WPCUE N2&N1f֩wM}W,8@q@wjK8bE'tD'sxoJTs_*^%(*z!C@3N}C N <]jCr9D\ r y$HN%ÍPy%ٖ+"`-˨\%#RW,]ذ37pugk&N_ Dd|Q2Rb+Y r-eb~κt.2N!YpNz%RGihx Hr>͈O^E]3`Xd`c i# % ^ 0 U8N! wo 4s z    m   \ 0D"Nfch 0UE  0" 0 0 0 0B 0 0 0I 0 0 0 03 0 0 0( 0 0X 0 0 0u 0%! 0! 0s"b# 0# 0# 0C$ 0$ 0% 0=& 0>& 09' 01( 0) 0) 0* 0+ 0, 0U- 02'. 0Y. 0:U/ 0Y/ 0_/ 0 G0 0Q1 02 B*4 D/5 025 D/87 0g7 0658 0k8 0:s9 0^9 0< : 1eG:U6: 0:U->;U* < 0N5< B< 1u< 0= D5= D-= 0K> 72f> AS>> 0? 0DU@ A@ DA TAdAdAdAdAOB\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK4,,,,0\1 (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularփF1b014c2 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU  R|#$      1    _ThetrialcourtsubsequentlygrantedAvisRentaCarsummaryjudgment,andPlaintiffhasnotappealedthis  ruling.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0   Y R|#$      2    _Nowhereintherecordorthepartiesbriefsisthereatranslationorotherexplanationastowhatthesewords  mean,butthetranslationisnotrelevanttothedispositiveissuesofthisappeal.*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &  */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   (88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  - -(,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   0AA.Normal  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition T  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  <AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(hh&H1  5+ ` hp x 5      5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H2  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H3  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H4  5+ ` hp x 5 XXX 5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H5  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  (]]&H6  5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 5  2DD0Address  5+ ` hp x 55+ ` hp x 5  8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted  /%  ,Kk %#/KQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/  <:zBottom of 7G(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?T%2A`Arial?  SS\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  &  d dF)1dxd<:zTop of For7I(X7    5+ ` hp x 5?T%2A`Arial?  SS\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X75+ ` hp x 5  F)2dxd0KS.SampleKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKQ<6X9`(Courier NewKSS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB   !"#$%& 35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.<6X9`(Courier New(|G2|#$ !.8%dd8         0  \  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial(O$ d3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(|3j$ !.8%dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  Wi)^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3j$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKKSDU_8SDU_3 R|#$      3    _SyTenn.CodeAnn.281105(a)#Sy~#. Hamblen COATenn.R.Civ.P. P.J.BeierMorristownSchutzenstrDietikonUnbekanntInconnuSconosciutodispositiveTenn.R.App.P.movant BainCarvellTenn.ApptortfeasorMcClungTenn.App.M.S.StempaWalgreenTillmanHaffeycaselawTenn.CodeGrubbsPilkingtonTenn.App.W.S.BallardArdenhaniBorchersKreggerb]etween !.8%dd8     _  %8RXXdd8  @ 4%INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#%4 #Ԉ &   September20,2004Session L XRX% #%XXR#CHARLESH.WEBBv.CHRISTIANWERNER,etal.XRX%  J @@ InterlocutoryAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforHamblenCounty  J @@No.00CV018JohnK.Wilson,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200400520_COA_ԄR9CVFILEDOCTOBER28,_2004_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     #%XXRt#  XRX%ThisisanautomobileaccidentcasewhereinthePlaintiffsuedthedriveroftheothervehicle, x  ChristianWerner,aSwisscitizen,andAllstateInsuranceCompany,Plaintiffsuninsuredmotorist d insurancecarrier.Allstatemovedforsummaryjudgment,allegingthatsincePlaintifffailedtoobtain P timelyserviceofprocessagainstWerner,pursuanttoTenn.R.Civ.P.3,thePlaintiffsactionwas < barredbytheoneyearstatuteoflimitations.ThetrialcourtgrantedAllstatesummaryjudgmentas (x regardsPlaintiffspersonalinjuryclaim.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtinthis d interlocutoryappeal. P  Tenn.R.Civ.P.9InterlocutoryAppealbyPermission;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourt ( Affirmed;CaseRemanded     SharonG.Lee,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichHerschelP.Franks,P.J.and  CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,J.,joined.  DouglasR.Beier,Morristown,forAppellantCharlesH.Webb. ` KennethW.Ward,Knoxville,forAppelleeAllstateInsuranceCompany. 8!   OPINION  #`"      @  I.FactualBackground $8 $  }   PlaintiffandtheDefendantChristianWernerwereinjuredinanautomobilecollisionon &"& March22,1999.OnJanuary12,2000,PlaintifffiledtheinstantlawsuitagainstWerner,who '"' Plaintiffallegedrearendedhisvehicle;AvisRentaCar,whichallegedlyrentedtoWernerthe (#( vehiclehewasdriving;  #  1      ׀andAllstate,Plaintiffsuninsuredmotoristinsurancecarrier.Thesameday |)$) Plaintifffiledhiscomplaint,asummonswasissuedtoWernerattheaddresslistedonthepolice h*%* report,Schutzenstr25,8953,Dietikon,Switzerland,01141796015682.Thissummonswasnotsent  toSwitzerlandbutwasretainedbyPlaintiffscounselwho,accordingtohisaffidavitfiledFebruary  3,2003,attemptedtopersonallyserveWernerinHamblenCounty,Tennessee.Wernerwasnever  servedwithprocess.Asummons,whichwasissuedtoAllstateonJanuary12,2000,wasservedon t Allstate. `   OverayearpassedandonNovember27,2001,Plaintiffcausedanaliassummonstobe 8  issuedtoWerneratthesameSwitzerlandaddress.Plaintiffalsocausedanaliassummonstobe $ t issuedtoWernerthroughtheTennesseeSecretaryofState.Bothofthesealiassummonseswere  ` returnedtothecourt,marked Unbekannt,Inconnu,Sconosciuto. #  2      ׀  L    AllstatefiledamotionforsummaryjudgmentonFebruary5,2002,allegingthatPlaintiff $  failedtoobtainserviceofprocessonWernerasrequiredbyTenn.R.Civ.P.3,andthathisclaimmust   failduetotheapplicableoneyearstatuteoflimitationsforpersonalinjuriesfoundatTenn.Code   Ann.283104.ThetrialcourtgrantedAllstatesmotionwithrespecttoPlaintiffsclaimfor   personalinjuries.Plaintiffmovedforpermissiontotakeaninterlocutoryappealofthecourts   decisionpursuanttoTenn.R.App.P.9,whichthetrialcourtandthiscourtgranted. p   II.IssuePresentedforReview H  X  ThesoleissueraisedbyPlaintiffinthisappealiswhetherthetrialcourterredingranting h summaryjudgmenttoAllstateregardingPlaintiffspersonalinjuryclaim. T    III.StandardofReview ,  2 ?+ ` hp x X?  SO S P !"#$%&(03WSX XXXR    2  ݀Amotionforsummaryjudgmentshouldbegrantedwhenthemovantdemonstratesthatthereare O nogenuineissuesofmaterialfactandthatthemovingpartyisentitledtoajudgmentasamatterof ; law.Tenn.R.Civ.P.56.04.Thepartymovingforsummaryjudgmentbearstheburdenof ' demonstratingthatnogenuineissueofmaterialfactexists.#XRX XSX#SX XXXRBainv.Wells,#XRX XSX#SX XXXRԀ936S.W.2d618,622  (Tenn.1997).Onamotionforsummaryjudgment,thecourtmusttakethestrongestlegitimateview  oftheevidenceinfavorofthenonmovingparty,allowallreasonableinferencesinfavorofthat   party,anddiscardallcountervailingevidence.