ÿWPCO áj=z â=Ò7 y[±ßÕÕŽm¦]æ5 êpU-°‡SÁ[ð;ñœLÑq=øò™¥Zé KÄì@‡ÑŨڴµÝ®­ÃÊpC£~‘:3Nªa+Ó+61ÔÀQZêîÎJ²ö*3·@e J^!2ì­‰èÆKö© Sy{Váü(nÁð:,mÉB*°–fÂ/õù&¯At°b~žðùÎLåiš;uy?¹Š™æR©»i²aLî?ýæ×-ð>“&ž1¤`bâhRÕïʯu:ˆ>ßË OG>ò {ÝIù;1 ÕvX£T[©e¹e¹·§Ú¼%âðÑ—+âþ(bnãUð•üžÙW{E÷¾WÿnaCqhªG§Ïè BÀkâ}C"õé³eœÏYIÖÍ›EÅ?Ø[€Õ/¡¼Õˆ÷×./Â9·¼£C%§†+¢Ær¿~÷Ùt'9‘uN•{W#ÁÂU Nƒ %Ñ 0:×UN UN_ Ó­ 0~€ 0Dþ ^ B wN 4R f u mw U@Ž Î Î Ö Ö ì E                                                               . B2˜HP LaserJet 4 Plus,ð,,,,,ð0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman Regular ÉÝ ƒÄ($ÝÔUSUS.,Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡X cXXXÔÔ‡ôÈŒ òXX cÔÔ_ÔDicksonÔ_Ô,€Tennessee€is€roughly€halfway€between€Mr.€Hensonððs€home€in€Memphis,€Tennessee,€and€Ms.Ð ° ÐSorrellððs€new€home€in€Monticello,€Kentucky,€slightly€closer€to€Memphis.Ô#†ô ¤ ò òôÈŒe#ÔÔ#†XéhX òô ¤„#Ô(.(3Ä($¤¤Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóóy~-s ä]ö,ÿ¬bk $®3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman   Ñ  Ñ Ñ ° Ñ $Ý ƒÄ($ÝÔUSUS.,Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€ô ¤ òXXÔ€One€of€these€contempt€petitions€filed€by€Mr.€Henson€led€to€the€arrest€of€Ms.€Sorrell,€purportedly€forÐ ° Ðdomestic€violence,€during€an€attempted€exchange€of€Alexander.€€Alexander€witnessed€the€arrest€of€his€mother.€€Ms.Ð tÄ ÐSorrell€(actually€Mrs.€Ramsey,€although€the€court€officially€recognizes€her€as€Ms.€Sorrell€for€these€proceedings)€wasÐ 8ˆ Ðpregnant€at€the€time. dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡X cXXXÔÔ‡¼£„»XX cÔÑ8€éhXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ#†X cX»¼£„\#ÔÔ‡îëgîXX cÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@õõ%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†X cXîîëgõ#ÔÔ‡¼£„»XX cԈРÜ, ÐÓ  ÓOCTOBER€30,€2001€SessionÐ X ÐÔ#†X cX»¼£„#ÔÌò òÔ‡¼£„»XX cÔELIZABETH€ELLEN€(SORRELL)€RAMSEYòòóó€Ð  ` Ðv.€Ð ( x ÐLARRY€AUBREY€HENSONòòóóÔ#†X cX»¼£„"#Ôó óÐ @  ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAn€Appeal€from€the€Juvenile€Court€for€Shelby€CountyÐ H ˜ Ðà@@øøìàNo.€H331€€€€€€Harold€W.€Horne,€JudgeÐ 8ˆ  ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ X  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2000„02162„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CV€„€Filed€Ô_ÔAugustÔ_Ô€30,€2002Ð W  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<æ` AßÐ ç7 Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThis€is€an€appeal€from€a€juvenile€court€proceeding€regarding€child€support€and€visitation.€€The€minorÐ æ6 Ðchild€was€born€in€1996;€the€mother€and€father€never€married€each€other.€€Mother€filed€a€petition€toÐ Ö& Ðestablish€paternity,€and€a€blood€test€established€the€fatherððs€paternity€of€the€child.€€On€June€20,€1996,Ð Æ Ða€consent€order€was€entered€providingòò€óóthat€the€mother€would€have€full€custody€of€the€minor€child,€Ð ¶ Ðand€that€the€parties€would€work€out€a€child€support€agreement€between€themselves,€as€well€as€aÐ ¦ö Ðvisitation€schedule.