WPC" #/qbe ;[@pmj+VhHԤ+ՎP1lsa?2} " +@/V,]Nh߸sa5s+,QLƮdׯҐRфuX{熗rݱ7JM 8sly@ Z O2d>6t3/O*[ԝ<($uri2*Z 77V'FezOc4%m0'܉WlfCq5"fY6^rf B/nt" hX#G)/O”0v=G,X SM^Nq 0&`6/jg)4 dƶ%p1_;gC(C\N[f1q<,2XkERk,v<^O6)AsIPqӱ`A1llۆTWxgOx%b#\ % ^ # 0/ w UN 4 z  i x mz   s 9 0DN   E                        b 0 B 0% D5 D- 0K++ ASv 0 0D3 AwHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5e,,,,0xv) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular-vn) C1g C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU  RY$      1  5  _NoissuehasbeenraisedregardingthecommercialreasonablenessoftheTinkhamsdecisiontoselltheir  propertyatauction.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   - -(|G2Y$ !.8dd8         0  5 d(|3Ϧ$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Ϧ$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8aXXdd8  XaX@  XXaINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#XaX #Ԉ &   XXaAssignedonBriefsAugust6,1999#XaX# L  XXaRICKRAYTINKHAM,etal.v.R.JEROMEBEASLEY#XaXD#  J @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforWilsonCounty  J @@No.10511ClaraByrd,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M199902809_COA_ԄR3CVFiledNovember22,2000   AV) ` dE<|` A }     WilliamC.Koch,Jr.,J.,dissenting. d   Thecourthasdecidedthatthevendorsofrealpropertyarenotentitledtodamageswhenthey < wereforcedtosellthepropertyforlessthanitscontractedforpriceafterthebuyerbreachedthe (x contract.Icannotconcurwiththisconclusionfortworeasons.First,itignoresoneofthemost d fundamentalprinciplesofdamages!thatthepurposeofawardingdamagesinbreachofcontract P casesistoplaceinjuredpartiesinthesamepositiontheywouldhavebeeninhadthecontractbeen < fullyperformed.Lamonsv.Chamberlain,909S.W.2d795,801(Tenn.Ct.App.1993);Hennessee ( v.WoodGroupEnters.,Inc.,816S.W.2d35,37(Tenn.Ct.App.1991).Second,itoverlooks  SpringfieldTobaccoRedryersCorp.v.CityofSpringfield,41Tenn.App.254,293S.W.2d189  (1956)inwhichthiscourtapprovedtheprecisemeasureofdamagesemployedbythetrialcourtin  thiscase.    Thefactsaresimpleandtheapplicationofthelawtothefactsisstraightforward.The ` TinkhamscontractedtosellahousetoR.JeromeBeasleyfor$167,000.Mr.Beasleybreachedthe L  contractbyrefusingtoclose,and,inordertomitigatetheirdamages,theTinkhamssoldthehouse 8!  atauctionfor$155,000.  #  1      ׀Thus,becauseofMr.Beasleysbreach,theTinkhamslostthebenefitof $"t! theircontractwithMr.Beasley.InordertoputtheTinkhamsinthepositiontheywouldhavebeen #`" inhadMr.Beasleynotbreachedthecontract,thetrialcourtawardedthem$12,000!thedifference #L# betweenthecontractedforpurchasepriceandtheeventualsaleprice.AccordingtoJudgeFelts, $8 $  thisisthecorrectmeasureofrecovery.SpringfieldTobaccoRedryersCorp.v.CityofSpringfield, %$!% 41Tenn.App.at278,293S.W.2dat200. &"&    `     h     ___________________________________ )$)    `     h     WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE