WPCP  0~V 0x 0kL 0k 0" 0~ 0: 0 0 0 0  0 01 0C 0V( 0~ 0M 0 0 0X 0 0 0 0KUB %0 0z6 0 1 0 r 0= 0F 0P 1V 0 0O$#Es# 0}u# 0x# 0j$ 0j$ 0ea% 0W% 0W& 0t& 0j& 0b' 0( 0( 0w) 0X* 0L+ 0S, 0-m- 0@. 0/ 00 0#1 01 0^2 03 03 0l4 04 15?6nO6 046 B074M7 0a7^7 0J\88 0Jn9 0T9 0^ :w@j: 0h: 0r; 0|; 0@< D3@< 0s< 0< 1u= 0d=U 6b>B)>DC> AM?U*Q?{?@aDv~GvH AOaNN 0DvO D/O BOV& 8Document[8]Document Style0..8` ..` V8Document[4]Document Style.. . V 8Document[6]Document Style8..V 8Document[5]Document Style0..V/8Document[2]Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   V& 8Document[7]Document Style0..0` ..` zU :Right Par[1]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..2I.3  Ԁ..0..zh :Right Par[2]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..2A.3  Ԁ..0` ..` V?8Document[3]Document Style.. 21.3  Ԁ   z{ :Right Par[3]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  ..P 21.3  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. z :Right Par[4]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. .. 2a.3  Ԁ .. 0..z :Right Par[5]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..2(1)3  Ԁ..0h..hz :Right Par[6]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..2(a)3  Ԁh..h0..z :Right Par[7]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....2i)3  Ԁ..0..z :Right Par[8]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..2a)3  Ԁ..0p..pVX8Document[1]Document Style  @..8  2I.3  Ԁ     Ԉ l2:Technical[5]Technical Document Style.. 2(1)3  Ԁ. l2:Technical[6]Technical Document Style.. 2(a)3  Ԁ. l/%:Technical[2]Technical Document Style 2A.3  Ԁ   .. l,!:Technical[3]Technical Document Style 21.3  Ԁ   .. l(!:Technical[4]Technical Document Style 2a.3  Ԁ   .. l:0:Technical[1]Technical Document Style  2I.3  Ԁ     .. l1:Technical[7]Technical Document Style.. 2i)3  Ԁ. l1:Technical[8]Technical Document Style.. 2a)3  Ԁ. <6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXR& 8BibliogrphyBibliography0....jo4Tech InitInitialize Technical StyleS   1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 S CuyTechnicalTechnical Document Style11.11.1.11.1.1.11.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1fp2Doc InitInitialize Document StyleS #    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)S !"($0 ($0 0 (($0 0 0   A_ekqwDocumentDocument StyleI.1.A.a.(1)(a)i)a)x?t2PleadingHeader for Numbered Pleading Paper % z &(  &XXXXX6G''*d66G''*d6HH1HH2HH3HH4HH5HH6HH7HH8HH910111213141516171819202122232425262728  .+('2$ FT!   p4Heading 2Underlined Heading Flush LeftV4Heading 1Centered Heading@..  b* 8Bullet ListIndented Bullet List0..0` ..` B& $1Document Style0..8` ..` B $2Document Style.. . B $3Document Style8..B $4Document Style0..B-$5Document Style 23  Ԁ   B& $6Document Style0..0` ..` dS $7Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..23  Ԁ..0..df $8Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..` 23  Ԁ..0` ..` B=$9Document Style.. 23  Ԁ   fy &10Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. 23  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. f &11Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..23  Ԁ .. 0..f &12Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h23  Ԁ..0h..hf &13Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..23  Ԁh..h0..f &14Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....23  Ԁ..0..f &15Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..p23  Ԁ..0p..pDV!&16Document Style  @..  23  Ԁ     Ԉ X/&17Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&18Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X-(&19Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X*$&20Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X)$&21Technical Document Style 23  Ԁ   .. X83&22Technical Document Style  23  Ԁ     .. X/&23Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ. X/&24Technical Document Style.. 23  Ԁ.   CRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@( T$   df|$$(G.2$ FT!   EXX     0  MARVINBERKELESLIEMcWILLIAMS($   0   VANNLASLEYPINCHAKMcDONALDLUFKINFRIERSONSUMMITTGillilandMansell Supp2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  e+DDӀ26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  ("$    GGGG'dxd2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23  QRSVWX]^ ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 dhhhh7Border 1ddYiC << G<  9p`(Arial  F!  #d#g  kk   YYY FILEDkX August18,1998CecilCrowson,Jr.kAppellateCourtClerk   F!#d#g  I$g         InMansellv.Mansell,490U.S.581(1989),theUnitedStatesSupremeCourtexplainedwhyamilitaryretireemightmakesuchanelection:     Inordertopreventdoubledipping,amilitaryretireemayreceivedisabilitybenefitsonlytotheextentthathewaivesacorrespondingamountofhismilitaryretirementpay.[38U.S.C.gXg3105(1982ed.&Supp.V)].Becausedisabilitybenefitsareexemptfromfederal,state,andlocaltaxation,[38U.S.C.gXg3101(a)(1982ed.&Supp.V)],militaryretireeswhowaivetheirretirementpayinfavorofdisabilitybenefitsincreasetheiraftertaxincome.Notsurprisingly,waiversofretirementpayarecommon.  F!#d#g  I$g         262216.InstallmentpaymentstoobtainstayofgarnishmentServiceofgarnishmentsummons. (a)(1)...Thefilingofsuchmotionbythedebtorshallstaytheissuance,executionorreturnofanywritofgarnishmentagainstwagesorsalaryduethejudgmentdebtororanyotherfundsbelongingtothejudgmentdebtorsoughttobesubstitutedtothesatisfactionorpaymentoforuponsuchjudgmentduringtheperiodthatsuchjudgmentdebtorcomplieswiththeorderofthecourt.PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva YC<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd F! . g    ћ7 9XXdd7\RA'\ `    , 5  h u` ќRjliA1-j|`  `@Rߛ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALS@ @ ATKNOXVILLEWANDAGAILREVELS(KIRK)@ @ ) HAMILTONCOUNTY       ) 03A019803CV00104 PlaintiffAppellee@ ) @ )@ ) v.@ ) HON.ROBERTM.SUMMITT,@ ) JUDGE  @ )  @ ) L.E.REVELS,JR.@ )@ ) DefendantAppellant@ ) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDEDMITCHELLA.BYRDOFCHATTANOOGAFORAPPELLANTJOHNR.MORGANOFCHATTANOOGAFORAPPELLEE@ @ @     OPINION         Goddard,P.J.  RespondingtoamotionpursuanttoT.C.A.262216relativetoinstallmentpaymentstostaygarnishments,theTrialCourtorderedL.E.Revelstopaythesumof$250permonthonajudgmentpreviouslyrenderedagainsthimintheamountof$39,508.50,whichrepresentedhisdelinquencyastoalimonypayments.  ByhisappealheinsiststheTrialCourtdidnothaveauthoritytorequirehimtopaymorethantheamounthisformerwife,WandaGailRevels(Kirk),wouldbeentitledtoreceivebygarnishmentofhismilitaryretirement.  Beforeproceedingfurther,itshouldbepointedoutthatMr.Revelsterminatedpaymentofalimonyafterhiswiferemarriedpriortothe1994amendmenttoT.C.A.365101,whichterminatedalimonyautomaticallyuponremarriage.  Thefactspertinenttodispositionofthisappealwillnowbedetailed.  Mr.Revelsisaretiredveteranwho,accordingtohistestimony,isunabletowork.Hisincomeconsistsofamilitarypensionintheamountof$1134,ofwhichamounthewas,athisrequest,grantedawaiverwhichreducestheamountofhismilitarypension,butincreasesdollarfordollartheamountofhisV.A.disabilitypension. m   ׀Afterthewaiver,Mr.Revelswasleftthesumof$431asdisposableincomeundertheFederalStatutes.Ofthisamount$45.18iswithheldfortaxes.Thus,hereceivesfromhismilitarypensionasdisposalincomeeither$431or$385.82permonth.Inaddition,hereceivesSocialSecurityincomeintheamountof$842permonth.  Mr.RevelsconcedesthatundertheFederallawMrs.Kirkwouldbeentitledbygarnishmentto65percentofhisdisposableincomeasdefinedbyFederallaw.Thiswouldbe65percentof$431,or65percentof$385.82upondeductingwithholdingtax.Thiswecalculatetobe$280.15and$250.78,respectively.Thus,evenifMr.Revels'majorpremiseiscorrect,theTrialCourt'sjudgmentof$250waslessthanMrs.Kirkwouldbeentitledtobygarnishment.  Mr.RevelsalsoarguesthatundertheTennesseeGarnishmentStatuteMrs.Kirkwouldonlybeentitledto$96.45.ϜThisis25percentofMr.Revels'disposableincome,whichhecontendsis$385.82.Thefallacyofthisargument,however,isthattheInstallmentPayStatutedoesnotpurporttolimittheamountoftheawardbytheTrialCourttotheamountthatcouldbeobtainedbygarnishment.  Inreachingourdecision,wehavenotoverlookedGillilandv.Stanley,anunreportedopinionofthisCourtfiledinJacksononApril16,1997,whichMr.RevelsreliesuponfortheargumentthattheTrialCourtislimitedbytheamountMrs.Kirkcouldreceivebygarnishment.First,wefindthecaseinappositeinthattheawardsoughttobemodifiedwasheldtobeadivisionofmaritalproperty,notalimony,andassuchnotsubjecttorevision.Second,wedonotacceptMr.Revels'insistencethatthiscaseholdsanawardundertheInstallmentPaymentStatutecannotexceedanamountapartywouldbeentitledtobygarnishmentwhich,inalldeferencetocounsel,wedonotfindthecasetohold.  WefindthelimitationsastogarnishmentbothundertheFederalandStateStatutesdonotprecludetheTrialCourtfromsettingahigheramount,andthatthe$250setbytheTrialCourtislessthantheamountMrs.KirkcouldreceivebygarnishmentunderFederalStatutes.  WealsopointoutthatifMr.RevelsiscorrectandMrs.Kirkwouldreceivealesseramountbygarnishment,hecanstopmakingthe$250paymentsorderedbytheTrialCourt,resultinginMrs.Kirkreceivingalesseramountbygarnishment. n     Mrs.Kirk'sapplicationonappealforfeesandcosts,otherthancourtcosts,isdenied.  FortheforegoingreasonsthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtisaffirmedandthecauseremandedforthecollectionofcostsbelow.CostsofappealareadjudgedagainstMr.Revelsandhissurety.      _______________________________      HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.CONCUR:________________________________DonT.McMurray,J.________________________________WilliamH.Inman,Sr.J.