ÿWPC= …# VU:a %› 0@¡w@á4! 5 0„D 0DÈ   UP 0Jl 0T¶ 0^ 0hh 0rÐ 0|B 0†¾ 0D 1uÔ 0dIU6­ BãB)DC) AMl D3¹U*ì0 0@F†0v~GvÓÅ AO˜Æç 0D­ D/ñ B ˜HP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPTÀÌÀääÀÀÌ0 <Ô6X9`+"Courier 10cpiX(ù$¡¡Ó  ÓÓ  Ó ÏÐDÑEÒÓVÔEÕÓ€áâãî©U!(V3|xã(4(3DX$¤¤Ý ƒù!ÝÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó('Ã$òòÚ  Ú2Ú  Úóó&@FÐZ ‹8CaslonOpnface BT Regular2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(Courier New d% Line 7 d''''7Border 1dd€-(Cþÿ << Gÿÿ&&&&'ÿÿdxd< Œ 9p`(Arial &Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€+ÔÔ€+ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€+XÔÌÌò òOctober€22,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€+ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò †Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòThe€defendant,€after€the€divorce,€was€convicted€of€attempting€to€murder€hisÏformer€wife€and€murdering€his€wife's€companion.€€He€entered€a€guilty€plea€and€wasÏsentenced€to€life€imprisonment€with€possibility€of€parole.óóÌ ÷Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÝ ƒ $Ýà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  ÚóóÝ  ÝòòA€petitioner€in€a€post„divorce€action€stands€in€the€shoes€of€a€plaintiff.óóÌ &Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ€+ÔÔ€+ÔÓ  ÓÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€+XÔÌÌò òOctober€22,€1996ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€+ôÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó óPtPtHPð€ÿÜÿìô”(üHPð€P € €'Styl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  BA Op Geneva ÒÒ  BA Op Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€%ÔÓ  ÓÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÑ ä ÑÑ  ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€·DXXdÈdÈ7ÑÙ€€ÙßL€),(;+'h|z` Å `€€Lß›à@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALSÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌGINA€M.€C.€SANJINES,€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHAMILTON€CIRCUITÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àC.A.€NO.€03A01„9606„CV„00222Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Plaintiff„Appellee€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ìvs.€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àHON.€SAMUEL€H.€PAYNEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)à àJUDGEÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)ÌJ.€ARIEL€SANJINES,€M.D.,€€€€€€€€)à àREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€)Ì€€€€€€€€€€Defendant„Appellant€€€)ÌÌÌÌÌJ.€ARIEL€SANJINES,€M.D.,€Pro€Se.ÌÌÌWILLIAM€H.€œHORTON›,€œHorton›,€Maddox€&€Anderson,€œPLLC›,€Chattanooga,€forÏappellee.ÌÌÌÌÌÌÓÓà@ àòòO€P€I€N€I€O€NóóÌÌà€ àMcMurray,€J.ÌÌà àIn€this€case€the€appellant,€J.€Ariel€Sanjines€(defendant)€has€filedÏa€petition,€pro€se,€asking€the€circuit€court€of€Hamilton€County€for€aÏmodification€of€child€visitation.€€The€trial€œcourt€›summarily€dismissed€theÏpetition€without€affording€the€appellant€any€type€of€hearing.€€œWe›€reverseÏthe€judgment€of€the€trial€court.ÌÌà àThe€parties€were€divorced€in€the€Circuit€Court€for€Hamilton€County,Ïby€decree€entered€on€the€œ14th›€day€of€July,€1992.