ÿWPC E]„CσçWFæˆN©FÁ_åO±Þjà+©vÎ>M¥`?}ìÖ/Ï9ûš0{oºRöSóô{+«´™~ø6h6bùs¼v(Á=‡åñyªì{Ȉ´c”–èƒÈÇ¡ç2`´6OŽWjå«ÛWž_!K±xKe¾QKW¤Éœçe€¾G#ð²þ6Þkx}r5$J¡Ém´–~/ãÞÕÞæký:`À–§%ÚŽ%3åÏ=ÿƒ{“¦Ö².LަÛë4ÄzÌð^c• .qN"³GbÒ),æäÿÈÕ퀯Ŕ¸Z5…ú4ü~ü½ƒéõ3qÑrC—â§WÉ™ª’ÏÃiiÀÈÕoûŠ×gУöØP“¢â#)¸³Ã.»…R^‰Ñ†Ÿi® „]ÇžÕ6àÝLaà²ÃnP«1Îî5‚µ8¹d‡ñ¢÷» .AøóÑéF 4zš<™äƒ*örœ|Næ}˜;JGº3©¥½ÛaôUø¢Íy\Õ=jH'tÇVY°dÝE ¨ ¨×–754‹ë^¼ÅË´eOºöXæUù»¹ÉÑCoÜÂÀ/X“ŠÕÌeµv]ÞäQ¡ÿË£êÖxóSO°Â¦#~WORè£m)0_y6J³eb#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ UN· w 4 z Ò— i x mz ‘ Æ™ Æ_ Æ% Æë UN±NÿÿÿEb 0ë     Böö 0¤ D3· D-ê 0K ASbƵ 0¤{ 0D A«c˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»q-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular9‚±,¢Ø+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular- ù-(|G2:I$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€PÍ»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôíEò»»Ô d(|3 g$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€PÍ»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3 g$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€PÍ»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€PÍ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼PÍ»»»ÔÑ8€XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñ\à@ü ü ìàÔ‡îJ\PÍÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼PÍ»îîJ\ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓFebruary€14,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XX»¼PÍÔÌò òÔ#†¼PÍ»XX÷#ÔJERRY€DWAYNE€Ô_ÔNOEÔ_Ôòòóó€v.€MELISSA€DAWN€Ô_ÔNOEÔ_Ô€(BARNES)Ô‡XX»¼PÍÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Ô_ÔCheathamÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€10676€€€€€€Leonard€W.€Martin,€ChancellorÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„02223„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€August€7,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ԀР¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThis€is€an€appeal€by€the€Wife€in€a€divorce€case€complaining€of€the€disposition€of€marital€property.€Ð xÈ  ÐThe€Husband€also€complains€about€an€award€of€alimony€in€solido€against€him.€€We€affirm€theÐ d´ ÐChancellor.€Ð P  ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€Court€Affirmedó óÐ (x ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼PÍ»àX°#ÔÔ‡XX.¼PÍÔWilliam€B.€Cain,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòPatricia€J.€Cottrell,€J.óó€andÐ P ÐòòóóVòòERNONóó€NòòEALóó,€SòòPóó.€J.,€joined.Ð ì< ÐÌLawrence€D.€Wilson,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Melissa€Dawn€Ô_ÔNoeÔ_Ô€(Barnes).Ð Ä ÐÌJennifer€F.€Ô_ÔNoeÔ_Ô,€Ashland€City,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€Jerry€Dwayne€Ô_ÔNoeÔ_Ô.Ð œì ÐÓ©ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼PÍ»XXØ#ÔÔ‡XX»¼PÍÔÐ tÄ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼PÍ»XX- #ÔÔ‡XX»¼PÍÔÓ  Óà  àJerry€Dwayne€Noe€(ð ðHusbandðð)€and€Melissa€Dawn€Barnes€(ð ðWifeðð)€were€married€onÐ L œ ÐSeptember€7,€1991.€€Twins€were€born€to€the€marriage€but€one€died€shortly€after€birth.€€The€HusbandÐ 8!ˆ  Ðfiled€a€complaint€for€divorce€on€November€22,€2000€on€the€grounds€of€inappropriate€marital€conductÐ $"t! Ðand€irreconcilable€differences.€€An€answer€and€counter„complaint€were€filed€by€the€Wife€onÐ #`" ÐDecember€6,€2000€alleging€that€the€Husband€was€guilty€of€cruel€and€inhuman€treatment,Ð ü#L# Ðabandonment,€and€that€irreconcilable€differences€existed€between€the€parties.Ð è$8 $ ÐÌà  àOn€February€4,€1994,€the€parties€acquired€3.20€acres€of€land€by€quit€claim€deed€from€theÐ À&"& ÐWifeððs€parents,€Larry€and€Sandra€Barnes.€€The€parties€constructed€a€home€on€the€land.€€Both€of€theÐ ¬'ü"' Ðpartiesðð€family€members€and€friends€contributed€to€the€building€of€the€marital€residence€either€byÐ ˜(è#( Ðmanual€labor€or€by€financial€contribution.€€In€March€of€1998,€the€parties€started€a€landscapingÐ „)Ô$) Ðbusiness€called€Ô#†¼PÍ»XX‹ #ÔÔ€XX»¼PÍÔD€&€D€Landscaping.€€The€business€acquired€certain€assets€and€liabilities.€€TheÐ p*À%* ÐHusband€left€the€marital€residence€in€September€2000.€€The€trial€in€this€case€was€heard€on€May€31,Ð \+¬&+ Ð2001.Ð H,˜', ÐÐ 4-„(-ý Ðà  àOn€July€23,€2001,€the€trial€court€issued€the€Final€Decree€holding€in€pertinent€part:Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà ` à2.à ¸ àThe€Court€hereby€finds€that€the€parties€have€acquired€real€propertyÐ ˆØ Ðlocated€at€3241€Ô_ÔThomasvilleÔ_Ô€Road,€Ô_ÔChapmansboroÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€during€the€marriageÐ tÄ Ðthat€is€marital€property€as€well€as€certain€items€of€personal€property€which€is€outlinedÐ `° Ðin€Exhibit€6€and€was€stipulated€by€the€parties.ÐL œÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à3.à ¸ àIn€reviewing€the€marital€residence€it€appears€that€there€is€equity€ofÐ $ t Ð$37,228.62€according€to€the€appraisal€and€the€payoff€on€the€first€and€secondÐ  ` Ðmortgage.€€The€court€hereby€finds€that€the€deed€to€the€property€was€jointly€titled€andÐ ü L  Ðthat€all€equity€is€marital€property€in€which€each€side€is€awarded€a€one€half€interest€ofÐ è 8  Ð$18,614.31.ÐÔ$ Ð Ð  ÐÌÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à4.à ¸ àThe€wife€is€hereby€awarded€the€marital€residence€and€shall€be€liableÐ ¬ü  Ðfor€the€first€and€second€mortgage€as€well€as€all€taxes.€€The€wife€shall€have€husbandÐ ˜è  Ðreleased€from€both€the€mortgageððs€either€by€the€lender€releasing€him€or€by€the€wifeÐ „Ô  Ðrefinancing€both€debts€as€soon€as€possible€but€no€later€than€one€year.€€Wife€shallÐ pÀ ÐÔ_ÔindemnifyÔ_Ô€and€hold€husband€harmless€of€said€debts.Ð\¬Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à5.à ¸ àThe€wife€is€hereby€awarded€the€personal€property€as€established€in€theÐ 4„ ÐOffer€of€Settlement€of€Personal€Property€as€filed€by€the€Plaintiff€which€is€Exhibit€7Ð  p Ðwith€the€exception€of€the€1998€Chevrolet€Lumina.€€The€total€value€of€the€personalÐ  \ Ðproperty€shall€also€be€equally€divided€with€a€setoff€to€the€husband.ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à6.à ¸ àEach€party€is€awarded€their€separate€property€as€outlined€in€theirÐ Ð  Ðstipulated€exhibits€listing€separate€property€which€is€Exhibit€5.€€Husbandððs€separateÐ ¼  Ðproperty€is€a€hunting€rifle,€boat,€fishing€equipment,€clothing€items€of€personal€nature,Ð ¨ø Ðstereo,€parts€washer,€generator,€guns€&€a€quilt.€€Wifeððs€separate€property€is€herÐ ”ä Ðjewelry,€guns,€fishing€equipment,€microwave,€glass€coffee€table,€and€glass€bambooÐ €Ð Ðdinning€suite.€€The€wife€is€awarded€the€1968€Chevrolet€Ô_ÔCamaroÔ_Ô€as€the€custodian€ofÐ l¼ ÐConner€Dwayne€Ô_ÔNoeÔ_Ô€and€said€vehicle€is€held€in€trust€for€the€minor€child.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à7.à ¸ àThe€parties€have€a€credit€card€debt€of€$8,200.00€which€the€court€findsÐ 0"€  Ðas€a€joint€marital€debt€which€each€party€is€liable€for€one€half€or€$4,100.00.€€The€courtÐ #l! Ðhereby€finds€that€the€wife€is€responsible€for€the€Credit€Card€debt€and€shall€indemnityÐ $X" Ðand€hold€husband€harmless.Ðô$D #Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à8.