WPC # VU:a % 0(b w@4 ) 0J8 0T 0^ 0h4 0r 0| 0 0 1u 0d U*y B) DC AM\v~Sv B D3 0@ AO4 0DI D/ BHP LaserJet 4Si/4SiMX PS 600dpiPSCRIPT0nLH,rAZ"Arial RegularX($- - @UATBDCDDUEaFDGDHӀRD 3|xR2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d7Border 1dd-C << G !  #d#     YYY FILEDXMay23,1997CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerk  PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva  d%%%%'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! .          \RA'\\RA'\7XXdd7    @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ WESTERNSECTIONATNASHVILLER A1-j|Q`  `@RCONNIEA.WILLIAMS,   )(NowMontgomery)    )      ) Respondent/CounterPetitioner/ ) Appellant,    )      ) AppealNo.      ) 01A019610CV00468VS.      )      ) PutnamCircuit      ) No.NJ3698MICHAELC.WILLIAMS,   )      ) Petitioner/CounterRespondent/ ) Appellee.    )@  OPINIONDISSENTINGINPARTAND@ CONCURRINGINTHERESULT     Irespectfullydissentfromthemajoritysconclusionthatasubstantialchangeofcircumstanceshasnotoccurredsincethelowercourtspriorcustodyorder.PerhapsIambeingoverlytechnical,becausethemajoritydoesqualifyitsconclusionbyadding, sufficientlycompellingtowarrantchangingcustody.Iagreethattheevidencepreponderatesagainstthetrialjudgesfindingthatthebestinterestsofthechildrenwouldbeservedbyplacingtheminthefathersprimarycustody,butIbelievetheparentsnewrelationships,andtheimpacttheyhaveonthechildrenisasufficientchangetowarrantafreshlookbythecourt.Especiallyinthiscase,wherethechildrenthemselveshaveputoutsuchcontradictorysignalsaboutthechangesintheirlives.  Iwouldreversethecustodyawardbasedsolelyonthepreponderanceoftheevidence.      _________________________________      BENH.CANTRELL,JUDGE