ÿWPCÐ  6Ã*f„¼f6=í¸÷¾Yù:*@Œÿó÷мyÿEßEs«>ÔD0·ÍAQÀQ¬ÆÛ%ãxÊC  iìüi2¹¤w!Þð>qŽúK/°=]’¿úÇïMî´ æÖ= 1æ Ä^æirø †büçgTNœ¡ûÆš…z¦J°¡éY¹AEb¥›Âó°W³… ÷GÒ191L}/c—æ0qA‚Æ=ö˜¾‰NÙ®/‡õå , |"&"#XùuED##:“x tßsÁY”[fý^¸¥ªÌ… áQUûf<ˈ†®Q"ï4jæÆ#5•r]¾ÄIXW¶`4@T 0(c‹w“—UN™ 0lç 0DS m—#!®NÏ ^ Ñ Ý Ý Ý 6å U:       UBU %— — — — — — — — — — — — B AQº Æ 0DÑ 0D 0DY Y D3 tpO'ÔøÔô3|x($¡¡(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular((3úÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0ݱ'L   ,Ý ƒ[¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€Xx¨XXXÔÔ€èÓ9çXXx¨ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€˽çèÓ9ÔÐ  ÐÌDecember€15,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAxÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular<þ6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiX dZ[\]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó&&&&'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔѰÑÒܰÒÑ ý ÑÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ8€iäXXdêdÈ8ÑÔ€X<XXXÔÔ€Š¤ž‹XX<ÔÔ_Ô€€€€à@M M ‚àò òIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  ÐÌßx€Y_B2.jzuý( `€€@ÿE 4 Žtt¨¦E ~xßà@’’"‚àAT€KNOXVILLE€€€€€€ˆà0 ô àÐ ô(#ô(# ÐÌà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àà œ àà ô àÌó óÌÌÌALDRIDGE€LYNN€SHOCKLEY,à0 ì à)€C/A€NO.€03A01„9905„CH„00162Ð ì(#ì(# Ðà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à)Ìà 4 àDefendant„Appellant,à0 ” àà0ì”(#”(#à)€HAMBLEN€CHANCERYÐ  ì(#ì(# Ðà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à)Ìvs.à0 4 àà0Œ 4(#4(#àà0ä Œ (#Œ (#àà0<ä (#ä (#àà0”<(#<(#àà0ì”(#”(#à)€HON.€THOMAS€R.€FRIERSON,€IIÐ  ì(#ì(# Ðà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à)€CHANCELLORÌELLA€MAE€SHOCKLEY,à0 ” àà0ì”(#”(#àà0Dì(#ì(#à)Ð D(#D(# Ðà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à)€AFFIRMED€ANDÌà 4 àPlaintiff„Appellee.à0 < àà0”<(#<(#àà0ì”(#”(#à)€REMANDEDÐ ì(#ì(# ÐÌÌJOHNNY€V.€DUNAWAY,€LaFollette,€for€Defendant„Appellant.ÌÌDENISE€TERRY€STAPLETON,€Morristown,€for€Plaintiff„Appellee.ÌÌÌÌà@%‚àò òòòO€P€I€N€I€O€Nóóó óˆÐ   ÐÌÌà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àà œ àFranks,€J.ÌÌÌÓÓà 4 àà Œ àIn€this€divorce€action,€the€husband€appeals€from€the€ChancellorððsÏdivision€of€marital€property€and€the€award€of€alimony€to€the€wife.Ìà 4 àà Œ àHusband€and€wife€were€married€in€1981€and€no€children€were€born€toÏthis€marriage.€€The€wife€has€two€children€from€a€previous€marriage,€and€the€husbandÏhas€one€child€from€a€previous€marriage.€€During€the€marriage,€the€husband€wasÏemployed€by€Rockwell,€now€Meritor,€as€a€press€operator.€€His€annual€salary€wasÏ$42,874.00€as€of€December€1998.€€The€husband€also€has€income€from€the€sale€of€hayÏand€tobacco€grown€on€his€land.€€The€wife€works€at€Sun€Trust€Bank€as€a€head€teller.€ÏHer€annual€salary€is€$18,000.00€and€the€evidence€shows€there€is€no€room€forÏadvancement€within€the€bank€where€she€works.€€At€the€time€of€the€trial,€the€husbandÏwas€50€years€old€and€the€wife€was€44€years€old.