WPC vHkLPG@mX lG~DS B_sB[,#&$dBZ.E:ٕո¼Xh\BsPyu_| 'bDb$*LVº-:*$Ygkjp ח^@4R !$(k?ݶ=!b*c{Y BAht:<Jk4!k&3[U]kR@ĄR]Vy*t(=tb"C"S{=Ҩ@ZV]qehƷ1LV}ഉilR۝:1( Sc\d o| (×+|CMη\[EaI{Q->Ի?Ib#\ %% ^ + 07 UN w 4 z+  w  m  y? 0DNEb 0 B 0 D5 D- 0K ASY 0r 0D AZ\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK4,,,,0z/ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular=.:i+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU  R%$      1  u   _ԀWegleanfromthemeagerrecordasassistedbythebriefstotheextentpermittedthatthePetitionerwas  marriedtothedaughterofoneoftheRespondents,allofwhomwereattheCourthouse;thePetitioner,asaparty,the t Respondentsasthefatherandbrothers,wededuce,ofPetitionerswife.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0     R%$      2  u   _ԀAscontrastedtothe OrderofProtectionwithoutSocialContact,whichwasthebasisforthefindingof  contempt.- -(|G2~$ !.8%dd8         0   d(|3k$ !.8%dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3k$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8%dd8     _  %8NXXdd8  @ d%INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#%d #Ԉ &   October15,2003Session L XNX% #%XXN#RONNIEL.JOHNSONv.MARKR.WHITE,etal.XNX%  J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforKnoxCounty  J @@No.91729,91730,91731Bill_Swann_,Judge  6 FILEDNOVEMBER26,_2003_    @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200202815_COA_ԄR3CV   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thesethreecaseswereconsolidatedfortrial.EachRespondentagreedtoanOrderofProtection x  soughtbytheirkinsman,whowasmarriedtothedaughterofMarkV.White,thesisterofMarkR. d WhiteandnieceofMichaelScottWebb.ThethroesofthedivorceactionbetweenthePetitionerand P hiswife,JenniferWhiteJohnson,precipitatedapurportedassaultonthePetitionerbythe < Respondentswhichresultedincriminalchargesinadditiontoanorderofprotection.Thereafter,the (x PetitionerandhiswifeattendedtheFourthCircuitCourtforahearing,andtheRespondentsupon d instructionsoftheirattorneyinthecriminalcasealsoattended,andfollowedthePetitioner about P thecourthouseplacinghiminfear.Theywerecitedforcriminalcontempt,foundguilty,and < sentencedtotendaysconfinement,withfivedayssuspended.Eachappeals,complainingthatthe ( evidenceofcriminalcontemptisinsufficient.Weaffirm.   Tenn.R.App.P.AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtisAffirmed     #%XNq#XNX.%WilliamH._Inman_,Sr.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand t D.Michael_Swiney_,JJ.,joined. ` Mike_Whalen_,Knoxville,Tennessee,attorneyforappellants,MarkR.White,MarkV.Whiteand 8!  MichaelScottWebb. $"t! DavidL._Valone_,Knoxville,Tennessee,attorneyforappellee,RonnieL.Johnson. #L#   OPINION #%XXN #XNX% %$!% #%XXN #XNX%     I.  &"& .   AgreedOrdersofProtectionWithoutSocialContact#%XXN #XNX%ԀwereissuedAugust15,2002which (#( enjoinedtheRespondentsfrom )$) 8  8`   ...comingaboutthepetitionerforanypurpose,andspecifically \+&+ fromabusing,threateningtoabusepetitioner,orcommittinganyacts H,', ofviolenceuponpetitioner;youarefurtherenjoinedfromdestroying 4-(- _petitionersproperty;youareenjoinedfromplacingpetitionerinfear;  allthisuponpenaltyofcontempt.` x` x   TheseOrdersofProtectionwereissuedpursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.363602which t provides,asrelevanthere,that ` 8  8`   ...anyvictimwhohasbeensubjectedto,orthreatenedwithor 8  placedinfearof,domesticabusebyanadultwhofallsintooneofthe $ t categories...mayseekrelief...byfilingaswornpetitionalleging  ` suchdomesticabusebytherespondent. L ` x` x   Thecaseswereconsolidatedfortrial,andallthreeRespondentswerefoundguiltyof $  violatingtherespectiveOrderofProtectionandeachwassentencedtotendaysinjailforcontempt,   withfivedayssuspended.EachRespondentappeals.Stayofexecutionpendingappealwasdenied   andeachoftheRespondentshasservedhissentence.      II.  p   Thecaseswereheardonoraltestimonywithnoreporter,andnoverbatimtranscriptorrecital H oftheevidencebeingavailable,theRespondentsundertooktofurnishthisCourtwithaStatement 4 oftheEvidencepursuanttoRule24_(c_),Tenn.R.App.P.,whichprovidedthat [_t]he_Ԁstatement,  p certifiedbytheappellantortheappellantscounselasanaccurateaccountoftheproceedings,shall  \ befiled.... H   TheStatementoftheEvidence,ineachcase,wasnotcertifiedasrequiredbyRule24_(c_),   Tenn.R.App.P.,butnoobjectionswerefiled.Therefore,theStatementoftheEvidenceisdeemed   tohavebeenapprovedbythetrialjudge.Rule24(f),Tenn.R.App.P.     