à ¸ àThe€court€awards€the€business€of€D€&€D€Landscaping€to€the€PlaintiffÐ Ì&"% Ðalong€with€all€equipments€and€profits€as€listed€in€Exhibit€4.€€The€husband€shall€beÐ ¸'#& Ðsolely€liable€for€the€current€debt€of€the€business€which€said€debts€are€on€the€GreatÐ ¤(ô#' ÐDane€Mower,€the€Ex€Mark€Mower€and€on€the€payback€to€Mr.€Ô_ÔNoeÔ_Ôððs€brother€for€theÐ )à$( Ðpayments€he€has€made€on€the€Great€Dane€Mower.€€All€assets€and€liabilities€ofÐ |*Ì%) Ðbusiness€as€stipulated€to€by€the€parties€are€listed€in€Exhibit€4.€€Husband€shallÐ h+¸&* Ðindemnify€and€hold€wife€harmless€for€said€debt€and€liabilities.€€The€court€finds€inÐ ° Ðreviewing€Exhibit€4€as€stipulated€to€by€the€parties€that€the€business€has€a€minimumÐ œì Ðvalue€after€deducting€liabilities.€ÐˆØÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à9.à ¸ àThe€husband€shall€receive€the€1997€Ô_ÔGMCÔ_Ô€four€wheel€drive€truck€andÐ `° Ðbe€solely€responsible€for€the€debt€on€the€vehicle.€€Husband€shall€indemnify€and€holdÐ L œ Ðwife€harmless€of€said€debt.€€The€court€finds€that€is€has€no€value€due€to€the€fact€thatÐ 8 ˆ Ðmore€is€owed€on€the€vehicle€that€it€is€worth.Ð$ tÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à10.à ¸ àThe€court€hereby€find€that€the€husbands€one€half€interest€of€personalÐ ü L  Ðproperty€is€$11,225.00€after€deducting€$250.00€for€the€John€Boat€and€tools€that€heÐ è 8  Ðis€receiving€that€is€owed€to€him€as€well€as€$18,614.31€for€the€one€half€of€interest€inÐ Ô$  Ðthe€marital€residence€for€a€total€of€$29,839.31.€€Husband€is€liable€for€one€half€of€theÐ À  ÐCredit€Card€debt€of€$4,100.00€which€brings€his€total€due€to€him€at€$25,739.31.€€TheÐ ¬ü  Ðparties€own€a€1998€Chevrolet€Lumina€that€is€paid€for€with€a€value€of€$10,000.00.€Ð ˜è  ÐThe€court€hereby€awards€solely€to€the€Husband€the€1998€Chevrolet€Lumina.€€TheÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€gave€the€wife€the€option€of€purchasing€the€vehicle€and€paying€to€the€husbandÐ pÀ Ð$10,000.00€which€she€declined.€€Ð\¬Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à11.à ¸ àThe€remaining€$15,739.31€left€owed€to€the€husband€as€his€one€halfÐ 4„ Ðshare€is€hereby€awarded€to€the€wife€as€alimony€in€solido.€€Said€alimony€is€intendedÐ  p Ðto€be€an€award€to€cover€all€rehabilitative€alimony€and€to€offset€wifeððs€attorney€feesÐ  \ Ðand€defray€the€expense€of€the€lawsuit.ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌÔ‡XXXXÔà  àReview€of€the€record€in€this€case€indicates€that€the€major€marital€asset€of€the€parties€is€theirÐ Ð  Ðmarital€home€which€is€encumbered€by€two€mortgages€totaling€$97,771.38€leaving€an€equity€ofÐ ¼  Ð$37,228.62.€€The€business€known€as€D&D€Landscaping€had€a€taxable€loss€in€1999€of€$3,908.00€andÐ ¨ø Ða€taxable€income€of€$2,189.00€in€the€tax€year€2000.€€The€trial€court€held€this€business€appears€to€haveÐ ”ä Ða€minimum€value€for€distribution€as€marital€property.€€It€likewise€appears€that€the€1997€Ô_ÔGMCÔ_Ô€4„Ð €Ð Ðwheel€drive€truck,€though€marital€property,€has€no€value€since€it€is€undisputed€that€more€is€owed€onÐ l¼ Ðthe€vehicle€than€it€is€worth.€€The€trial€court,€after€determining€to€divide€the€marital€property€equally,Ð X ¨ Ðfound€the€Husband€to€have€a€gross,€marital€property€share€including€half€interest€in€the€personalÐ D!” Ðproperty€and€half€interest€in€the€residential€equity,€having€a€value€of€$29,839.31.€€The€ChancellorÐ 0"€  Ðthen€deducted€one„half€of€the€credit€card€debt€of€$4,100.00€to€be€paid€by€the€Husband€and€theÐ #l! Ð$10,000.00€value€of€the€1998€Chevrolet€Lumina€leaving€the€Husband€a€net€value€of€$15,739.31€asÐ $X" Ðhis€share€of€the€marital€property.