€thanÐ 4„ Ðissuing€a€temporary€injunction€in€accordance€with€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.04,€the€trial€courtððs€OctoberÐ  p Ð4,€2004€order€simply€directed€that€the€September€21,€2004€temporary€restraining€order€ð ðremainÐ  \ Ðbinding€and€in€effect€pending€a€trial€in€this€matter.ððÐ øH ÐÌà  àTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(5)€provides€that€a€temporary€restraining€order€issued€without€noticeÐ Ð  Ðexpires€within€fifteen€days€after€its€issuance€unless€the€trial€court€extends€it€during€that€period.€€IfÐ ¼  Ða€trial€court€decides€to€extend€a€temporary€restraining€order,€it€may€do€so€for€only€fifteen€additionalÐ ¨ø Ðdays.€€The€trial€courtððs€September€21,€2004€temporary€restraining€order€could€have€remained€inÐ ”ä Ðeffect€until€October€21,€2004.€€Thus,€the€trial€court€erred€by€directing€that€it€ð ðremain€binding€and€inÐ €Ð Ðeffectðð€past€that€date.€€It€follows,€therefore,€that€the€trial€courtððs€order,€to€the€extent€that€it€continuedÐ l¼ Ðits€temporary€restraining€order€past€October€21,€2004,€is€contrary€to€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€65.03(5)€andÐ X ¨ Ðmust€be€vacated.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð D!” ÐÌÌÐ $X" Ðà@dd)ìàò òIV.ó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àThe€business€ownersðð€application€for€an€extraordinary€appeal€is€hereby€granted,€and€the€trialÐ ˆØ Ðcourtððs€September€21,€2004€and€October€4,€2004€orders€are€vacated€without€prejudice€to€the€CityððsÐ tÄ Ðseeking€a€new€temporary€injunction€after€giving€proper€notice€as€required€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„Ð `° Ð3„106(a).€€The€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€consistent€with€this€opinion.€Ð L œ ÐThe€costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€to€the€Metropolitan€Government€of€Nashville€and€DavidsonÐ 8 ˆ ÐCounty€for€which€execution,€if€necessary,€may€issue.Ð $ t ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àPER€CURIAM