WPC8 Ya$<~=;IB dbK gC(o/p68~E8NBXz^LJ!a-!nf L²(oS#\s=-Zװb`㾚QٯA4wf멪0M,Њg%mH})#"}TdonqC.VPf`gZ%rtݚFٽ5:G`_#X XXX   Pursuanttotheguidelines,thepartiesminorchildisentitledtotwentyonepercentof   the_obligor_s netincome.SeeT#]mXX O#]mENN#]m셕b#X X]m._C#]mXX b#]mOMP_#]m/c#X X]m.R.&_R#]mXX c#]mEGS_#]mc#X X]m.Tit.10,Ch.124024.03.Uponreview,   wefindnoadequatejustificationforthedeviationfromthispercentageamount.Therefore,thetrial  courtsdecisiononthisissueisreversed.Thisissueisremandedtothetrialcourtfora  determinationofHusbandsnetincome. #  10          WifealsoasksthatHusbandberequiredtopaytheminorchildsprivateschooltuition. X  Pursuanttothestatutoryguidelines#X XXX a#  X XXX ,thecourtcanauthorizeanupwarddeviationifitfindsthatthe D! childwillincur extraordinaryeducationalexpenses.SeeT#]mXX 3d#]mENN#]m셾g#X X]m._C#]mXX h#]mOMP_#]mXh#X X]m.R.&_R#]mXX h#]mEGS_#]mi#X X]m.Tit.10,Ch. 0"  124024.04(1)(c).#X XXX f#X XXX ԀFurthermore,the_obligor_Ԁspousecannotreducehischildsupportpaymentsby #l! theprivateschoolexpenses.Dwightv.Dwight,936S.W.2d945,950(Tenn.Ct.App.1996).#X XXX i#X XXX ԀInorder $X" toconstitute extraordinaryeducationalexpenses,thepartyrequestingthedeviationmustshow $D # boththatprivateschoolwouldbenefitthechildandthatthepartiescanaffordtheexpense. %0!$ _Jankovich_Ԁv._Jankovich_,No.35801A019111CV00427,1992WL81446,at*3*4(Tenn.Ct.App. &"% April24,1992). '#&    Basedonthestandardsetforthaboveandourreviewoftherecord,weholdthatHusband  shouldberesponsiblefortheprivateschoolexpensesofthepartiesminorchild.Thechildhasbeen  attendingthesameprivateschoolsincekindergartenatanexpenseofaboutfivehundreddollarsper t month.Withoutadoubt,thecontinuityofhisschoolexperienceaswellasthesmallerclassesand ` individualinstructionavailableintheprivateschoolsettingwillbenefitthechild.Inaddition,based L  onthechildspreviousattendanceaswellastheHusbandsabilitytoprovidefortheadultchildrens 8  educationalexpenses,Husbandisclearlyabletoaffordtheexpense#X XXX j#X XXX .Accordingly,thetrialcourt $ t erredinfailingtorequireHusbandtopaythisexpense.Thedecisionofthetrialcourtishereby  ` reversedonthisissue.   L    D.MaritalProperty    Zq  WifeassertsthatthetrialcourterredinexcludingHusbandsroyaltyrightsandstockoptions   fromthepartiesmaritalproperty.Husbandassertsthatthetrialcourterredinallocatinga   disproportionateamountofthemaritalassetstoWife.Thelowercourtdid,however,considerboth p thestockoptionsandtheroyaltyincomeincomputingHusbandsincomeforthepurposesof \ alimonyandchildsupport.Baseduponthefollowing,wefindthatthetrialcourtdidnoterrinthe H divisionofthemaritalassetsandthatanyerrorintheclassificationofmaritalassetswasharmless. 4   Itisnecessaryforthetrialcourttoclassifytheparties'propertyaseitherseparateormarital  \ beforemakinganequitabledivisionofthemaritalestate._Watters_Ԁv._Watters_,959S.W.2d585,#X XXX \p#X XXX Ԁat H 588(Tenn.Ct.App.1997)#X XXX u#X XXX .#X XXX Av#X XXX Ԁ Maritalpropertyisdefinedasfollows: 4 8  [_A]ll_Ԁrealandpersonalproperty,bothtangibleandintangible,acquiredbyeitheror   bothspousesduringthecourseofthemarriageuptothedateofthefinaldivorce  hearingandownedbyeitherorbothspousesasofthedateoffilingofacomplaint  fordivorce,exceptinthecaseoffraudulentconveyanceinanticipationoffiling,and  includinganypropertytowhicharightwasacquireduptothedateofthefinal l divorcehearing,andvaluedasofadateasnearasreasonablypossibletothefinal X  divorcehearingdate.D!   T#]mXX \i#]mENN.#]my#X X]mԀ#X XXX v#X XXX C#]mXX 1z#]mODE#]m셷z#X X]mԀA#]mXX z#]mNN#]m@{#X X]m.36-4-121(b)(1)(A).#X XXX tz#X XXX ԀPursuanttothisdefinition,Wifeassertsthatboththestock #l! optionsandtheroyaltyincomequalifyasmaritalpropertyandshouldhavebeensubjecttodivision $X" bythecourt. $D #   TestimonyattrialindicatedthatHusbandhasbothvestedand_unvested_Ԁstockoptions.These &"% optionsmayormaynotberedeemableataprofit,dependingonthepriceofthestockontheopen '#& market.Asthiscourtrecentlystated, Wedonotbelieve_unvested_Ԁpropertythatissocontingentand (#' sospeculativeshouldbeconsideredmaritalproperty.Brandonv.Brandon,#X XXX {#X XXX ԀNo.01A019805CV )$( 0023,1999WL248652,at*5(Tenn.Ct.App.April29,1999)#X XXX #X XXX .However,vestedstockoptions |*%) obtainedasaresultofeffortsexpendedduringthemarriageshouldbesubjecttoequitable h+&* distribution.#X XXX #X XXX ԀJohnsonv.Johnson,#X XXX #X XXX ԀNo.02A019703CH00069,1998WL835562,at*4(Tenn.Ct.  App.Dec.3,1998)#X XXX  #X XXX citing_Pascale_Ԁv._Pascale_,140N.J.583,660A.2d485,498(N.J.1995).Wifealso  claimsthatthetrialcourterredinexcludingHusbandsroyaltyincomefromthedivisionofmarital  assets.Testimonyregardingtheroyaltyincomeindicateditishighlyvariableandwilllikely t diminishsignificantlyinthefuture.Asaresult,thetrialcourtconsideredtheroyaltyandthestock ` optionsaspartofHusbandsincomeratherthanpartofthemaritalestatesubjecttoequitable L  division.#X XXX #X XXX  8    Inlightofthemixedcharacteroftheseassets,andWifesgenerousmaritalpropertyaward,  ` wefindthatthetrialcourtdidnoterrinexcludingthestockoptionsandtheroyaltyincomefromthe  L  divisionofmaritalassets.Asstatedabove,thetrialcourtisgrantedbroaddiscretioninadjustingand  8  adjudicatingtheparties'interestinalljointlyownedproperty.#X XXX #X XXX Itsdecisionregardingdivisionofthe $  maritalpropertyisentitledtogreatweightonappeal.#X XXX #X XXX _Watters_Ԁat590;#X XXX e#X XXX Ԁciting#X XXX ܇#X XXX _Batson_Ԁv._Batson_,769   S.W.2d849,at859(Tenn.Ct.App.1988).#X XXX &#X XXX Thefairnessofthepropertydivisionisjudgeduponits   finalresults.Withtheforgoinginmindandconsideringallrelevantfactors,wedonotfindthefinal   resultsofthetrialcourt'sdistributiontobeinequitable.#X XXX #X XXX      E.AttorneysFees H  #X XXX I#X XXX     HusbandassertsthatthetrialcourterredinrequiringHusbandtopayWifesattorneysfees  p incurredintheproceedingsbelow.Wifeassertsthatthetrialcourtdidnoterr,andrequests  \ attorneysfeesincurredonappeal.Forthefollowingreasons,wefindthatthetrialcourtdidnoterr. H Inaddition,weholdthatWifeisentitledtoattorneysfeesincurredonappeal. x  4   Inadivorcecase,attorneys'feesmaybeproperlyallowedaspartofthealimonyawarded.   #X XXX #X XXX _Raskind_Ԁv._Raskind_,325S.W.2d625#X XXX #X XXX (Tenn.Ct.App.1959).#X XXX J#X XXX Thedecisiontogrant#X XXX #X XXX attorney'sfees  islargelyinthediscretionofthetrialcourt,andthiscourtwillnotinterfereunlessthereisaclear  showingofabuseofthatdiscretion.Aaron#X XXX #X XXX at411#X XXX #X XXX .#X XXX Y#X XXX ԀWhenthespouseseekinganawardoflegal  expenseslackssufficientfundstopayherexpensesorwouldberequiredtodepleteherresources, l theawardoflegalexpensesisappropriate#X XXX #X XXX .Brown,913S.W.2dat170;Butlerv.Butler,680S.W.2d X  467(Tenn.App.1984). #X XXX #X XXX Ԁ Inaddition, thetrialcourthastheauthoritytomakeanadditionalawardto D! aninnocentspouseinordertooffsetthelegalexpensesresultingfromthedivorce.Luna#X XXX s#X XXX Ԁat676. 4"    Basedupontheforegoing,aswellasthecircumstancespresentedinthiscase,wefindthat  $\" Wifeisentitledtoanawardoflegalexpensesincurredbothintheproceedingsbelowandonappeal. $H # Accordingly,thedecisionofthetrialcourtonthisissueisaffirmed,andthematterisremandedfor %4!$ considerationofattorneyfeesonappeal. & "% #X XXX # X XXX    l+&* CONCLUSION       Fortheforegoingreasons,thedecisionofthetrialcourtisherebyaffirmedinpart,reversed  inpart,modifiedinpart,andremanded.CostsofappealaretaxedtoAppellee,Rolf_Birger_ t _Zettersten_,forwhichexecutionmayissue,ifnecessary.#X XXX #X XXX   `  #X XXX ##]mXX {#X X]m   `     h #]mXX #X X]m   `     h     ___________________________________      `     h     ALANE.HIGHERS,JUDGE