ÿWPCd> Ù²ÈV*4 ­E 3ÎZz×$O5a-g©úë‚’’ÏB,Z&tŒfðækÿYŸE~ËÍm: ©ž¨3¼kolö&Ñ®5vÐw3NíÝnyð³nlQÓhF…Ý€üô·‡òŽì ©~ìgW©±WÈf‹ÙnçÃ#'E‡É+æŠûÎZ¼Ñæ@MÑKj›C¡Þú’‹[‰²¥Æ)ÂP‡X›vÙ—­·XÊýøïìÿ…äø_—W–ÒEK5j¼˜¦{„¢HùDÀ7¶ a®øW1»\t¨ÂH7$¥gÿ™q!Ü‹= ›WÐ5~•#Y˜.yÔ‘ªø„¢Ê㥧l{¦nœk+kãZ½‚b#Á\ % UI@# 0ˆc UaNë 0 D9 ^ } z‰ Ò U,Õ w  4 Æ2 Æø ƾÆ„JNYÆ[2!ES±U0I6Š2 "I=3 m†4º444444444444444bW9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9W9 0 ë_9_9_9_9 BJ:J: 0¤g: D5 ; D-@; 0Km;m; AS¸;Æ < 0¤Ñ< 0Du= A«¹=˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(ÈhH  Z(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó~‡)  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt, øð AZArial  Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAt€the€time€of€trial,€Husband€had€already€set€aside€approximately€$200,000€in€investment€accounts€in€theÐ ° Ðchildrenððs€names.õ}|)1'­©CorelLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|x ¼Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€partiesðð€second€child€was€born€to€the€marriage€in€1993. (Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôâòòôâÔHusbandððs€income€was€as€follows:€1995€($764,779);€1996€($805,333);€1997€($710,036);€1998€($713,292)Ô#†ôâòòôâ~#Ô.€ §Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôâòòôâÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð36„4„121(c)€provides:Ð ° ЀIn€making€equitable€division€of€marital€property,€the€court€shall€consider€all€relevant€factors€including:Ð tÄ Ðà  à(1)€The€duration€of€the€marriage;Ð 8ˆ Ðà  à(2)€The€age,€physical€and€mental€health,€vocational€skills,€employability,€earning€capacity,€estate,€financialÐ üL Ðliabilities€and€financial€needs€of€each€of€the€parties;Ð À Ðà  à(3)€The€tangible€or€intangible€contribution€by€one€(1)€party€to€the€education,€training€or€increased€earning€powerÐ „Ô Ðof€the€other€party;Ð H ˜ Ðà  à(4)€The€relative€ability€of€each€party€for€future€acquisitions€of€capital€assets€and€income;Ð  \ Ðà  à(5)€The€contribution€of€each€party€to€the€acquisition,€preservation,€appreciation€or€dissipation€of€the€marital€orÐ Ð  Ðseparate€property,€including€the€contribution€of€a€party€to€the€marriage€as€homemaker,€wage€earner€or€parent,€with€theÐ ” ä  Ðcontribution€of€a€party€as€homemaker€or€wage€earner€to€be€given€the€same€weight€if€each€party€has€fulfilled€its€role;Ð X ¨  Ðà  à(6)€The€value€of€the€separate€property€of€each€party;Ð  l  Ðà  à(7)€The€estate€of€each€party€at€the€time€of€the€marriage;Ð à 0  Ðà  à(8)€The€economic€circumstances€of€each€party€at€the€time€the€division€of€property€is€to€become€effective;Ð ¤ô  Ðà  à(9)€The€tax€consequences€to€each€party;€€andÐ h¸  Ðà  à(10)€Such€other€factors€as€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equities€between€the€parties.Ð ,|  ÐÌà  àÌÔ#†ôâòòôâ#ÔÔ‡ ôÌ: òòôâÔ &Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔAlthough€Husbandððs€income€exceeded€ten€thousand€dollars€per€month,€the€court€limited€his€obligation€to€thirty„Ð ° Ðtwo€percent€of€ten€thousand€dollars.€€The€court€stated€that€this€deviation€was€appropriate€because€Husband€was€orderedÐ tÄ Ðto€pay€all€medical€and€dental€expenses€for€the€children€as€well€as€their€tuition€and€other€costs€associated€with€privateÐ 8ˆ Ðeducation. ?Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔHusband€attempted€to€offer€proof€at€trial€that€his€income€level€would€substantially€decrease€in€January€2000,Ð ° Ðdue€to€the€addition€of€another€partner€to€his€medical€practice. €Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôâòòôâÔ€Ô_ÔTenn.Comp.R.Ô_Ô€&€Ô_ÔRegsÔ_Ô.,€ch.€1240-2-4-.04(3)€provides€as€follows:€€The€court€must€order€child€support€basedÐ ° Ðupon€the€appropriate€percentage€of€all€net€income€of€the€Ô_ÔobligorÔ_Ô€as€defined€according€to€1240-2-4-.03€of€this€rule€butÐ tÄ Ðalternative€payment€arrangements€may€be€made€for€the€award€from€that€portion€of€net€income€which€exceeds€$6,250.€Ð 8ˆ ÐWhen€the€net€income€of€the€Ô_ÔobligorÔ_Ô€exceeds€$6,250€per€month,€the€court€may€establish€educational€or€other€trust€fundsÐ üL Ðfor€the€benefit€of€the€child(Ô_ÔrenÔ_Ô)€or€make€other€provisions€in€the€child(Ô_ÔrenÔ_Ô)'s€best€interest;€€however,€all€of€the€supportÐ À Ðaward€amount€based€on€net€income€up€through€$6,250€must€be€paid€to€the€custodial€parent.Ô#†ôâòòôâ~#Ô (Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð36„5„101(d)€provides:Ð ° Ðà  àIt€is€the€intent€of€the€general€assembly€that€a€spouse€who€is€economically€disadvantaged,€relative€to€the€otherÐ tÄ Ðspouse,€be€rehabilitated€whenever€possible€by€the€granting€of€an€order€for€payment€of€rehabilitative,€temporary€supportÐ 8ˆ Ðand€maintenance.€€Where€there€is€such€relative€economic€disadvantage€and€rehabilitation€is€not€feasible€in€considerationÐ üL Ðof€all€relevant€factors,€including€those€set€out€in€this€subsection,€then€the€court€may€grant€an€order€for€payment€of€supportÐ À Ðand€maintenance€on€a€long-term€basis€or€until€the€death€or€remarriage€of€the€recipient€except€as€otherwise€provided€inÐ „Ô Ðsubdivision€(a)(3).€€Rehabilitative€support€and€maintenance€is€a€separate€class€of€spousal€support€as€distinguished€fromÐ H ˜ Ðalimony€in€solido€and€periodic€alimony.€€In€determining€whether€the€granting€of€an€order€for€payment€of€support€andÐ  \ Ðmaintenance€to€a€party€is€appropriate,€and€in€determining€the€nature,€amount,€length€of€term,€and€manner€of€payment,Ð Ð  Ðthe€court€shall€consider€all€relevant€factors,€including:Ð ” ä  Ðà  à(A)€The€relative€earning€capacity,€obligations,€needs,€and€financial€resources€of€each€party,€including€incomeÐ X ¨  Ðfrom€pension,€profit€sharing€or€retirement€plans€and€all€other€sources;Ð  l  Ðà  à(B)€The€relative€education€and€training€of€each€party,€the€ability€and€opportunity€of€each€party€to€secure€suchÐ à 0  Ðeducation€and€training,€and€the€necessity€of€a€party€to€secure€further€education€and€training€to€improve€such€party'sÐ ¤ô  Ðearning€capacity€to€a€reasonable€level;Ð h¸  Ðà  à(C)The€duration€of€the€marriage;Ð ,|  Ðà  à(D)€The€age€and€mental€condition€of€each€party;Ð ð@  Ðà  à(E)€The€physical€condition€of€each€party,€including,€but€not€limited€to,€physical€disability€or€incapacity€due€toÐ ´  Ða€chronic€debilitating€disease;Ð xÈ  Ðà  à(F)€The€extent€to€which€it€would€be€undesirable€for€a€party€to€seek€employment€outside€the€home€because€suchÐ <Œ Ðparty€will€be€custodian€of€a€minor€child€of€the€marriage;Ð P Ðà  à(G)€The€separate€assets€of€each€party,€both€real€and€personal,€tangible€and€intangible;Ð Ä Ðà  à(H)€The€provisions€made€with€regard€to€the€marital€property€as€defined€in€ðð€36-4-121;Ð ˆØ Ðà  à(I)€The€standard€of€living€of€the€parties€established€during€the€marriage;Ð Lœ ÷ Ðà  à(J)€The€extent€to€which€each€party€has€made€such€tangible€and€intangible€contributions€to€the€marriage€asÐ ° Ðmonetary€and€homemaker€contributions,€and€tangible€and€intangible€contributions€by€a€party€to€the€education,€trainingÐ tÄ Ðor€increased€earning€power€of€the€other€party;à À àÐ 8ˆ Ðà  à(K)€The€relative€fault€of€the€parties€in€cases€where€the€court,€in€its€discretion,€deems€it€appropriate€to€do€so;€Ð üL ÐandÐ À Ðà  à(L)€Such€other€factors,€including€the€tax€consequences€to€each€party,€as€are€necessary€to€consider€the€equitiesÐ „Ô Ðbetween€the€parties.Ð H ˜ Ðà  à(2)€An€award€of€rehabilitative,€temporary€support€and€maintenance€shall€remain€in€the€court's€control€for€theÐ  \ Ðduration€of€such€award,€and€may€be€increased,€decreased,€terminated,€extended,€or€otherwise€modified,€upon€a€showingÐ Ð  Ðof€substantial€and€material€change€in€circumstances.€€Rehabilitative€support€and€maintenance€shall€terminate€upon€theÐ ” ä  Ðdeath€of€the€recipient.€€Such€support€and€maintenance€shall€also€terminate€upon€the€death€of€the€payor€unless€otherwiseÐ X ¨  Ðspecifically€stated.€€The€recipient€of€the€support€and€maintenance€shall€have€the€burden€of€proving€that€all€reasonableÐ  l  Ðefforts€at€rehabilitation€have€been€made€and€have€been€unsuccessful.Ð à 0  ÐÌà  à€ ?Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThis€figure€is€based€on€Husbandððs€Ô‡ôâòòôâÔ1998€income€of€$713,292Ô‡XXòôâÔÔ#†XXXX£#Ô.Ô#†ôâòXXÙ#ÔÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ °Ý ƒRs]$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôâòòôâÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð36„5„101(e)(1)Ô#†ôâòòôâ~#Ô€provides:€Ô‡ôâòòôâÔ€In€making€its€determination€concerning€the€amount€of€supportÐ ° Ðof€any€minor€child€or€children€of€the€parties,€the€court€shall€apply€as€a€rebuttable€presumption€the€child€support€guidelinesÐ tÄ Ðas€provided€in€this€subsection.€€If€the€court€finds€that€evidence€is€sufficient€to€rebut€this€presumption,€the€court€shall€makeÐ 8ˆ Ða€written€finding€that€the€application€of€the€child€support€guidelines€would€be€unjust€or€inappropriate€in€that€particularÐ üL Ðcase,€in€order€to€provide€for€the€best€interest€of€the€child(ren)€or€the€equity€between€the€parties.€€Findings€that€theÐ À Ðapplication€of€the€guidelines€would€be€unjust€or€inappropriate€shall€state€the€amount€of€support€that€would€have€beenÐ „Ô Ðordered€under€the€child€support€guidelines€and€a€justification€for€the€variance€from€the€guidelines.Ô#†ôâòòôâí#Ô- ù-(|G2s]$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôâò»»Ô d(|3Gy$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gy$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€^ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼^ »»»ÔÑ8€XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îDœî»¼^ ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼^ »îîDœ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓJULY€13,€2000€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XX»¼^ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼^ »XXò#ÔDONALD€JOSEPH€Ô_ÔRUSSOÔ_Ôòòóó€v.€DEBRA€ANN€Ô_ÔRUSSOÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XX»¼^ Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Sumner€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€98D„355;€€The€Honorable€Tom€E.€Gray,€ChancellorÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M1999„02380„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€December€7,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XXXXÔThis€appeal€arises€from€an€action€for€divorce€initiated€by€Donald€Joseph€Ô_ÔRussoÔ_Ô€(ð ðHusbandðð)€againstÐ xÈ  ÐDebra€Ann€Ô_ÔRussoÔ_Ô€(ð ðWifeðð).€€The€trial€court€ò òó ógranted€Wife€an€absolute€divorce€and€alimony€in€futuro;Ð d´ Ðawarded€custody€of€the€partiesðð€minor€children€to€Wife;€ordered€Husband€to€pay€child€support€in€theÐ P  Ðamount€of€thirty„two€hundred€dollars€per€month€with€additional€child€support€of€two€thousandÐ <Œ Ðdollars€€per€month€to€be€placed€in€educational€trust€for€partiesðð€minor€children;€and€awarded€theÐ (x Ðmajority€of€marital€assets€to€Wife.€Husband€appeals.Ô#†XXXX#ÔÔ#†¼^ »XXª#ÔÔ‡XX»¼^ ÔÐ d ÐÓüÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Chancery€Court€Affirmed€in€Part,Ð ì< ÐReversed€in€Partó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼^ »àXF#ÔÔ‡XX.¼^ ÔAlan€E.€Highers,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòW.€Frank€Crawford,€P.J.,€W.S.,€Ð ° Ðóóand€òòWilliam€B.€Cain,€J.Ô#†¼^ »àXV #ÔÔ‡XX.¼^ Ôóó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌÌÌJames€C.€Bradshaw,€III,€Nancy€A.€Vincent,€Nashville,€for€AppellantÐ L œ ÐÌLarry€Hayes,€Jr.,€Nashville,€for€AppelleeÐ $"t! ÐÓ' ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼^ »XX1 #ÔÔ‡XX»¼^ ÔÐ ü#L# ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼^ »XXK #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XX»¼^ ÔÔ‡XXXXÔOn€August€20,€1998,€Husband€filed€a€complaint€for€divorce€in€the€Sumner€County€Chancery€Court,Ð Ô%$!% Ðalleging€inappropriate€marital€conduct,€abandonment,€and€irreconcilable€differences.€Thereafter,Ð À&"& ÐWife€filed€an€answer€and€counter„complaint€for€divorce,€alleging€inappropriate€marital€conduct€byÐ ¬'ü"' ÐHusband.€Wife€later€amended€her€complaint€to€allege€adultery€as€an€additional€ground€for€divorce.Ð ˜(è#( ÐWife€also€moved€to€dismiss€Husbandððs€complaint€for€divorce€based€on€the€doctrine€of€uncleanÐ „)Ô$) Ðhands.€Ô#†XXXXÔ #ÔÔ‡XXXXÔAt€trial€on€the€matter,€the€following€testimony€was€presented.ò òÐ p*À%* ÐÌà  àó óHusband€and€Wife€were€married€in€1979,€following€their€respective€graduations€fromÐ H,˜', Ðmedical€and€nursing€school.€€In€the€early€years€of€the€marriage,€the€parties€moved€several€times€soÐ 4-„(-ý ÐHusband€could€participate€in€various€internship€and€fellowship€programs.€€In€1985,€the€partiesÐ ° Ðmoved€to€Ô_ÔHendersonvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€in€order€for€Husband€to€start€a€private€cardiology€practice.€Ð œì ÐPrior€to€the€move,€Wife€worked€as€a€nurseððs€aide€and€a€registered€nurse.€Following€the€move,€WifeÐ ˆØ Ðremained€at€home€to€care€for€the€partiesðð€newly€adopted€child.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€Both€parties€acknowledge€that€WifeÐ tÄ Ðhas€always€served€as€primary€Ô_ÔcaregiverÔ_Ô€to€the€children,€now€aged€fourteen€and€eight.Ð `° ÐÌÔ#†XXXXd#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔà  àFrom€1985€to€1987,€Wife€worked€part„time€for€Husband€as€a€bookkeeper€for€HusbandððsÐ 8 ˆ Ðmedical€practice.€€At€some€point€in€1987,€Wife€refused€to€continue€as€a€bookkeeper,€and€the€wifeÐ $ t Ðof€one€of€Husbandððs€partners€took€over€the€duties.€€The€partiesðð€marriage€began€to€deteriorateÐ  ` Ðsometime€during€this€period.€€Wife€felt€that€Husband€did€not€spend€enough€time€with€her€and€theÐ ü L  Ðchildren€because€of€the€long€hours€spent€at€his€medical€practice.€Husband€also€committed€adulteryÐ è 8  Ðon€two€separate€occasions€during€the€marriage.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àOn€May€29,€1997,€Wife€filed€a€complaint€for€divorce€that€was€subsequently€withdrawn€whenÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€parties€reconciled.€€In€1998,€Wife€told€Husband€that€she€would€continue€the€marriage€only€if€heÐ ˜è  Ðabandoned€his€medical€practice€and€moved€to€a€ranch€out€west.€Wife€claimed€that€her€ð ðinner€spiritððÐ „Ô  Ðneeded€to€ride€the€range.€€Although€Husband€did€not€quit€his€practice,€he€did€agree€to€buy€Wife€aÐ pÀ Ðfarm€somewhere€nearby.€According€to€Wife,€she€felt€that€the€marriage€was€over€although€she€did€notÐ \¬ Ðintend€to€Ô_ÔrefileÔ_Ô€for€divorce.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àWife€testified€that€her€living€expenses€were€around€eleven€thousand€dollars€per€month,€andÐ  p Ðthat€the€expenses€for€the€partiesðð€children€were€around€twenty„two€hundred€dollars€per€month.Ð  \ ÐHusband€testified€that€his€expenses€(excluding€alimony€and€child€support)€were€around€sixteenÐ øH Ðthousand€dollars€per€month.€Husbandððs€income€for€the€four€years€preceding€the€trial€ranged€betweenÐ ä4 Ðseven€hundred€thousand€and€eight€hundred€thousand€dollars.׃T×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€partiesðð€marital€estate€consistedÐ Ð  Ðof€real€property€valued€at€$689,700;€investment€accounts€valued€at€$1,521,745;€retirement€accountsÐ ¼  Ðworth€$805,894;€bank€accounts€valued€at€$40,926;€vehicles€worth€$28,679;€Husbandððs€interest€inÐ ¨ø Ðhis€medical€practice€valued€at€$370,000;€and€other€assets€valued€at€$138,863.Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àOn€October€25,€1999,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€granting€Wife€an€absolute€divorce.€TheÐ l¼ Ðcourt€held€that€although€both€parties€were€at€fault€for€the€demise€of€the€marriage,€Husband€was€moreÐ X ¨ Ðat€fault.€In€addition,€the€trial€court€found€that€Wifeððs€motion€to€dismiss€Husbandððs€complaint€forÐ D!” Ðunclean€hands€was€not€well€taken€because€his€adulterous€acts€did€not€cause€the€partiesðð€divorce.€Ð 0"€  ÐAccording€to€the€court,€Wife€condoned€one€of€Husbandððs€adulterous€acts€and€did€not€know€of€hisÐ #l! Ðother€infidelity€until€after€the€divorce€action€was€initiated.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àWife€was€awarded€custody€of€the€partiesðð€two€minor€children,€with€liberal€visitation€grantedÐ à%0!$ Ðâ âto€Husband.€€The€court€awarded€Wife€child€support€in€the€amount€of€thirty„two€hundred€dollars€perÐ Ì&"% Ðmonth.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€€This€amount€included€the€tuition€and€school€activity€fees€requested€by€Wife.€€€In€addition,Ð ° Ðâ âHusband€was€ordered€to€pay€all€of€the€health€care€and€dental€expenses€for€the€partiesðð€children.€€TheÐ œì Ðcourt€further€found€that€there€was€no€need€for€an€educational€trust€fund€because€Husband€hadÐ ˆØ Ðsufficiently€set€aside€funds€for€this€purpose.׃  ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€court€later€amended€this€finding€and€orderedÐ tÄ ÐHusband€to€pay€an€additional€one€thousand€dollars€per€child€per€month€into€an€educational€trust€fundÐ `° Ðfor€the€children.Ð L œ ÐÔ#†XXXXÇ#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÌà  àThe€trial€court€found€that€Wife€was€entitled€to€alimony€in€futuro€of€seven€thousand€dollarsÐ $ t Ðper€month,€regardless€of€her€training€and€Ô_ÔlicensureÔ_Ô€as€a€registered€nurse€and€her€intention€to€resumeÐ  ` Ðwork€at€some€point€in€the€future.€€The€court€based€the€alimony€award€on€Husbandððs€annual€incomeÐ ü L  Ðat€the€time€of€trial.׃ð×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€In€addition,€tÔ#†XXXX"##ÔÔ‡XXXXÔhe€court€awarded€Wife€assets€worth€approximately€58.73%€of€theÐ è 8  Ðmarital€estate.€€This€award€included€all€of€the€investment€accounts€($1,521,745);€$251,527€ofÐ Ô$  Ðretirement€accounts;€$24,791€of€bank€accounts;€vehicles€worth€$18,679;€and€other€assets€valued€atÐ À  Ð$35,529.