€€The€consent€order€stated€that€if€either€party€moved€more€than€90€miles€from€theÐ –æ Ðpermanent€residence€of€the€other€party,€both€parties€would€share€equally€in€transportation€costs.€Ð †Ö ÐAfter€much€litigation,€including€two€prior€appeals,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€which€includedÐ vÆ Ðinter€alia€the€denial€of€several€motions€by€the€defendant€father,€an€increase€in€the€fatherððs€childÐ f¶ Ðsupport€obligation,€an€awarding€of€attorneyððs€fees€to€the€plaintiff€mother,€and€the€setting€aside€of€anyÐ V¦ Ðfuture€visitation€by€the€father€with€the€minor€child€until€the€father€obtains€substantial€psychologicalÐ F– Ðcounseling€and€demonstrates€that€the€resumption€of€visitation€is€in€the€childððs€best€interest.€€TheÐ 6† Ðfather€again€appeals.€€We€affirm,€finding€ample€support€for€the€order€of€the€trial€court.Ð & v ÐÌÓðÓò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Juvenile€Court€is€Affirmed€andÐ "V  ÐRemandedó óÐ ö"F! ÐÌòòÓ  ÓHolly€Kirby€Lillard,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòW.€Frank€Crawford,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óóÐ Ö$& # ÐÔ_ÔW.S.Ô_Ô€and€òòAlan€E.€Highers,€J.óó,€joined.Ð Æ%!$ ÐÌLarry€Aubrey€Henson,€appellant,€pro€se.Ð ¦'ö"& ÐSusan€A.€Shubert,€for€the€appellee€Elizabeth€Ellen€(Sorrell)€Ramsey.Ð –(æ#' ÐÌÓÊ Óò òòòÔ#†XéhXXX c=#ÔÔ‡XéhXXXéhÔà@@ìì!ìàóóOPINIONó óÔ#†XéhXXXéh¢ #ÔÔ‡X cXXXéhÔÐ v*Æ%) ÐÌòòóóÓ  ÓÓ Óà  àThis€is€the€latest€salvo€in€the€fusillade€of€litigation€in€this€action€in€Memphis,€Tennessee.€€TheÐ R,¢'+ Ðpetitioner€mother€ò òó óElizabeth€Ellen€(Sorrell)€Ramsey€(ð ðMotherðð)€and€the€respondent€father,€ò òó óLarryÐ B-’(,÷ ÐAubrey€Henson€(ð ðFatherðð),€are€the€parents€of€the€minor€child,€Alexander€Henson,€born€March€11,€Ð ° Ð1996.€€Mother€and€Father€never€married€each€other.€€Mother€filed€a€petition€to€establish€FatherððsÐ à Ðpaternity€and€obtain€child€support.€€Father€contested€the€paternity€petition.€€A€blood€test€indicatedÐ €Ð Ðthat€Father€was€Alexanderððs€biological€father.€€Subsequently,€on€June€26,€1996,€a€consent€order€wasÐ pÀ Ðentered€which€ò òó óestablished€Fatherððs€paternity,€providedòò€óóthat€Mother€€would€have€full€custody€of€theÐ ` ° Ðminor€child,€and€stated€that€the€parties€would€work€out€a€child€support€agreement€and€a€visitationÐ P   Ðschedule€between€themselves.€€The€June€1996€order€also€provided€that€if€either€party€moved€moreÐ @  Ðthan€90€miles€from€the€permanent€residence€of€the€other€party,€both€parties€would€share€equally€inÐ 0 € Ðtransportation€costs.€€€The€ensuing€relationship€between€the€parties€was€contentious€at€best;€there€isÐ  p  Ða€long€history€of€litigation.€€òòò òSee€Sorrell€v.€Henson,ó óóó€No.€02A01„9609„JV„00212,€1998€Tenn.€App.Ð `  ÐLEXIS€852,€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Dec.€18,€1998),€and€ò òòòHenson€v.€Sorrell,óóó ó€No.€02A01„9711„CV„00291,Ð P  Ð1999€Tenn.€App.€LEXIS€12,€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Jan.€8,€1999).Ð ð@  ÐÔ#†XéhXXX c#Ôà  àInitially,€both€parties€resided€in€the€Memphis€area.