€€This€amount€was€then€awarded€to€the€Wife€as€rehabilitativeÐ ô$D # Ðalimony€and€to€offset€Wifeððs€attorneyððs€fees€and€defray€the€expense€of€the€lawsuit.€€The€Wife€wasÐ à%0!$ Ðawarded€the€marital€residence€but€also€required€to€get€the€Husband€released€and€held€harmless€fromÐ Ì&"% Ðthe€$97,000.00€indebtedness€on€the€house.€Ð ¸'#& ÐÔ#†XXXX!'#ÔÌà  àOn€appeal,€Wife€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€dividing€marital€property€equally€asÐ )à$( Ðâ âopposed€to€equitably,€erred€in€its€division€of€marital€property€by€not€considering€all€factors€requiredÐ |*Ì%) Ðby€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€36„4„121(c),€and€in€allocating€all€debt€to€the€Wife.€€HusbandÐ ° Ðargues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€its€award€of€$15,734.31€as€alimony€in€solido.€€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àThe€trial€court€is€obligated€to€equitably€divide€the€marital€property€in€a€divorce€case€withoutÐ tÄ Ðregard€to€fault.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(a)(1).€€Trial€courts€have€broad€discretion€in€determiningÐ `° Ðwhat€is€equitable€in€a€given€case.€€òòÔ_ÔBatsonÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔBatsonÔ_Ôóó,€769€S.W.2d€849€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988).€€TheÐ L œ Ðtrial€courtððs€classification€and€division€of€marital€property€is€reviewed€de€novo€with€a€presumptionÐ 8 ˆ Ðthat€the€trial€courtððs€factual€findings€are€correct.€€òòWaters€v.€Watersóó,€959€S.W.2d€585,€588€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð $ t ÐApp.€1997).€€The€trial€courtððs€division€of€marital€property€is€entitled€to€great€weight€on€appeal,Ð  ` ÐòòEdwards€v.€Edwardsóó,€501€S.W.2d€283€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1973),€and€should€be€presumed€correct€unlessÐ ü L  Ðthe€evidence€preponderates€otherwise.€€òòLancaster€v.€Lancasteróó,€671€S.W.2d€501€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð è 8  Ð1984).Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àIn€exercising€its€discretion,€the€trial€court€must€weigh€the€factors€set€forth€in€Tennessee€CodeÐ ¬ü  ÐAnnotated€section€36„4„121(c)€which€include:Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(1)à0¸ Ð Ð àThe€duration€of€the€marriage;ÐpÀ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(2)à ¸ àThe€age,€physical€and€mental€health,€vocational€skills,€employability,Ð H˜ Ðearning€capacity,€estate,€financial€liabilities€and€financial€needs€of€each€of€the€parties;Ð4„Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(3)à ¸ àThe€tangible€or€intangible€contribution€by€one€(1)€party€to€theÐ  \ Ðeducation,€training€or€increased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(4)à ¸ àThe€relative€ability€of€each€party€for€future€acquisitions€of€capitalÐ Ð  Ðassets€and€income;м Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(5)à ¸ àThe€contribution€of€each€party€to€the€acquisition€preservation,Ð ”ä Ðappreciation,€depreciation€or€dissipation€of€the€marital€or€separate€property,€includingÐ €Ð Ðthe€contribution€of€a€party€to€the€marriage€as€homemaker,€wage€earner€or€parent,€withÐ l¼ Ðthe€contribution€of€a€party€as€homemaker€or€wage€earner€to€be€given€the€same€weightÐ X ¨ Ðif€each€party€has€fulfilled€its€role;€ÐD!”Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(6)à0¸ Ð Ð àThe€value€of€the€separate€property€of€each€party;Ð#l!¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` à(7)à0 ¸ àThe€estate€of€each€party€at€the€time€of€the€marriage;Ðô$D #¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌà8  àà ` à(8)à ¸ àThe€economic€circumstances€of€each€party€at€the€time€the€division€ofÐ Ì&"% Ðproperty€is€to€become€effective;и'#&Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(9)à ¸ àThe€tax€consequences€to€each€party,€costs€associated€with€theÐ )à$( Ðreasonably€foreseeable€sale€of€the€asset,€and€other€reasonably€foreseeable€expensesÐ |*Ì%) Ðassociated€with€the€asset;Ðh+¸&*Ð Ð  Їà8  àà ` à(10)à0¸ Ð Ð àThe€amount€of€social€security€benefits€available€to€each€spouse;€andа¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(11)à ¸ àSuch€other€factors€as€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equities€betweenÐ ˆØ Ðthe€parties.€ÐtÄÐ Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„4„121(c).Ð L œ ÐÌà  àÔ‡XXXXÔWhen€marital€assets€in€this€case€are€compared€to€marital€debt€encumbering€the€maritalÐ $ t Ðproperty,€there€was€little€equity€to€divide.€€The€decision€of€the€trial€court€to€make€an€equalÐ  ` Ðdistribution€of€net€marital€assets€was€within€his€sound€discretion.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àAfter€careful€examination€of€the€record€in€this€case,€we€cannot€find€that€the€evidenceÐ Ô$  Ðpreponderates€against€the€trial€courtððs€division€of€the€marital€property€or€that€it€was€inequitable€inÐ À  Ðlight€of€the€relevant€factors€contained€in€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€36„4„121(c).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€appellee€complains€of€the€trial€court€action€in€awarding€an€amount€equal€to€his€net€shareÐ „Ô  Ðof€the€marital€assets€distribution€($15,739.31)€to€the€appellant€as€alimony€in€solido.Ð pÀ ÐÌà8  àTrial€judges€have€broad€discretion€to€determine€whether€spousal€support€is€neededÐ H˜ Ðand,€if€so,€its€nature,€amount,€and€duration.€€òòSee€Ô_ÔGarfinkelÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔGarfinkelÔ_Ôóó,€945€S.W.2dÐ 4„ Ð744,€748€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996);€òòJones€v.€Jonesóó,€784€S.W.2d€349,€351€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð  p ÐApp.€1989).€€Appellate€courts€are€generally€disinclined€to€second„guess€a€trial€judgeððsÐ  \ Ðspousal€support€decision€unless€it€is€not€supported€by€the€evidence€or€is€contrary€toÐ øH Ðthe€public€policies€reflected€in€the€applicable€statutes.€€òòSee€Brown€v.€Brownóó,€913Ð ä4 ÐS.W.2d€at€169;€òòÔ_ÔIngramÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔIngramÔ_Ôóó,€721€S.W.2d€262,€264€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1986).ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌòòÔ_ÔKinardÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔKinardÔ_Ôóó,€986€S.W.2d€220,€234€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998).Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àWe€see€no€reason€to€second€guess€the€trial€courtððs€broad€discretion€in€this€award€of€alimonyÐ €Ð Ðin€solido.Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€in€all€respects€affirmed€and€costs€assessed€against€theÐ D!” Ðappellant.€€The€case€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€such€further€proceedings€as€may€be€deemedÐ 0"€  Ðappropriate.€Ð #l! ÐÌÌÔ#†XXXX‰>#ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à____________________________________Ð ¤(ô#' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€Ô_ÔJUDGEÔ_Ô