ÿWPC% ¶B@TÀ ¥›Z÷kXG) ›ÓwvJ:|ÀW‡öÄÖ5B¡ÔɉróÙþo’“¯ÐÉŸÿÕ‰m¹ýw׿ƒÏ þ»2¥¼wÁ O™tûVÓˆ8ÓÕIßãg±Ûì•!¶êì‡Àp@ÆöÉ;Žõ–|섾¿¹Â<µ¼ÔÍe3^eXÑ>?=JÂï¢uŸb$Žøi¸ÃˆŠ|*Ifö;_íðd˜8;Ì _յл³MSÜæ³«]űÜðù:×'6Fô AŸÁK‡ÖeÈo â4)%Jц£ÂV”x[ô¢E·ì2òfBÆ7ÙØ±DæO®D°@ž½ %X©ÇÄS”YvUÕ¹öMAw4ˆ|.¦(:¡+•~W±tÜ•…id×;¬zP2¸ÃöP'uÛ´-óHíó^«úLž;fâµõ˜‰ûûا‹ÀýÉk^¬>‰°ZèK¶›#Ô>™qø•šçÇ0&0¸™u4/ø² ¶âFö#Zkç§GF+Çe™XCÙI©r°S‘åw§²ªD±UÏiÜSmÔ¿gŸ_,ÏqV¨-©Iߟw½†Y¦lPj*@»tUha\O Er´ÑÊãø|ÀݵNBU|}­ÓgÿºçÙVŠ æ$ÍmŒxX*# LU NW %¥ 04« 0³ßb’w@š4Úîýj AQo 0DÀ  ¦ N­ ^ ¯ » m½ 3Ô õ oü _kÜÊÚ¦U:€ºU:½½½½ B÷Æ 0DÚ 0D 0Dbb D/¦¦ BÕ D3ò˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLhÎ'í€"  Z 6Times New Roman Regular¼( ¤U$¡¡Ó  Ó(c(2w$¤¤Ý ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XŽX¼¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù- o Dp q r s t u v Ó€€  ìu[%3|x united steelworkers v. pollution control board - opinion Î( '  0 .   !"#$&Cþÿ<< Cÿÿ(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ùÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€¼d³¼¼¼ÔÔ€Ѿ ¼¼d³ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€Xa( X ѾÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€29,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó RamageWalkup Tuke YoppCallaway USWA HRADeptGovt Jaco—\%ä ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ )Ý ƒw$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XŽX¼¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€fact€that€Bayou€Steel€used€a€subsidiary,€TV€Acquisition€Corp.,€to€purchase€these€assetsÐ Ü Ðis€not€relevant€to€this€appeal. ëÝ ƒSU$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÎÚX»¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔBayou€Steel€later€withdrew€as€a€party€of€record€in€the€administrative€proceeding. eÝ ƒSU$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÎÚX»¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔòòCompareóó€òòHRA,€Inc.€v.€Tennessee€Depððt€of€Commerce€&€Ins.óó,€914€S.W.2d€512,€515„16Ð Ü Ð(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1995);€€òòMetropolitan€Govððt€v.€Tennessee€Bd.€of€Equalizationóó,€No.€01A01„9108„CH„Ð Ìð Ð00289,€1991€WL€274516,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Dec.€27,€1991)€(No€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€11€applicationÏfiled)€(holding€that€a€summons€must€be€issued€and€served€along€with€the€petition€for€review)€òòwithóóÐ ¬Ð ÐòòJaco€v.€Department€of€Healthóó,€No.€01A01„9507„CH„00285,€1996€WL€200341,€at€*4€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð œ À ÐApril€26,€1996),€òòaffirmedóó,€òòJaco€v.€Department€of€Health,€Bureau€of€Medicaidóó,€950€S.W.2d€350Ð Œ ° Ð(Tenn.€1997)€(holding€that€a€summons€was€not€required).€The€panel€that€issued€the€òòJaco€v.Ð |   ÐDepartment€of€Healthóó€opinion€did€not€call€for€an€en€banc€hearing€as€envisioned€by€Tenn.€Ct.€App.Ð l  ÐInternal€Operating€Procedure€(f).€€ UÝ ƒSU$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÎÚX»¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€model€act€requires€that€a€petition€for€review€must€contain€(1)€the€name€and€mailingÐ Ü Ðaddress€of€the€petitioner,€(2)€the€name€and€address€of€the€agency€whose€action€is€at€issue,€and€(3)€theÏidentity€of€the€persons€who€were€parties€in€any€adjudicative€proceeding€that€led€to€the€agency€actionÏat€issue.€€òòSeeóó€Model€State€Admin.€Procedure€Act€(1981)€ðð€5„109(b),€15€Ô_ÔU.L.A.Ô_Ô€118€(1990). ÒÝ ƒSU$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÎÚX»¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€model€act€requires€that€the€petition€for€review€be€served€on€the€agency€but€only€that€theÐ Ü Ðother€parties€to€the€adjudicatory€proceeding€be€given€notice.€€òòSee€óóModel€State€Admin.€Procedure€ActÐ Ìð Ð(1981)€ðð€5„110,€15€Ô_ÔU.L.A.Ô_Ô€119€(1990). ÐÝ ƒSU$ÝÓ  ÓÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€XÎÚX»¼Ôà ` àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔòòSee€HRA,€Inc.€v.€Tennessee€Ô_ÔDepððtÔ_Ô€of€Commerce€&€Ins.óó,€914€S.W.2d€at€515„16;€òòSouthwestÐ Ü ÐMotor€Freight,€Inc.€v.€Department€of€Commerce€&€Ins.óó,€No.€01A01„9209„CH„00371,€1993€WLÐ Ìð Ð82423,€at€*2„3€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€Mar.€24,€1993)€(No€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€11€application€filed)€(holdingÏthat€the€requirement€of€a€summons€was€waived€by€a€general€appearance);€òòMetropolitan€Ô_ÔGovððtÔ_Ô€v.Ð ¬Ð ÐTennessee€Bd.€of€Equalizationóó,€1991€WL€274516,€at€*2„4.,@ÓÐAZ‹"Arial Regular ùÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€¼d³¼¼¼ÔÔ€Ѿ ¼¼d³ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€Xa( X ѾÔÐ  ÐÌOctober€29,€1998ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,@ÓÐAZ‹"Arial Regular dƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd 'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ¤U!ÝÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ„°ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ7€&®¼¼ddÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€„«„¼¼Ôò òñ ññv ñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@E ±` 8ttxPX°ð  rßñv ññ ññ ññ ñÌà@¡ ¡ DàIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌñ ñßt€ )>.*jx` `€€@E"…` 8ttxPZ€ð  tßñ ñà@ÜÜ)DàAT€NASHVILLEó óˆÐ €Ð ÐÔ€¼&®¼„„«ÔÌÌÌUNITED€STEELWORKERS€OFà  à)Ð * z ÐAMERICA,à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð @  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiff/Appellant,à À àà  à)à p àDavidson€ChanceryÐ l¼  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àNo.€95„3724„IÐ ‚Ò  ÐVS.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð ˜è  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àAppeal€No.Ð ®þ  ÐTENNESSEE€AIR€POLLUTIONà  à)à p à01A01„9605„CH„00235Ð Ä  ÐCONTROL€BOARD,à h àà À àà  à)Ð Ú* Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendant/Appellee.à À àà  à)Ð V ÐÌÌÌÌÔ‡î7€î¼¼&®Ôà@I I DàAPPEAL€FROM€THE€CHANCERY€COURTˆÐ tÄ Ðà@€€&DàFOR€DAVIDSON€COUNTYˆÌà@ÉÉ$DàAT€NASHVILLE,€TENNESSEEˆÌÌÌà@ððDàTHE€HONORABLE€IRVIN€H.€KILCREASE,€JR.,€CHANCELLORˆÌÔ#†¼&®¼îî7€¤#ÔÌÌòòFor€Plaintiff/Appellantóó:à h àà À àà  àà p àà È àòòFor€Defendant/Appelleeóó:Ð ¨%ø  ÐÌW.€Edward€Ramageà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àJohn€Knox€WalkupÐ Ô'$# ÐTuke€Yopp€&€Sweeneyà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ ê(:$  ÐNashville,€TennesseeÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àMelissa€L.€CallawayÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àEnvironmental€DivisionÌÌÌÌÌÌÔ€„«„¼¼&®Ôò òà@%DàREVERSED€AND€REMANDEDó óˆÐ Æ3/* ÐÔ€¼&®¼„„«ÔÌÌÌÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÐ  ²;71d ÐÑܰÑѰ„ÑÔ€„«„¼¼&®Ôò òòòÓ€Óà@ÎÎ)DàO€P€I€N€I€O€NˆÐ Ü ÐÌóóó óÔ€¼&®¼„„«Ôà ` àThis€appeal€involves€a€dispute€over€the€issuance€of€an€operating€permit€by€theÐ  8 ÐTennessee€Division€of€Air€Pollution€Control€for€a€reheat€furnace€at€a€steel€productionÏfacility€in€Rockwood.