WPC # VUHa % 0w@n 4   0 0D  0J& 0Tp 0^ 0h" 0r 0| 0x 0 1u 0dU6gB)DC AM U*Vv~v D3f 0@ B AOE 0D  D/O B~HP LaserJet 4HPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLd<09Z 0Courier (W1) RegularX(;d$X|XXX      TRY(3' LetterY(3' Letter3' Letter3' LetterT EDDUDUDӀf|$urier 3|xH((3޵$ ;d!XXXX      TRY3' Letter3' 3' Letter3'T      0  (#$  0  2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Courier New% Line 7 d####7Border 1dd-$C << G<  9p`(Arial  !  #d#"      \R3'\  &&   YYY FILED&X August4,1998CecilCrowson,Jr.&AppellateCourtClerk PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva ....'dxd("$     d-C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! . "      \R3'\       \RA'\7XXdd7  R%'$A1-j| `  `@Rߛ ̀@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALS@ ATKNOXVILLEHEATHERALICIAROACHTHOMSON,) UNIONCHANCERỲ)C.A.NO.03A019705CH00165 Appellant)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.BILLYJOEWHITÈ) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)PATRICKJAMESTHOMSON,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀ Appellee)A.THOMASMONCERET,Knoxville,forAppellantF.D.GIBSON,Maryville,forAppellee@ OPINION McMurray,J. Thisisanappealfromapostdivorceproceedingwhereintheappellantsoughtachangeincustodyofthepartiesminorchildonthegroundsthattherehadbeenamaterialchangeofcircumstancesjustifyingsuchachange.Thetrialcourtdismissedthecomplaintandthisappealresulted.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. Theappellantstatesherissueasfollows:̛̜8  Thetrialcourterredbynotfindingasamatteroflawamaterialchangeofcircumstancesjustifyingachangeofcustodywhenacustodialfatherendangersthehealthsafetyandwelfareofthechildbyneglectingthechild,engaginginviolentbehaviorinfrontofthechildandcohabitating[sic]withanunrelatedfemale. Wefirstwishtomaketheobservationthattheissueasframedisstatedargumentativelyandtheallegederroroflawassertedisnecessarilybaseduponfactsthatmustbedeterminedbythecourtbeforethelawcanbeapplied.Therefore,wechoosetotreattheissueasachallengetothesufficiencyoftheevidence. Ourstandardofreviewisasfollows:"Unlessotherwiserequiredbystatute,reviewoffindingsoffactbythetrialcourtincivilactionsshallbedenovoupontherecordofthetrialcourt,accompaniedbyapresumptionofthecorrectnessofthefinding,unlessthepreponderanceoftheevidenceisotherwise."Rule13(d),TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure.Inadenovoreview,thepartiesareentitledtoareexaminationofthewholematteroflawandfactandthiscourtshouldrenderthejudgmentwarrantedbythelawandevidence.Thornburgv.Chase,606S.W.2d672(Tenn.App.1980);AmericanBuildingsCo.v.White,640S.W.2d569(Tenn.App.1982);TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,Rule36.Wenote,however,thatnosuchpresumptionattachestoconclusionsoflaw.SeeAdamsv.DeanRoofingCo.,715S.W.2d341,343(Tenn.App.1986). Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtreflectsthatthecourtfoundthatonlyonechangeofcircumstancehadoccurredsincetheprevioushearingwhereincustodywasestablished.Thatchangewasthattheappellanthadsincemarried.Upondueconsiderationoftheentirerecordinthiscause,wedonotfindthattheevidencepreponderatesagainstthefindingofthetrialcourt.Wefurtherareoftheopinionthattheevidencedoesestablishbyapreponderanceoftheevidence,thefactsassertedintheappellant'sissue.Afindingofthesefactswouldbenecessarybeforetheappellantcansuccessfullychallengethejudgmentofthecourt.Inessence,theappellantfailedtocarryherburdenofproof.Thus,wefindnoerroronthepartofthetrialcourt. Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtinallrespects.Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourt.Ӝ________________________________̀DonT.McMurray,Judge̜CONCUR:___________________________________HoustonM.Goddard,PresidingJudge___________________________________HerschelP.Franks,Judge  7QXXdXXd7р@ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALS@ ATKNOXVILLEHEATHERALICIAROACHTHOMSON,) UNIONCHANCERỲ)C.A.NO.03A019705CH00165 Appellant)̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)vs.) HON.BILLYJOEWHITÈ) CHANCELLOR̀)̀)̀)̀)̀)PATRICKJAMESTHOMSON,) AFFIRMEDANDREMANDED̀)̀ Appellee)`  X@ JUDGMENT  ThisappealcameontobeheardupontherecordfromtheChanceryCourtofUnionCounty,briefsandargumentofcounsel.Uponconsiderationthereof,thisCourtisofopinionthattherewasnoreversibleerrorinthetrialcourt.%   Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtinallrespects.Costsaretaxedtotheappellantandthiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourt.̜ӛ       PERCURIAM̛