€€Mother€ò òó ómarried,€changing€her€name€fromÐ Ð  ÐElizabeth€Sorrell€to€Elizabeth€Ramsey.€€On€July€16,€1999,€Mother€moved€to€Monticello,€Kentucky,Ð ¼  Ðbecause€Motherððs€husband€found€employment€there.€€The€move€occurred€despite€Fatherððs€attemptsÐ ¨ø Ðto€prevent€Mother€from€moving€with€Alexander.€€After€the€move,€Mother€and€Father€agreed€to€meetÐ ”ä Ðin€Dickson,€Tennessee,€to€facilitate€the€exchange€of€Alexander.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€There€were€numerous€difficultiesÐ €Ð Ðin€these€exchanges,€and€the€problems€in€the€exchanges€prompted€numerous€contempt€petitions€byÐ l¼ ÐFather€against€Mother.€€During€this€time€frame,€Father€filed€a€number€of€motions€with€the€juvenileÐ X¨ Ðcourt€including:Ð D” ÐÔ‡X cXXXéhÔà  àJuly€21,€1999:€Petition€for€restraining€order.Ð l Ðà  àJuly€21,€1999:€Petition€to€prevent€Ms.€Sorrell€from€moving.Ð üL Ðà  àSeptember€27,€1999:€Two€contempt€petitions.Ð Ü, Ðà  àNovember€24,€1999:€Two€contempt€petitions.׃U ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ¼  Ðà  àApril€27,€2000:€Two€contempt€petitions.Ð œ!ì Ðà  àMay€23,€2000:€Two€contempt€petitions.Ð |#Ì! ÐÔ#†XéhXXX cÙ#ÔÑ€oNÑÑ€OaÑà  àOn€August€9,€2000,€the€juvenile€court€entered€an€order€denying€all€of€Fatherððs€motions.€€InÐ ° Ðaddition€to€denying€Fatherððs€motion,€the€August€9€order€included€the€following€findings€of€fact:Ð œì Ðò òà8  àó ó1.€€That€the€plaintiff,€Elizabeth€Ellen€Sorrell€and€the€defendant,€Larry€AubreyÐ tÄ ÐHenson,€are€the€parents€of€Alexander€Henson,€born€March€11,€1996.€€The€partiesÐ `° Ðnever€married€each€other.€€The€petition€to€establish€paternity€was€filed€January€23,Ð L œ Ð1996€before€the€birth€of€the€child.€€Ms.€Sorrell€subsequently€married€her€presentÐ 8 ˆ Ðhusband,€Mr.€Ramsey.Ð$ tÐ Ð  Ðà8  à2.€€A€consent€order€of€paternity€was€entered€June€7,€1996€stating€in€part:€ð ðshouldÐ ü L  Ðeither€party€move€his€or€her€permanent€residence€more€than€ninety€miles€from€theÐ è 8  Ðpermanent€residence€of€the€other€party,€the€parties€shall€share€evenly€the€costs€andÐ Ô$  Ðexpenses€involved€in€the€exercise€of€visitation.ððÐÀ Ð Ð  Ðà8  à3.€€Since€the€date€of€the€consent€order€the€defendant€has€filed€numerous€causes€ofÐ ˜è  Ðaction,€motions€and€petitions€which€have€required€many€hearings€before€this€courtÐ „Ô  Ðand€other€courts.€€All€the€defendantððs€actions,€appeals,€motions€and€petitions,€otherÐ pÀ Ðthan€those€pending€now,€have€been€dismissed.€€For€example,€he€filed€a€petition€toÐ \¬ Ðmodify€order€December€9,€1997€which€was€dismissed€December€18,€1997.€€He€thenÐ H˜ Ðfiled€another€petition€to€modify€December€19,€1997;€both€petitions€requesting€soleÐ 4„ Ðcustody€of€the€child.Ð pÐ Ð  Ðà8  à4.€€That€the€Court€recalls€previous€testimony€of€the€defendant€when€he€stated€that€heÐ øH Ðhad€no€love€for€his€child€but€that€if€he€was€to€pay€support€he€wanted€the€Court€toÐ ä4 Ðenforce€his€ð ðrightðð€to€visitation€and€that€he€knew€his€rights€because€he€belonged€toÐ Ð  Ða€fatherððs€rights€organization€which€taught€men€how€to€use€the€courts.м Ð Ð  Ðà8  à5.