WPCr {!po0nưz&j>&.c%)eܧa 9H7wQ_T _hvjZ޲o@sE!Rs/O 3qē OZGRN Γ2YQz)T :},"7(CwGT%x?{#Z@|MJv E]ӝA ;/><`zҚ#iے w±mPUn&$2Bss)&!k#ϐ "DPMќ!gIvXE} W]Cu)tH =4AffH>.ܛ2K5%Ba-b5~ӲD_ͧI/KC@!㉈$"t90d~8K =LU;$OVDDdi \ a~iTT[ZK.u°*S2>?3qVb#\UB %_ 0e U@ 9 UNA z  ^ w 4     `&N( m**EAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 0KKKK BBB 0_ D3 D-B 0Koo AS  0 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6,,,,0-9 Z*ChelthmITC Bk BT (l{$..8]tdd8      (9 Z(Times New Roman  ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptt-s 9,3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5U- -(G2$ {!.8udXXd8           0  nm d(3U=$ {!.8udXXd8       VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3U=$ {!.8udXXd8       ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK {!.8udd8       _u8XXdd8  @ uINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#u #Ԉ & @ AssignedonBriefsDecember11,2001 L XXu #uXX#  ROGERDALETHOMASv.GAILTHOMASXXu   6 O@TT ChanceryCourtforGilesCounty  6 @ No.9631JimT.Hamilton,Judge  " @*AV) ` dE<` A߈   @ No.M200101226_COA_ԄR3CV_ԄFiledAugust2,_2002__Ԉ   AV) ` dE<|` A }   #uXX{#uuXXu#XXXX#XXXXWilliamC.Koch,Jr.,concurring. v   Thisappealmarksthethirdoccasionforustoreviewadecisionbyatrialcourtinthe N TwentySecondJudicialDistrictemployingthis mediationprocess.Trialcourtsinotherdistricts : haveusedsimilarproceduresaswell.Asthisdecisionshouldmakeclear,thissortofprocedureis &v notmediationand,moreimportantly,isnotagoodidea.Inthefuture,shouldeitherorbothofthe b partiesproposethisprocedure,trialcourtsshouldsimplysayno.TeamDesignv.Gottlieb,No. N M199900911COAR3CV,2002Tenn.App.LEXIS508,at*38(Tenn.Ct.App.July18,2002). : Partieswho,forwhateverreason,desiretoeschewtraditionallitigationhaveampleoptionsfor & alternativedisputeresolutionunderTenn.S.Ct.R.31withoutjuryriggingaprocedureliketheone  usedinthiscase.    IconcurwiththecourtsdecisionthatreliefisnotavailableunderTenn.R.App.P.13(b)in  thiscase.Thepartiescreatedtheirownproceduralquagmire,andweshouldbedisinclinedto r  extricatethemfromitnow.Tenn.R.App.P.36(b)(appellatecourtsarenotrequiredtograntrelief ^!  topartiesresponsibleforanerrororwhofailedtotakereasonablyavailableactiontopreventor J"! nullifytheharmfuleffectofanerror). 6#"    `     h     _____________________________ &6"&    `     h     WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE#XXXX^##uXX#