€€In€making€the€award€the€court€acknowledged€Wife€received€an€additional€one€hundredÐ ¬ü  Ðthousand€dollars€from€Husband€as€a€down„payment€for€a€house€prior€to€the€final€decree€of€divorce.€Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àHusband€was€awarded€the€remaining€41.27%€of€the€marital€estate.€€His€award€included€theÐ pÀ Ðfollowing:€real€property€($689,000);€retirement€accounts€worth€$555,131;€bank€accounts€worthÐ \¬ Ð$16,135;€a€vehicle€valued€at€$10,000;€and€other€assets€worth€$100,934.€Husband€appeals.Ð H˜ ÐÌà  àOn€appeal,€Husband€asserts€the€trial€court€erred€in€awarding€Wife€alimony€in€futuro€ratherÐ  p Ðthan€rehabilitative€alimony.€€Husband€also€asserts€the€division€of€marital€assets€is€inequitable.€Ð  \ ÐHusband€claims€the€court€erred€in€granting€the€divorce€to€Wife€and€in€requiring€Husband€to€establishÐ øH Ðan€educational€trust€for€children.€€Wife€raises€two€additional€issues.€€Wife€asserts€the€trial€court€erredÐ ä4 Ðin€failing€to€dismiss€Husbandððs€complaint€for€divorce.€€Wife€also€seeks€attorneysðð€fees€on€appeal.Ð Ð  ÐÌò òÓ  ÓAnalysisó óÐ ¨ø ÐÌÓm+Óà  àOur€review€of€this€case€is€pursuant€to€Rule€13(d)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€AppellateÐ €Ð ÐProcedure,€which€provides€for€a€de€novo€review€upon€the€record€of€the€trial€court's€findings€of€fact,Ð l¼ Ðaccompanied€by€a€presumption€of€correctness,€unless€the€evidence€preponderates€otherwise.Ô#†XXXXi%#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ X ¨ ÐÌÓ  Óò òÐ 0"€  ÐÔ_ÔAlimonyó óÐ ° ÐÌÓK-ÓÔ#†XXXX-#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔà  àHusband€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€granting€Wife€alimony€in€futuro€rather€thanÐ ˆØ Ðrehabilitative€alimony.€€Husband€claims€that€due€to€Wifeððs€substantial€award€of€marital€assets€as€wellÐ tÄ Ðas€her€ability€to€be€rehabilitated,€alimony€in€futuro€is€improper.€€In€addition,€Husband€requests€theÐ `° Ðamount€of€alimony€awarded€be€reduced.€€We€agree€with€Husband.€€Based€upon€the€following,€weÐ L œ Ðfind€both€the€term€and€amount€of€alimony€awarded€to€Wife€should€be€reduced.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àÔ#†XXXXÒ-#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔThe€trial€court€has€broad€discretion€concerning€the€amount,€type,€and€duration€of€spousalÐ  ` Ðsupport€based€on€the€particular€facts€involved.€Ô#†XXXXc0#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€The€exercise€of€such€power€will€not€be€interferedÐ ü L  Ðwith€absent€a€showing€of€abuse.€òòWatters€v.€Wattersóó,€959€S.W.2d€585,€at€593€Ô#†XXXXC1#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997)Ð è 8  ÐcitingÔ#†XXXX2#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€òòAaron€v.€Aaronóó,€909€S.W.2d€408,€410€(Tenn.1995);€òòLuna€v.€Lunaóó,€718€S.W.2d€673,€675Ð Ô$  Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1986).€€Accordingly,€this€Court€is€not€inclined€to€alter€a€trial€court's€award€ofÐ À  Ðalimony€unless€it€is€not€supported€by€the€evidence€or€is€contrary€to€the€public€policy€embodied€in€theÐ ¬ü  Ðapplicable€statutes.€òòóó€òòBrown€v.€Brownóó,€913€S.W.2d€163,€169€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1994)Ô#†XXXX2#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ;€€€òòGilliam€v.Ð ˜è  ÐGilliamóó,€776€S.W.2d€81,€86€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1988);€€òòIngram€v.€Ingramóó,€721€S.W.2d€262,€264€(Tenn.Ð „Ô  ÐCt.€App.1986).Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àWhether€an€alimony€award€is€appropriate€is€dependent€on€the€facts€and€circumstances€of€eachÐ H˜ Ðcase.òòóóÔ#†XXXX4#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€Ô#†XXXX6#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔWhile€the€alimony€analysis€is€factually€driven,€Ô#†XXXXb6#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€the€court€must€also€balance€several€statutoryÐ 4„ Ðfactors€including€those€enumerated€in€ðð€36-5-101(d).׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€òòBrownóó€at€169;€òòDenton€v.€Dentonóó,€902€Ô_ÔS.W.2dÐ  p Ð930,€932€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1995).Ô#†XXXXÔ6#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€Ô#†XXXX]8#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€Although€all€statutory€factors€listed€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€36„5„Ð ° Ð101(d)(1)€are€important€and€will€be€considered€by€the€trial€court,€need€and€the€ability€to€pay€are€theÐ œì Ðcritical€factors€in€setting€the€amount€of€an€alimony€award.