€€The€decree€of€the€courtÏincorporated€by€reference€a€marital€dissolution€agreement€entered€into€byÏthe€parties.€€Among€other€things,€the€marital€dissolution€agreementÏprovided€that€the€wife€(plaintiff)€would€have€custody€of€the€parties'Ïminor€children€with€the€defendant€having€specified€visitation€privileges.€ÏBy€subsequent€decree€entered€on€July€7,€1993,€the€court€modified€theÏdefendant's€visitation€privileges€granting€expanded€privileges€to€œhim.›ÌÌà àOn€April€22,€1996,€the€defendant€filed€the€petition€giving€rise€toÏthis€appeal.€€The€verified€petition,€among€other€things€averred€that€theÏdefendant€was€now€incarcerated€in€the€Morgan€County€Regional€CorrectionalÏFacility€in€Wartburg,€Tennessee.× ƒ. ××  ×€€He€further€avers€that€since€his€incar…ceration€in€March€1994,€he€has€been€unable€to€visit€with€his€children€andÏhas€been€able€to€successfully€communicate€with€one€of€the€children€on€onlyÏone€single€occasion.€€He€further€alleges€that€the€facility€in€which€he€isÏincarcerated€offers€inmates€Saturday,€Sunday€and€holiday€visitation€fromÏ8:00€a.m.€to€3:30€p.m.,€and€provides€outside€visitation€areas€for€picnicsÏand€barbecues€and€a€children's€play€area.€€He€asks€that€the€court€modifyÏvisitation€to€allow€visitation€on€two€Saturdays€or€Sundays€per€month€andÏon€alternating€holidays.€€He€further€asks€that€the€court€enter€an€orderÏmandating€that€the€children€be€transported€by€an€"agreed€upon€œparty"›€toÏthe€Morgan€County€Regional€Correctional€Facility€or€other€place€whereinÍthe€petitioner€is€incarcerated€for€the€express€purpose€of€visiting€withÏpetitioner.ÌÌà àIncarceration,€in€and€of€itself,€is€not€grounds€for€denying€orÏsuspending€visitation€by€the€inmate€with€his€children.€€òòSuttles€v.ÏSuttlesóó,€748€S.W.2d€427€(Tenn.€1988).€€Visitation€may€be€suspended€for€theÏperiod€of€incarceration€under€proper€circumstances.€€òòSuttlesóó,€supra.€ÏAlthough€we€find€no€authority€touching€the€point,€we€hold€as€a€matter€ofÏlaw€that€incarceration€for€a€crime€committed€voluntarily€is€œinsufficient›Ïto€constitute€a€œchange›€of€circumstances€which€would€warrant€a€change€inÏœvisitation€favorable€to€the€inmate.Ì›€€Ìà àThe€defendant€asked€the€trial€court€and€now€this€court€to€requireÏthat€the€children€be€brought€to€his€place€of€incarceration€so€that€he€mayÏexercise€his€visitation.€€Specifically,€he€asks€that€the€court€enter€anÏorder€mandating€that€the€children€be€transported€by€œan›€"agreed€upon€party"Ïto€the€Morgan€County€Regional€Cor‚rectional€facility€so€that€he€may€exer…cise€visitation€privileges.€€Additionally,€he€charges€that€the€plaintiffÍblocked€communication€with€his€children€and€he€is€unable€to€maintain€aÏmeaningful€relationship€with€his€children.ÌÌà àUnder€the€circumstances€set€out€in€òòSuttlesóó,€the€trial€court€andÏCourt€of€Appeals€allowed€òòSuttlesóó€reasonable€visitation€privileges€œ"onÏwhatever€basis€the€Department€of€Correction€would€allow."€€òòSuttlesóó,€pageÏ429.€€The›€œcircumstances€of€òòSuttlesóó€were›€not€altogether€materially€differ…ent€from€this€case.€€The€Supreme€œCourt›€reversed€the€trial€court€and€theÏCourt€of€Appeals.€€In€so€doing,€the€Court€found€that€suspension€of€visita…tion€privileges€was€appropriate,€however,€the€court€stated:€€"...€toÏprevent€the€bonds€between€the€defendant€and€child€from€being€severedÏcompletely,€he€is€free€to€communicate€with€his€child€by€telephone€or€mailÏor€other€means€approved€by€the€trial€court,€but€may€not€utilize€theseÏopportunities€to€harass€or€threaten€either€his€former€wife€or€his€child."€ÏIn€a€footnote€œto›€the€foregoing€quotation€the€court€stated:€"Nor€mayÏplaintiff€attempt€to€interfere€with€the€relationship€between€defendant€andÏtheir€son."ÌÌà àWe€are€of€the€opinion€that€there€is€a€viable€issue€of€fact€raised€inÏthe€pleadings€and€that€a€œsummary›€œdismissal€was›€error.€€Specifically,€weÏhold€œthat,€at€a€minimum,›€there€should€be€a€hearing€allowed€on€the€matterÏof€communication€between€the€defendant€and€his€children€œpursuant€to›€theÏguidance€of€òòSuttlesóó.ÌÌà àThe€defendant€in€his€pleadings€has€further€asked€that€he€be€trans…ported€to€Hamilton€County€for€the€purpose€of€testifying€and€presentingÏevidence€or€testimony€of€other€witnesses.€€We€note€that€the€question€ofÏwhether€a€prisoner€should€be€allowed€to€attend€a€hearing€in€a€civil€caseÏwherein€he€is€the€plaintiff€has€been€extensively€addressed€in€€òòœWhisnant›€v.ÏByrdóó,€525€S.W.2d€152€wherein€it€is€stated:× ƒ/ ××  ×ÌÌÓÓà8 àWe€...€hold€that€a€prisoner€has€a€constitutional€right€toÏinstitute€and€prosecute€a€civil€action€seeking€redress€forÏinjury€or€damage€to€his€person€or€property,€or€for€the€vindi…cation€of€any€other€legal€right;€however,€this€is€a€qualifiedÏand€restricted€right.Ì€Ìà8 àWe€quote€with€approval€the€following€language€from€òòTabor€v.ÏœHardwick›óó,€224€F.2d€526€(œ5th›€Cir.€1955):Ì€Ìà8 à(We)€think€that€the€principle€of€the€cases€[relating€toÏrestraint€of€personal€liberty]€should€not€be€extended€to€giveÏthem€an€absolute€and€unrestricted€right€to€file€any€civilÏaction€they€may€desire.€Otherwise,€penitentiary€wardens€andÏthe€courts€might€be€swamped€with€an€endless€number€of€unneces…sary€and€even€spurious€lawsuits€filed€by€inmates€in€remoteÏjurisdictions€in€the€hope€of€obtaining€leave€to€appear€at€theÏhearing€of€any€such€case,€with€the€consequent€disruption€ofÏprison€routine€and€concomitant€hazard€of€escape€from€custody.ÏAs€a€matter€of€necessity,€however€regrettable€the€rule€may€be,Ïit€is€well€settled€that,€"Lawful€incarceration€brings€aboutÏthe€necessary€withdrawal€or€limitation€of€many€privileges€andÏrights,€a€retraction€justified€by€the€considerations€underly…ing€our€penal€system."€òòPrice€v.€œJohnston›óó,€334€U.S.€266,€285,Ï68€œS.Ct›.€1049,€1060,€92€œL.Ed›.€1356.€224€F.2d€at€529.Ì€Ìà8 àWe€further€quote€with€approval€the€following€language€fromÏòòœSeybold›€v.€Milwaukee€County€Sheriffóó,€276€œF.Supp›.€484€(œE.D.Wis›.1967):ÌÌà8 àRegardless€of€the€merit€of€the€causes€of€action€stated€inÏtheir€complaints,€it€must€be€remembered€that€theÏprisoner„plaintiffs€have,€by€their€own€acts€resulting€inÏconviction,€placed€themselves€in€a€position€such€that€effec…tive€prosecution€by€themselves€is€not€possible€without€inter…ference€by€the€court€with€their€detention,€and€it€is€ourÏopinion€that€absent€unusual€circumstances€that€œinterference›€isÏnot€warranted.€In€other€words,€their€unavailability€forÏhearings€and€trials€is€due€to€their€convictions,€and€althoughÏthe€court€believes€that€they€should€not€therefore€lose€theirÏrights€of€action€by€operation€of€a€statute€of€limitations,€weÏknow€of€no€authority€compelling€us€under€ordinary€circumstanc…es€to€deliver€them€from€their€self„caused€restrictions€andÏproceed€with€their€cases€as€though€they€could€appear€at€will.Ï276€œF.Supp›.€at€488.Ì€Ìà8 àWe€note€that€Sec.€41„604€T.C.A.€[now€T.C.A.€Sec.€€41„21„304(a)]€provides€that€"in€no€civil€case€can€a€convict€be€removedÏfrom€the€penitentiary€to€give€personal€attendance€at€court,Ïbut€his€testimony€may€be€taken€by€deposition,€as€in€otherÏcases€.€.€.€œ."›€ÌÌà8 àThe€ensuing€section€provides€for€depositions€in€criminal€casesÏand€Sec.€41„606€T.C.A.€[now€T.C.A.€Sec.€41„21„305]€authorizesÏthe€presiding€judge€of€any€court€to€order€the€warden€of€theÏpenitentiary€to€bring€a€convict€before€the€court€to€giveÏtestimony€for€the€state€in€criminal€cases,€and€the€nextÏsection€makes€it€the€duty€of€the€warden€to€produce€the€convictÏwitness.€òòThere€are€no€such€provisions€in€our€law€relating€toÏcivil€suitsóó.€(Emphasis€added.)ÌÌà8 àWe€hold€that,€absent€unusual€circumstances,€prisoners€who€haveÏfiled€their€civil€complaints,€unrelated€to€the€legality€ofÏtheir€convictions€...€will€not€be€afforded€the€opportunity€toÏappear€in€court€to€present€their€cases€during€their€prisonÏterms.€Instead€such€matters€will€be€held€in€abeyance€until€theÏprisoner€shall€have€been€released€and€present€his€case.€WeÏhold€that€in€a€proper€case,€and€upon€a€proper€showing€ofÏparticularized€need,€the€trial€judge,€in€his€discretion,€mayÏissue€an€appropriate€directive€requiring€the€attendance€of€theÏprisoner.€ÌÓÓÌà àThe€defendant€also€seeks€the€appointment€of€counsel€to€represent€himÏduring€the€hearing.€€We€are€of€the€opinion€that€this€is€a€matter€thatÏaddresses€itself€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court.€"It€is€rare€andÏunusual€that€the€occasion€arises€for€the€appointment€of€counsel€by€theÏcourt€in€a€civil€case€...€."€€òòœFerguson›€v.€Paycheckóó,€672€S.W.2d€œ746.›ÌÌà àœ€We€are€of€the€opinion€that€the€defendant€should€have€been€granted€aÏhearing.€Our›€discussion€of€the€relief€sought€in€the€petition€is€not€anÏindication€of€the€opinion€of€this€court€on€any€issue.€œ€We€discuss€theseÏissues€for€the€sole€purpose€of€outlining€proper€procedural€steps€thatÏshould€be€taken€on€remand€to€afford€the€defendant€a€proper€hearing.›€€InÏthe€event€the€trial€court€exercises€his€discretion€and€denies€the€defen…dant€the€right€to€be€transported€to€Hamilton€County€for€the€hearing,€theÏœdefendant,€upon€reasonable€notice€of€the€hearing,›€œis›€entitled€to€presentÏhis€evidence€by€œdeposition,›€interrogatories€œor›€other€lawful€means.ÌÌà àWe€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€and€remand€this€case€toÏthe€trial€court€for€other€and€further€action€consistent€with€this€opinion.€ÏIn€our€discretion,€we€tax€the€costs€equally€between€the€parties.ÌÓӜ̛ÌÌà€ àœ______________________________Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€›€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Don€T.€McMurray,€J.ÌœÌÌCONCUR:›ÌÌœÌ___________________________________›ÌHouston€M.€Goddard,€Presiding€Judge̛̜Ì___________________________________ÌCharles€D.€Susano,€Jr.,€œJudgeÌÇÑ  ÑÑ7€g+XXdÈXXdÈ7Ñ›Ñ7€g+XXdÈXXdÈ7Ñà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌÌÌÌGINA€M.€C.