€€After€the€Division€issued€the€permit,€the€United€SteelworkersÏof€America€sought€an€appeal€and€a€stay€from€the€Tennessee€Air€Pollution€ControlÏBoard.€€The€Board€denied€the€appeal€on€the€ground€that€the€union€lacked€standingÏbecause€it€was€not€an€aggrieved€party.€€The€union€filed€a€timely€petition€for€reviewÏin€the€Chancery€Court€for€Davidson€County,€but€the€trial€court€dismissed€the€petitionÏbecause€the€union€had€failed€to€have€summonses€issued€when€it€filed€its€petition€andÏbecause€the€union€failed€to€make€the€permit€holder€a€party€to€the€judicial€reviewÏproceedings.€€We€have€determined€that€the€union€was€not€required€to€causeÏsummonses€to€be€issued€when€it€filed€its€petition€for€review€and€that€the€unionÏsubstantially€fulfilled€its€statutory€obligation€to€serve€a€copy€of€its€petition€on€theÏpermit€holder.€€Accordingly,€we€reverse€the€order€dismissing€the€unionððs€petition€forÏjudicial€review€and€remand€the€case€for€further€proceedings.ÌÌà@ùù.Dàò òI.ó óˆÐ ƒ"§" ÐÌà ` àIn€early€1995€Bayou€Steel€Corporation€(ð ðBayou€Steelðð),€a€DelawareÏcorporation,€acquired€a€majority€of€the€assets€of€the€Tennessee€Valley€SteelÏCorporation,€including€a€steel€production€facility€in€Rockwood,€Tennessee.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€In€AprilÐ )+#* Ð1995,€Bayou€Steel€applied€to€the€Tennessee€Division€of€Air€Pollution€Control€for€aÏpermit€to€operate€the€reheat€furnace€at€the€Rockwood€facility.€€In€its€application,ÏBayou€Steel€stated€that€it€intended€to€form€another€subsidiary,€Bayou€SteelÏCorporation€(Tennessee)€(ð ðBayou€Steel€(Tennessee)ðð),€to€operate€the€reheat€furnaceÏand€requested€permission€to€continue€to€operate€under€Tennessee€Valley€SteelÏÔ_ÔCorporpationÔ_Ôððs€permit€until€the€Division€issued€a€permit€to€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee).€ÏOn€May€25,€1995,€the€Division€issued€the€permit€to€Bayou€Steel€without€public€noticeÏor€opportunity€to€comment.Ð 630: Їà ` àOn€June€1,€1995,€the€United€Steelworkers€of€America€(ð ðUSWAðð)€filed€aÏpetition€for€appeal€and€a€request€for€a€stay€of€the€Divisionððs€May€25,€1995€decisionÏwith€the€Tennessee€Air€Pollution€Control€Board.€€In€its€petition,€the€USWA€allegedÏthat€it€ð ðexists€to€protect€and€advocate€for€the€various€interests€of€its€individualÏmembers€and€their€familiesðð€and€that€its€members€ð ðwill€suffer€injury€if€the€permit€isÏissued€because€the€emissions€will€adversely€affect€the€air€and€air€quality€in€the€areasÏin€which€these€members€work,€live,€and€recreate.ðð€€Among€other€defects€in€theÏpermitting€process€pointed€out€in€its€petition,€the€USWA€pointed€out€that€the€DivisionÏhad€issued€the€permit€to€Bayou€Steel€rather€than€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee),€the€currentÏoperator€of€the€facility.€€On€July€10,€1995,€the€Division€issued€a€second€Ô_ÔpermtÔ_Ô€toÏBayou€Steel€(Tennessee).€€ÌÌà ` àBayou€Steel€and€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€intervened€in€ñp ñthe€ñp ñUSWAððs€appeal.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀РŒ° ÐThereafter,€Bayou€Steel€and€the€Division€moved€to€dismiss€ñq ñthe€ñq ñUSWAððs€appealÏbecause€the€USWA€was€not€an€aggrieved€party€and,€therefore,€lacked€standing€toÏcomplain€about€the€Divisionððs€decision€to€issue€the€air€permit€to€Bayou€SteelÏ(Tennessee).