€òòóóÔ#†XXXX 8#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ ˆØ ÐÌà  à€Ô_ÔTenn.CodeÔ_Ô€Ann.€ðð€36-5-101(d)(1)€reflects€a€preference€for€temporary,€rehabilitative€Ô_ÔspousalÔ_ÔÐ `° Ðsupport,€as€opposed€to€long-term€support.€òòWilson€v.€Mooreóó,€929€S.W.2d€367,€375Ð L œ Ð(Ô_ÔTenn.Ct.AppÔ_Ô.1996).€€The€purpose€of€rehabilitative€support€is€to€enable€the€disadvantaged€spouseÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€acquire€additional€job€skills,€education,€or€training€that€will€enable€him€or€her€to€be€moreÐ $ t Ðself-sufficient.€€òòSmith€v.€Smithóó,€912€S.W.2d€155,€160€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1995);€òòÔ_ÔKinardÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔKinardÔ_Ôóó,€986Ð  ` ÐS.W.2d€220,Ô#†XXXXø9#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€at€234€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1998)€In€contrast,€tÔ#†XXXXO=#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔhe€purpose€of€long-term€Ô_ÔspousalÔ_Ô€support€isÐ ü L  Ðto€provide€support€to€a€disadvantaged€spouse€who€is€unable€to€achieve€some€degree€ofÐ è 8  Ðself-sufficiency.€òòÔ_ÔLoriaÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔLoriaÔ_Ôóó,€952€S.W.2d€836,€838€(Ô_ÔTenn.Ct.AppÔ_Ô.1997).€€AÔ#†XXXX½=#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€court€may€grantÐ Ô$  Ðalimony€in€futuro€only€where€rehabilitation€is€not€feasible.€òòAaronóó€at€€410;€€òòSelf€v.€Selfóó,€861€S.W.2dÐ À  Ð360,€361€(Tenn.1993).Ô#†XXXXy?#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà  àIn€the€case€at€bar,€the€express€findings€of€the€trial€court€supported€by€the€record€include€theÐ „Ô  Ðfollowing:€Wife€is€financially€disadvantaged€due€to€her€long€absence€from€the€working€world;€dueÐ pÀ Ðto€Wifeððs€education€and€training€she€will€eventually€be€able€to€resume€her€profession;€both€partiesÐ \¬ Ðare€at€fault€in€the€marriage€break„up.Ô#†XXXX{@#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€€€In€addition€to€the€facts€above,€the€court€must€consider€all€otherÐ H˜ Ðsources€of€income€available€to€the€dependant€spouse.€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€ðð36„5„101(d)(1)(A).€Ð 4„ ÐTherefore,€we€must€analyze€the€alimony€award€in€light€of€Wifeððs€award€of€nearly€two€million€dollarsÐ  p Ðof€marital€assets.€€In€doing€so,€we€find€the€award€of€seven€thousand€dollars€alimony€in€futuro€isÐ  \ Ðimproper.€€Accordingly€we€hereby€reduce€Wifeððs€alimony€award€to€five€thousand€dollars€per€monthÐ øH Ðfor€a€period€of€five€years€following€the€entry€of€this€opinion.€€Both€the€time€period€and€the€amountÐ ä4 Ðof€the€award€will€give€Wife€ample€opportunity€to€bring€her€job€skills€and€training€up€to€date.€Ð Ð  ÐTherefore,€the€decision€of€the€trial€court€oÔ#†XXXXiB#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔn€this€issue€is€reversed.€Ô#†XXXX÷E#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ ¼  ÐÌÓ  Óò òEducational€Trustó óÐ ”ä ЇÓˆFÓà  àHusband€asserts€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€requiring€him€to€set€up€and€make€contributionsÐ ° Ðto€an€educational€trust€for€the€benefit€of€the€partiesðð€children.€€Husband€argues€that€in€light€of€theÐ œì Ðinvestment€accounts€already€in€place,€the€educational€trust€is€unnecessary€and€improper.€€We€do€notÐ ˆØ Ðagree.€€For€the€following€reasons,€we€hold€that€the€educational€trust€is€proper.Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àWhile€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€facts€are€entitled€to€a€presumption€of€correctness€on€appeal,Ð L œ Ðthe€lower€courtððs€discretion€is€tempered€by€the€child€support€guidelines.€TÔ‡ôâòXXÔENNÔ#†XXòôâ}I#Ô.€R.€AÔ‡ôâòXXÔPPÔ#†XXòôâÈI#Ô.€P.€13€(d);Ð 8 ˆ ÐòòJones€v.€Jonesóó,€930€S.W.2d€541,€544€(Tenn.€1996).€Statutory€authority€provides€for€a€Ô_ÔrebuttableÔ_ÔÐ $ t Ðpresumption€that€the€percentage€amount€of€child€support€provided€in€the€guidelines€is€the€correctÐ  ` Ðamount.€€However,€"[the€guidelines]€are€subject€to€deviation€upward€or€downward€when€theÐ ü L  Ðassumptions€on€which€they€are€based€do€not€pertain€to€a€particular€situation."€òòNash€v.