WPC # VUNa % 0(w@4 1 UP@ 0l 0D @ 0JH 0T 0^ 0hD 0r 0| 0 0 1u 0d%U>U6B) 0@&DCf D3o B AO AU* v~v% 0K D+C AOn 0D D/ BHP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(9 Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($ DEDDӀf|$, 3|x&@FZ 8CaslonOpnface BT Regular((3$ !      0  (#$  0  2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(&Times New Roman<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d("$    &&&&7Border 1ddLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5++++'dxd d'B(C << G)'BG&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK<  9p`(Arial  !#d#$  ..   YYY FILED.X July8,1998CecilCrowson,Jr..AppellateCourtClerk   !#d#$   $       %%Rule10(b),RulesoftheCourtofAppeals,providesasfollows: 8 TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva ( $ Figure  1  'dxd'C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . $  P %7fXXdd7  \RA'\R,/(A1-j|`  `@Rߛ @ COURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ ATKNOXVILLEETTAMECHELLEPARKS,  )C/ANO.03A019711GS00519      )  PlaintiffAppellant,)      )      )      )v.      )APPEALASOFRIGHTFROM   X       )THECAMPBELLCOUNTY          )GENERALSESSIONSCOURT      )      )      )      )CRAIGDEWAYNEPARKS,  )      )HONORABLEROCKYH.YOUNG,  DefendantAppellee. )JUDGEForAppellant     ForAppelleeJOHNNYV.DUNAWAY    J.STEPHENHURST̜DunawayLawOffice    Rogers,Hurst&Kruskenski̜LaFollette,Tennessee   LaFollette,Tennessee@    MEMORANDUMOPINION%%X̜AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED       Susano,J.  Inthisdivorcecase,theappellantEttaMechelleParksarguesthatthetrialcourterredinawardingherformerhusband,CraigDewayneParks,custodyoftheirtwoboys,agessevenandalmostfour.Wedonotfindthattheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialcourtscustodydecree.SeeRule13(d),ϜT.R.A.P.; Hassv.Knighton ,676S.W.2d554,555(Tenn.1984).Accordingly,wecannotsaythatthetrialcourtabuseditsdiscretioninplacingthechildrenssolecustodywithMr.Parks.See Grantv.Grant ,286S.W.2d349,350(Tenn.App.1954).  TheappelleeseeksdamagesforafrivolousappealpursuanttotheprovisionsofT.C.A.271122.Whilewehavedecidedappellantssoleissueadversetoher,wedonotfindherappealtobefrivolous.  ThejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedpursuanttotheprovisionsofRule10(b),RulesoftheCourtofAppeals. 0   כCostsonappealaretaxedtotheappellantandhersurety.Thiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforenforcementofthejudgmentandforcollectionofcostsassessedbelow,allpursuanttoapplicablelaw.       ___________________________       CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.CONCUR:________________________HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.________________________̜DonT.McMurray,J.