€€The€Board€heard€the€motions€on€September€13,€1995€and€entered€anÏorder€on€October€2,€1995,€stating€that€ñr ñthe€ñr ñUSWA€lacked€standing€to€pursue€its€appealÏbecause€it€was€not€an€aggrieved€party€and€because€it€had€alleged€only€threatened€orÏpotential€injury€because€the€reheat€furnace€was€not€yet€operating.ÌÌà ` àOn€November€28,€1995,€the€USWA€filed€a€petition€for€review€in€the€ChanceryÏCourt€for€Davidson€County.€The€USWA€also€submitted€three€summonses€addressedÏto€the€Tennessee€Air€Pollution€Control€Board,€the€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€andÏBayou€Steel.€€Bayou€Steelððs€summons€identified€ð ðBayou€Steel€Companyðð€and€theÏð ðDivision€of€Air€Pollution€Controlðð€as€the€respondents€and€listed€Bayou€Steelððs€Ïaddress€as€ð ðBayou€Steel€Corporationðð€in€care€of€its€attorneys.€€Bayou€Steelððs€attorneysÏaccepted€service€of€the€summons€on€November€29,€1995.€€After€the€attorneys€revokedÏtheir€acceptance€of€service€on€January€2,€1996,€the€USWA€prepared€new€summonsesÏfor€Bayou€Steel€and€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€which€were€served€on€the€twoÏcorporationsðð€registered€agents€for€service€of€process€on€January€16,€1996.Ð 781< Їà ` àOn€the€same€day€that€Bayou€Steelððs€attorneys€withdrew€their€acceptance€of€theÏsummons,€the€Board€moved€to€dismiss€the€USWAððs€petition€for€judicial€review€onÏthe€ground€that€the€court€lacked€subject€matter€jurisdiction.€€The€Board€asserted€thatÏthe€trial€court€lacked€subject€matter€jurisdiction€because€the€USWA€failed€to€nameÏBayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€as€a€party€to€its€petition€for€judicial€review€and€because€theÏsummons€to€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€was€not€issued€within€sixty€days€of€the€entryÏof€the€Boardððs€final€order.€€In€response,€the€USWA€moved€under€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.Ï4.09€for€permission€to€amend€its€original€process€naming€ð ðBayou€Steel€CorporationððÏto€add€the€parenthetical€ð ð(Tennessee)ðð.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€theÏUSWAððs€motion€to€amend€its€process€and€granted€the€Boardððs€motion€to€dismiss.€ÏThe€trial€court€explained€that€it€lacked€subject€matter€jurisdiction€over€the€USWAððsÏpetition€for€review€because€the€USWA€had€failed€to€have€a€summons€served€onÏBayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€and€had€failed€to€make€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€a€partyÏwithin€sixty€days€after€the€entry€of€the€Boardððs€final€decision€on€October€2,€1995.€ÏThe€USWA€has€appealed€from€the€dismissal€of€its€petition.ÌÌà@ËË.Dàò òII.ó óˆÐ  @  ÐÌà ` àWe€need€not€tarry€long€with€the€question€concerning€whether€the€USWA€wasÏrequired€to€file€and€serve€a€summons€along€with€its€petition€for€review.€€WhileÏdifferent€panels€of€this€court€had€reached€conflicting€results€while€this€case€wasÏpending€before€the€trial€court,׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€resolved€the€ambiguityÐ P(t"* Ðcreated€by€these€conflicting€decisions€when€it€held€that€ØØthe€right€to€obtain€judicialÏreview€of€administrative€decisions€in€accordance€with€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322Ïâ â(1998)€did€not€depend€on€the€timely€issuance€of€a€summons€when€the€defending€partyÐ <-`'0 Ðin€the€trial€court€was€also€a€party€to€the€administrative€proceeding.