€œSANJINES›,à àà àà à)C/A€NO.€œ03A01›„9606„CV„00222Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)HAMILTON€COUNTY€CIRCUIT€COURTÌœßJ€)0;+'b|` Å `€@ÿJß›à àà àPlaintiff„Appellee,à àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìv.à àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)ÌJ.€œARIEL›€œSANJINES›,€M.D.,à àà àà à)Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àà à)HONORABLE€SAMUEL€H.€PAYNE,Ìà àà àDefendant„Appellant.à à)JUDGEÌÌÌÌÌÌà@ àÔ€ÔÔ€¼ÔOPINION€CONCURRING€IN€PARTÌà@ à€€€€€€AND€DISSENTING€IN€PART€€€€€Ô€%ÔÔ€%XÔÌÌÌÓÓà àà àI€dissent€from€so€much€of€Judge€œMcMurray›ððs€opinion€as€holdsÌÓÓà àà8 à.€.€.€as€a€matter€of€law€that€incarceration€for€aÏcrime€committed€voluntarily€is€insufficient€toÏconstitute€a€change€of€circumstances€which€wouldÏwarrant€a€change€in€visitation€favorable€to€theÏinmate.ÌÌÓÓœPage€3,€slip€opinion.€€I›€am€not€willing€to€make€such€a€broad,€sweepingÏstatement.Ìà àà àThe€question€on€this€appeal€is€not€whether€a€parentððs€incar…ceration€entitles€him€or€her€to€visitation€at€the€site€of€œthat€imprison…ment.›€€As€Judge€œMcMurray›€points€out,€that€subject€is€comprehensivelyÏaddressed€in€òòò òœSuttles›€v.€œSuttles›ó óóó,€748€œS.W.2d›€427€(Tenn.€1988).€€The€realÏissue€on€this€appeal€is€whether€a€petition€that€alleges,€in€effect,€thatÏvisitation€was€established€when€the€petitioner€was€a€free€man€in€HamiltonÏCounty,€and€further€alleges€that€he€is€now€incarcerated€in€Morgan€County,Ïœmakes›€out€a€prima€facie€case€of€a€change€of€circumstances€warranting€aÏhearing€to€determine,€under€the€principles€œarticulated›€in€òòò òœSuttles›ó óóó,Ïwhether€visitation€should€be€adjusted€and,€if€so,€to€what€extent.€€IÏbelieve€it€clearly€does.€€The€circumstances€that€existed€at€the€time€ofÏthe€divorce€and€the€subsequent€decree€have€changed€substantially,€at€leastÏaccording€to€the€pleadings€before€us.€€I€am€not€aware€of€any€case€holdingÏthat€voluntary€acts,€even€criminal€acts,€that€place€a€parent€in€a€positionÏwhere€that€parent€cannot€exercise€the€visitation€previously€œgranted,›€doÏnot€qualify€as€a€change€of€circumstances€on€a€petition€to€modify€a€courtððsÏvisitation€decree.€€Having€said€this,€I€hasten€to€add€that€such€a€changeÏof€circumstances€does€not€necessarily€mean€that€the€visitation€requestedÏby€the€petitioner€is€appropriate.€€As€ò òòòœSuttles›óóó ó€teaches,€there€are€manyÍfactors€to€be€considered,€and€the€end€result€may€well€be€that€the€trialÏcourt€will€find€visitation€at€the€penitentiary€inappropriate.€€This€issueÏaddresses€itself€to€the€broad€discretion€of€the€trial€judge.€€ò òòòœSuttles›ó óóó,Ï748€œS.W.2d›€at€429.Ìà àà àI€concur€in€the€majorityððs€decision€that€the€petitionerððsÏrequest€that€he€be€transported€to€a€hearing€is€controlled€by€ò òòòœWhisnant›€v.ÏByrdó óóó,€525€œS.W.2d›€152€(Tenn.€1975);€that€his€request€for€appointment€ofÏcounsel€addresses€itself€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€judge;€and€thatÏthe€judgment€below€should€be€reversed€and€this€case€remanded€for€furtherÏproceedings;€however,€I€would€remand€for€a€full€hearing€on€the€issuesÏraised€by€the€petition.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà àà à_______________________________Ìà àà àà àà àà àà àCharles€D.€œSusano›,€Jr.,€J.œÔ€%Ô