WPC$ # t U: % 0 w@ 4  # 0J+ 0Tu 0^ 0h' 0r 0| 0} 0 1u 0dU*lB)DCU> B@ AM]Qv~v^ D31 0@d AO  0D! D/! B," 0?I" 0D$HP LaserJet 4 PlusHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLD,cAZ"Arial RegularX(~$  HTR[A' LegalLh (Avery 4167 Post CardA' Legalh (Avery 4167 Post CardTXmXXX73XXdXXd7 MDN eOPQERSETUVӀڃ" 03|xaH2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd<  9p`(&Times New Roman d-"C << G  !  #d#     H \RA'\#d#      YYY FILED X October30,1997CecilCrowson,Jr. AppellateCourtClerk   !  #d#     H \RA'\#d#  $       10.AffirmanceWithoutOpinionMemorandumOpinion.  8  (b)MemorandumOpinion. TheCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodifytheactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhavenoprecedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinionitshallbedesignated MEMORANDUMOPINION,shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforanyreasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.[AsamendedbyorderfiledApril22,1992.]PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva $$$$'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd((3$ ~!  HTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'TX*XXX7*XXdd7   `   0  (#$  0   ! .      H \RA'\#Xd##Xd#   ##R%&"A1-j|` . `@Rߛ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ EASTERNSECTIONATKNOXVILLE MARYHELENWHITTLE ) HAMILTONCIRCUITWOLFE,    )     ) NO.03A019704CV00107 Plaintiff/Appellant )     )v.     ) HON.GARYGERBITZ     ) JUDGEJOHNTROYWOLFE,  ) ByInterchange     ) Defendant/Appellee ) AFFIRMEDJohnP.KonvalinkaandAntonioL.Matthews,Chattanooga,forAppellant.̜GlennaM.Ramer,Chattanooga,forAppellee. @ # MEMORANDUMOPINION#%         INMAN,SeniorJudge Themonetarytermsofthedissolutionoftheappellantseighth(8th)marriagewerenotsatisfactorytoher,andsheappeals. Atraditionalopinionwouldneitherservetheendsofjusticenornourishthebodyofdomesticrelationslawinthisjurisdiction. ThiscaseispeculiarlyadaptivetotheapplicationofRule10,RulesoftheCourtofAppeals, '   כandthejudgmentisinallrespectsaffirmedwithcostsassessedtotheappellant.      _________________________________      WilliamH.Inman,SeniorJudgeCONCUR:_______________________________HoustonM.Goddard,PresidingJudge_______________________________CharlesD.Susano,Jr.,Judge