WPC .2d^3_Mv|eӊq]L?H_(0^j-G~@ fpړQį@sR!n}pVۿQ0;MU W{KyTӁZH:]֘#KP,tIO?:  ^ .ܤl{O4 (AGJ9Vy?.hT*݅0|㱇| 2v]yb qv/19t짣Ӫ]DtDY*&q2a44i^ۦp8cmm DB14~ rKE!Sd)Yq[n"eoAwͤ=`籚W϶0[qۖB|旋rX8^Wx4ol f / iB&4VMvdv.']tdE{*M*]V6b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz C `& 0DN022E:UN<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<b 0 B}} 0 D3> D-q 0K AS< 0 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0p3+s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularB++00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU 9 R$      1    _Ԁ _Affirmance_ԀWithoutOpinionMemorandumOpinion. (b)TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudges  participatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhena v formalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated :  MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequent N unrelatedcase.[AsamendedbyorderfiledApril22,1992.]#Ճ#ԁLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2$ !.8B dXXd8         0   d(|3K$ !.8B dXXd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3K$ !.8B dXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8B dd8     _  B 8QXXdd8  @ W<B INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#B W< #Ԉ &   August8,2001Session L XQXB  #B XXQ#DOLORESE._ROSSELLO_v.MICHAELMAGILL,CommissionerXQXB   J @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  J @@No.001985IIrvinH._Kilcrease_,Jr.,Chancellor  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200100113_COA_ԄR3CVFiledSeptember19,_2001_   AV) ` dE<|` A }      Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed  P   #B XQ#XQX.B WilliamH._Inman_,Sr.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichBenH._Cantrell_,_P.J._,M.S.#B XQ#XQX.B  (x WilliamC.Koch,Jr.,#B XQ#XQX.B .J.,joined. d Peter_Skeie_,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,DoloresE._Rossello_. < PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;andDouglasEarl_Dimond_,AssistantAttorney  General,fortheappellee,MichaelMagill,Commissioner,TennesseeDepartmentofLaborand  WorkforceDevelopment,DivisionofEmploymentSecurity.   MEMORANDUMOPINION #B XXQA#XQXB  t #B XXQ #XQXB     ThejudgmentoftheChanceryCourtisaffirmedpursuanttoRule10,RulesoftheCourtof L  Appeals.#B XXQ #XQXB _  #  1      _ 8!    Theappellantwasemployedbyalawfirmasaparalegalandassignedtoworkforaspecific #`" attorney,LauraStewart.Sheworkedabouttwomonthsbeforeshewasterminated. #L#   IfMs._Rossello_Ԁvoluntarilyquitherjobwithoutgoodcause,sheisdisqualifiedfromreceiving %$!% unemploymentbenefits.Tenn.CodeAnn.507303(a)(1).Sheinsiststhatshewasfired,and &"& henceentitledtobenefits,statingthatshe couldnolongerworkundercircumstanceswhereIwas '"'O _beingverballyandemotionallyabusedbyLauraStewart.TheemployerinsiststhatMs.Rossello  voluntarilyquit.    ShewasinitiallydeniedbenefitsbytheDepartment,whichthereafterdeterminedthatshewas t entitledtobenefits.TheemployerappealedtotheDESAppealsTribunalwhoseRefereeconducted ` ahearingonFebruary24,2000.TheevidencewasconflictingontheissueofwhetherMs.Rossello L  quitherjob,orwasdischargedformisconduct,butsheconcededthatshehadstatedtoMs.Haas, 8  amemberofthelawfirm,thatshewouldnotworkforLauraStewartunderanycircumstances. $ t   TheAppealsRefereefoundthatMs.Rossellovoluntarilyquitherjob,andthatshewasnot  L  harassedbyanyone.TheBoardofReviewaffirmedtheAppealsTribunal.Onpetitionforcertiorari,  8  theChanceryCourtaffirmedtheBoardofReview. $    IfthedecisionofDECissupportedbymaterialevidence,theCourtsmustaffirm.Tenn.   CodeAnn.507303(a)(1).Substantialandmaterialevidenceis anyrelevantevidencewhicha   reasonablemindmightaccepttosupportarationalconclusion,andwhichfurnishesareasonably   soundbasisfortheactionbeingreviewed. Froggev.Davenport, 906S.W.2d920(Tenn.Ct.App. p 1995).Thisrecordreflectssubstantialandmaterialevidencereinforcedbyadeterminationof ` credibilityofthewitnesses.See, Pricev.TennesseeCivilServiceCommission ,1997WL203603. L (Tenn.Ct.App.1997). 8    `     h      p      x    Thejudgmentisaffirmedatthecostsoftheappellant,DoloresE.Rossello. `    `    `     h     ___________________________________     `     h     WILLIAMH.INMAN,SENIORJUDGE