WPC /sLIO/$MᝡGk oVp=]T.V]IH%㋊qH KX "XƯh28]$m2Jz>HdLg~sɔTu+Ð=Bm1k_)B?NS~HFiIs_Tu5zyGCK`6]D ۄJ=%nMQD71]OJt18ۭ< 7˔@x$|kqb_HYJ\]ڥ̉@+pLVQb o.]+0 h`bQWjNh V/HeT$suJ8<1Sszf-aY,*5[-ڊ? kC>.hFmoң@Yh+^ڣ9XmeY@hzbUN\ % 0#8   ^ _ zk  V  m w   b(4N  & E022 bA ^ 0D EE M U ] e m u }    b 0 B 0 D3U D- 0K ASS 0 0D A("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    HP LaserJet 4Si,,,,,,0C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\CUSTOM~1\OPINION3.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\Custom WP Templates\opinion3.wpt$(L  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 59?(H\Opinion Summary3|x?\Appellants Attorney Name & Appellant's Name.?\Appellees Attorney Name & Appellee's Name.(#$  0  134567891012 - -(|G26D$ !.8dd8         0  XX d(|3A $ !.8dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3A $ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _TRY,3' LetterX3' Letter 3' Letter3'T     ` # #    h      p      x  @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$AT KNOXVILLE#r#Ԉ ,    @  @`  @  @  @h  @ June2000 X ##XX #XX#%    ROBERTL.TAYLOR%v.MICHELLEBOWERSTAYLOR##XX  ( x @! !  Direct%  %ԀAppealfromthe%  ChanceryCourt% for_Unicoi_%  Ԁ% aCounty 0  @T T No.% ! 5619%!Ԁ% " G.RichardJohnson,Judge%"Ԉ  p    `     h FILEDJULY25,_2000_@*AV) ` dE<` A߈ @     `    @No.E199901774COAR3CV% # %#^Ԁ ?     `     h   %  %Thisappealarisesfromahearinginthe_Unicoi_ԀChanceryCourtonmotionsbytheparties.The  CourtdeterminedthatMichelleTaylorshouldretaincustodyoftheparties'minorchildandthat  RobertTaylorshouldsatisfyhischildsupportarrearage.WeaffirmthejudgmentoftheChancery  CourtandremandforfurtherprocAV)V` d2EV` Aeedings,ifany,consistentwiththisopinion.#XXx#XX   % $   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight%$j ;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed% % %% and _ Remanded  O w HoustonM.Goddard#X2 #XX.,P.J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franksand / D.MichaelSwiney,JJ.% ' %'5 joined. o %  RobertL.Taylor,ProSe%z . O %  % JudithFain,JohnsonCity,Tennessee,fortheappellee,MichelleBowersTaylor.  / @*   `     h     @55' OPINION #XX #%  XXԈ % #    ` Thisisanappealfromajudgmententeredbythe_Unicoi_ԀCountyChanceryCourt o'"% followingahearingconsidering,amongnumerousissues,achangeofcustodyfortheparties'minor _(#& sonandpaymentbytheFatherofhischildsupportarrearage. O)$'    `     h        ` TheChanceryCourtheldthattheFatherfailedtoprovethatachangeofcustodywas ,o'* warranted,andthus,custodyandcontroloftheparties'sonremainedwiththeMother.Inaddition, -_(+ theChanceryCourtheldthattheFatherwasincontemptforrefusaltopaychildsupport,and  therefore,orderedhimtosatisfyhischildsupportarrearage.       `     h      p    `     h    ` WeareunabletoaddressMr.Taylor'sissuesbecausewehaveonlyapartialtranscript p aspartoftheappellaterecord,andalloftheissuesraisedrequireaconsiderationofthefacts.Under `  suchcircumstances,wemustpresumethejudgmentoftheTrialCourtissupportedbysufficient P  evidence.Danielv.MetropolitanGovernment,696S.W.2d8(Tenn.Ct.App.1985). @  @*   ` Inlightoftheforegoing,weconcludethatthisisapropercaseforaffirmance `  pursuanttoRule10(a),RulesoftheCourtofAppeals. P     ` FortheforegoingreasonsthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtisaffirmedandthecause 0  remandedforsuchfurtherproceedingsasmaybenecessaryandcollectionofcostsbelow.Costsof   appealareadjudgedagainstMr.Taylorandhissurety.     `     `     h _________________________________________ p    `     h HOUSTONM.GODDARD,PRESIDINGJUDGE