WPC !# UN %7 04= 0qw@04p mj 0J 0Th 0^ 0h 0r 0| 0p 0 1u 0d U>_ v~ v HP LaserJet 4 PlusHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0^:'"  Z 6Times New Roman Regular( U$  (o(2K$ U!   XXNX   `   0   KELPMPNOdPUQeRrSrTeHe#x3|xTUwolfe v. ut - concurring opinion   & '  0 .   2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23   ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(&Times New RomanPtPtHH(FG(HH(d'`Styl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   ion-F Geneva  ion-F Geneva ! .          X \RA'\\RA'\7fdd7  ћ @ INTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ MIDDLESECTIONATNASHVILLE PATRICIAANNWOLFE,   )BETTEL.ROBERTS,    )PATRICIAPELTON,    )ODIEL.MANN,     )BOYDSTUBBLEFIELD,   )andRICHARDG.RAY,    )       ) Plaintiffs/Appellants,   )       ) FranklinChancery       ) No.14240VS.       )       ) AppealNo.       ) 01A019611CH00514THEUNIVERSITYOFTENNESSEE )andTHEUNIVERSITYOF   )TENNESSEESPACEINSTITUTE,  )       ) Defendants/Appellees.   )@ CONCURRINGOPINION  IconcurwiththeresultsoftheCourtsopinion.Basedonmyindependentreviewoftheevidencebothinsupportofandinoppositiontothemotionforsummaryjudgment,IhavedeterminedthatthesixplaintiffshavenotproducedevidencefromwhichajurycouldreasonablyconcludethatthereasonsgivenbytheUniversityofTennesseeSpaceInstitutefortheadverseemploymentactionstakenagainsteachoftheplaintiffswere_pretextual_Ԁorthattheemploymentactionsweretakenforprohibitedreasons.       _____________________________       WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE