WPC 2 cs.jz@FRh$/29"4ʍJWR_:ZFIh뜘f/YK]vG.s]P_?ְftrߴwZmoƶ-~jZW9q(k0PIZRh煦43dw [2K1aW%9u:?e!zHݩ"NJϤR@-*+; #L-o14ך+0^HU#5({#ͨޱ GrړwoX\.vU-i3O"ahOr^,7\AH8^sU2>0"9sktnehd!Hrؾ-W za5w m'QЮ,v8I3%c^>Fyl>7'*_Nh</b<ƌ,D>RS{>c{5r)~(WJ!bUN\ % 0^ 8wD4H\ zk m 1 1uW   X  72 N# E 0Db 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASR 0k 0D AS(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    Ӂ, yG*t)tWpdocs3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 i) HP LaserJet 40500  R$      1    _ ` (a)(2).InformationNotSubjecttoDisclosure.Exceptasprovidedinparagraphs(A),(B),and(D)  ofsubdivision(a)(1),thisruledoesnotauthorizethediscoveryorinspectionofreports,memoranda,orotherinternal t statedocumentsmadebythedistrictattorneygeneralorotherstateagentsorlawenforcementofficersinconnectionwith 8 theinvestigationorprosecutionofthecase,orofstatementsmadebystatewitnessesorprospectivestatewitnesses. L (#$  0    X - -(|G2$ !.8<dd8         0   d(|3w$ !.8<dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3w$ !.8<dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8<dd8     _  <8rXXdd8  /V@ 0<INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#<0#Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsFebruary21,2002 L XrX< #<XXr#_OMAWALI_Ԁ__Ԁ_ASHANTI_Ԁ_SHABAZZ_,a/k/aFREDEDMONDDEANv. J GREELEYWELLS,etal.XrX<   ^ @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforSullivanCounty  ^ @@No.2720R.JerryBeck,Judge  J FILEDJULY31,2002 "  @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200102315COAR3CV   AV) ` dE<` A      Inthissuit,wherein_Omawali_Ԁ_Ashanti_Ԁ_Shabazz_,a/k/a,FredEdmondDean,seekstoacquirecertain  materialsheldintheofficeoftheDistrictAttorneyGeneral.TheTrialCourtdeniedthereliefhe x soughtbecause,under_Tenn.R.Crim_.P.16,hewasnotentitledtothematerialwhileapost d convictionproceedingwaspending.Weaffirm. P #<XXr<#XrX<E Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed; (x CauseRemanded  d   #<Xr#XrX.<HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand < CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,joined. ( OmawaliAshantiShabazz,a/k/aFredEdmondDean,ProSe  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter,MichaelE.Moore,SolicitorGeneral,andMichael  A.Meyer,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheAppellees t  R OPINION #<XXr#XrX< L"! #<XXr #  XrX<  OmawaliAshantiShabazz,a/k/aFredEdmondDean,filessuitseekingaccesstofilesinthe $$t# possessionofGreeleyWells,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,andBarryStaubus,hisAssistant,relating %` $ tocriminalchargeswhichhadbeenbroughtagainsthim. %L!%   TheDefendantsfiledaRule12motiontodismiss,whichtheTrialJudgetreatedasamotion '$#' forsummaryjudgment,havingconsideredmatterswhichhedeemedtobebeyondtheallegationsof ($( theoriginalsuit.Uponconsiderationofthebriefsfiledbytheparties,theTrialCourtconcludedthat )$)  dispositionofthecasewascontrolledbyWallerv.Bryan,16S.W.3d770(Tenn.Ct.App.1999), *%* /V X   whereinthisCourtheldthatwhenapostconvictionproceedingwaspendingapartycouldnotavail  himselfoftheprovisionsof_Tenn.R.Crim.P._Ԁ16. #  1      ׀     Mr.Shabazzappealscontendingthathewasconvictedoftwocharges,oneforseconddegree t murderandthesecondforattemptedseconddegreemurder.Hepointsoutthatalthoughthepost ` convictionproceedingwasstillpendingastothesecondcharge,onewasnotastothefirst. L    InaddressingthisissueonMr.Shabazz'smotiontoalteroramend,theTrialCourtmadethe $ t followingobservationswithwhichweconcur:  ` @& Analysis   8   (5h83 1.Wallerv.Bryantseemstostandforthetheorythatauniformpracticeshould   existandthetheoryputforwardisthatonlyoneortheothermeansofdiscovery   shouldexistwhereapostconvictionpetitionispendingafinaldecision.   2.Consideringthatthetwocrimesarosefromthesameexactincidentastotime, p place,andmotive,itwouldseemdoubtfulthattheCourtofCriminalAppeals \ intendedthattherebeadeviationbecauseonesuchchargemightbecomefinal. H Suchafindingassuggestedbytheplaintiffcouldresultinsomestrange 4 proceeding.Forexample,adefendantmightbeconvictedofmurderbyuseofan  p automobileandalsodrivingthevehiclewithoutproperregistration.Atthe  \ completionofhisthirtydaysentenceforviolationofregistration,hethenseeks H theentiredistrictattorneysfileonthetheorythathisClassCmisdemeanorcase 4 wascomplete.Sucharulingwoulddefeatthepurposesofourdiscoveryrules.   ̀ Finding .Althoughtheplaintiffhasraisedanovelissue,theresultheseeks  woulddefeatthepurposesoftheTennesseeRulesofCriminalProcedure.    FortheforegoingreasonsthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtisaffirmedandthecauseremanded p forcollectionofcostsbelow.CostsofappealareadjudgedagainstMr.Shabazz. \     `     h   _________________________________________  $\"    `     h   HOUSTONM.GODDARD,PRESIDINGJUDGE $H #