€€òòSee€Jaco€v.Ð Ü ÐDepartment€of€Heath,€Bureau€of€Medicaidóó,€950€S.W.2d€350,€353€(Tenn.€1997).Ð €¤ Ðâ âÌà ` àThe€USWA€filed€its€petition€seeking€judicial€review€within€sixty€days€after€theÏentry€of€the€Boardððs€October€2,€1995€order.€€The€parties€implicated€by€that€petitionÏwere€also€parties€to€the€Boardððs€administrative€proceedings.€€Because€the€USWA€wasÏnot€required€to€issue€summonses€to€these€parties€along€with€its€petition€for€review,Ïthe€trial€court€erred€by€holding€that€it€lacked€subject€matter€jurisdiction€solely€becauseÏñs ñthe€Ô_Ôñs ñUSWAÔ_Ô€had€failed€to€cause€a€summons€to€be€issued€and€served€on€Bayou€SteelÏ(Tennessee).ÌÌà@-Dàò òIII.ó óˆÐ è  ÐÌà ` àThe€Board€also€asserts€that€the€trial€court€properly€dismissed€the€petitionÏbecause€the€USWA€failed€to€name€Bayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€as€a€party€in€itsÏNovember€28,€1995€petition€for€review.€€This€argument,€like€the€earlier€one€regardingÏthe€necessity€of€a€summons,€is€inconsistent€with€the€plain€meaning€of€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2)€and€overlooks€the€fact€that€the€parties€to€a€contested€caseÏproceeding€are€parties€to€the€judicial€review€proceeding€by€operation€of€law.ÌÌà ` àThe€Uniform€Administrative€Procedures€Act€contains€two€requirements€forÏseeking€judicial€review€of€a€final€agency€decision€in€a€contested€case€proceeding.€ÏThe€first€requirement€involves€the€deadline€for€filing€the€petition€for€review.€€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(1)€requires€persons€aggrieved€by€a€final€decision€in€aÏcontested€case€to€file€a€petition€for€review€within€sixty€days€after€the€entry€of€theÏagencyððs€final€order.€€This€deadline€is€mandatory€and€jurisdictional,€and€failure€toÏadhere€to€it€is€fatal€for€those€seeking€judicial€review€of€an€administrative€decision.€Ð „0¨*4 ÐòòSee€Bishop€v.€Department€of€Correctionóó,€896€S.W.2d€557,€558€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1994).Ð (2L,6 ÐÌà ` àThe€second€requirement€is€that€the€person€seeking€judicial€review€notify€theÏproper€persons€that€it€has€initiated€judicial€review€of€the€agency€decision.€€In€thisÏregard,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2)€provides:Ð ¸8Ü2> ÐÓ€Óà8 ` àà8¸ ` (#` (#àCopies€of€the€petition€shall€be€served€upon€the€agency€andÏall€parties€of€record,€including€the€attorney€general€andÏreporter,€in€accordance€with€the€provisions€of€theÏTennessee€Rules€of€Civil€Procedure€pertaining€to€serviceÏof€process.Ð ¸ Ð ¸ Ð  ÐÌÓ€ÓThis€provision€differs€from€the€Model€State€Administrative€Act€and€other€statesððÏadministrative€procedures€acts€in€that€it€does€not€contain€detailed€requirements€for€theÏcontents€of€the€petition€for€review,ØØÔ_Ô׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€does€not€draw€a€distinction€between€service€of€theÐ ´Ø  Ðpetition€on€the€agency€and€providing€notice€to€the€other€parties,Ô_Ô׃P×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€and€does€not€provideÐ X|  Ða€deadline€for€effecting€service€or€notice.ÌÌà ` àOur€responsibility€is€to€construe€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2)€withoutÏunduly€restricting€its€coverage€or€expanding€it€beyond€its€intended€scope.