WPC  y7 g4e*m`gT@0@YEpFn>JrCC*0K1YK]H]dP# E   \2npl&aPqo7uAi_<7akY}kr@¦ BldNÀ/+hJ?n[ Ս A:ΐ c?ʫYk/;.}gzKW\7smmdkC Wbk*<~2}3Ub~jr{؀xui /{$4|SݜͿRmQ=#"|^y愾ij?%X&`|37|wohyOwHmPEМH! =A,(V"kRãˠa}>岺=&o0a9p*# LUNW % 04b 0^ w@4 m. N  U: AQ/  0DF 0D 0D D/ BA B^ D3{ HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(() Z6Times New Roman Regular( U$  - -(o(2$ U!   XTX   `   0  {i% IUJDKLPMENO{PdQӀ[u[%3|x[UCon. Op. in Williams  )% ' 2William C. Koch, Jr.20William C. Koch, Jr. .     ""  ώ z  ώ   Ad FILEDX5 X z  November9,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAh ,@AZ"Arial Regular!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd U!   _XTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T~7dd7  P  P[Qr )<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxPX  rQ[[t )>.*jx#` `@E` 8ttxP@ # t[@ D Y~INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@)DATNASHVILLE  <` ~YSIJ.WILLIAMS,0  0h%%0h%h%0%%) %%  `     h     ) ` Plaintiff/Appellee,0 h 0h%h%)0%%DavidsonCircuit %%  `     h     )0 p No.95D3793 0 p%p% VS.0 ` 0 ` %` %0 % %0h%%0h%h%0%%)@ %%  `     h     )0 p AppealNo.,P p%p% MARYC.WILLIAMS,0 h 0h%h%0%%)0p%%01A019709CV00522<` p%p%  `     h     ) ` Defendant/Appellant.0  0%%)\%% @::&D  J ~CONCURRINGOPINION#~  J#   II ` Iconcurwiththeresultsofthisopinion.However,Iamfilingthisseparateopiniontoclarifymyunderstandingofthesignificanceoftheportionofthedecisiondealingwiththeneedofthepartiesdaughterforcontinuingsupportpasthereighteenthbirthday. ` Mr.Williamsscrueltreatmentofhisdaughterhasleftdeepemotionalscars.Theevidenceintroducedattrial,includingtheevidenceofrepeatedhospitalizationsandcontinuingoutpatienttreatment,leaveslittleroomfordoubtthatthegirlsproblemsarerealandgenuine.However,thetrialcourtapparentlydeclinedtorequireMr.Williamstosupporthisdaughterafterhereighteenthbirthdaybecauseitgavelittleweighttotheopinionofferedbythepsychologicalcounselorwhohadbeentreatingthegirlforfouryears. ` Thecounselorsopinionaboutthegirlscurrentsocializationandhercontinuingneedfortherapyisextremelyequivocal,andforthatreason,IagreethatMs.WilliamsdidnotcarryherburdenofprovingthatMr.Williamsshouldberequiredtocontinuetosupporthisdaughter.However,thetrialcourtsexplanationofitsdecisioncouldalsobeinterpretedtomeanthatthegirlsconditionisnotthesortofconditionthatwarrantsfurthertherapyandthatthegirlscounselorisnotqualified_torenderanopinionontheissuebecauseheisapsychologistwithamastersdegreeratherthanan ;5< psychiatristwithamedicaldegree.Ouropinionshouldnotbeconstruedasagreeingwitheitheroftheseinterpretations.Basedonthefactsintherecord,thetreatingpsychologistwasqualifiedunderTenn.R.Evid.702torenderanopinionconcerninghispatientsconditionandshouldhavebeenpermittedunderTenn.R.Evid.703tousehermedicalrecordsasabasisforhisopinion.JJKKL `     h     _________________________________ `     h     LOLwLOMLkLMONckNOOWILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGEONN