ÿWPC ŠZñí&ë…t ?ª¥k¼€Áõ¶·_)|ªW!€øšÍ^è.Ìký_¾wÙ\ûœ=¯0ìóéÝØN²);&:gHŠõû~ðM²É¼«,|âœC_ L†ü™á.Ø·ÀÊL (%4Œ–² ?<ÃJ´o'÷(ø>bRÚëG³¡ÝÕõ¬[íë>ÐDÝÎuesoãð!˜ð¯n¾*a•eÀõç Ë<š4Ë]£ƒxÏ-Fm§UÜ"n>+¡uÈÜR®ßE&ËT‹Mnq‰fT“¨™»NØÂY É+0P}õ‰²ób´÷ ÆÑ D¤KZhe‰÷ƒjñ ›’%¥Ò"TuTE¥Õ»§àØ0ƒY§!޼<;Çáî§ÈµXbÓÁ;¡L>ë¿°«ýšËC¦°Y.‡€Ï›jqî4H¦Ñ”gé‰'«©h·‚î–—0s_ŸÉ÷J•W“Å^P|¥f±Ak&"Æ"Ì a ³ÞZD v ))ŽŠ2&l&E`ÛáÞÚb=MÞ…)%ü|b£. ö‰w¹P³È‰½6eA ò5Å`ìEl¯ÜqÔݨ:Óðuv¸àŸ^] $¶šŽá¢“'«ohX û¿á,ZæÔÅÍ#{·,]cÑ#Á %Ï ^ Õ 0ˆá UNi w· 4» zÏ ÒI  * m, C ÆK ÆÆ×ÆNc 0DeeE©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©b«««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««« 0ë³³³³ Bžž 0¤» D3_ D-’ 0K¿¿ AS Æ] 0¤# 0DÇ A«                               D5¶ Bë˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»½|+s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular-C +X⟠˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G25¾$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôñåò»»Ô d(|3É]$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3É]$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»dXXdì8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKK€€€€)ûÿ!dxdxüÿP PdÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€C»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼C»»»ÔÑ8€qXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ü ü ìàÔ‡îRÜCÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼C»îîRÜ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€March€14,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XqX»¼CÔÌò òÔ#†¼C»XXqþ#ÔòòóóJOSEPH€Ô_ÔTURLEYÔ_ÔÔ‡XqX»¼CÔó ó€Ô#†¼C»XXqw#Ôò òv.€FRANCIS€P.€MARINO,€òòET€ALóó.€ó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òÔ€XqX»¼CÔ€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Davidson€CountyÐ  p Ðà@@øøìàNo.€97C„3189€Walter€C.€Kurtz,€JudgeÐ  \ ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<Ï` AßÐ Ð  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„01684„Ô_ÔCOAÔ_Ô„R3„CD€„€Filed€August€14,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ Ë  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<¢` AßÐ £ó  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓAppellant,€Joseph€Turley,€was€charged€with€two€counts€of€criminal€contempt€by€the€trial€court€in€anÐ žî  Ðorder€issued€May€3,€2000.€€The€trial€court€appointed€a€special€prosecutor€to€pursue€this€matter€andÐ ŠÚ Ðappointed€the€public€defender€to€represent€the€appellant.€€The€trial€on€June€15,€2000€resulted€in€a€trialÐ vÆ Ðcourt€finding€of€guilty,€after€which€the€appellant€was€sentenced€to€48€hours€in€jail.€€Ô_ÔTurleyÔ_Ô€appeals,Ð b² Ðand€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€Ð Nž ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ &v ÐÌòòÓ  ÓWilliam€B.€Cain,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòBen€H.€Cantrell,€P.J.,€M.S.óó€andÐ þN ÐòòWilliam€C.€Koch,€Jr.€J.óó,€joined.Ð ê: ÐÌJodie€A.€Bell,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Joseph€Turley.Ð Â ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter€and€Jennifer€L.€Bledsoe,€Assistant€Attorney€General,Ð šê ÐNashville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee,€(Francis€P.€Marino€and€TeresaÐ †Ö ÐÔ_ÔGoldsberryÔ_Ô).€Ð r  ÐÓõÓÌò òOPINIONó óÐ J"š! ÐÌòòóóÓ  Óà  àThe€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure€24(c)€statement€of€the€evidence€filed€byÐ "$r# ÐAppellant€is€not€contradicted€by€the€State€and,€in€its€entirety,€reveals:Ð %^ $ ÐÌà8  àOn€June€15,€2000,€appellant,€Joseph€Turley,€was€convicted€of€one€count€of€criminalÐ æ&6"& Ðcontempt€and€sentenced€to€forty„eight€(48)€hours€in€jail.ÐÒ'"#'Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àThe€contempt€proceedings€arose€from€a€civil€case€where€appellant€was€a€plaintiffÐ ª)ú$) Ðwho€had€sustained€injuries€in€an€automobile€accident.€€The€appellant€was€representedÐ –*æ%* Ðby€attorney€Jack€Green.€€The€defendant€was€Francis€Marino;€Mr.€Marino€wasÐ ‚+Ò&+ Ðrepresented€by€attorney€Jeffrey€Powell.€€At€appellantððs€contempt€trial,€Mr.€PowellÐ n,¾', Ðtestified€that€on€May€3,€2000,€the€morning€of€appellantððs€civil€jury€trial,€pretrialÐ Z-ª(-ý Ðmotions€addressing€the€admissibility€of€appellantððs€prior€criminal€convictions€wereÐ ° Ðheard.€€During€opening€statements,€the€defense€called€appellant€a€ð ðbad€manðð€andÐ œì Ðasked€the€jury€to€have€ð ðbad€men€finish€last.ðð€€At€the€conclusion€of€appellantððs€firstÐ ˆØ Ðwitness,€the€trial€judge€stopped€the€trial€so€that€counsel€for€all€parties€could€confer.€Ð tÄ ÐWhen€court€resumed,€appellantððs€attorney€announced€that€all€parties€had€agreed€toÐ `° Ða€nonsuit.€€The€court€accepted€the€nonsuit€and€instructed€the€parties€to€prepare€theÐ L œ Ðnecessary€paperwork.€€Court€then€adjourned€for€the€day.Ð8 ˆÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àIn€the€courtroom,€counsel€began€discussing€preparation€of€the€final€documentation.€Ð  ` ÐDuring€these€discussions,€appellant,€who€appeared€upset,€walked€towards€the€doorÐ ü L  Ðto€exit€the€courtroom.€€Mr.€Powell€testified€that€as€appellant€was€leaving€the€room,Ð è 8  Ðhe€said€to€his€attorney,€Mr.€Green€ð ðIððm€a€card€carrying€member€of€the€KKK€and€IððmÐ Ô$  Ðnot€speaking€to€that€nigger€lawyer.ðð€€Mr.€Powell€is€an€African„American.€€WordsÐ À  Ðpassed€between€appellant€and€Mr.€Powell,€at€which€time€Mr.€Powell€told€appellantÐ ¬ü  Ðto€ð ðkeep€talking.ðð€€According€to€both€Mr.€Powell€and€Mr.€Marino,€appellant€thenÐ ˜è  Ðaddressed€Mr.€Marino€saying,€ð ðas€soon€as€my€shoulder€is€better,€Iððm€going€to€showÐ „Ô  Ðyou€who€is€afraid.ðð€€Appellant€then€left€the€courtroom.ÐpÀÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àThe€conversation€was€brought€to€the€trial€judgeððs€attention.€€Court€officers€locatedÐ H˜ Ðappellant€and€returned€him€to€court.€€The€trial€judge€informed€appellant€that€he€wasÐ 4„ Ðbeing€charged€with€two€counts€of€contempt,€set€a€bond€of€$3,500.00€and€scheduledÐ  p Ða€hearing€for€May€26,€2000.€€The€judge€subsequently€appointed€attorney€JohnÐ  \ ÐHerbison€as€special€prosecutor.€€On€May€26,€2000,€the€Office€of€the€MetropolitanÐ øH ÐPublic€Defender€was€appointed€to€represent€appellant€and€his€hearing€wasÐ ä4 Ðrescheduled€for€June€15,€2000.ÐÐ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àOn€June€15,€2000,€appellantððs€trial€on€charges€of€criminal€contempt€was€held.€€At€theÐ ¨ø Ðbeginning€of€the€trial,€the€prosecutor€informed€the€trial€judge€that€the€contemptÐ ”ä Ðcharges€had€been€modified€to€one€count€of€criminal€contempt€that€could€be€provenÐ €Ð Ðby€alternative€theories€under€T.C.A.€sections€29„9„102(1)€and€29„9„102(4).€€AfterÐ l¼ Ðhearing€the€testimony€of€Mr.€Powell€and€Mr.