Ð  :33ýø Ðà 4 àà Œ àOn€January€22,€1999,€the€Trial€Judge€granted€the€wife€a€divorce€on€theÐ  ÐÔ_Ôgrounds€of€inappropriate€marital€conduct,€and€divided€the€marital€estate€awarding€theÐ   Ðwife,€according€to€his€evaluations,€$80,928.77.€€Additionally,€the€wife€was€awardedÐ   Ðinterest€in€any€retirement€proceeds€through€Kroger,€and€the€future€rental€income€on€aÐ   Ðtrailer.€€The€husband€was€awarded€$80,906.96,€plus€farming€equipment,€not€in€theÐ  Ðabove€valuations,€to€a€value€of€approximately€$3,100.00.€€Both€parties€were€to€retainÐ   Ðthe€amounts€previously€withdrawn€from€the€money€market€stock€accounts.Ð   Ðà 4 àà Œ àOur€review€of€the€division€of€marital€property€is€òòde€novoóó€upon€theÐ  Ðrecord,€with€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€Trial€Courtððs€findings€of€fact.€Ð  ÐT.R.A.P.€Rule€13(d).€€òòHass€v.€Knightonóó,€676€S.W.2d€554,€555€(Tenn.€1984).€€TrialÐ  Ðcourts€have€wide€discretion€in€the€manner€in€which€marital€property€is€divided,€andÐ  Ðtheir€decisions€are€given€great€weight€on€appeal.€€òòWade€v.€Wadeóó,€897€S.W.2d€702,€715Ð  Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994).€€An€equitable€division€of€marital€property€is€not€necessarily€anÐ  Ðequal€division,€and€is€not€achieved€by€mechanical€application€of€the€statutory€factors,Ð ! Ðbut€rather€by€considering€and€weighing€the€most€relevant€factors€in€light€of€the€uniqueÐ # Ðfacts€of€each€case.€€òòWaters€v.€Watersóó,€959€S.W.2d€585€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1997).€€Ð % Ðà 4 àà Œ àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð36„4„121(c)€sets€forth€the€criteria€whichÐ '  Ðcourts€are€to€consider€in€making€an€equitable€division€of€marital€property.€€In€this€case,Ð )"" Ðthe€parties€do€not€dispute€the€values€given€to€the€marital€assets€by€the€Court,€and€theÐ +$$ ÐCourt€divided€the€marital€assets€close€to€50/50,€with€slightly€more€to€the€wife.€€TheÐ -&& Ðparties€were€married€for€seventeen€years,€and€as€the€Trial€Court€correctly€observed,Ð /(( Ðthere€is€significant€discrepancies€in€the€partiesðð€respective€earning€capacities.Ð 1** Ðà 4 àà Œ àThe€record€established€the€husband€made€more€financial€contributions€toÐ 3,, Ðthe€marital€estate€than€did€the€wife,€however,€the€wife€made€contributions€to€theÐ 5.. Ðmarriage€as€a€spouse€and€mother.€€She€testified€she€took€care€of€the€house,€buyingÐ 700 Ðgroceries,€cooking€and€cleaning€and€also€cared€for€all€the€minor€children,€one€ofÐ 922 Ðwhom€was€the€husbandððs€by€a€prior€marriage.Ð  Ðà 4 àà Œ àThe€husband€argues€that€while€the€Court€considered€the€wifeððsÐ   Ðcontribution€to€the€marriage,€it€failed€to€consider€his€contributions,€and€instead,Ð   Ðpenalized€him€for€fault€in€the€break„up€of€the€marriage.€€He€points€out€that€fault€is€notÐ   Ðto€be€considered€in€the€division€of€marital€property.€€òòSeeóó€T.C.A.€ðð36„4„121(a)(1).€Ð  ÐThese€contentions€are€without€merit.€€Clearly,€the€court€considered€and€compared€theÐ   Ðrespective€contributions€made€by€each€party,€and€the€evidence€in€the€record€does€notÐ   Ðsupport€the€argument€that€the€husband€was€penalized€for€fault€in€the€break„up€in€theÐ  Ðdistribution€of€marital€property.Ð  Ðà 4 àà Œ àConsidering€all€the€relevant€factors€enumerated€in€T.C.A.€ðð36„4„121(c),Ð  Ðwe€hold€that€the€Trial€Courtððs€distribution€of€marital€property€is€equitable.Ð  Ðà 4 àà Œ àThe€husband,€in€his€brief,€argues€that€the€Trial€Judge€erred€in€awardingÐ  Ðthe€ð ðhobby€carsðð€to€the€wife.€€These€are€antique€cars€that€the€husband€had€worked€onÐ  Ðand€rebuilt,€and€were€acquired€during€the€partiesðð€marriage.€€In€this€regard,€the€partiesÐ ! Ðagreed€at€oral€argument,€that€this€issue€was€resolved€between€the€parties,€and€is€moot.Ð # Ðà 4 àà Œ àTrial€courts€have€broad€discretion€to€determine€where€spousal€support€isÐ % Ðneeded,€and€if€so,€its€nature,€amount€and€duration.€€òòSee€Garfinkel€v.€Garfinkelóó,€945Ð '  ÐS.W.2d€744,€748€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996).€€Ð )"" Ðà 4 àà Œ àWhile€T.C.A.€ðð36„5„101(d)(1)€reflects€a€preference€for€temporaryÐ +$$ Ðrehabilitative€spousal€support,€as€opposed€to€long„term€support,€(òòsee€Herrera€v.Ð -&& ÐHerreraóó,€944€S.W.2d€379€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996)),€the€Trial€Court€determined€thatÐ /(( Ðrehabilitative€alimony€was€inappropriate€in€this€case,€and€the€evidence€does€notÐ 1** Ðpreponderate€against€that€finding.€€T.R.A.P.€Rule€13(d).€€In€awarding€alimony,€theÐ 3,, ÐTrial€Judge€made€the€following€findings€and€award:Ð 5.. ÐÓÓà0 4 àà0Œ 4(#4(#àCompared€with€the€husband,€the€wife€will€be€economicallyÐ 700 Ðdisadvantaged€following€the€divorce.€€Her€earning€capacity€is€far€lessÐ 811 Ðthan€his€and€there€is€little€likelihood€that€it€will€improve€.€.€.€ConsideringÐ 922 Ðall€of€the€circumstances€of€this€case€and€the€equities€between€the€parties,Ð :33 Ðthe€Court€determines€that€there€is€a€relative€economic€disadvantageÐ  Ðbetween€the€parties€and€that€rehabilitation€of€the€wife€is€not€feasible.€Ð  ÐTherefore,€the€Court€grants€an€order€for€payment€of€support€andÐ   Ðmaintenance€on€a€periodic€basis.€€The€Court€directs€that€Mr.€ShockleyÐ   Ðshall€pay€to€Mrs.€Shockley€alimony€òòin€futuroóó€in€the€amount€of€$75.00Ð   Ðper€week€for€a€period€of€seven€years.Ð Œ (#Œ (# ÐÌÓÓà 4 àà Œ àThe€evidence€supports€the€Chancellorððs€findings.€€òòSee€Aaron€v.€Aaronóó,Ð  Ð909€S.W.2d€408€(Tenn.€1995);€òòFord€v.€Fordóó,€952€S.W.2d€824€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996);€Ð   Ðand€òòShackleford€v.€Shacklefordóó,€611€S.W.2d€598€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1980).Ð   Ðà 4 àà Œ àWe€find€that€the€Court€intended€to€award€the€wife€alimony€òòin€futuroóó,€asÐ   Ðdecreed,€and€we€affirm€his€judgment.Ð  Ðà 4 àà Œ àThe€cost€of€the€appeal€is€assessed€to€Aldridge€Lynn€Shockley,€and€theÐ  Ðcause€remanded.Ð  ÐÓÓÌÌÌòòà 4 àÌóóà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à__________________________Ð   Ðà 4 àà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àHerschel€P.€Franks,€J.Ð ! ÐÌÌCONCUR:Ð $ ÐÌÌÌÌÌ___________________________Ð *## ÐHouston€M.€Goddard,€P.J.Ð +$$ ÐÌÌÌÌÌ___________________________Ð 1** ÐCharles€D.€Susano,€Jr.,€J.Ð 2++ Ð