WPC" # VUNa % 0(UP 0l- 0D w@ 4 1 @ 0JH 0T 0^ 0hD 0r 0| 0 0 1u 0d%U>U6B)DC& D3i B AM 0@U*Fp|v~v) AO K! 0D" D/U" B"HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLd(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($&@FZ 8CaslonOpnface BT Regular((3$ !      0  (#$  0   EDӀڃ"B3|x2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(&Times New Roman<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d((((7Border 1dd++++'dxd d-)C << G("$    <  9p`(Arial  !#d#&  ..   YYY FILED.X September29,1997CecilCrowson,Jr..AppellateCourtClerk  r !#d#&   $       ''Atthetimeofthehearingbelow,i.e.,May18,1995,T.C.A.371147(d)provided,inpertinentpart,asfollows: 8 Afterhearingevidenceonaterminationpetition,thecourtmayterminateparentalrightsifitfindsonthebasisofclearandconvincingevidencethatterminationisinthechildsbestinterestandthatone(1)ormoreofthefollowingconditionsexist: 8 (1)Thechildhasbeenremovedfromthecustodyoftheparentbythecourtforatleastone(1)yearandthecourtfindsthat: 8 (A)Theconditionswhichledtotheremovalorotherconditionswhichinallreasonableprobabilitywouldcausethechildtobesubjectedtofurtherabuseorneglectandwhich,therefore,preventthechildsreturntothecareoftheparent(s)stillpersists; 8 (B)Thereislittlelikelihoodthattheseconditionswillberemediedatanearlydatesothatthechildcanbereturnedtotheparentinthenearfuture;and 8 (C)ThecontinuationofthelegalparentandchildrelationshipgreatlydiminishesthechildschancesofearlyintegrationintoastableandpermanentϜhome;....  !#d#&   $       ''Rule10(b),Ct.ofApp.R.,providesasfollows: 8 TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoϜprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . &  P \RA'\'\RA'\7XXdd7ћ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE̜R,/)A1-j|`  `@RߛSTATEOFTENNESSEE,   )C/ANO.03A019701CV00002DEPARTMENTOFHUMANSERVICES, )      )  PlaintiffAppellee, )      )      )      )APPEALASOFRIGHTFROMTHEv.      )HAWKINSCOUNTYJUVENILECOURT      )      )      )      )REBECCAWALLACERUSSELL,  )      )HONORABLEJOHNS.ANDERSON,  DefendantAppellant.)JUDGEForAppellant     ForAppelleeMARKA.SKELTON    JOHNKNOXWALKUPRogersville,Tennessee   AttorneyGeneralandReporter̜       Nashville,Tennessee̛       DOUGLASEARLDIMOND       AssistantAttorneyGeneral       GeneralCivilDivision       Nashville,Tennessee@  MEMORANDUMOPINION''XAFFIRMEDANDREMANDED       Susano,J.  ThetrialcourtterminatedtheparentalrightsofRebeccaWallaceRussell( Mother)inandtoherminorchild,ϜKaylaMichelleWallace,whosedateofbirthisFebruary10,1993.Motherappealed,arguingthattheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialcourtsdeterminationthatthereisclearandconvincingevidencethatterminationisinthechildsbestinterestandthatoneormoreoftheconditionssetforthinT.C.A.371147(d)(1)(A)(C)(Supp.1995) 0   כexistinthiscase.Weaffirm.  Aparenthasafundamentalrighttothecare,custodyandcontrolofhisorherchild. Stanleyv.Illinois ,405U.S.645,92S.Ct.1208,31L.Ed.2d551(1972).However,thisrightisnotabsolute;itmaybeterminatedifthereisclearandconvincingevidencejustifyingsuchterminationundertheapplicablestatute. Santoskyv.Kramer ,455U.S.745,102S.Ct.1388,71L.Ed.2d599(1982).Intheinstantcase,wearecalledupontodeterminewhethertheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialcourtsfindingthatthereisclearandconvincingevidenceintherecord(a)thatterminationofMothersparentalrightsisinthebestinterestofthechild,and(b)thatoneormoreoftheconditionssetforthinT.C.A.371147(d)(1)(A)(C)(Supp.1995)existinthiscase.SeeRule13(d),T.R.A.P.  Wehavecarefullyreviewedtherecordinthiscase.Theevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainstthetrialcourtsfindings.Onthecontrary,wefindclearandconvincingevidenceintherecordthatterminationofMothersparentalrightsisinthebestinterestofKaylaMichelleWallace;thatthechildwasremovedfromMotherinMay,1993,morethanoneyearpriortothehearingbelow;andthatoneormoreoftheconditionssetforthinT.C.A.371147(d)(1)(A)(C)(Supp.1995)exist.  WeaffirmthiscasepursuanttotheprovisionsofRule10(b),Ct.ofApp.R. 1   כCostsonappealaretaxedagainsttheappellant.Thiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforenforcementofitsjudgmentandcollectionofcostsassessedbelow,allpursuanttoapplicablelaw.       __________________________       CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.CONCUR:________________________HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.________________________̜HerschelP.Franks,J.