€€That€on€September€9,€1999€the€court€ordered€that€Ms.€Sorrell€could€move€fromÐ ”ä Ðthe€jurisdiction€of€the€court€so€long€as€she€did€not€interrupt€the€defendantððs€visitation.€Ð €Ð ÐThe€partiesðð€order€of€June€7,€1996€required€them€to€share€evenly€the€costs€andÐ l¼ Ðexpenses€of€visitation.€€From€the€testimony€the€court€finds€that€Ms.€Sorrell€drove€overÐ X ¨ Ðhalf€the€way€to€meet€for€visitation€exchange,€and€at€times€drove€the€entire€distance,Ð D!” Ðrequesting€no€reimbursement€from€Mr.€Sorrell€[sic].€€Further,€that€the€defendant€lostÐ 0"€  Ðno€opportunity€to€visit€with€their€child€by€her€fault.Ð#l!Ð Ð  Ðà8  à6.€€That€Ms.€Sorrellððs€move€to€Kentucky€was€due€to€her€husbandððs€employment€andÐ ô$D # Ðwas€reasonable.Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  Ðà8  à7.€€That€to€avoid€conflict€Ms.€Sorrell€attempted€to€have€other€members€of€her€familyÐ ¸'#& Ðdeliver€the€child€to€the€defendant€for€visitation,€but€he€insisted,€verbally€and€inÐ ¤(ô#' Ðwriting,€that€she€must€be€present€at€the€time€of€the€pick€up€and€return€so€he€can€seeÐ )à$( Ðher.Ð|*Ì%)Ð Ð  Їà8  à8.€€That€during€the€last€period€of€visitation€the€defendant€had€Ms.€Sorrell€arrested€forÐ ° Ðdomestic€violence.€€He€brought€the€child€to€the€scene€of€the€arrest€to€see€his€motherÐ œì Ðhandcuffed€by€the€police€and€taken€off€from€a€Ô_ÔMcDonaldsÔ_Ô€where€they€had€agreed€toÐ ˆØ Ðmeet€at€the€end€of€scheduled€visitation.€€As€part€of€this€arrest,€he€requested€andÐ tÄ Ðobtained€an€injunction€prohibiting€the€mother€from€coming€about€his€person.€€HeÐ `° Ðthen€cites€her€for€contempt€for€failure€to€meed€[sic]€him€for€the€next€visitation€despiteÐ L œ Ðhis€insistence€that€she€must€deliver€the€child€to€him€in€person.Ð8 ˆÐ Ð  Ðà8  à9.€€That€he€also€complains€that€the€plaintiff€will€not€return€his€phone€calls€and€ignoresÐ  ` Ðhis€e„mail€messages€despite€the€existence€of€the€injunction€he€requested€to€prohibitÐ ü L  Ðsuch€contact.Ðè 8 Ð Ð  Ðà8  à10.€€That€he€refuses€to€acknowledge€the€fact€that€the€plaintiff€has€married€someoneÐ À  Ðother€than€him.€€In€his€communication€with€the€plaintiff,€he€insists€in€using€herÐ ¬ü  Ðmaiden€name.€€He€has€requested€in€the€past€that€her€husband€not€be€allowed€toÐ ˜è  Ðexercise€any€parental€rights€without€his€permission.Ð„Ô Ð Ð  Ðà8  à11.€€That€the€defendant€is€employed€at€Federal€Express€Corporation€and€presentlyÐ \¬ Ðearns€$4,018.60€per€month.€€That€his€present€order€to€pay€child€support€is€$552.30Ð H˜ Ðper€month€and€that€based€on€his€present€income,€he€should€be€paying€$657.30€perÐ 4„ Ðmonth,€fees€included.€Ð pÐ Ð  ÐFrom€these€findings€of€fact,€the€trial€court€concluded:Ð øH ÐÓ ÓÔ‡X cXXXéhÔà8  à1.€That€the€defendant,€Larry€Aubrey€Henson,€is€using€the€Courts€(The€Juvenile€CourtÐ Ð  Ðof€Memphis€and€Shelby€County,€Tennessee,€the€Circuit€Court€of€Shelby€CountyÐ À ÐTennessee,€the€General€Sessions€Court€of€Shelby€County€Tennessee,€The€Court€ofÐ ° ÐAppeals€of€Tennessee,€and€that€[sic]€Supreme€Court€of€Tennessee)€to€harass€andÐ  ð Ðotherwise€abuse€the€plaintiff,€and€or€as€a€means€of€exercising€control€over€theÐ à Ðplaintiff.ЀÐÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à2.€That€the€defendantððs€pursuit€through€otherwise€legal€process€of€visitation,Ð `!° Ðdiscovery,€mental€examinations,€custody€and€numerous€appeals€is€a€fiction€used€byÐ P"   Ðhim€to€inflict€his€abuse€and€to€exercise€his€control€over€the€plaintiff.Ð@#!Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à3.€That€the€Court€can€not€find€it€to€be€in€the€best€interest€of€the€partiesðð€child€that€anyÐ  %p # Ðfurther€contact€exist€between€the€child€and€the€father;€and€in€light€of€the€defendantððsÐ &`!$ Ðconduct€since€1996,€the€Court€has€to€be€concerned€for€the€welfare€and€safety€of€theÐ 'P"% Ðchild€when€in€the€defendantððs€control.Ðð'@#&Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à4.€That€in€this€last€hearing€the€Court€finds€that€the€plaintiff€has€gone€out€of€her€wayÐ Ð) %( Ðto€obey€the€visitation€as€ordered€and€that€her€move€to€Kentucky€was€reasonable€andÐ À*&) Ðnot€in€any€way€intended€to€deny€the€defendant€access€to€their€child.а+'*Ð Ð  Їà8  à5.€That€there€is€no€merit€to€any€of€the€motion€[sic]€or€petitions€filed€by€Mr.€Henson.аРР ÐÌà8  à6.€That€he€should€be€prohibited€from€further€contact€with€petitioner€by€phone,€e„mailÐ à Ðor€in€person.ЀÐÐ Ð  ÐÌÓÓà8  à7.€That€the€request€for€attorney€fees€filed€by€the€plaintiff€is€very€reasonable.€Ð` °Ð Ð  ÐÔ#†XéhXXX cƒ0#ÔThe€trial€court,€in€addition€to€denying€Fatherððs€pending€motions,€then€ordered€the€following:Ð @  ÐÓÓà8  àÔ‡X cXXXéhÔ7.€That€the€order€of€January€28,€1998€be€modified€to€increase€child€support€paymentsÐ  h  Ðmonthly€from€$552.30€monthly€to€$657.30€monthly,€fees€included,€by€incomeÐ X  Ðassignment,€effective€September€1,€2000.ÐøH Ð Ð  Ðà0  àà0` (#(#àÐ ` (#` (# Ðà8  à8.€That€the€plaintiff€be€awarded€reasonable€attorney€fees€of€$10,975.00€for€theÐ Ø(  Ðservices€of€counsel€in€connection€with€these€proceedings€to€date.ÐÈ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à9.€That€the€plaintiff,€Mrs.€Elizabeth€Ellen€(Sorrell)€Ramsey,€be€allowed€to€move€fromÐ ¨ø Ðthe€jurisdiction€of€Shelby€County,€Tennessee.ИèÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à10.€That€any€other€motions€or€petitions€previously€filed€and€inadvertently€overlookedÐ xÈ Ðbe€dismissed.Ðh¸Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  à11.€That€all€previously€ordered€visitation€between€Larry€Aubrey€Henson€and€theÐ H˜ Ðparties€[sic]€child€be€set€aside€and€Mr.€Henson€is€prohibited€from€any€contact€withÐ 8ˆ Ðthe€plaintiff,€including€telephone€and€e„mail€contact.Ð(xÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  à12.€That€before€the€court€will€consider€future€visitation€the€defendant€must€completeÐ X Ðanger€management€and€parenting€classes€and€seek€and€complete€intensiveÐ øH Ðpsychological€counseling€for€his€abusive€and€controlling€personality€and€be€able€toÐ è8 Ðshow€that€such€visitation€would€be€in€the€best€interests€of€the€parties€[sic]€child.