WPC !gTo?(> jԠGi<F p-e5bZ޹ {ߞ_EuR<IaaA)o .vd&cR E+ v2u&q>`Vpct\4,v3AQURA1H^ir21z"W#3ay>"m9UB_'20![swg5dU3#spk@D՘)DQw-K\@߯p[b0k]*nze?,&GcH6\nN'ekV<Ph{1H2B#(Gq=vϛeKAU(+}Dm볉njgODa#b a|U!#wp:?;%iX'S=镳uΏsKuC!b1= ~&&Hɮb#\ % 0D# 0g UN U@= U'N} z E  U, w V o55Nj4lE^  mb 0 B 0 D5s D- 0K AS s 09 0D A!HP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0(#$  0  (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(hH  Z(Times New Roman (I Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt v RX$      2  &   _ b  &#&   b~#p  &Simpsonisnowdeceased.TheexecutorofSimpsonsestateispursuingtheaction.#&  p#p  &,  AZArial  L RX$      4  &   _Thelanguageoftheorderprovides: TheCourtfurtherfindsthattheproperwaytodeterminethevalueofthe  dwellingistoorderasaleofthedwellingandoneacreonwhichitissituatedandtoproratebetweenthepartiesthe t valueofthedwellingonlyandthevalueoftheoneacreuponwhichitissituated.Wefindthatthisistantamountto 8 the enhancedvalueoftheproperty.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 + RX$      1  &   _Daviswasnamedindividually,inhercapacityasexecutrixofherdeceasedmothersestate,andinhercapacity  astrusteeofthedeceasedstrust.r')5seJca6J3|x   RX$      3  &   _Bothpriortoandduringthetestimony,Davisobjectedtotheinclusionofaportionofthedepositiontestimony,  claimingthatitviolatedTennesseesDeadMansStatute.TheobjectioncenteredonSimpsonsdepositionstatement t thatheandLillieneverdiscussedtheownershipoftheproperty.Thecourtallowedthetestimony.Ã4) U- -(|G2X$ !.8\d d 8         0  1( d(|3$ !.8\d d 8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8\d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Hdd d8     _  -8&XXdd 8  @ -INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#- #Ԉ &   APRIL2000Session L X!X- #-XX!#SAMLEESIMPSON,etal.v.ADDIEWILLIAMSDAVIS,etal.X!X-  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheChanceryCourtforFayetteCounty  J @@No.12122;TheHonorableMarthaB.Brasfield,Chancellor  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W199900689_COA_ԄR3CVFiledSeptember15,2000   AV) ` dE<|` A }     ThisappealarisesfromabreachoffiduciarydutyandunjustenrichmentactioninitiatedbySam x  SimpsonagainstAddieDavis. #  1      ׀SimpsonallegedDavisbreachedherdutyastrusteeofherdeceased d mothersestateandwasunjustlyenrichedbySimpsonsconstructionofaresidenceonDavis P property.ThetrialcourtheldthatalthoughDavisdidnotbreachafiduciaryduty,shewasunjustly < enriched.Thecourtorderedthesaleofboththepropertyandresidencewithproceedstobeallocated (x betweentheparties.   #  2      Davisappeals.#-XX!v#X!X- d  Tenn.R.App.P.3;AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed  @   #-X! #X!X.-AlanE.Highers,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichFarmer,J.,andLillard,J.,  joined.  IvanD.Harris,Jr.,Collierville,forAppellant  J.PaysonMatthews,Somerville,forAppellee d  OPINION #-XX!#X!X-