€Marino,€appellant€was€found€guilty€ofÐ X ¨ Ðcriminal€contempt.òò2óó€€The€trial€court€findings€included€that€Mr.€Powell,€an€attorney,Ð D!” Ðand€Mr.€Marino,€a€litigant,€were€subjected€to€harassment€and€abuse€by€Mr.€Turley,Ð 0"€  Ðwho€was€also€a€litigant.€€The€trial€court€further€found€that€Mr.€Turleyððs€ð ðwillfulÐ #l! Ðbehavior€was€so€near€to€the€presence€of€the€court€that€it€obstruct[ed]€theÐ $X" Ðadministration€of€justice.ðð€€A€brief€sentencing€hearing,€where€appellant€testified,€wasÐ ô$D # Ðheld.€€Appellant€was€sentenced€to€forty„eight€(48)€hours€in€jail€and€was€given€a€reportÐ à%0!$ Ðdate€to€serve€his€sentence.€€ÐÌ&"%Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àOn€June€27,€2000,€Appellantððs€notice€of€appeal€was€filed€and€his€sentence€wasÐ ¤(ô#' Ðstayed.Ð)à$(Ð Ð  ÐÌÐ h+¸&* Ðà8  à______________________аРР Ðà8  àà ` àÔ_ÔòòÔ‡ôñåòhXqÔ2óóAppellantÔ#†XqXòôñåI#ÔÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔÔ‡ôñåòXXqÔspecificallyÔ_Ô€waived€his€right€to€testify€in€accordance€with€the€requirements€ofÐ œì ÐòòMomon€v.€Stateóó,€18€S.W.3d€152,€162€(Tenn.€Ô_Ô1999).Ô#†XqXòôñå¹#ÔÔ_ÔЈØÐ Ð  ÐÌÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€29„9„102€provides,€in€part:Ð 8ˆ ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€power€of€the€several€courts€to€issue€attachments,€and€inflict€punishmentsÐ  ` Ðfor€contempts€of€court,€shall€not€be€construed€to€extend€to€any€except€the€followingÐ ü L Ðcases:Ðè 8Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` à(1)€The€willful€misbehavior€of€any€person€in€the€presence€of€the€court,€or€soÐ À   Ðnear€thereto€as€to€obstruct€the€administration€of€justice;€Ð¬ü Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„9„102(2000).€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àFor€a€layman€to€utter€the€words€ð ðIððm€a€card€carrying€member€of€the€KKK€and€Iððm€notÐ \¬  Ðspeaking€to€that€nigger€lawyerðð€on€a€public€street€may€be€bullet€proof€under€the€First€AmendmentÐ H˜ Ðto€the€Constitution€of€the€United€States,€but€to€utter€such€words€in€the€sanctity€of€the€courtroom€toÐ 4„ Ðofficers€of€the€court€who€are€in€the€process€of€preparing€documentation€that€they€have€beenÐ  p Ðinstructed€by€the€court€to€prepare€is€a€different€matter€all€together.€€For€that€same€layman,€still€in€theÐ  \ Ðcourtroom,€to€address€his€opponent€in€the€non„suited€civil€case€with€the€threatening€words€ð ðas€soonÐ øH Ðas€my€shoulder€is€better,€Iððm€going€to€show€you€who€is€afraidðð€compounds€the€problem.€€It€is€thisÐ ä4 Ðconduct€by€Mr.€Ô_ÔTurleyÔ_Ô,€after€the€judge€had€left€the€courtroom€but€while€the€attorneys€and€parties€wereÐ Ð  Ðdiscussing€preparation€of€the€documentation€that€had€been€required€of€them€by€the€trial€judge,€thatÐ ¼  Ðis€the€basis€on€which€the€trial€judge€held€Mr.€Turley€to€be€in€criminal€contempt.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àAppellant€relies€primarily€on€òòState€v.€Creasyóó,€885€S.W.2d€829€(Ô_ÔTenn.Crim.AppÔ_Ô.€1994).€€InÐ €Ð Ðthat€case,€the€trial€judge€was€out€of€the€courtroom,€and€the€jury€was€deliberating€the€case.€€TheÐ l¼ Ðdefendant€attempted€to€engage€the€prosecutor,€who€was€still€in€the€courtroom,€in€conversation€tellingÐ X¨ Ðher€to€ð ðtake€your€best€shotðð€and€calling€her€a€ð ðcommunist.ðð€€Even€when€defense€counsel€came€toÐ D” Ðcounselððs€table,€the€defendant€further€referred€to€the€prosecutor€as€a€ð ðcommunistðð€and€a€ð ðdictator.ðð€Ð 0 € ÐThe€trial€judge€held€the€defendant€in€willful€contempt€under€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€29„Ð !l Ð9„102€for€criminal€misbehavior€in€the€presence€of€the€court€or€so€near€thereto€as€to€obstruct€theÐ "X  Ðadministration€of€justice.Ð ô"D! ÐÌà  àThe€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€reversed,€holding€the€evidence€to€be€insufficient€to€supportÐ Ì$ # Ðthe€conviction.€€The€defendant,€Ô_ÔCreasyòòÔ_Ô,óó€had€also€been€convicted€in€the€criminal€proceeding€ofÐ ¸%!$ Ðdisorderly€conduct€in€addition€to€contempt€of€court.€While€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€reversedÐ ¤&ô!% Ðthe€contempt€charge,€it€affirmed€the€conviction€of€Creasy€for€disorderly€conduct.€€The€opinion€of€theÐ 'à"& ÐCourt€of€Criminal€Appeals€was€issued€May€5,€1994.€€The€record€in€the€Creasy€case€shows€that€theÐ |(Ì#' Ðonly€application€to€the€Supreme€Court€for€permission€to€appeal€was€the€Rule€11€application€ofÐ h)¸$( ÐCreasy€filed€on€June€27,€1994.€€The€Supreme€Court€denied€that€application€on€September€19,€1994.€Ð T*¤%) ÐThus,€the€contempt€of€court€issue€was€never€brought€before€the€Supreme€Court€of€Tennessee.Ð @+&* ÐÐ ,,|'+ Ðà  àBarely€two€years€after€permission€to€appeal€had€been€denied€in€the€òòCreasyóó€case,€the€SupremeÐ ° ÐCourt,€on€December€23,€1996,€released€its€opinion€in€òòBlack€v.€Blountóó,€938€S.W.2d€394€(Tenn.€1996).€Ð œì ÐIn€this€case,€the€trial€court€held€the€attorney€for€the€plaintiff€to€be€in€criminal€contempt€of€court,€bothÐ ˆØ Ðfor€his€gestures€to€the€jury€in€court€as€they€announced,€what€he€considered€to€be,€an€inadequateÐ tÄ Ðverdict,€and€for€his€conduct€after€court€had€adjourned€in€berating€members€of€the€jury€in€the€hallwayÐ `° Ðas€they€attempted€to€leave€the€courtroom.€€The€Court€of€Appeals€reversed,€finding€the€evidence€toÐ L œ Ðbe€insufficient€to€support€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€The€court€appointed€òòamicus€curiaeóóÐ 8 ˆ Ðprosecuting€the€contempt€filed€a€Rule€11€application€to€appeal€to€the€Supreme€Court,€whichÐ $ t Ðapplication€was€granted.Ð  ` ÐÌà  àIn€reversing€the€Court€of€Appeals€and€reinstating€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court,€theÐ è 8  ÐTennessee€Supreme€Court€traced€the€history€of€the€contempt€power€from€remote€antiquity€to€theÐ Ô$  Ðpresent€time.€€In€òòBlack€v.€Ô_ÔBlountÔ_Ôóó€the€Supreme€Court€makes€its€only€reference€to€the€òòCreasyóó€case€inÐ À  Ðholding:Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà8  àWe€will€not€disturb€a€verdict€of€guilt€for€lack€of€sufficient€evidence€unless€the€factsÐ „Ô  Ðcontained€in€the€record€and€any€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€facts€areÐ pÀ Ðinsufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€find€the€defendant€guiltyÐ \¬ Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€òòDaugherty,óó€137€Tenn.€at€127,€191€S.W.€at€974;€òòCreasyóó,Ð H˜ Ð885€S.W.2d€at€831.Ð4„Ð Ð  ÐÌòòBlackóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€399.Ð  \ ÐÌà  àReference€to€òòCreasyóó€discloses€that€the€discussion€on€page€831€of€885€S.W.2d€was€the€portionÐ ä4 Ðof€the€òòCreasyóó€opinion€dealing€with€the€disorderly€conduct€conviction€of€Creasy€on€which€theÐ Ð  ÐSupreme€Court€had€denied€an€application€to€appeal.€€The€discussion€in€òòCreasyóó€of€the€contempt€ofÐ ¼  Ðcourt€finding€does€not€begin€until€page€833€of€885€S.W.2d.Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€òòBlackóó€case,€after€a€careful€discussion€òòóóof€the€contempt€powers€of€the€court,€held:Ð €Ð ÐÌà8  àà ` àApplying€these€standards€to€the€facts€of€this€case,€we€find€the€evidenceÐ X ¨ Ðsufficient€to€support€the€trial€courtððs€finding€that€Blountððs€gestures€and€comments€toÐ D!” Ðthe€jury€as€the€verdicts€were€being€read€and€his€comments€and€conduct€outside€theÐ 0"€  Ðcourtroom€toward€the€jurors€and€opposing€counsel,€constitute€willful€misbehavior€soÐ #l! Ðnear€to€the€presence€of€the€court€that€it€obstructs€the€administration€of€justice.€Ð $X" ÐAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€Court€of€Appeals€is€reversed,€and€the€trial€courtððsÐ ô$D # Ðjudgment€finding€Blount€guilty€of€two€counts€of€contempt€is€reinstated.Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  ÐÌòòBlackóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€401.Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àAny€precedential€effect€the€publication€of€òòCreasyóó€may€have€had€on€the€question€of€contemptÐ )à$( Ðof€court€must€yield€to€the€subsequent€pronouncements€of€the€Supreme€Court€of€Tennessee€in€òòBlackóó.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐTherein,€the€supreme€court€held:Ð h+¸&* Їà8  àà ` àWhile€some€courts€have€accepted€the€proposition€that€only€conduct€whichÐ ° Ðactually€interferes€with€a€pending€proceeding€is€punishable€as€contempt€whichÐ œì Ðð ðobstructs€the€administration€of€justice,ðð€we€agree€with€the€cases€above€discussedÐ ˆØ Ðthat€such€a€limited€interpretation€of€the€phrase€ð ðadministration€of€justiceðð€is€bothÐ tÄ Ðunwarranted€and€unwise.€€As€the€òòTanneróó€court€recognized€ð ð[i]t€is€unthinkable€a€courtÐ `° Ðshould€be€so€weak€or€supine,€so€wanting€in€constitutional€power,€as€to€not€be€able€toÐ L œ Ðprotect€its€officers€in€the€proper€discharge€of€their€sworn€duty.ðð€€62€F.2d€at€602.à0@ÒÐ Ð àà x à€€€Ð8 ˆÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àTherefore,€we€explicitly€hold€that€criminal€contempt€of€court€which€obstructsÐ  ` Ðthe€administration€of€justice€includes€all€willful€misconduct€which€embarrasses,Ð ü L  Ðhinders,€or€obstructs€a€court€in€its€administration€of€justice€or€derogates€the€courtððsÐ è 8  Ðauthority€or€dignity,€thereby€bringing€the€administration€of€law€into€disrepute.ÐÔ$ Ð Ð  ÐÌòòId.óóÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€conduct€of€Turley€occurred€so€near€to€the€presence€of€the€court€ð ð.€.€.€as€to€obstruct€theÐ „Ô  Ðadministration€of€justice.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€29„9„102(1).Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àApplying€the€principles€set€out€in€òòBlackóó,€the€trial€court€correctly€held€Turley€to€be€in€criminalÐ H˜ Ðcontempt€of€court;€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€in€all€respects€affirmed.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àCosts€of€this€cause€are€assessed€against€the€AppellantÔ_Ô.Ô_ÔÐ  \ ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ¼  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€B.€CAIN,€JUDGE