WPC + F n; F{.ԡx1IQP鰇Q!諴w|e>_D=ҁs}snD~@(=+;zl q&Fu(Wl"?f,Wxt?.h/E`ǍqD8*dFj($2 +oR1. I#ˠP-Xgj`ccQd'0'q f;(/]=u`fQJF\I(wZPYgAw A"l]Nꁏ("ElzQ? 8镈f>DPLHnn92p:;OR fM 5 X\"g.=Tycn%?P:EpbU= L~D4 :VF5 ~Pث9G_k%{ׇ18N~"p4b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz   _ %  NEb 0 B 0 D3i D- 0K ASg 0- 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0p3+s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularB+غ C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2e$ !.8GdXXd8         0   d(|3]$ !.8GdXXd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3]$ !.8GdXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Gdd8     _  G8XXdd8  @ LGINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#GL #Ԉ &   August8,2001Session L XXG #GXX#PILGRIM_EMMANUAL_ԀBAPTISTCHURCHv.ALBERTBUCKINGHAM, J etal.XXG   ^ @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  ^ @@No.00206I(III)Ellen_Hobbs_ԀLyle,Chancellor  J @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200002377_COA_ԄR3CVFiledSeptember19,_2001_   AV) ` dE<` A      Thepartiesagreedtotheconsolidationoftwocasesfortrialandappellateproceedings.The  plaintiffsineachcasesoughtbroadinjunctiverelieftocorrectallegedirregularitiesintheaffairsof x thechurch.Allnamedparties,plaintiffsanddefendants,wereenjoinedfromdisturbingordisrupting d anyworshipserviceorchurchmeeting,andcertainsafeguardswereplacedonchurchfundsand P property.Thereafter,thechurchmovedforsummaryjudgmentwhichwasgranted,thuseffectively < terminatingthelitigation.Mr.Buckinghamappeals. (x % Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed  P   #GX#XX.GWilliamH._Inman_,Sr.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichBenH._Cantrell_,_P.J._,M.S. ( andWilliamC.Koch,Jr.,J.,joined.  TerryR.Clayton,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,AlbertBuckingham.  CyrusL.Booker,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellee,PilgrimEmmanuelBaptistChurch. t  L OPINION #GXX{#XXG L"! #GXX #XXG     I.  $$t# Y   The_dispositive_ԀissueiswhetherMr.Buckingham,amemberoftheincorporatedchurch,had %L!% standingtofileanactiononbehalfofthechurchagainstitsPastor,seekingtocallhimtoaccount &8"& forallegedfinancialirregularities. '$#'   DuringthependencyofthisactionthechurchappointedanInvestigationCommitteetolook )$) intotheallegationsofmisconduct.TheCommitteesreport,favorabletothePastor,wasapproved *%* byamajorityoftheBoardofDeaconstowhomitwassubmitted;theBoard,inaccordancewith +&+ acceptedprocedures,thenreferredtheReporttotheentiremembershipwhichapproveditbyavote p,', of114to12. \-(- _ԇ  TheChancellorgrantedthemotionofthechurchforsummaryjudgment,holdingthatthe  actionisaderivativeoneandthat nodemandhasbeenmadeinthesubstanceandformrequiredby  lawandthat noproperderivativeclaimhasbeenassertedinthisaction.     II.  ` S  Tenn.CodeAnn.#GXX+ #XXGԀ4817401(b)providesthat 8  8  8`   Acomplaintinaproceedingintherightofacorporationmustbe  ` verifiedandallegewithparticularitythedemandmade,ifany,to  L  obtainactionbytheboardofdirectorsandeitherthatthedemandwas  8  refusedorwhyhedidnotmakethedemand.#GXX#XXG$ ` x` x   Rule23.06oftheTenn.R.Civ.P.requiresthecomplainttoallegewithparticularitythe   effortsoftheplaintifftoobtainfromthedirectorsorcomparableauthority,andifnecessary,from   thestockholdersormembers,andthereasonsforhisfailuretoobtaintheactionornotmakingthe   effort. p   Mr.Buckinghamscomplaintwasnotverified,andnowrittendemandwasservedbyhim H requestingthataspecificclaimshouldbeassertedonbehalfofthechurchagainstitsPastor.There 4 isnoevidenceintherecordthatsuchdemandwouldhavebeenfutile.See, Lewisv.Boyd ,838  p S.W.2d215(Tenn.Ct.App.1992).  \   ItresultsthatthejudgmentoftheChanceryCourtmustbeaffirmedatthecostsofthe 4 appellant,AlbertBuckingham.      `     h     ___________________________________     `     h     WILLIAMH.INMAN,SENIORJUDGE l @*