WPC /tUaBq[?8C,Vm8i7[\B߯͡P*1=h&Am(n&`ܐQ6L\#oSWUw 4x(jomthEԷ".!DP`#OS$xɤтϗ\ ElBFǀti*.@\ytr3=S@W*jy D55bkʮcq9e&hC"b,ߨ- U^4qp=0&Zę $y;25]$hf.VeAa-pz: >w²c|?X_!Tvw=%c #f`m,&KS::b"]!f 8Az|UN@@Eb 0 B 0 D3D D-w 0K ASB 0 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6,,,,0fu+s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular8n_+ k\צ C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU G RLe$      1  !  _!!!!CourtofAppealsRule10:  8  ThisCourt,withtheconcurrenceofalljudgesparticipatinginthecase,mayaffirm,reverseormodify t theactionsofthetrialcourtbymemorandumopinionwhenaformalopinionwouldhaveno 8 precedentialvalue.Whenacaseisdecidedbymemorandumopinion,itshallbedesignated L "MEMORANDUMOPINION,"shallnotbepublished,andshallnotbecitedorreliedonforany  reasoninasubsequentunrelatedcase.#!!~##!!#   ЁLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0  'O Z 6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2Le$ !.8@dd8         0  ! d(|3G$ !.8@dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3G$ !.8@dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8@dd8     _  @8 XXdd8  @ Ox@INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#@Ox #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsAugust2,2001 L X X@ #@XX #JIMMYWAYNEWILSONv.STATEOFTENNESSEEX X@  J @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  J @@No.98301IIrvinH._Kilcrease_,Jr.,Chancellor  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M200002934_COA_ԄR3CVFiledNovember21,_2001_Ԁ   AV) ` dE<|` A }     ByopinionofthisCourtdatedAugust27,1999,dismissalbythetrialcourtofPlaintiffsPetition x  forDeclaratoryJudgmentorCommonLawWritofCertioraricomplainingaboutcomputationofhis d sentencereductioncreditswasaffirmedwithcostsassessedagainstPetitioner.Hethenattempted P tohavehisinmatetrustaccountshieldedfromcollectionofcourtcostsbyclaimingexceptionsunder < TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection262101,etseq.Thetrialcourtdeniedhisapplicationandhe (x filedtimelyappeal.Weaffirmthetrialjudge. d  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourtAffirmed  <   #@X r#X X.@WilliamB.Cain,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichBenH._Cantrell_,_P.J._,M.S.and  PatriciaJ.Cottrell,J.,joined.  JimmyWayneWilson,_Wartburg_,Tennessee,ProSe.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporterandArthur_Crownover_,II,Nashville,Tennessee, d fortheappellee,TennesseeDepartmentofCorrection. P   MEMORANDUMOPINION #@XX >#X X@  #  1       ("x! #@XX #  X X@  JimmyWayneWilson,havingbeenunsuccessfulincasenumber01A019806CH00302in $P# sustaininghispetitionfordeclaratoryjudgmentand/orcommonlawcertiorarirelativetosentence $< $ reductioncredits,wastaxedwithcourtcostsinthetrialcourtandcourtcostsonappealunder %(!% judgmentofthisCourtdatedAugust27,1999. &"& Ї  Appellantthenappliedtothetrialcourtseekingtointerposetheexemptionstatutesin  TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection262101,etseq.toexempthisinmatetrustaccountfrom  executionforcourtcosts.    Theonlyissuepresentedonappealinthiscaseistherefusalofthetrialjudgetoexempthis ` inmatetrustaccountfromcollectionofcourtcosts.Thisissueiscontrolledbytheopinionofthis L  CourtinDavidPalmerv.TennesseeDepartmentofCorrection,No.M200002351_COA_ԄR3CV 8  releasedbythisCourtonNovember8,2001. $ t   InPalmer,thisCourtheldthatTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection262101,etseq.was  L  inapplicabletocourtcostsassessedagainstapartyinstitutinglitigation.SaidtheCourt:  8  8   ` Wehavedeterminedthatthroughoutourhistorythelegislatureintendedthat   costsoflitigationaretobetheresponsibilityofthepersoninstitutingthelitigation   unlessrelievedthereofbythejudgmentofthecourt.Theintentismanifestedagain   bytheprovisionsofthe1978legislation,partofwhichisthesubjectexemption   statute,indicatingthatthelegislationisdirectedatdefendantjudgmentdebtors. p Placingthisdeterminationwiththeexplicitprovisioninthepaupersoathstatutethat \ merelysuspendsthepaymentofcostsuntil taxedbythecourt,wereachthe H conclusionthatthelegislativeintent,asexpressedbytheordinarymeaningofthe 4 languageused,isthatapersonwhoisallowedtocommenceasuitwithoutgiving  p securityforthecostsisnotrelievedoftheobligationtopaythecostsbyvirtueofthe  \ exemptionstatute.H   Palmer,2001WL1386091,at4.     Accordingly,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.    Thiscaseisremandedtothetrialcourtforsuchfurtherproceedingsasmaybenecessary.  CostsofthisappealareassessedagainstAppellant,JimmyW.Wilson,forwhichexecutionmay l issueifnecessary. X     `     h     ___________________________________ $X"    `     h     WILLIAMB.CAIN,JUDGE