#XRX XSXb#SX XXXRId.#XRX XSX#SX XXXRԀIn#XRX XSX3#SX XXXRByrdv.Hall,#XRX XSX|#SX XXXRԀ847S.W.2d208(Tenn.1993),our ! SupremeCourtstated:% b #XRX XSX#%b8SX XXXR26݌ s"  Ќ XX   2 ?+ ` hp x X?  ` 0  0` xx  2   Onceitisshownbythemovingpartythatthereisnogenuineissue $" ofmaterialfact,thenonmovingpartymustthendemonstrate,by % # affidavitsordiscoverymaterials,thatthereisagenuine,materialfact v&!$ disputetowarrantatrial....Inthisregard,Rule56.05[nowRule b'"% 56.06]providesthatthenonmovingpartycannotsimplyrelyuponhis N(#& pleadingsbutmustsetforth#XRX XSXy#SX XXXRspecificfacts#XRX XSX#SX XXXRԀshowingthatthereisa  genuineissueofmaterialfactfortrial.#XRX XSX #SX XXXR2݌` x` x Ќ XX   ` e2 ?+ ` hp x X?  2Z!  Id.#XRX XSX #SX XXXRԀat211(citationsomitted)(emphasisinoriginal). + 2Z!!݌̌ XX     Summaryjudgmentisonlyappropriatewhenthefactsandthelegalconclusionsdrawnfrom  V thefactsreasonablypermitonlyoneconclusion.#XRX XSX "#SX XXXRCarvellv.Bottoms,#XRX XSX##SX XXXRԀ900S.W.2d23,26(Tenn.1995).  B Sinceonlyquestionsoflawareinvolved,thereisnopresumptionofcorrectnessregardingatrial  . court'sgrantofsummaryjudgment.#XRX XSX##SX XXXRBain,#XRX XSX$#SX XXXRԀ936S.W.2dat622.Therefore,ourreviewofthetrial   court'sgrantofsummaryjudgmentis#XRX XSXG%#SX XXXRdenovo#XRX XSX%#SX XXXRԀontherecordbeforethiscourt.#XRX XSXH&#SX XXXRWarrenv.Estateof   Kirk,#XRX XSX&#SX XXXRԀ954S.W.2d722,723(Tenn.1997).     @$ IV.Analysis     InsupportofitsargumentthatthetrialcourtcorrectlydismissedPlaintiffspersonalinjury C  claimagainstAllstatebecauseheallowedhisclaimagainstWernertolapse,Allstatereliesonthe / rulestatedasfollowsinWintersv.Jones,932S.W.2d464(Tenn.App.1996): k 8  8`   Aplaintiffwhofailstoestablishlegalliabilityagainstadefendant  tortfeasorcannotimposeliabilityuponheruninsuredmotoristcarrier  fortheactsofthatsametortfeasor...Thus,whenthroughinattention q orneglectaplaintiffallowshercauseofactionagainstthetortfeasor ] tolapse,sheisprecludedfromobtainingarecoveryfromtheinsurer I aswell. 5` x` x  Winters,932S.W.2dat46566(citationsomitted);seealsoHooperv.StateFarmMut.Auto.Ins.  Co.,682S.W.2d505,507(Tenn.App.1984). Therefore,ifPlaintifffailedtosatisfytherequirements  ofTenn.R.Civ.P.3asregardsWerner,thenthetrialcourtsgrantofsummaryjudgmentinAllstates  favormustbeaffirmed.  s    TennesseeRuleofCivilProcedure3providesasfollows: "= #XRX XSX!'#*?+ ` hp x X?  8  8`   SX XXXRAllcivilactionsarecommencedbyfilingacomplaintwiththeclerk k%  ofthecourt.Anactioniscommencedwithinthemeaningofany W&!  statuteoflimitationsuponsuchfilingofacomplaint,whetherprocess C'"! beissuedornotissuedandwhetherprocessbereturnedservedor /(#" unserved.Ifprocessremainsunissuedfor30daysorisnotserved )k$# within30daysfromissuance,regardlessofthereason,theplaintiff *W%$ cannotrelyupontheoriginalcommencementtotolltherunningofa *C&% statuteoflimitationsunlesstheplaintiffcontinuestheactionby +/'& obtainingissuanceofnewprocesswithinoneyearfromissuanceof  thepreviousprocessor,ifnoprocessisissued,withinoneyearofthe  filingofthecomplaint.(Emphasisadded)#XRX XSX-#` x` x -SX XXXR  OurSupremeCourthasrecentlystatedthefollowinginconstruingtherequirementsof  V Rule3inrelationtotheTennesseesavingstatute:d #  3      ׀   p   B   8  8`   Rule3anticipatesthat,whenaplaintiffhasfailedtoserveprocesson p  adefendantwithinthirtydaysofcommencement,theplaintiffwill \  continuetheactionbyissuingprocessontheoriginalcomplaint H  withinoneyearofpriorissuance,orifnopriorissuance,withinone 4  yearoffilingthecomplaint. p ` x` x    `    *0 h 0h(#h(#*0(#(#0p(#(#*_ p(#p(# 8  8`   WeholdthatRule3permitsaplaintiffwhohasnotissuedprocess   withinthirtydaysorhasnotservedprocesswithinthirtydaysof  issuancetorelyupontheoriginalcommencementdatetosatisfya v statuteoflimitationsonlyiftheplaintiffcontinuestheactionwithin b oneyearoffirstissuance,orifnoissuancehasoccurred,withinone N yearoffilingthecomplaint,byissuingnewprocessontheoriginal : complaint.