WPC] 4# U> %1 0(74_s 0l 0DL:bw@ 0J 0T 0^l 0h 0r2 0| 0  0 1u6 0d B AQ, } 0DC 0@ 0D D/ B: D3W U6 U> B) DC' AMj U* + v~ vHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl<( 9Z &Courier RegularX($_# x3|x((3$ !      0  (#$  0  C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT- - DDDDDDӀ2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X d!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  ("$    ($$   1  ((' dxdP Pd'dxd<  9p`(Courier New<  9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d----7Border 1dd!#.C << G<  9p`(Arial ! !  #d#+  ""  00   YYY FILED0XNovember14,1997CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva ! . +  ݛ\RA'\ ` X X \RA'\7;XdXXd7  ,Ԝ PAULKEVINNELSON, )   )#` XxX# Plaintiff/CounterDefendant/ ) AppealNo. Appellee, ) 01A019703CV00137v.  )  ) DavidsonCircuit!R/1.A1-j|s`  `@RTHEAPPLICATIONGROUP,INC., ) No.96C1861  ) Defendant/CounterPlaintiff/ ) Appellant. )  ,CONCURRINGOPINION  #` ` X#, Iconcurwiththecourtsconclusionthatthedefendant/appellantisentitledtoreliefunderTennesseeRuleofCivilProcedure60.02(1).IalsoconcurwiththeconcurringopinionofJudgeKoch.Thisreliefshouldnotbegrantedoneveryoccasionthata lawyerrealizeshisoversightandtakesstepstocorrectit.Thetrialcourtshouldconsidereachcaseanddeterminewhich termsasarejust. Additionally,Iwouldpointoutthatthelawyerdidnotinfactcomply with[local]Rule19bytimelyfilingamotiontosetbecausetheRulerequirestheactualsettingfortrial.Nevertheless,thelawyertookstepstocomplyandreliefshouldbegranted. PerhapsthedraftsmanshipofRule19shouldbereviewed.  __________________________________  WALTERW.BUSSART,JUDGÈ