WPCv -U] \sHlã!ETۙ{'p]*Ÿ1rcMSVf[@soȦqHR:AI˾/9т+D˟^=Ƿ[LY'7–̙b!+b4%Y'[I;۬ oreaW͟!TKBmllH{#Q]]a $u,}rF\ǠJkI 6}qF{0.23(t vkN hѷB6JD25g7#6yT l: 3p]jcwj AM @=Su6u.d[r;xD^y|C@L %OB8󶴄kh2t[gې;iɯ ߐ_!~Q4ϖ4{sԊY|Π&% gzbUN\ % 0^ 8wD4H\ zk m  #  _ %  $N 0DU NEiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiibkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 0ssss B^^ 0{ D3 D-R 0K AS 0 0D A(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    %m+ m~g+:i+003|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU HP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  RD$      1  A   _ ` Thealtercationbeganinthebreakroombeforetheparticipantshadclockedout,andconcludedinthe  Citysparkinglot.(#$  0  (I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2D$ !.8/d d 8         0  PI d(|3M$ !.8/d d 8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3M$ !.8/d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8!d d8     _  98UXXdd 8  @ 9INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#9 #Ԉ &   August30,2001Session L XG%X9 #9XXG%#ROYMICHAELSHANKSv.HAZELR.ALBERT,ACTING J COMMISSIONER,TENNESSEEDEPARTMENTOFEMPLOYMENT  ^ SECURITY,etal.XG%X9  " r @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforHamblenCounty " r @@No.98229ThomasR.Frierson,II,Chancellor ^  FILEDNOVEMBER9,2001 6  @@*AV) ` dE<` A "  @@TTNo.E200100066COAR3CV   AV) ` dE<` A     RoyMichaelShanksappealsdismissalofhissuitseekingtooverturnadeterminationoftheBoard  ofReviewthathewasnotentitledtounemploymentcompensationbecauseofmisconduct.We  concurinthedeterminationoftheChancellorandaffirm. x  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed; P CauseRemanded  <   #9XG%#XG%X.9HoustonM.Goddard,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand d D.MichaelSwiney,JJ.,joined. P PaulG.Whetstone,Morristown,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,RoyMichaelShanks ( PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter,andDouglasEarlDimond,AssistantAttorney  General,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheAppellee,HazelR.Albert   RobertC.JesseeandLoriL.Jessee,Morristown,Tennessee,fortheAppellee,TheCityof t"! Morristown `#"  OPINION  8% $     Inthissuitseekingunemploymentcompensation,RoyMichaelShanksappealsthejudgment '`"& oftheTrialCourtwhichfoundasdidtheAppealsTribunaltowhichitwasappealedfromthe 'L#'  Agency,andtheBoardofReviewwhereitwas#9XXG%#XG%X9appealedfromtheAppealsTribunalthatMr.Shanks (8$( wasnotentitledtounemploymentcompensationbecauseofhismisconductinfightingwithafellow  employeeonCityofMorristownproperty. #  1           ThestandardofreviewoftheChancellorissetforthinT.C.A.507304andislikewiseour t standardofreviewonappeal.Fordv.Traughber,813S.W.2d141(Tenn.Ct.App.1991): `  (2)Thechancellormayaffirmthedecisionoftheboardorthechancellor 8  mayreverse,remandormodifythedecisioniftherightsofthepetitionerhave $ t beenprejudicedbecausetheadministrativefindings,inferences,conclusionsor  ` decisionsare:  L   (A)Inviolationofconstitutionalorstatutoryprovisions; $   (B)Inexcessofthestatutoryauthorityoftheagency;    (C)Madeuponunlawfulprocedure;      (D)Arbitraryorcapriciousorcharacterizedbyabuseofdiscretionor   clearlyunwarrantedexerciseofdiscretion;or    (E)Unsupportedbyevidencewhichisbothsubstantialandmaterialin p thelightoftheentirerecord. \  (3)Indeterminingthesubstantialityofevidence,thechancellorshalltake 4 intoaccountwhateverintherecordfairlydetractsfromitsweight,butthe  p chancellorshallnotsubstitutethechancellorsjudgmentforthatoftheboardof  \ reviewastotheweightoftheevidenceonquestionsoffact.Nodecisionofthe H boardshallbereversed,remandedormodifiedbythechancellorunlessforerrors 4 whichaffectthemeritsofthefinaldecisionoftheboard.Suchpetitionfor   judicialreviewshallbeheardbythechancelloreitherattermtimeorvacationas   amatterofright,anyotherstatuteofthisstatetothecontrarynotwithstanding.    WehavereadtheChancellorsorderdismissingMr.Shanksclaim,aswellasthetestimony  introducedbeforetheAppealsTribunalandconcurintheChancellorsfindingsoffactand l conclusionsoflaw. X    ThejudgmentoftheChancellorisaccordinglyaffirmedandthecaseremandedforcollection 0"  ofcostsbelow.CostsofappealareadjudgedagainstRoyMichaelShanksandhissurety. #l!    `     h   _________________________________________ &"%    `     h   HOUSTONM.GODDARD,PRESIDINGJUDGE