ÐØ(Ð Ð  ÐÔ#†XéhXXX cU9#ÔÌÓ Óà  àOn€appeal,€Father€argues€that€the€trial€court€violated€his€constitutional€rights,€erred€inÐ ´! Ðdeclining€to€deduct€his€travel€costs€from€his€child€support€obligation,€erred€in€terminating€orÐ  "ð  Ðsuspending€his€visitation€rights,€erred€in€ordering€him€to€pay€a€portion€of€Motherððs€attorneyððs€fees,Ð Œ#Ü! Ðand€that€the€trial€court€discriminated€against€him.€€These€issues€will€be€addressed€in€turn.€€Ð x$È" Ðà  àBecause€this€case€was€tried€by€the€trial€court€sitting€without€a€jury,€we€review€the€case€deÐ P& !$ Ðnovo€upon€the€record€with€a€presumption€of€correctness€of€the€findings€of€fact€by€the€trial€court.€€ò òòòSeeó óóóÐ <'Œ"% ÐTenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(d).€€We€review€the€trial€courtððs€conclusions€of€legal€questions€de€novo,€affordingÐ ((x#& Ðno€presumption€of€correctness€to€the€trial€courtððs€legal€conclusions.€€ò òòòSee€Ô_ÔCambellÔ_Ô€v.€Florida€SteelÐ )d$' ÐCorp.ó óóó,€919€S.W.2d€26,€35€(Tenn.€1996);€ò òòòÔ_ÔRidingsÔ_Ô€v.€Ralph€M.€Parsons€Co.ó óóó,€914€S.W.2d€79,€80Ð *P%( Ð(Tenn.€1996).Ð ì*<&) ÐÑoNÑâ âѰÑâ âÑ  Ñà  àFather€argues€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€violated€his€constitutional€rights.€€He€cites€noÐ ° Ðplace€in€the€record€in€which€this€issue€was€raised€to€the€trial€court.€€ò òòòSeeó óóó€Rule€27(a)(6)€and€(7),Ð œì ÐTennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure.€€ò òó óOnly€issues€raised€at€the€trial€court€may€be€raised€onÐ ˆØ Ðappeal.€€ò òòòSee€Ô_ÔBarnhillÔ_Ô€v.€Ô_ÔBarnhillÔ_Ôó óóó,€826€S.W.2d€443,€458€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1991);€ò òòòState€Ô_ÔDepððtÔ_Ô€ofÐ tÄ ÐHuman€Ô_ÔServsÔ_Ô.€v.€Ô_ÔDefrieceÔ_Ôó óóó,€937€S.W.2d€954,€960€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1996)€(ð ðIt€is€well„settled€thatÐ `° Ðissues€not€raised€at€trial€may€not€be€raised€for€the€first€time€on€appeal.ðð).€€This€issue€is€thereforeÐ L œ Ðwaived€on€appeal.€€Ð 8 ˆ Ðà  àFather€asserts€that€the€trial€court€failed€to€deduct€his€travel€costs€from€the€amount€of€his€childÐ  ` Ðsupport€obligation.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€36„6„108(b)€(2001)€provides€in€pertinent€part:Ð ü L  ÐÔ‡XéhXXXéhÔà8  àThe€court€shall€assess€the€costs€of€transporting€the€child€for€visitation€and€determineÐ Ô$  Ðwhether€a€deviation€from€the€child€support€guidelines€should€be€considered€in€lightÐ À  Ðof€all€factors€including,€but€not€limited€to,€additional€costs€incurred€for€transportingÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€child€for€visitation.€Ð˜è Ð Ð  ÐÔ#†XéhXXXéhÉI#ÔThe€trial€court€concluded€that€Mother€had€gone€out€of€her€way€to€obey€visitation€as€ordered,€and€thatÐ pÀ Ðher€move€to€Kentucky€was€reasonable.€€Motherððs€move€to€Kentucky€resulted€in€additionalÐ \¬ Ðtransportation€costs€for€visitation€for€both€parties.€€While€additional€costs€for€transportation€forÐ H˜ Ðvisitation€are€a€factor€for€consideration€to€deviate€from€the€child€support€guidelines,€the€trial€courtÐ 4„ Ðis€not€required€to€deviate€downward€in€light€of€such€costs.