WPC  $`y9)Q+i.k4?Iٞܣ,`N)!T%dl~ v)i˗TX-&UjOʤrHT+DHm&>:7^4 Ad\0 $r\r:v-} .bEXN(@`쐔sȆ;4sv-6gi&7;x 59EcL4 8ryC2mٔ -&Q`r8ζC }-i\;F7qv"Um]kEƑ7zz9A/bVA 3k2Wۚϐ6.[^5K;2 Ƚil G8=$8oj]MvMD7 3zS:^5@Xo9$Ga﭂ql:RG!a~bvm&QD>#`4@T 0(cw(UN 0l  0Dw m#!N ^ UN O W U:7 UNq  U:UNUB' %iiiiiiiiiiii BoU:lUN AQE 0D  0DO 0D D3tpO'3|x($EE(hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular((3$ !      0  (#$  0  UHP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0'L (hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular   ["  _XXXX)XX   Ad FILED)  December10,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx8e d 8e @X # d*## I#  ,cAZ"Arial Regular(hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular  ["  _XXXX)XX   Ad FILED)  December10,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx8e d 8e @X # d*## I#  ,cAZ"Arial Regular(hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX d  ["  _(XXXX()X(X   Ad FILED(()  December10,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAx)8e ()d )8e @X #( )d*##( (I# ' ,cAZ"Arial Regular(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularZ[\]_C<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  &&&&'dxd !  _  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T8XXdd8X0XXXdXX0_̀@M M  INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @44%ATKNOXVILLLE        4    <      D    rY_<,(j ^?0:6 `@EB 6ttN@*z*ruY_?/+j^?0:6 `@EB 6ttN@*z*u 4    <    vY'_@0,j^'" 6 `@EB6ttN@z *vrY_<,(j ^'" 6 `@EB6ttN@z *rKIM_NUCHOLS_Ԁ(WALKER),0  0(#(#)C/ANO.03A019901GS00007 (#(#  4    <     ) 4  Appellant,0 < 0<(#<(#0(#(#)_BLOUNT_ԀGENERALSESSIONS  (#(#  4    <     )vs.0 4 0 4(#4(#0 (# (#0< (# (#0<(#<(#0(#(#)HON.WILLIAMR.BREWER,JR.,  (#(#  4    <     )JUDGEBENNY_NUCHOLS_,0 < 0<(#<(#0(#(#)  (#(#  4    <     ) 4  Appellee.0 < 0<(#<(#0(#(#) (#(# @i i  OPINIONONPETITIONTOREHEAR     4    <      D   Franks,J. 4  Benny_Nuchols_ԀhasfiledaPetitiontoRehear,andatourdirection,Kim_Nuchols_Ԁhasresponded. 4  InouroriginalOpinion,werevisedthevisitationschedulewiththemother,becausewewereoftheopinionthatthestandardvisitationscheduleadoptedbytheTrialCourtwasnotadequateunderthecircumstancesofthiscase. 4  WenowconcludethattheTrialCourtisinabetterpositiontoestablishthevisitationandcustodyinthiscasethanthisCourt,andweaccordinglyrecallourOpiniontotheextentthatthefirstfullparagraphonpage4ofouroriginalOpinionisdeleted,andthecauseisremandedtotheTrialCourttoestablishvisitationforthemotherwiththechildrensubstantiallyinexcessoftheTrialCourtsstandardvisitationschedulethroughouttheschoolyear,aswellasduringsummervacationsandholidays. 4  ThecostsshallbetaxedinaccordancewiththeoriginalOpinion.  ;44 _@+ D  4    <     __________________________    4    <     HerschelP.Franks,J.CONCUR:___________________________HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.____________________ddD.MichaelSwiney,J.#dd~# %