III.     TheStatementoftheEvidencerevealsthattwowitnessestestified,thefirstofwhomwas X  Bruce_Poston_,anattorney,whorepresentstheRespondents inthismatterincriminalchargesfrom D! whichtheoriginalorderofprotectionflowed._Poston_ԀtestifiedthattheRespondentswerepresent 0"  intheCourthouseforthepurposeoftestifyinginthedivorcecase,andthatnothinguntoward #l! occurredbetweenthemandthePetitioner. $X"   ThePetitionertestified abouttheallegedassaultwhichwasthebasisfortheOrdersof %0!$ Protection.HesawtheRespondentsattheCourthouse,andthatnoneofthemspokeorgesturedto &"% him.Hetestifiedthathe wasafraidoftheRespondentsand thateverywherehewentinthe '#& CourthousehelookedupandsawtheRespondentsasiftheywerefollowinghim. (#'   Theviolationofanorderofprotectionisacriminalact,andcontemptordersinsuchcases |*%) requireguilttobeestablishedbeyondareasonabledoubt. Shifletv.State ,400S.W.2d542(Tenn. h+&* Ct.App.1966); Robinsonv.Gaines ,725S.W.2d692(Tenn.Ct.App.1986).Respondentsargue  thattheyhadarighttobeattheCourthousethattheymovedaboutwhileawaitinginstructions,and  thatitwasnotaviolationoftheOrderofProtectioniftheyoccasionallysawthePetitioner.  %  1          TheOrdersofProtectionprohibitedtheRespondentsfrom(1)comingaboutthePetitioner ` foranypurpose,and(2)fromplacinghiminfear. L    ThetrialjudgeaccreditedthetestimonyofthePetitionerandadjudicatedthecontempt, $ t becauseof theirproximitytothepetitionerintheCourthouse,andbecausetheyrepresenteda  ` crediblethreattothesafetyofthePetitioner.ThetrialjudgefurtherfoundtheRespondents came  L  aboutthepetitionerinviolationoftheOrdersofProtectiontherebyplacinghiminfear.  8    WenotethataprintedformentitledOrderofProtection %  2      ׀wasutilizedbythetrialjudgefor   eachRespondent.Prime_facia_,thisdocumentisconfusing;itinitiallypurportstobearestraining   order,thenprogressestofindingsoffactrespectingaviolationofapreviousagreedorder,then   regressestospecificrestraints,and,finally,tojudgmentthattherespondentissentencedtotendays   injailforcriminalcontempt,withfivedayssuspended.Theprintedformcontainsthelanguage p  [_t]he_Ԁcourtfindsthatthepetitionerhasproveddomesticabusebyapreponderanceoftheevidence. \ Inparticular,thecourtfindsthattheRespondentcameaboutthePetitionerinviolationofthe H previousagreedorderofprotectiontherebyplacinghiminfear...Theitalicizedsentenceispart 4 oftheprintedform;theremainderis_manuscripted_.Ifthefindingofguiltwasbaseduponthe  p standardofpreponderanceoftheevidence,theconvictionscannotbesustained,becauseaheightened  \ standardisconstitutionallyrequired. UnitedStatesv._Gaudin_ ,515U.S.506;115S.Ct.2310 H (1995), Statev._Ducker_ ,27S.W.3d889(Tenn.2000).ButtheMittimusdatedNovember14,2002 4 providesthatthethreedefendantsareguiltybeyondareasonabledoubtforwillfulcontemptofthree   nocontactordersofprotectionandwehavedeterminedfromtheentirerecordthateachdefendant   wasfoundguiltybeyondareasonabledoubtofcriminalcontemptandthattherecordsupportsthe  findingsandjudgments.     `     h      p     Judicialreviewrequiresthatalloftheevidenceistobeconsideredinthelightmostfavorable l totheprosecution,andthefindingsofguiltmaybesetasideonlyiftheevidenceisinsufficientto X  supportthefindingsofguiltbythetrieroffactbeyondareasonabledoubt. Statev.Smith ,626 D! S.W.2d283(Tenn.Crim.App.1981), Statev.Bohanon ,745S.W.2d892(Tenn.Crim.App.1987). 0"  Wefindthattheevidencesupportsthefindingsofguiltbeyondareasonabledoubt. #l!   TheRespondentspresentforreviewtheissueofwhetherthetrialcourterredinadmitting $D # evidenceoftheassaultbytheRespondentsinJune2002,arguingthatsuchevidencewasirrelevant. %0!$ Wedisagree.TheassaultwasapparentlythereasonfortheissuanceoftheOrderofProtection,and  evidenceofitsrelevanceismanifest.See,Rule402,RulesofEvidence.    Thejudgmentisaffirmed,withcostsassessedtotheRespondents. t __   `     h     ___________________________________ $ t    `     h     WILLIAMH.INMAN,SENIORJUDGE