€€In€this€case,€the€trial€court€found€thatÐ  p ÐMotherððs€move€to€Kentucky€was€for€a€legitimate€reason€and€not€intended€to€deny€Father€access€toÐ  \ Ðtheir€child.€€Considering€the€record€as€a€whole,€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€settingÐ øH Ðthe€child€support€obligation.Ð ä4 Ðà  àFather€claims€further€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€setting€aside€his€visitation€with€his€son.€€TheÐ ¼  Ðtrial€court€essentially€suspended€Fatherððs€visitation€with€Alexander€until€Father€obtains€theÐ ¨ø Ðpsychological€counseling€described€in€its€order€and€demonstrates€that€visitation€is€in€AlexanderððsÐ ”ä Ðbest€interest.€€After€reviewing€the€record€in€this€cause,€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€trial€court€erredÐ €Ð Ðin€finding€that€the€best€interests€of€this€child€would€be€served€by€such€a€suspension€of€visitation€untilÐ l¼ ÐFather€obtains€counseling,€successfully€addresses€the€psychological€issues€noted€by€the€trial€court,Ð X ¨ Ðand€demonstrates€that€the€resumption€of€visitation€is€in€Alexanderððs€best€interest.€Ð D!” Ðà  àFather€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€awarding€Mother€$10,975.00€in€legal€fees.€€HeÐ #l! Ðasserts€that€some€of€those€attorneyððs€fees€were€generated€for€matters€unrelated€to€this€appeal.€Ð $X" ÐMotherððs€Petition€for€Fees€and€Expenses€indicates€that€the€total€amount€of€the€attorneyððs€fees€andÐ ô$D # Ðexpenses€were€for€matters€in€the€trial€court€related€to€this€case€from€1996€to€2000.€€Given€the€volumeÐ à%0!$ Ðof€litigation€generated€by€Fatherððs€actions€in€this€case,€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€trial€court€erredÐ Ì&"% Ðin€assessing€this€amount€of€attorneyððs€fees.Ð ¸'#& ÐÐ )à$( ÐÑOaÑâ âѰÑâ âÑ  Ñà  àFinally,€Father€makes€the€conclusory€allegation€that€the€trial€judge,€Harold€Horne,Ð ° Ðdiscriminated€against€him.€€Father€asserts€throughout€his€appellate€brief€that€he€was€not€treated€fairly€Ð œì Ðbecause€he€is€a€man.€€However,€the€record€in€this€case€includes€ample€evidence€supporting€theÐ ˆØ Ðactions€of€the€trial€court€in€this€cause.€€This€argument€is€without€merit.€Ð tÄ Ðà  àMother€seeks€an€award€of€attorneyððs€fees€for€this€appeal.€€We€find€that€such€an€award€isÐ L œ Ðwarranted€under€the€circumstances€of€this€case.€€The€cause€is€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€aÐ 8 ˆ Ðdetermination€of€the€reasonable€amount€of€attorneyððs€fees€for€this€appeal.Ð $ t Ðà  àThe€decision€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed€and€the€cause€is€remanded€for€a€determination€ofÐ ü L  Ðthe€reasonable€amount€of€attorneyððs€fees€to€be€awarded€to€Mother€for€this€Appeal.€€Costs€are€to€beÐ è 8  Ðtaxed€to€the€appellant,€Larry€Aubrey€Henson,€and€his€surety,€for€which€execution€may€issue,€ifÐ Ô$  Ðnecessary.Ð À  ÐÌÔ‡X cXXXéhÔÌÓ Óà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð P  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àHOLLY€KIRBY€Ô_ÔLILLARDÔ_Ô,€JUDGEÔ#†XéhXXX c Z#ÔÐ @ ÐÌ