€€òòSee€PerryÐ è  Ðv.€Sentry€Ins.€Co.óó,€938€S.W.2d€404,€406€(Tenn.€1996);€òòÔ_ÔKulturaÔ_Ô,€Inc.€v.€SouthernÐ Œ° ÐLeasing€Corp.óó,€923€S.W.2d€536,€539€(Tenn.€1996).€€We€must€derive€a€statuteððsÐ 0T Ðmeaning€from€its€words,€òòsee€State€v.€Ô_ÔLevandowskiÔ_Ôóó,€955€S.W.2d€603,€604€(Tenn.Ð Ôø Ð1997);€òòRiggs€v.€Ô_ÔBursonÔ_Ôóó,€941€S.W.2d€44,€54€(Tenn.€1997),€and€when€the€statutoryÐ xœ Ðlanguage€is€clear,€we€must€enforce€the€statute€as€written.€€òòSee€Hawks€v.€City€ofÐ  @ ÐÔ_ÔWestmorelandÔ_Ôóó,€960€S.W.2d€10,€16€(Tenn.€1997);€òòDavis€v.€Reaganóó,€951€S.W.2d€766,Ð À!ä  Ð768€(Tenn.€1997).ÌÌà ` àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2)€could€not€be€clearer.€€It€simply€requires€theÏperson€seeking€judicial€review€of€an€administrative€agencyððs€financial€decision€toÏserve€a€copy€of€its€petition€for€review€on€the€administrative€agency,€the€AttorneyÏGeneral€and€Reporter,€and€the€parties€of€record€in€the€contested€case€proceeding.€ÏNothing€in€this€statute,€nor€in€any€other€statute€for€that€matter,€prescribes€the€contentsÏof€the€petition€for€review€or€requires€the€person€seeking€judicial€review€of€an€agencyÏdecision€to€take€any€other€step€to€perfect€its€right€to€judicial€review.€€Even€theÐ „0¨*2 Ðpreparation€and€filing€of€the€administrative€record€is€the€agencyððs€responsibility.€€òòSeeóóÐ Ü ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(d).ÌÌà ` àOur€earlier€decisions€construing€the€requirements€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„¼322(b)(2)€have€been€colored€by€the€mistaken€conclusion€that€persons€seeking€judicialÏreview€of€administrative€decisions€were€required€to€cause€summonses€to€be€servedÏon€the€parties€to€the€administrative€proceeding.Ô_Ô׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô_Ô€€Even€though€the€Tennessee€SupremeÐ ´Ø  ÐCourt€put€that€issue€to€rest€in€òòJaco€v.€Department€of€Health,€Bureau€of€Medicaidóó,Ð X|  Ðdicta€in€the€Courtððs€opinion€still€clouds€the€meaning€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„¼322(b)(2).€€In€its€òòJaco€óóopinion,€the€Court€noted€that€the€decision€in€the€òòHRA,€Inc.€v.Ð  Ä ÐTennessee€Ô_ÔDepððtÔ_Ô€of€Commerce€&€Ins.óó€that€the€petitioner€had€failed€to€preserve€itsÐ Dh Ðright€of€judicial€review€was€ð ðclearly€correct,ðð€but€the€Court€never€explained€how€itÏarrived€at€that€conclusion.€€òòSee€Jaco€v.€Department€of€Health,€Bureau€of€Medicaidóó,Ð Œ° Ð950€S.W.2d€at€353.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€two€cornerstones€of€this€courtððs€òòHRA,€Inc.óó€decision€were€(1)€that€Tenn.Ð xœ ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)€required€the€issuance€and€service€of€a€summons€in€additionÏto€the€service€of€the€petition€for€review€and€(2)€that€a€contested€case€proceeding€andÏthe€judicial€review€of€the€outcome€of€a€contested€case€proceeding€were€distinct€andÏseparate.€€òòSee€HRA,€Inc.€v.€Tennessee€Ô_ÔDepððtÔ_Ô€of€Commerce€&€Ins.óó,€914€S.W.2d€at€514„Ð %,& Ð516.€€The€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€later€repudiated€both€these€notions€when€it€heldÏthat€petitions€for€review€could€be€served€without€summonses,€òòsee€Jaco€v.€DepartmentÐ P(t"* Ðof€Health,€Bureau€of€Medicaidóó,€950€S.W.2d€at€354,€and€that€judicial€review€of€anÐ ô)$, Ðadministrative€order€€was€ð ða€continuing€proceeding€in€which€the€parties€haveÏ[already]€been€determined€and€are€of€record.ðð€€òòJaco€v.€Department€of€Health,€BureauÐ <-`'0 Ðof€Medicaidóó,€950€S.W.2d€at€352.€With€these€cornerstones€removed,€it€is€difficult€toÐ à.)2 Ðperceive€precisely€how€our€conclusion€that€the€petitioner€in€òòHRA,€Inc.óó€had€failed€toÐ „0¨*4 Ðpreserve€its€right€of€judicial€review€could€be€correct.Ð (2L,6 Їà ` àThe€entity€seeking€judicial€review€in€the€òòHRA,€Inc.óó€case€filed€a€timely€petitionÐ Ü Ðfor€review€naming€only€the€Commissioner€of€the€Department€of€Commerce€andÏInsurance.€€It€also€served€a€copy€of€its€petition€on€the€administrative€law€judge€whoÏpresided€over€the€contested€case€proceeding,€the€chief€counsel€of€the€Department€ofÏCommerce€and€Insurance,€and€the€attorney€representing€the€other€party€to€theÏcontested€case€proceeding.€€It€did€not,€however,€serve€the€Attorney€General€andÏReporter,€as€required€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2).ÌÌà ` àIn€light€of€the€plain€language€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2),€theÏTennessee€Supreme€Courtððs€dicta€in€òòJacoóó€concerning€the€correctness€of€the€result€ofÐ  Ä Ðour€òòHRA,€Inc.óó€opinion€could€only€have€been€based€on€the€petitionerððs€failure€to€serveÐ Dh Ðthe€Attorney€General€and€Reporter.€€It€could€not€have€been€based€on€the€petitionerððsÏfailure€to€name€all€possible€parties€in€its€petition€for€review€or€to€serve€all€partiesÏwithin€sixty€days€after€the€entry€of€the€final€administrative€order€because€theseÏrequirements€cannot€be€found€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b).ÌÌà ` àThe€purpose€of€the€service€requirement€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2)€isÏto€ensure€that€the€proper€parties€have€notice€that€the€court€has€been€asked€to€reviewÏthe€administrative€decision.€€òòSee€Southwest€Motor€Freight,€Inc.€v.€Department€ofÐ d#ˆ$ ÐCommerce€&€Ins.óó,€1993€WL€82423,€at€*3;€òòsee€also€Wisconsin€Ô_ÔEnvððtlÔ_Ô€Decade,€Inc.€v.Ð %,& Ðñt ñPublic€Serv.€Ô_ÔCommððnÔ_ÔÔ_Ôñt ññt ñDepartment€ofñt ñÔ_ÔÔ_Ôñt ñ€Naturalñt ñÔ_ÔÔ_Ôñt ñ€Resourcesñt ñóó,Ô_Ô€267€N.W.2d€609,€617„18€(Wis.€1978).€€Notice€is€adequate€asÐ ¬&Ð ( Ðlong€as€the€party€to€whom€notice€must€be€given€is€aware€of€the€judicial€reviewÏproceeding€in€sufficient€time€to€prepare,€appear,€and€be€heard.€€òòSee€WilliamsburgÐ ô)$, ÐTruck€Plaza€v.€Ô_ÔMuriÔ_Ôóó,€857€S.W.2d€534,€537€(Mo.€Ct.€App.€1993).€Thus,€as€long€asÐ ˜+¼%. Ðadequate€notice€has€been€given,€substantial€compliance€with€the€notice€requirementÏwill€be€sufficient.€€òòSee€Hall€v.€Seattle€Sch.€Dist.€1óó,€831€P.2d€1128,€1130€(Wash.€Ct.Ð à.)2 ÐApp.€1992).€€€€ÌÌà ` àNothing€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€4„5„322(b)(2),€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€4,€or€in€anyÏother€statute€or€rule,€provides€a€deadline€for€serving€the€administrative€agency,€theÏAttorney€General€and€Reporter,€and€the€other€parties€of€record€in€the€administrativeÏproceeding€with€a€copy€of€the€petition€for€review.€€In€this€case,€the€USWA€filed€itsÐ ¸8Ü2> Ðpetition€for€review€on€November€28,€1995.€€It€served€Bayou€Steelððs€attorneys€with€aÏcopy€of€the€petition€on€November€29,€1995,€and€it€served€both€Bayou€Steel€andÏBayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€on€January€16,€1996.