&v` x` x Fryev.BlueRidgeNeuroscienceCenter,P.C.,70S.W.3d710,71617(Tenn.2002)(emphasisin  original);seealsoClarkv.McClung,2003WL22994304at*5,C/ANo.M200300552COAR3  CV(Tenn.App.M.S.filedNov.4,2003)( AsStempa[v.WalgreenCo,70S.W.2d39 | (Tenn.App.2001)]andTillman[v.Haffey,63S.W.3d367(Tenn.App.2001)]confirm,Tenn.R.Civ.P. h 3imposesastrictoneyeartimeframeinwhichprocessmustbeissuedorreissuedtotollthestatute T oflimitations.). @   Asnotedabove,PlaintiffissuedprocesstoWernerattheSwitzerlandaddressonJanuary12, ! 2000.ThisprocesswasneversenttoSwitzerlandnorwasiteverserved.Plaintiffdidnot " subsequentlyattempttoreissueprocessuntilNovember27,2001,roughly22monthslater.These # factsarenotindispute;however,PlaintiffarguesthattheTennesseeuninsuredmotoriststatute, $ Tenn.CodeAnn.5671206(d),operatestorelievehimoftheoneyearrequirementof n%  Tenn.R.Civ.P.3.Tenn.CodeAnn.5671206(d)providesasfollows: Z&!! U3S'<#'"#XRX XSX 2#?+ ` hp x X?  8  8`   SX XXXR(d)Intheeventthatserviceofprocessagainsttheuninsuredmotorist, '<#" whichwasissuedtothemotorist'slastknownaddress,isreturnedby (($# thesherifforotherprocessservermarked,"Nottobefoundinmy )%$ county,"orwordstothat% c #XRX XSX=#%cA?SX XXXReffect,orifserviceofprocessisbeingmade  uponthesecretaryofstateforanonresidentuninsuredmotoristand  theregisterednoticetothelastknownaddressisreturnedwithout  serviceontheuninsuredmotorist,theserviceofprocessagainstthe t uninsuredmotoristcarrier,pursuanttothissection,shallbesufficient ` forthecourttorequiretheinsurertoproceedasifitistheonly L  defendantinsuchacase.8 ` x` x #XRX XSX?#SX XXXR  TherecordcontainsacopyofthesummonsissuedtoWerneronJanuary12,2000atthe   Switzerlandaddress,withahandwrittennotationatthebottom,stating wasunabletolocateand    findtheDefendantinHamblenCounty...failedtoservethissummonswithin30daysafterits   issuancebecause[Defendant]nottobefoundinHamblenCountyw/in30days,andsignedby z  Plaintiffscounsel.Thereisnodateindicatingwhenthesummonswasreturnedorwhenthenote f  atthebottomwaswritten.Thereisalsonoindicationintherecordthatthisdocumentwaseverfiled R  withthetrialcourt.#XRX XSXB#SX XXXR#S XSX#SX XS >  =#XRX XSX#E#SX XXXR    TherecordalsocontainsahandwrittenaffidavitofPlaintiffscounsel,datedJanuary31,2003   andfiledFebruary3,2003,nearlyoneyearafterAllstatesmotionforsummaryjudgmentwasfiled,  whichstatesinrelevantpartasfollows:  8  8`   OriginalprocesswascausedbyvirtueofaSummonsuponthefiling b ofthisComplaintonJanuary12,2000.N` x` x 8  8`   Atthattime,wehadinformationthattheDefendant,Christian = WernerslastknownaddresswasinHamblenCo.,TN,andthathe )y wasconnectedwithoneoftheindustrialplantsorbusinessesherein e HamblenCo.andalsothathewasgoingtocollegehere...Q` x` x 8  8`   Iwastheonewhotriedtoservetheprocess.Wewereunabletolocate @ theDefendant,ChristianWernerinHamblenCo.atthatlastknown , | address.!h` x` x 8  8`   TheSummonsgotmisplaced,butwasfoundandreturnedandistrue W" andaccurate.C#` x` x       InthecaseofWintersv.Jones,932S.W.2d464(Tenn.App.1996),theplaintiffpresentedan %!  argumentsimilartothePlaintiffsargumentinthecaseatbar.TheWinterscourtfoundalackofdue &!! diligencebytheplaintiff,statingasfollows: '"" #XRX XSXE#?+ ` hp x X?8  8`   SX XXXR[W]ebelievethestatuterequiresamorediligenteffortonthe *g%$ plaintiff'sparttopreserveherrights,andtherightsofherinsurer, +S&% againstthetortfeasor...#XRX XSXL#?+ ` hp x X?SX XXXR[T]herequirementofserviceuponthe +?'& tortfeasorisnotimposedontheplaintiffasanemptyformality,but  asapracticalmeansofmaintainingtheinsurer'srighttorecoverfrom  theresponsibleparty,onceithaspaidthepolicyholder...  #XRX XSX?N#SX XXXRSt#XRX XSXO#?+ ` hp x X?SX XXXRInthepresentcase,theplaintiffcannotproceeddirectlyagainstthe  insurancecompanyinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofTenn.Code  Ann.#XRX XSXZP#SX XXXR#XRX XSXQQ#SX XXXR5671206(d)becauseeventhoughshemanagedtoelicita   "Nottobefoundinmycounty"responseonthereturnofprocess,she   didnotserve,orattempttoserve,theresponsiblepartyathislast w  knownaddress.c ` x` x K  Winters,932S.W.2dat46566.Tennesseecourtshaveconsistentlyimposedarequirementofdue 1  diligenceinattemptingtolocateandserveprocessonadefendantincasessuchasthepresentone.   Winters,supra;Lamv.Smith,891S.W.2d207,212(Tenn.1994);Clarkv.McClung,supra,2003   WL22994304(Tenn.App.2003);Grubbsv.Pilkington,2001WL1660826,2001Tenn.App.LEXIS   943,C/ANo.M200002965COAR3CV(Tenn.App.W.S.filedDec.28,2001);Ballardv.   Ardenhani,901S.W.2d369,374(Tenn.App.1995);Carrv.Borchers,815S.W.2d528,532 } (Tenn.App.1991). i   TheWintersandBallardcasescitedabovedemonstratethatwhileTenn.CodeAnn.567 7 1206(d)#XRX XSXQ#SX XXXRallowsaplaintifftoproceeddirectlyagainstanuninsuredmotoristcarrierundercertain # circumstanceseveniftheuninsuredmotoristisneversuccessfullyservedwithprocess,seeBrewer  v.Richardson,893S.W.2d935(Tenn.1995),aplaintiffisstillrequiredtomakeadulydiligenteffort  toserveprocessontheuninsuredmotorist,andwhenthisdiligenteffortislackingandan  unreasonableamountoftimehaspassed,aplaintiffcannotusetheuninsuredmotoriststatuteto  avoidtherequirementsofTenn.R.Civ.P.3.Weareawareoftheresultreachedbythiscourtinthe o casesofLadyv.Kregger,747S.W.2d342(Tenn.App.1987)andLittlev.StateFarmMut.Ins.Co., [ 784S.W.2d928(Tenn.App.1989);however,inneithercasedidthecourtfindalackofduediligence G bytheplaintiff. 3    Inthepresentcase,AllstatefiledaTenn.R.Civ.P.56.03statementofmaterialfactsalong ^! withitsmotionforsummaryjudgment.OneofthematerialfactsallegedbyAllstateisthat J"  [b]etweenJanuary12,2000,andNovember27,2001[whenaliassummonseswereissued],Plaintiff 6# madenootherattemptstoserveprocessonthedefendant,ChristianWerner.Plaintiffsfiled "$r  responseadmitsthisfactisundisputed.AlthoughPlaintiffcausedasummonstobeissuedon %^ ! January12,2000,thereisnoshowingthatheeverattemptedtodeliverittoWernerslastknown %J!" addressinSwitzerland. &6"#   UndertheabovecitedauthoritiesandtheplainlanguageofTenn.R.Civ.P.3,weholdthat d)$% thetrialcourtdidnoterrinrulingPlaintifffailedtoshowtherequiredduediligenceinattempting P*%& toserveprocessonWerner.ThereisnoshowingthatPlaintiffmadeanyeffortinthisregardfor <+&' some22monthsafterthecomplaintwasfiled. (,x'( Ї  Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedandthecaseremandedforsuchotheractionas  maybenecessary,consistentwiththisopinion.CostsonappealareassessedtotheAppellant,  CharlesH.Webb,forwhichexecutionmayissue,ifnecessary.#XRX XSXV#  SX XXXR  #XRX XSX`#2   2a  2a8a݌̌   2   2a  _   `  _2aa݌̌ XX   2   2eb  2ebb݌̌      `    _________________________________________   2      `     h 2Wc  _ SHARON_ԀG.LEE,JUDGE #%XXReE#