WPC, h'%m0I*c]%c7U&uSoӘU "}0;D@q6'1`k'OK':Nc2lGv ~ΜqJ$gmNamk_]eGK| RE)~ ֕MeԭTK;odW6La!x?bipBa *"ʻr[YK\4Wpq@\N)¬hON%v߱ۀgEp ,rw´+\eS*A~ &X_HJ\RH+,@8s]޶l4_d#v̻(JEK_S~$20?7S^.TU`aXL_8BRБE~zf Q. j N9 ^v$b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz z  W   0DNE 0U 0: 0 0 0Z 0t 0' 0 0{ 0 0 0 0e 0 0 0Z 0 0 0! 0!b" 0" 0_# 0 $ 0$ 0K% 0% 0u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u&u& 0&&&& B'' 0( D5( D-( 0K ) ) ASX)) 0q* 0D+ AY+HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6,,,,0vn8-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular,-4 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#$  0     Rl$      1    __ԀAprisonerisentitledtocreditagainsthisorhersentencefortimespentincommunitycorrectionsbutisnot  entitledtosimilarcreditfortimespentonprobation.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(e)(3)(B)(Supp.2001);State_v._ t Godwin,No.03C019710CC00479,1998WL827215,at*1(Tenn.Crim.App.Dec.1,1998)(NoTenn.R.App.P. 8 11_application_Ԁfiled);Young_v._ԀState,539S.W.2d850,85455(Tenn.Crim.App.1976).*+ (_2623  ..*G+G (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ../%` ` hp x /   *8+8 (_24  ," hp x ,23  ..," hp x ,  *5+5 (_23 ` ) hp x )23  ..) hp x ) ` *2+2 (_22  &hhp x &23  ..&hhp x &    Rl$      2    __He_states_:  8  Had[I]concededthatthedocumentwasinfactatrueandcorrectrecordfromtheWhiteCounty 8 Court,therewouldbenogenuineissuetolitigatebeforeanycourt.Since[I]hadnoknowledgeofthis L document,oranypriorknowledgeoftheCommunityCorrectionsSentencebeingRevoked,andno  knowledgeofanyactionsbeingtakentoRevoke[me]fromtheCommunityCorrectionsSentence,the  onlyobviousconclusion...isthatthedocumentisfraudulent.H    */+/ (_21  #p x #23  ..#p x #  *,+, (_20 h  p x 23  .. p x h *)+) (_19  pp x 23  ..pp x   *&+& (_18   x 23  .. x   *AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x   (&& &_9   x 23  Ԁ x   (AA &_8  5+ ` hp x 523  5+ ` hp x 5  (GG &_7   /%` ` hp x /23  /%` ` hp x /   - -(88 &_6  ," hp x ,23  ," hp x ,  (55 &_5 ` ) hp x )23  ) hp x ) ` (22 &_4  &hhp x &23  &hhp x &  (// &_3  #p x #23  #p x #  (,, &_2 h  p x 23   p x h ()) &_1  pp x 23  pp x   &&& $_   x 23   x   (|G2l$ !.8ZdXXd8         0   d(|3k$ !.8ZdXXd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3k$ !.8ZdXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Zdd8     _H  Z8IXXdd8  @ UZINTHECOURTOFAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#ZU#Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsOctober12,1999 L XIXZ #ZXXI#CHARLESCLAYYOUNGv.DONALCAMPBELL,etal.XIXZ  J @@ AppealfromtheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCounty  J @@No.982735IICarolL.McCoy,Chancellor  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.M199902788_COA_ԄR3CV_ԄFiledSeptember24,_2002__   AV) ` dE<|` A }     ThisappealinvolvesadisputebetweenaprisonerandtheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection x  regardingthecalculationofhissentenceexpirationdate.AftertheDepartmentdeclinedtogivehim d creditforthetimehehadbeenonprobationforapriorarsonsentence,theprisonerfiledsuitagainst P theCommissionerofCorrectionintheChanceryCourtforDavidsonCountyseeking1,568daysof < additionalsentencecredits.ThetrialcourtgrantedtheCommissionersmotionforsummary (x judgmentafterconcludingthattheDepartmentscalculationoftheprisonerssentencewas d consistentwiththesentencingcourtsorders#ZXXI#XIXZԀandthatitlackedjurisdictiontoreviewtheactionsof P thesentencingcourt.Theprisonerhasappealed.Wehavedeterminedthatthetrialcourtproperly < dismissedtheprisonerspetitionforcertiorari. (  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheChanceryCourt  AffirmedandRemanded     #ZXI#XIX.ZWilliamC.Koch,Jr.,#ZXI #XIX.Zdeliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichWilliamB.CainandPatricia t J.Cottrell,JJ.,_joined_. ` CharlesClayYoung,Clifton,Tennessee,ProSe. 8!  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;MichaelE.Moore,SolicitorGeneral;Kimberly #`" J.Dean,DeputyAttorneyGeneral,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellees,DonalCampbell,etal. #L#   OPINION #ZXXIe #XIXZ %$!%  I.  '"' #ZXXI #  XIXZ  In1989,CharlesClayYoungwasconvictedofarsonintheCriminalCourtforWhiteCounty )$) and,inJanuary1990,wassentencedtosixyearsin_acommunitybasedalternativecorrections_ p*%* program.OnAugust16,1990,thetrialcourt,apparentlywithoutahearing,enteredanorder \+&+ removingMr.Youngfromthecommunitybasedprogramandplacinghimonsupervisedprobation. H,',   Unfortunately,Mr.Younghadnotlearnedtheerrorofhisways.InOctober1994,hewas  .p). convictedoftwocountsofsolicitationtocommitfirstdegreemurderandreceivedtwoconsecutive  /\*/ tenyearsentences.ThesentencingcourtalsorevokedMr.Youngsprobationonhisarson  convictionandorderedhimtoservetheremainderofhissixyeararsonsentencebeforebeginning  toservehistwoconsecutivetenyearsentences.    WhentheDepartmentofCorrectionoriginallycalculatedMr.Youngsnewsentence ` expirationdate,itneglectedtogivehimcreditforthe210daysforthetimehehadspentinthe L  community_corrections_Ԁprogramin1990.AsaresultofasuitbyMr.Youngin1998,theDepartment 8  correcteditserrorbycreditinghimwith210daysagainsthistotalsentence. $ t   Mr.YoungthendecidedtopressthepointfurtherbyfilingasecondlawsuitintheChancery  L  CourtforDavidsonCountyagainsttheCommissionerofCorrection,claimingthathewasentitled  8  toanadditional1,568daysofcreditagainsthisarsonsentencebecausehehadbeeninthe $  community_corrections_Ԁprogramforhisentirearsonsentence.TheCommissionermovedfora   summaryjudgmentsupportedbyanaffidavitofasentencetechnicianstatingthatMr.Youngwas   notentitledtoadditionalsentencecreditsbecausetheAugust16,1990_order_Ԁplacinghimon   probationhadremovedhimfromthecommunitycorrectionsprogram. #  1      ׀Mr.Youngrespondedby   labelingtheAugust16,1990_order_Ԁas fraudulentandbyrequestingadditionaltimetodiscover p informationregardingthecircumstancessurroundingtheentryoftheAugust16,1990order.The \ CommissionerrepliedthatMr.YoungalreadypossessedcopiesofalltherecordsfromtheWhite H CountyproceedingsandthattheDepartmenthadcalculatedhissentencebasedontheserecords. 4   InJune1999,thetrialcourtenteredanordergrantingtheCommissionerssummary  \ judgmentmotion.ThetrialcourtconcludedthattheDepartmentwasrequiredtocomputesentences H usingtherecordsofthesentencingcourtandthatprisonerswerenotentitledtosentencecreditsfor 4 timespentonprobation.BecausethesentencingcourtsrecordsshowedthatMr.Younghadbeen   onprobationsinceAugust1990,thetrialcourtconcludedthattheDepartmentscalculationofhis   sentenceexpirationdatewascorrect.Thetrialcourtalsodeterminedthatitlackedjurisdictionto  resolveMr.YoungsdisputewiththesentencingcourtregardingitsAugust16,1990_order_.  Accordingly,thetrialcourtdeclinedtograntMr.Youngadditionaltimefordiscoveryanddismissed  hiscertioraripetition.Mr.Younghasappealed. l @) II.  D! @ TheDenialofMr.YoungsMotionforAdditionalDiscovery  0"    Mr.YoungtakesissuewiththetrialcourtsdecisiontogranttheCommissionersmotionfor $X" summaryjudgmentwithoutfirstgivinghimanopportunitytoobtainadditionaldiscoveryregarding $D # theentryoftheAugust16,1990_order_Ԁremovinghimfromthecommunitycorrectionsprogramand %0!$ placinghimonprobation.Heinsiststhatheshouldhavebeenpermittedtodiscoverthisinformation &"%  todemonstratethatthesentencingcourtdidnotaffordhimahearingpriortotheentryofthatorder. '#& WehavedeterminedthatthetrialcourtdidnoterrbydenyingMr.Youngsrequestforfurther  discovery.     Litigantsmayuseamotionforsummaryjudgmenttochallengetheiradversariestoputup t orshutuponacriticalissueinacase.Streetv.J.C.Bradford&Co.,886F.2d1472,1478(6thCir. ` 1989).Amovingpartywillbeentitledtoasummaryjudgmentifitcandemonstratethatthenon L  movingpartywillbeunabletoproveanessentialelementofitscaseonwhichitwillbeartheburden 8  ofproofattrial.Byrdv.Hall,847S.W.2d208,213(Tenn.1993);Solomonv.FloWarrMgt.,Inc., $ t 777S.W.2d701,706(Tenn.Ct.App.1989).Anonmovingpartyfacedwiththissortofsummary  ` judgmentmotionmayinvokeTenn.R.Civ.P.56.07torequestadditionaltimetodiscoverthe  L  informationneededtorespond.MotionsunderTenn.R.Civ.P.56.07addressthemselvestothetrial  8  courtsdiscretion.Hardenv.DanekMed.,Inc.,985S.W.2d449,45354(Tenn.Ct.App.1998); $  MastersbyMastersv.Rishton,863S.W.2d702,707(Tenn.Ct.App.1992).Accordingly,we   reviewthetrialcourtsdecisiononthesemotionsforabuseofdiscretion.Hughesv.Effler,No.   