€Ô_ÔMulleÔ_Ôóó,€846Ð è 8  ÐS.W.2d€803,€805€(Tenn.1993)€Ô#†XXXXSF#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€Ô#†XXXX…L#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔIn€order€to€justify€a€deviation€from€this€amount,€the€trial€court€mustÐ Ô$  Ðmake€written€findings€outlining€the€reasons€for€this€deviation.€€These€reasons€must€show€that€theÐ À  Ðdeviation€is€either€in€the€best€interest€of€the€childò òòòóóó óÔ#†XXXXÈL#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ;€that€theÔ#†XXXXN#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€child€support€guidelines€would€be€unjustÐ ¬ü  Ðor€inappropriate;€or€needed€to€maintain€equity€between€the€parties.€€Ô#†XXXXhN#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð36„5„Ð ˜è  Ð101(e)(1).׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú7Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô#†XXXX-O#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ „Ô  ÐÌÔ#†XXXXúO#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔà  àÔ#†XXXXRP#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔPursuant€to€the€guidelines,€the€partiesðð€minor€children€are€entitled€to€thirty„two€€percent€ofÐ \¬ Ðthe€Ô_ÔobligorÔ_Ôððs€ð ðnet€income.ðð€òòSeeóó€TÔ‡ôâòXXÔENNÔ#†XXòôâ…Q#Ô.€Ô_ÔCÔ‡ôâòXXÔOMPÔ_ÔÔ#†XXòôâÝQ#Ô.€R.€&€Ô_ÔRÔ‡ôâòXXÔEGSÔ_ÔÔ#†XXòôâJR#Ô.€Tit.€10,€Ch.€1240„2„4„.03.Ô_Ô׃ì×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú8Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€In€the€caseÐ H˜ Ðat€bar,€Husbandððs€child€support€obligation€would€amount€to€approximately€twelve€thousand€dollarsÐ 4„ Ðper€month.׃L ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú9Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€court€below€limited€that€amount€to€thirty„two€hundred€dollars€per€month.€€The€courtÐ  p Ðbased€its€deviation€from€statutory€guidelines€on€Husbandððs€payment€of€the€childrenððs€medical€andÐ  \ Ðdental€expenses€as€well€as€all€educational€expenses.€€Ô#†XXXX P#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔIn€addition,€the€court€required€Husband€toÐ øH Ðcontribute€one€thousand€dollars€per€month€per€child€into€educational€trust€to€provide€for€the€collegeÐ ä4 Ðexpense€of€the€children.€€Therefore,€Husbandððs€total€child€support€obligation€totaled€fifty„twoÐ Ð  Ðhundred€dollars€per€month.Ð ¼  Ðâ âÐ ¨ø Ðà  àWhile€this€amount€may€seem€both€excessive€Ô#†XXXXgU#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔand€unnecessary€to€Husband,€we€find€that€theÐ ° Ðâ âtrial€courtððs€decision€is€proper.€€In€ordering€Husband€to€contribute€to€the€educational€trust,€the€courtÐ œì Ðnoted€that€its€decision€was€affected€by€both€the€uncertainty€of€the€investment€funds€growth€potentialÐ ˆØ Ðand€the€rising€costs€of€education.€€Upon€review,€we€find€this€presents€adequate€justification€for€theÐ tÄ Ðestablishment€of€the€educational€trust.€€Therefore,€the€trial€courtððs€decision€on€this€issue€is€affirmed.Ð `° ÐÌÔ#†XXXX]W#ÔÓ  ÓÔ‡XXXXÔò òDivision€of€Marital€Assetsó óÔ#†XXXXìY#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ 8 ˆ ÐÌÓàYÓòòò òó óóóÔ#†XXXXNZ#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔà  àHusband€asserts€the€trial€courtððs€division€of€marital€assets€is€inequitable.€€Wife€was€awardedÐ  ` Ðapproximately€sixty€percent€of€the€marital€assets,€with€Husband€receiving€the€remaining€fortyÐ ü L  Ðpercent.€€For€the€following€reasons,€we€find€that€the€division€was€equitable€and€the€decision€of€theÐ è 8  Ðtrial€court€should€be€affirmed.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  à€After€characterizing€the€partiesðð€assets€as€either€marital€or€separate€property,€the€trial€courtÐ ¬ü  Ðwill€make€an€equitable€division€of€marital€assets.€€ò òó óAn€equitable€division€of€property€does€notÐ ˜è  Ðnecessarily€meanò ò€ó óan€equal€division.€òòÔ_ÔBookoutÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔBookoutÔ_Ôóó,€954€S.W.2d€730€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997);Ð „Ô  ÐòòÔ_ÔBatsonÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔBatsonÔ_Ôóó,€769€S.W.2d€849,€859€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1988).€€ð ðThe€division€of€the€estate€is€notÐ tÄ Ðrendered€inequitable€simply€because€it€is€not€mathematically€equal,€or€because€each€party€did€notÐ `° Ðreceive€a€share€of€every€item€of€marital€property.ðð€òòKing€v.€Kingóó,€986€S.W.2d€216,€219€(Tenn.€Ct.Ð Lœ ÐApp.€1998)€citing€òòCohen€v.€Cohenóó,€937€S.W.2d€823,€832€(Tenn.1996);€€òòEllis€v.€Ellisóó,€748€S.W.2dÐ 8ˆ Ð424,€427€(Tenn.1988);€òòBrown€v.€Brownóó,€913€S.W.2d€163.€€ò òó óIn€determining€what€constitutes€anÐ $t Ðequitable€division€of€marital€assets,€the€court€will€consider€the€factors€listed€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð36„Ð ` Ð4„121(c).׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú10Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€trial€court's€classification€and€division€of€marital€property€enjoys€a€presumption€ofÐ üL Ðcorrectness€and€will€be€reversed€or€modified€only€if€the€evidence€preponderates€against€the€court'sÐ è8 Ðdecision.òòóó€òòLancaster€v.€Lancasteróó,€671€S.W.2d€501,€502€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1984);€€òòÔ_ÔHardinÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔHardinÔ_Ôóó,€689Ð Ô$ ÐS.W.2d€152,€154€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.1983).€€Ô#†XXXXÂZ#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÐ À Їà  àAs€stated€above,€the€trial€court€is€granted€broad€discretion€in€adjusting€and€adjudicating€theÐ ° Ðparties'€interest€in€all€jointly€owned€property.€€òòóóÔ#†XXXXÂc#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔIts€decision€regarding€division€of€the€marital€propertyÐ œì Ðis€entitled€to€great€weight€on€appeal.€€Ô#†XXXXÑd#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔòòÔ_ÔWattersÔ_Ô€óóat€590;Ô#†XXXX‡e#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€citing€Ô#†XXXXþe#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔòòÔ_ÔBatsonÔ_Ôóó€at€859.€Ô#†XXXXHf#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔThe€fairness€of€theÐ ˆØ Ðproperty€division€is€judged€upon€its€final€results.€With€the€forgoing€in€mind€and€considering€allÐ tÄ Ðrelevant€factors,€we€do€not€find€the€final€results€of€the€trial€court's€distribution€to€be€inequitable.Ô#†XXXX¿f#ÔÔ‡XXXXԀР`° ÐAccordingly,€the€divisions€of€assets€as€determined€by€the€trial€court€is€hereby€affirmed.Ð L œ ÐÌÌò òòòÓ  ÓóóAttorneyððs€FeesòòÐ  ` ÐÌóóó óÔ#†XXXXh#ÔÓ±hÓÔ‡XXXXÔà  àWife€requests€attorneyððs€fees€incurred€on€appeal.€€For€the€following€reasons,€we€hold€thatÐ è 8  ÐWife€is€entitled€to€attorneyððs€fees€incurred€on€appeal.€€In€a€divorce€case,€attorneys'€fees€may€beÐ Ô$  Ðproperly€allowed€as€part€of€the€alimony€awarded.€€òòÔ#†XXXX$i#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÔ_ÔRaskindÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔRaskindÔ_Ôóó,€325€S.W.2d€617,€625€Ô#†XXXX“j#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ(Tenn.Ð À  ÐCt.€App.€1959).Ô#†XXXX@k#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€€When€the€spouse€seeking€an€award€of€legal€expenses€lacks€sufficient€funds€to€payÐ ¬ü  Ðher€expenses€or€would€be€required€to€deplete€her€resources,€the€award€of€legal€expenses€isÐ ˜è  ÐappropriateÔ#†XXXX¬k#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ.€€òòBrownóó,€at€170;€òòButler€v.€Butleróó,€680€S.W.2d€467€(Tenn.€App.€1984).ò òÔ#†XXXXÏl#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€ó óÔ#†XXXXem#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔBased€upon€theÐ „Ô  Ðforegoing,€as€well€as€the€circumstances€presented€in€this€case,€we€find€that€Wife€is€entitled€to€anÐ tÄ Ðaward€of€legal€expenses€incurred€on€appeal.Ð `° ÐÌÓ  Óò òRemaining€IssuesòòÐ 8ˆ ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àAs€a€final€matter,€we€find€it€unnecessary€to€discuss€the€remaining€issues€raised€by€the€parties.€Ð ` ÐIn€particular,€Husbandððs€appeal€of€the€grant€of€divorce€to€Wife€and€Wifeððs€appeal€of€the€lowerÐ üL Ðcourtððs€refusal€to€dismiss€Husbandððs€divorce€complaint€are€irrelevantÔ#†XXXX«m#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔ€in€light€of€our€ruling€on€theÐ è8 Ðother€issues.€€As€neither€of€these€issues€affect€our€disposition€of€this€case,€they€do€not€meritÐ Ô$ Ðconsideration.Ð À ÐÌÔ#†XXXXYp#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔÓ  Óò òConclusionÐ ˜è ÐÌÓ  Óó óÔ#†XXXXgq#ÔÔ‡XXXXÔà  àBased€on€the€foregoing,€the€decision€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed€in€part€and€reversed€inÐ pÀ Ðpart.€€Costs€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€to€Appellant,€Donald€Joseph€Ô_ÔRussoÔ_Ô€€for€which€execution€mayÐ \ ¬ Ðissue€if€necessary.€Ô#†XXXXçq#ÔÐ H!˜ Ðà  àà ` àÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ø$H # Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€HIGHERS,€JUDGE