€€Under€these€factual€circumstances,ÏBayou€Steel€(Tennessee)€received€timely€notice€of€the€USWAððs€petition€for€reviewÏbecause€it€would€have€been€afforded€ample€time€to€prepare,€appear,€and€be€heard€withÏregard€to€the€USWAððs€legal€arguments€that€the€Board€had€erred€by€dismissing€itsÏappeal€on€the€ground€that€it€lacked€standing€to€challenge€the€Divisionððs€issuance€ofÏa€permit€to€operate€the€reheat€furnace.ÌÌà@¥¥.Dàò òIV.ó óˆÐ  Ä ÐÌà ` àWe€reverse€the€order€dismissing€the€petition€for€review€filed€by€the€UnitedÏSteelworkers€of€America€and€remand€the€case€to€the€trial€court€with€directions€to€hearÏand€decide€the€standing€issue€in€the€USWAððs€petition€on€its€merits.€€We€also€tax€theÏcosts€of€this€appeal€to€the€State€of€Tennessee.€€ÌÌÓ€Óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à______________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌ__________________________________ÌHENRY€F.€TODD,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌMIDDLE€SECTION€ÌÌÌÌ__________________________________ÌBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGEñu ñ€Ð  l/). ÐÑ8€zþ¼»d¼»d8ÑÔ€„Ý¿„»¼zþÔò òà@  DàÔ‡ FD !»¼zþÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ Ü Ðà@ZZ)DàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†„Ý¿„ ! FDŒU#Ôó óˆÐ B ÐÔ‡¼zþ»»¼zþÔÌÌUNITED€STEELWORKERS€OFà  à)Ð  ´ ÐAMERICA,à ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð ¨ Ì Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àPlaintiff/Appellant,à À àà  à)à p àDavidson€ChanceryÐ Ø ü Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àNo.€95„3724„IÐ ð  ÐVS.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ð ,  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à p àAppeal€No.Ð  D  ÐTENNESSEE€AIR€POLLUTIONà  à)à p à01A01„9605„CH„00235Ð 8\  ÐCONTROL€BOARD,à h àà À àà  à)Ð Pt  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àDefendant/Appellee.à À àà  à)Ð €¤ ÐÌÔ#†„Ý¿„»¼zþ?V#Ôò òòòà@cc(DàÔ‡ FD !»¼zþÔJ€U€D€G€M€E€N€TÔ#†„Ý¿„ ! FDfZ#Ôóóó óˆÐ °Ô ÐÔ€¼zþ»„„Ý¿ÔÌÓ€ÓÔ‡Š\ ‹»¼zþÔà ` àThis€cause€came€on€to€be€heard€upon€the€record€on€appeal€from€the€Davidson€CountyÐ  . ÐChancery€Court,€the€briefs€of€the€parties,€and€arguments€of€counsel.€€Upon€consideration€ofÏthe€entire€record,€this€court€finds€and€concludes€that€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€should€beÏreversed.ÌÌà ` àIn€accordance€with€the€opinion€filed€contemporaneously€with€this€judgment,€it€is,Ïtherefore,€ordered,€adjudged,€and€decreed€that€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€be€and€is€herebyÏñl ñreversedñl ññu ññm ñ___ñm ññu ñ,€that€the€cause€be€remanded€to€the€trial€court€for€further€proceedings€consistent€withÏthis€courtððs€opinion,€and€that€the€costs€be€taxed€in€the€manner€provided€in€this€judgment.ÌÌà ` àIt€is€further€ordered€that€the€costs€of€this€appeal€be€taxed€ñn ñto€the€State€of€Tennesseeñn ññu ñño ñ___ño ññu ñ.ÌÔ#†¼zþ» ‹Š\[#ÔÌÓ€Óà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à__________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àHENRY€F.€TODD,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àMIDDLE€SECTION€ÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à__________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àBEN€H.€CANTRELL,€JUDGE€ÌÌÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à__________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àWILLIAM€C.€KOCH,€JR.,€JUDGEñu ñ