E200003147COAR3CV,2001WL881352at*1(Tenn.Ct.App.Aug.7,2001)perm.app.   _denied_(Tenn.Dec.27,2001).     OncetheCommissionermovedforsummaryjudgment,thefocusofMr.Youngslawsuit \ shifted.ItbecameacollateralattackontheAugust16,1990_order_.Apartyseekingtocollaterally H attackajudgmentmustshowthatthechallengedjudgmentwasobtainedbyfraudorthatthecourt 4 renderingitlackedjurisdiction.Submittinganaffidavitcontradictingtherecitalsinajudgmentor  p orderisnotenoughtocreateatriableissueaboutthejudgmentsvalidity.Glennv.GordonConstr.,  \ Inc.,No.M200001805COAR3CV,2002WL598553at*5(Tenn.Ct.App.Apr.19,2002)(No H Tenn.R.App.P.11_application_Ԁfiled).Ajudgmentofacourtofgeneraljurisdictionisconclusively 4 presumedvalidagainstcollateralattackunlesseithertherecordfromthecourtthatrenderedthe   judgmentorthejudgmentonitsfaceshowsthatthejudgmentororderisinvalid.Gilesv.Stateex   rel.Giles,191Tenn.538,545,235S.W.2d24,28(1950);DixieSav.Stores,Inc._v._ԀTurner,767  S.W.2d408,40910(Tenn.Ct.App.1988).    Mr.YoungbelievesthattheAugust16,1990_order_Ԁis fraudulentbecausethetrialcourtdid l notconductahearingbeforeenteringit.Theorderitselfprovidessomebasisforconcludingthat X  thetrialcourtdidnotconductahearingbeforeenteringtheorderbecausetheorderdoesnotcontain D! thecustomaryrecitalthatahearingwasheld.However,nohearingwasnecessary.Thesentencing 0"  courtretainsauthoritytoalteroramendacriminaldefendantssentenceoncethedefendantisplaced #l! in_acommunitycorrections_Ԁprogram.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(e)(2);Statev.Melton,No. $X" 01C019612CC00497,1998WL113997,at*3(Tenn.Crim.App.Mar.12,1998)(NoTenn.R. $D # App.P.11_application_).Thecourtmustholdahearingbeforeresentencingadefendanttoaharsher %0!$ formofpunishment.State_v._ԀSamuels,44S.W.3d489,49394(Tenn.2001).However,asentencing &"% courtisnotrequiredtoconductahearingbeforereducingadefendantssentence.Tenn.R.Crim. '#& P.35;State_v._ԀHodges,815S.W.2d151,15355(Tenn.1991). (#'   Accordingly,theAugust16,1990_order_Ԁisnotinvalidsimplybecausethetrialcourtdidnot |*%) conductahearingbeforeenteringit.Thereisnothingelseonthefaceoftheorderthatundermines h+&* itspresumptivevalidity.GrantingMr.Youngadditionaltimetoconductdiscoveryintothe T,'+ circumstancessurroundingtheentryoftheorderwouldhaveyieldednoadditionalinformation @-(, relevanttoopposingtheCommissionersmotionforsummaryjudgment.Therefore,thetrialcourt  properlyaddressedthecommissionersmotionwithoutfirstaffordingMr.Youngtimetoconduct  additionaldiscovery.  @^^( III.  ` @  TheDismissalofMr.YoungsPetition  L    Mr.Youngconcedesthatthesummaryjudgmentisappropriateifhischallengetothe $ t sentencingcourtsAugust16,1990orderfails. #  2      ׀WehavedeterminedthattheAugust16,1990_order_  ` isvalidonitsfaceandthatthetrialcourtdidnoterrbydecliningtograntMr.Youngadditionaltime  L  todiscoverevidencetoopposetheCommissionersmotion.BecausetheDepartmentmustcalculate  8  sentencesbasedonthesentencingdocuments,wehavedeterminedthatthetrialcourtproperly $  concludedthatMr.Youngwasnotentitledto1,568additionaldaysofsentencecreditsagainsthis   arsonsentence.   @dd) IV.      WeaffirmthejudgmentdismissingMr.Youngspetitionfor_commonlawwrit_Ԁofcertiorari \ andremandthecasetothetrialcourtforwhateverfurtherproceedingsmaybenecessary,consistent H withthisopinion.WetaxthecostsofthisappealtoMr.Youngforwhichexecution,ifnecessary, 4 mayissue.Wealsofindthatthecomplaintandsubsequentappealarefrivolousforthepurposesof  p Tenn.CodeAnn.4121807(c)(Supp.2001)andTenn.CodeAnn.4121816(a)(1)(1997).  \    `     h     _____________________________      `     h     WILLIAMC.KOCH,JR.,JUDGE